Home Study of Spray-dried Yoghurt Production in a Pilot-scale Equipment Using Drying Agents to Reduce Wall Deposition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Study of Spray-dried Yoghurt Production in a Pilot-scale Equipment Using Drying Agents to Reduce Wall Deposition

  • Edison Paulo De Ros Triboli and Jorge Andrey Wilhelms Gut ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 19, 2016

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine suitable conditions for yoghurt spray drying in a pilot-scale equipment with a rotary atomizer using drying auxiliary agents to reduce wall deposition in the drying chamber. First, the effects of the main process variables (disk rotation speed: 25,000–30,000 rpm; inlet air temperature: 160–180 °C; feed flow rate: 5.2–8.7 kg/h) were studied with a 23 central composite experimental design. Following, six different drying agents (maltodextrins 5 dextrose equivalent [DE] and 10 DE, EmCap®, acacia gum, skimmed milk and fumed silica) were tested to identify the most promising additive to improve process yield. Excellent results on wall deposition, product recovery, product color and particle size distribution span were achieved with fumed silica Aerosil® at 3 %, 26,000-rpm atomizer speed, 160 °C inlet air temperature and 8.7 kg/h yoghurt feed flow rate. The action of the fumed silica on particle agglomerates produced a free-flowing powder with good homogeneity.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from Mauá Institute of Technology.

Nomenclature

a*

Red–green axis value in CIE L*a*b* color space (–)

b*

Yellow–blue axis value in CIE L*a*b* color space (–)

CtPt

Binary variable that is true for the central point of the design (0 or 1)

Dv,0.1

Particle diameters corresponding to 10 % of particle volume distribution (μm)

Dv,0.5

Particle diameters corresponding to 50 % of particle volume distribution (μm)

Dv,0.9

Particle diameters corresponding to 90 % of particle volume distribution (μm)

Di

Particle diameter (μm)

D3,2

Sauter mean diameter (μm)

D3,2

Predicted D3,2 (μm)

dmin

Amount of dry matter fed to the process (kg)

dmprod

Amount of dry matter obtained as product from cyclone and chamber (kg)

dmwall

Amount of dry matter collected from chamber wall brushing (kg)

dmloss

Amount of dry matter lost in the process (kg)

DMprod

Fraction of the dry matter obtained as product from cyclone and chamber (%)

DMprod

Predicted DMprod (%)

DMwall

Fraction of the dry matter collected from chamber wall brushing (%)

DMwall

Predicted DMwall (%)

DMloss

Fraction of the dry matter lost in the process (%)

F

Yoghurt feed flow rate (kg/h)

fi

Frequency of particle diameter in the distribution (–)

L*

Light–dark axis value in CIE L*a*b* color space (–)

MC

Moisture content (%)

R

Disk rotation speed (rpm)

S

Particle size distribution span (–)

S

Predicted S (–)

Tin

Inlet air temperature (°C)

Tout

Outlet air temperature (°C)

Tout

Predicted Tout (°C)

Tg

Glass transition temperature (°C)

XR

Coded variable for disk rotation speed (–)

XT

Coded variable for inlet air temperature (–)

XF

Coded variable for yoghurt feed flow rate (–)

Greek letters
Δa*

Red–green axis difference in CIE L*a*b* color space (–)

Δb*

Yellow–blue axis difference in CIE L*a*b* color space (–)

ΔE*

Total color difference in CIE L*a*b* color space (–)

ΔE

Predicted ΔE* (–)

ΔL*

Light–dark axis difference in CIE L*a*b* color space (–)

References

1. FIESP-ITAL. Brasil food trends 2020. São Paulo: Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo and Instituto de Tecnologia de Alimentos, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

2. Kearney N, Meng XC, Stanton C, Kelly J, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. Development of a spray dried probiotic yoghurt containing Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338. Int Dairy J 2009;19:684–9.10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.05.003Search in Google Scholar

3. Gaiani C, Morand M, Sanchez C, Tehrany EA, Jacquot M, Schuck P, et al. How surface composition of high milk proteins powder is influenced by spray-drying temperature. Colloids Surf B 2010;75:377–84.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.09.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Patel RP, Patel MP, Suthar AM. Spray drying technology: an overview. Indian J Sci Technol 2009;2:44–7.10.17485/ijst/2009/v2i10.3Search in Google Scholar

5. Masters K. Spray dryers. In: Baker CG, editor. Industrial drying of foods. London: Blackie, 1997.10.1007/978-1-4613-1123-2_5Search in Google Scholar

6. Filková I, Huang LX, Mujumdar AS. Industrial spray drying systems. In: Mujumdar AS, editor. Handbook of industrial drying. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2006.10.1201/9781420017618.ch10Search in Google Scholar

7. Walton DE, Mumford CJ. Spray dried products – characterization of particle morphology. Chem Eng Res Des 1999;77(1):21–38.10.1205/026387699525846Search in Google Scholar

8. Huntington DH. The influence of the spray drying process on product properties. Dry Tech 2004;22(6):1261–87.10.1081/DRT-120038730Search in Google Scholar

9. HunterLab. Hunter L, a, b vs. CIE L*a*b* – Application Note AN.1005.00. Reston: Hunter Associates Laboratory, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

10. Kumar P, Mishra HN. Yoghurt powder – a review of process, technology, storage and utilization. Food Bioprod Process 2004;82(C2):133–42.10.1205/0960308041614918Search in Google Scholar

11. Ozmen L, Langrish TA. An experimental investigation of the wall deposition of milk powder in a pilot-scale spray dryer. Drying Technol 2003;21(7):1253–72.10.1081/DRT-120023179Search in Google Scholar

