Home Optimization of Spray Drying Process Parameters for Sweet Corn Enzymolysis Liquid
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Optimization of Spray Drying Process Parameters for Sweet Corn Enzymolysis Liquid

  • Ning Jiang , Chunquan Liu EMAIL logo and Dajing Li
Published/Copyright: April 17, 2015

Abstract

The aim of this study was to optimize the spray drying process parameters for sweet corn enzymolysis liquid concentrate (SCELC). Experimental design with inlet temperature (170–190°C), SCELC/maltodextrin (MD) ratio (0.25–4) and inlet feed rate (800–1000 mL h−1) as independent variables was studied to investigate the effects on product responses. The corresponding results showed that an increase in the inlet temperature resulted in sweet corn powder with lower moisture, bulk density, L* value, H° value and higher water solubility index. Meanwhile, an increase in MD ratio brought lower moisture and higher L* value, H° value, water solubility index. It was also found that an increase in the inlet feed rate caused higher moisture and lower water solubility index. The highest production yield was achieved at 42.86% with optimized inlet temperature of 177.66°C, SCELC/MD ratio of 0.84 and inlet feed rate of 834.50 mL h−1. Accordingly, the production yield, moisture content, bulk density, water solubility index, L* and H° value were 42.86%, 3.57%, 0.45 g/cm3, 96.54 g/100 g, 84.46, and 83.54, respectively.

References

1. ScottCE, EldridgeAL. Comparison of carotenoid content in fresh, frozen and canned corn. J Food Compos Anal2005;18:5519.10.1016/j.jfca.2004.04.001Search in Google Scholar

2. NiuLY, SongJF, LiDJ, LiuCQ. Research progress of nutrition and edible quality evaluation on sweet corn and its processing products. J Chinese Cereal Oil Assoc2011;4:911. (in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar

3. LiCM, ChiYJ, WangD. Study on the spray drying technology of sweet corn enzymolysis liquid. Sci Technol Food Ind2012;33:25765. (in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar

4. CheginiGR, KhazaeiJ, GhobadianB. Prediction of process and product parameters in an orange juice spray dryer using artificial neural networks. J Food Eng2008;84:53443.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.06.007Search in Google Scholar

5. GoulaAM, AdamopoulosKG. A new technique for spray drying orange juice concentrate. Innov Food Sci Emerg2010;11:34251.10.1016/j.ifset.2009.12.001Search in Google Scholar

6. QuekSY, ChokNK, SwedlundP. The physicochemical properties of spray-dried watermelon powders. Chem Eng Process2007;46:38692.10.1016/j.cep.2006.06.020Search in Google Scholar

7. GoulaAM, AdamopoulosKG. Spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: I. The effect on product recovery. J Food Eng2005;66:2534.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.029Search in Google Scholar

8. GoulaAM, AdamopoulosKG, KazakisNA. Influence of spraydrying conditions on tomato powder properties. Dry Technol2004;22:112951.10.1081/DRT-120038584Search in Google Scholar

9. LiuQM, SunJC, YangXM, YangLM. Study on technology of solid beverage with bayberry. Sci Technol Food Ind2007;4:11113.Search in Google Scholar

10. GongZQ, ZhangM, MujumdarAS, SunJC. Spray drying and agglomeration of instant bayberry powder. Dry Technol2008;26:11621.10.1080/07373930701781751Search in Google Scholar

11. GongZQ, ZhangM, SunJC. Physico-chemical properties of cabbage powder as affected by drying methods. Dry Technol2007;25:91316.10.1080/07373930701372239Search in Google Scholar

12. VinhT, BheshRB, TonyH. Optimization of co-current spray drying process of sugar-rich foods. Part I – moisture and glass transition temperature profile during drying. J Food Eng2005;71:5565.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.10.017Search in Google Scholar

13. JayaS, DasH. Accelerated storage, shelf life and colour of mango powder. J Food Process Pres2005;29:4562.10.1111/j.1745-4549.2005.00012.xSearch in Google Scholar

14. VardinH, YasarM. Optimization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice spray-drying as affected by temperature and maltodextrin content. Int J Food Sci Technol2012;47:16776.10.1111/j.1365-2621.2011.02823.xSearch in Google Scholar

15. Rodriguez-HernandezGR, Gonzales-GarciaR, Grajales-LagunesA, Ruiz-CabreraM. Spray-drying of cactus pear juice: effect on the physicochemical properties of powder and reconstituted product. Dry Technol2005;23:95573.10.1080/DRT-200054251Search in Google Scholar

16. YoussefiS, Emam-DjomehZ, MousaviSM. Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) in the prediction of quality parameters of spray-dried pomegranate juice. Dry Technol2009;27:91017.10.1080/07373930902988247Search in Google Scholar

17. AndradeI, FloresH. Optimization of spray drying of Roselle extract (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) drying Proceedings of the 14th International Drying Symposium. Sao Paulo, Brazil. 2004;597604.Search in Google Scholar

