Home Ultrasound-Assisted Rehydration of Dried Sea Cucumber (Stichopus japonicus) – Kinetics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ultrasound-Assisted Rehydration of Dried Sea Cucumber (Stichopus japonicus) – Kinetics

  • Longtao Zhang , Xuhui Huang , Song Miao , Shaoxiao Zeng , Yi Zhang and Baodong Zheng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 6, 2016

Abstract

Sea cucumbers are popular traditional tonic foods in Asia and the Middle East and are often dried for storage or sale. Rehydration of dried sea cucumber is a necessary step before further processing. The kinetics for ultrasound-assisted rehydration were mathematically described using mechanistic (Fick’s diffusion) and empirical (Peleg’s equation, Weibull model) models. The effective diffusivities of water transport with ultrasound were in the range of 0.182 mm2 min–1–0.197 mm2 min–1, which was greater than the value of the control, at 0.179 mm2 min–1, considering Fick’s diffusion. Peleg’s equation was concluded to be the best model to predict the ultrasound-assisted rehydration of dried sea cucumber. Its rehydration efficiency was increased 16-fold by ultrasound and rehydration time was reduced up to 45 h, the sea cucumbers did not show any negative effects on their texture properties after rehydration.

Funding statement: China Scholarship for Visiting Scholar, (Grant / Award Number: ‘[2015]3012’) the Science and Technology Plan Major Project of Fujian Province, (Grant / Award Number: ‘2014N0009’, ‘2014N3008’).

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Science and Technology Plan Major Project of Fujian Province (2014N0009, 2014N3008); China Scholarship for Visiting Scholar [2015]3012.

References

1. Bordbar S, Anwar F, Saari N. High-value components and bioactives from sea cucumbers for functional foods–a review. Mar Drugs 2011;9(10):1761–805.10.3390/md9101761Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Hu XQ, Xu J, Xue Y, Li ZJ, Wang JF, Wang JH, et al. Effects of bioactive components of sea cucumber on the serum, liver lipid profile and lipid absorption. J Sci Food Agr 2012;76(12):2214–8.10.1271/bbb.120495Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Luo L, Wu MY, Xu L, Lian W, Xiang JY, Lu F, et al. Comparison of physicochemical characteristics and anticoagulant activities of polysaccharides from three sea cucumbers. Mar Drugs 2013;11(2):399–417.10.3390/md11020399Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Sugawara T, Zaima N, Yamamoto A, Sakai S, Noguchi R, Hirata T. Isolation of sphingoid bases of sea cucumber cerebrosides and their cytotoxicity against human colon cancer cells. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2006;70(12):2906–12.10.1271/bbb.60318Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Zhang SY, Yi YH, Tang HF. Bioactive triterpene glycosides from the sea cucumber Holothuria fuscocinerea. J Nat Prod 2006;69(10):1492–5.10.1021/np060106tSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Aydin M. The commercial sea cucumber fishery in Turkey. SPC Beche de Mer Inf Bull 2008;28:40–1.Search in Google Scholar

7. Chen J. Present status and prospects of sea cucumber industry in China. Ile 2005;1:86.Search in Google Scholar

8. Duan X, Zhang M, Li XL, Mujumdar AS. Microwave freeze drying of sea cucumber coated with nanoscale silver. Dry Technol 2008;26(4):413–9.10.1080/07373930801929136Search in Google Scholar

9. Garcia-Perez JV, Carcel JA, Benedito J, Mulet A. Power ultrasound mass transfer enhancement in food drying. Food Bioprod Process 2007;85(C3):247–54.10.1205/fbp07010Search in Google Scholar

10. Misra NN, Pankaj SK, Kadam SU, editors. Acoustic field assisted food processing- fundamentals and applications. Laser ablation: Mechanisms and applications-II, AIP Publishing, 2011:175-187.Search in Google Scholar

11. Zhang L, Huang X, Miao S, Zeng S, Zhang Y, Zheng B. Influence of ultrasound on the rehydration of dried sea cucumber (Stichopus japonicus). J Food Eng 2016;178:203–11.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.024Search in Google Scholar

12. Cui L, Yue T, Pan Z, Peng B, Tang Yn. Water absorption properties of ultrasonic treated brown rice. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 2010;41(12):149–52.Search in Google Scholar

13. Wambura P, Yang W, Wang Y. Power ultrasound enhanced one-step soaking and gelatinization for rough rice parboiling. Int J Food Eng 2008;4(4):1–12.10.2202/1556-3758.1393Search in Google Scholar

14. Yildirim A, Öner MD, Bayram M. Fitting Fick’s model to analyze water diffusion into chickpeas during soaking with ultrasound treatment. J Food Eng 2011;104(1):134–42.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.005Search in Google Scholar