12. Kota K, Langrish TA. Fluxes and patterns of wall deposits for skim milk in a pilot-scale spray dryer. Drying Technol 2006;24:993–1001.10.1080/07373930600776167Search in Google Scholar

13. Langrish TA, Chan WC, Kota K. Comparison of maltodextrin and skim milk wall deposition rates in a pilot-scale spray dryer. Powder Technol 2007;179:84–9.10.1016/j.powtec.2007.01.019Search in Google Scholar

14. Keshani S, Daud WR, Nourouzi MM, Namvar F, Ghasemi M. Spray drying: an overview on wall deposition, process and modeling. J Food Eng 2015;146:152–62.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.09.004Search in Google Scholar

15. Jouppila K, Roos YH. Glass transitions and crystallization in milk powders. J Dairy Sci 1994;77(10):2907–15.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77231-3Search in Google Scholar

16. Keshani S, Daud WR, Woo MW, Talib MZ, Chuah AL, Russly AR. Artificial neural network modeling of the deposition rate of lactose powder in spray dryers. Drying Technol 2012;30:386–97.10.1080/07373937.2011.638228Search in Google Scholar

17. Bhandari BR, Datta N, Howes T. Problems associated with spray drying of sugar-rich foods. Drying Technol 1997;15:671–84.10.1080/07373939708917253Search in Google Scholar

18. Lloyd RJ, Chen XD, Hargreaves JB. Glass transition and caking of spray‐dried lactose. Int J Food Sci Technol 1996;31:305–11.10.1046/j.1365-2621.1996.00352.xSearch in Google Scholar

19. Koc B, Yilmazer MS, Balkir P, Ertekin FK. Spray drying of yogurt: optimization of process conditions for improving viability and other attributes. Drying Technol 2010;28:495–507.10.1080/07373931003613809Search in Google Scholar

20. Meste ML, Champion D, Roudaut G, Blond G, Simatos D. Glass transition and food technology: a critical appraisal. J Food Sci 2002;67(7):2444–58.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb08758.xSearch in Google Scholar

21. Fu N, Chen XD. Towards a maximal cell survival in convective thermal drying processes. Food Res Int 2011;44:1127–49.10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.053Search in Google Scholar

22. Peighambardoust SH, Tafti AG, Hesari J. Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 2011;22(5):215–24.10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009Search in Google Scholar

23. Fazaeli M, Emam-Djomeh Z, Kalbasi-Ashtari A, Omid M. Effect of process conditions and carrier concentration for improving drying yield and other quality attributes of spray dried black mulberry (Morus nigra) juice. Int J Food Eng 2012;8(1):8.10.1515/1556-3758.2023Search in Google Scholar

24. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Effect of maltodextrin addition during spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: I. Drying kinetics and product recovery. Drying Technol 2008;26(6):714–25.10.1080/07373930802046369Search in Google Scholar

25. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Effect of maltodextrin addition during spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: II. Powder properties. Drying Technol 2008;26:726–37.10.1080/07373930802046377Search in Google Scholar

26. Williams AM, Jones JR, Paterson AH, Pearce DL. Effect of fines on agglomeration in spray dryers: an experimental study. Int J Food Eng 2009;5(2):7.10.2202/1556-3758.1635Search in Google Scholar

27. Wang S, Langrish T. A review of process simulations and the use of additives in spray drying. Food Res Int 2009;42:13–25.10.1016/j.foodres.2008.09.006Search in Google Scholar

28. Quek SY, Chok NK, Swedlund P. The physicochemical properties of spray-dried watermelon powders. Chem Eng Process 2007;46:386–92.10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.020Search in Google Scholar

29. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Ortega-Rivas E, Juliano P, Yan H. Food powders: physical properties, processing, and functionality. New York: Kluwer, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

30. Evonik. Sipernat and aerosil – An essential in industrial powder technology. Hanau: Evonik Industries AG, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

31. Oliveira OW, Petrovick PR. Spray drying of plant extracts: basic remarks and application. Braz J Pharmacogn 2010;20(4):641–50.10.1590/S0102-695X2010000400026Search in Google Scholar

32. IAL. Métodos físico-químicos para análise de alimentos, 4th ed. São Paulo: Instituto Adolfo Lutz, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

33. Masters K. Spray drying handbook. New York: Longman, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

34. Masters K. Spray drying in practice. Charlottenlund: SprayDryConsult International APS, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

35. Triboli EP, Gut JA. Study of spray dried yoghurt production in a pilot scale equipment. Proceedings of the 2013 AIChE Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

36. Stencl J. Modelling the water sorption isotherms of yoghurt powder spray. Math Comput Simul 2004;65:157–64.10.1016/j.matcom.2003.09.002Search in Google Scholar

37. Barbosa-Cánovas GV, Juliano P. Physical and chemical properties of food powders. In: Onwulata C. editor. Encapsulated and powdered foods. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2005.10.1201/9781420028300.ch3Search in Google Scholar

38. Strumillo C, Kudra T. Drying: principles applications and design. New York: Gondon and Breach, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

39. Evonik. Aerosil® fumed silica and Aeroxide® oxides for toner – technical information TI 1222. Hanau: Evonik Industries AG, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

40. Evonik. Sipernat specialty silica and aerosil fumed silica in spray drying applications. Hanau: Evonik Industries AG, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

41. Koc B, Yilmazer MS, Ertekin FK, Balkir P. Physical properties of yoghurt powder produced by spray drying. J Food Sci Technol 2014;51:1377–83.10.1007/s13197-012-0653-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Published Online: 2016-8-19
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 14.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2015-0355/html
Scroll to top button