18. LohSK, ManYBC, TanCP, OsmanA, HamidNSA. Process optimization of encapsulated pandan (Pandanus amaryllifolius) powder using spray-drying method. J Sci Food Agr2005;85:19992004.10.1002/jsfa.2169Search in Google Scholar

19. MoreiraGEG, CostaMGM, SouzaACR, BritoES, MedeirosMFD, AzeredoHMC. Physical properties of spray dried Acerola pomace extract as affected by temperature and drying aids. LWT-Food Sci Technol2009;42:6415.10.1016/j.lwt.2008.07.008Search in Google Scholar

20. KocB, YilmazerMS, BalkirP, ErtekinFK. Spray drying of yogurt: optimization of process conditions for improving viability and other quality attributes. Dry Technol2010;28:495507.10.1080/07373931003613809Search in Google Scholar

21. ChenQC, HuangHH, WangJ, HuK, ZengLL. Optimization of spray drying technology in processing banana powder. Transactions of the CSAE2010;26:3317. (in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar

22. AOAC. Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

23. LoreanaG, JuanML, DanieA, VerónicaB, JulianaP. Influence of spray-drying operating conditions on Rhamnus purshiana (cáscara sagrada) extract powder physical properties. Powder Technol2011;208:20514.10.1016/j.powtec.2010.12.021Search in Google Scholar

24. MiltonCC, StringhetaPC, RamosAM. Effect of the carriers on the microstructure of mango powder obtained by spray drying and its functional characterization. Innov Food Sci Emerg2005;6:4208.10.1016/j.ifset.2005.05.003Search in Google Scholar

25. MishraP, MishraS, MahanataC. Effect of maltodextrin ratio and inlet temperature during spray drying on physicochemical and antioxidant properties of amla (Emblica officinalis) juice powder. Food Bioprod Process2014;92:2528.10.1016/j.fbp.2013.08.003Search in Google Scholar

26. TekindalMA, BayrakH, OzkayaB, GencY. Box-Behnken experimental design in factorial experiments: the importance of bread for nutrition and health. Turk J Field Crops2012;17:11523.Search in Google Scholar

27. BansalA, SharmaHA, NandaV. Optimization of spray drying process parameters for low-fat honey-based milk powder with antioxidant activity. Int J Food Sci Tech2014;49:1196202.10.1111/ijfs.12416Search in Google Scholar

28. CheginiGR, GhobadianB. Effect of spray-drying conditions on physical properties of orange juice powder. Dry Technol2005;23:65768.10.1081/DRT-200054161Search in Google Scholar

29. MohajelaN, RoholaminiNA, AzadmaneshK, VatanaraA, MoazeniE, RahimiA, et al. Optimization of a spray drying process to prepare dry powder microparticles containing plasmid nanocomplex. Int J Pharmaceut2012;423:57785.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.11.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. TononRV, BrabetC, HubingerMD. Influence of process conditions on the physicochemical properties of açai (Euterpe oleraceae mart.) powder produced by spray drying. J Food Eng2008;88:41118.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.02.029Search in Google Scholar

31. PapadakisSE, GardeliC, TziaC. Spray drying of raisin juice concentrate. Dry Technol2006;24:17380.10.1080/07373930600559019Search in Google Scholar

32. AbadioFDB, DominguesAM, BorgesSV, OliveraVM. Physical properties of powdered pineapple juice (ANNasCOMOSUS) juice: effect of maltodextrin concentration and atomization speed. J Food Eng2004;64:2857.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.10.010Search in Google Scholar

33. BaldwinAJ, TruongGNT. Development of insolubility in dehydration of dairy milk powders. Food Bioprod Process2007;85:2028.10.1205/fbp07008Search in Google Scholar

34. PapadakisSE, GardeliC, TziaC. Raizin extract powder: production, physical and sensory properties. In: Proceeding of the 11th International Drying Symposium ID’s 98, Haldiki: Ziti Editions, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

35. GoulaMA, AdamopoulosGK. Effect of maltodextrin addition during spray drying of tomato pulp in dehumidified air: II. Powder properties. Dry Technol2008;26:72637.10.1080/07373930802046377Search in Google Scholar

36. LiuXM, ChenZY, TangDB. Research progress on nutritional and functional components, biological activity, preservation and processing of sweet corn. GD Agric Sci2010;12:9094. (in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar

37. XiaoYD, LiDJ, LiuCQ. Stability of zeaxanthin in freeze-dried sweet corn kernels during storage. Food Sci2014;35:22933. (in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar

38. AngelRCM, Espinosa-MunozLC, Aviles-AvilesC. Spray drying of passion fruit juice using lactose-maltodextrin blends as the support material. Int J Braz Arch Bio Technol2009;52:101118.10.1590/S1516-89132009000400026Search in Google Scholar

39. ErsusS, YurdagelU. Microencapsulation of anthocyanin pigments of black carrot (Daucuscarota L.) by spray drier. J Food Eng2007;80:80512.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.07.009Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-4-17
Published in Print: 2015-6-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 29.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2014-0267/html
Scroll to top button