15. Yildirim A, Öner MD, Bayram M. Effect of soaking and ultrasound treatments on texture of chickpea. J Food Sci Technol 2013;50(3):455–65.10.1007/s13197-011-0362-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Ghafoor M, Misra NN, Mahadevan K, Tiwari BK. Ultrasound assisted hydration of navy beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Ultrason Sonochem 2014;21(1):409–14.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.05.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Patero T, Augusto PED. Ultrasound (US) enhances the hydration of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) grains. Ultrason Sonochem 2015;23:11–5.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.10.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Yao Y, Zhang W, He B. Investigation on the kinetic models for the regeneration of silica gel by hot air combined with power ultrasonic. Energ Convers Manage 2011; 52(11):3319–26.10.1016/j.enconman.2011.06.002Search in Google Scholar

19. Reyes A, Perez N, Mahn A. Theoretical and Experimental Study of Freeze-Drying of “loco” (Concholepas concholepas). Dry Technol 2011;29(12):1386–95.10.1080/07373937.2011.586479Search in Google Scholar

20. Deng Y, Luo YL, Wang YG, Yue J, Liu ZM, Zhong Y, et al. Drying-induced protein and microstructure damages of squid fillets affected moisture distribution and rehydration ability during rehydration. J Food Eng 2014;123:23–31.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.09.006Search in Google Scholar

21. Ozuna C, Cárcel JA, Walde PM, Garcia-Perez JV. Low-temperature drying of salted cod (Gadus morhua) assisted by high power ultrasound: Kinetics and physical properties. Innov Food Sci Emerg 2014;23:146–55.10.1016/j.ifset.2014.03.008Search in Google Scholar

22. Parthasarathi S, Anandharamakrishnan C. Modeling of shrinkage, rehydration and textural changes for food structural analysis: a review. J Food Process Eng 2014;37(2):199–210.10.1111/jfpe.12073Search in Google Scholar

23. Khazaei J, Mohammadi N. Effect of temperature on hydration kinetics of sesame seeds (Sesamum indicum L.). J Food Eng 2009;91(4):542–52.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.010Search in Google Scholar

24. Mohsenin NN. Physical properties of plant and animial materials. Vol. 1. Structure, physical characterisitics and mechanical properties. Physical properties of plant and animial materials Vol 1 Structure, physical characterisitics and mechanical properties. 1970;1.Search in Google Scholar

25. Amsden B. Solute diffusion within hydrogels. Mechanisms and models. Macromolecules 1998;31(23):8382–95.10.1021/ma980765fSearch in Google Scholar

26. Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion: Oxford University Press, 1979.Search in Google Scholar

27. Resio ANC, Aguerre RJ, Suárez C. Study of some factors affecting water absorption by amaranth grain during soaking. J Food Eng 2003;60(4):391–6.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00062-1Search in Google Scholar

28. Peleg M. An empirical model for the description of moisture sorption curves. J Food Sci 1988(53): 1216–7.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb13565.xSearch in Google Scholar

29. Saguy IS, Marabi A, Wallach R. New approach to model rehydration of dry food particulates utilizing principles of liquid transport in porous media. Trends Food Sci Tech 2005;16(11):495–506.10.1016/j.tifs.2005.07.006Search in Google Scholar

30. Xiang Y, Su X, Dong M, Chen C. Study on water immersion technology of salted sea cucumber. Food Science 2007;28(12): 153–56.Search in Google Scholar

31. Gallego-Juárez J. Some applications of air-borne power ultrasound to food processing. Ultrasound in food processing 1998:127–43.Search in Google Scholar

32. De la Fuente-Blanco S, De Sarabia ER-F, Acosta-Aparicio V, Blanco-Blanco A, Gallego-Juárez J. Food drying process by power ultrasound. Ultrasonics 2006;44:e523–e7.10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.181Search in Google Scholar

33. Gallego-Juarez JA, Rodriguez-Corral G, Gálvez Moraleda J, Yang T. A new high-intensity ultrasonic technology for food dehydration. Dry Technol 1999;17(3):597–608.10.1080/07373939908917555Search in Google Scholar

34. Teixeira MB, Tobinaga S. A diffusion model for describing water transport in round squid mantle during drying with a moisture-dependent effective diffusivity. J Food Eng 1998;36(2):169–81.10.1016/S0260-8774(98)00033-8Search in Google Scholar

35. Solomon W. Hydration kinetics of lupin (Lupinus albus) seeds. J Food Process Eng 2007;30(1):119–30.10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00098.xSearch in Google Scholar

36. Turhan M, Sayar S, Gunasekaran S. Application of Peleg model to study water absorption in chickpea during soaking. J Food Eng 2002;53(2):153–9.10.1016/S0260-8774(01)00152-2Search in Google Scholar

37. García-Pascual P, Sanjuán N, Melis R, Mulet A. Morchella esculenta (morel) rehydration process modelling. J Food Eng 2006;72(4):346–53.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.12.014Search in Google Scholar

38. Baran G, Boberick K, McCool J. Fatigue of restorative materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol M 2001;12(4):350–60.10.1177/10454411010120040501Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2016-9-6
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2016-0116/html
Scroll to top button