Home Influence of Reduced Cleaning-In-Place on Aged Membranes during Ultrafiltration of Whey
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Influence of Reduced Cleaning-In-Place on Aged Membranes during Ultrafiltration of Whey

  • T. Berg EMAIL logo , R. Ipsen , Niels Ottosen , A. Tolkach and F. van den Berg
Published/Copyright: June 26, 2015

Abstract

Optimization of cleaning-in-place (CIP) procedures using bench-scale equipment is severely restricted by the short testing times (typically 1–3 days) compared with the normal lifespans of industrial membrane materials (years). In our research, industrially used polyethersulfone membrane material (“aged membrane”) was migrated to a lab-scale filtration apparatus. Performance (flux) of aged membranes was found to be 10% lower compared to new membranes of the same specification. For each set of membranes, performance was on the same level during multiple filtrations with intermediate CIPs. Reducing the CIP from a three-step procedure (caustic, enzymatic, acid) to only one step (caustic) had no influence on subsequent filtration performance even though flux recovery after reduced CIP was as low as 38% compared to 90% after three-step CIP. Consequences of reduced cleaning could first be observed in the subsequent CIP where the level of resistance during the respective CIP steps was increased.

Acknowledgment

Jiang Wei from Alfa Laval (Nakskov, Denmark) is acknowledged for providing new membranes and for valuable insights into membrane (production) technology.

References

1. Rabiller-BaudryM, Le MauxM, ChauferB, BegoinL. Characterisation of cleaned and fouled membrane by ATR – FTIR and EDX analysis coupled with SEM: application to UF of skimmed milk with a PES membrane. Desalination2002;146:1238.10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00503-9Search in Google Scholar

2. VäisänenP, BirdMR, NyströmM. Treatment of UF membranes with simple and formulated cleaning agents. Food Bioprod Process2002;80:98108.10.1205/09603080252938735Search in Google Scholar

3. KuzmenkoD, ArkhangelskyE, BelferS, FregerV, GitisV. Chemical cleaning of UF membranes fouled by BSA. Desalination2005;179:32333.10.1016/j.desal.2004.11.078Search in Google Scholar

4. DelaunayD, Rabiller-BaudryM, PaugamL, PihlajamäkiA, NyströmM. Physico-chemical characterisations of a UF membrane used in dairy application to estimate chemical efficiency of cleaning. Desalination2006;200:18991.10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.291Search in Google Scholar

5. BégoinL, Rabiller-BaudryM, ChauferB, HautboisM-C, DonevaT. Ageing of PES industrial spiral-wound membranes in acid whey ultrafiltration. Desalination2006;192:2539.10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.009Search in Google Scholar

6. NorazmanN, WuW, LiH, WasingerV, ZhangH, ChenV. Evaluation of chemical cleaning of UF membranes fouled with whey protein isolates via analysis of residual protein components on membranes surface. Sep Purif Technol2013;103:24150.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.039Search in Google Scholar

7. PetrusHB, LiH, ChenV, NorazmanN. Enzymatic cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes fouled by protein mixture solutions. J Membr Sci2008;325:78392.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.09.004Search in Google Scholar

8. BergTH, KnudsenJC, IpsenR, van den BergF, HolstHH, TolkachA. Investigation of consecutive fouling and cleaning cycles of ultrafiltration membranes used for whey processing. Int J Food Eng2014;10:367.10.1515/ijfe-2014-0028Search in Google Scholar

9. Rabiller-BaudryM, PaugamL, BégoinL, DelaunayD, Fernandez-CruzM, Phina-ZiebinC, et al. Alkaline cleaning of PES membranes used in skimmed milk ultrafiltration: from reactor to spiral-wound module via a plate-and-frame module. Desalination2006;191:33443.10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.028Search in Google Scholar

10. MarshallAD, DaufinG. Physico-chemical aspects of membrane fouling by dairy fluids. Fouling and Cleaning of Pressure Driven Membrane Processes. IDF Special Issue 9504. International Dairy Federation (IDF), Brussels, Belgium;1995:8–35.Search in Google Scholar

11. D’SouzaNM, MawsonAJ. Membrane cleaning in the dairy industry: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr2005;45:12534.10.1080/10408690490911783Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Tran-HaMH, WileyDE, LawrenceND, IyerM. Development of a standard cleaning protocol to evaluate the effect of cleaning on membrane performance. Aust J Dairy Technol2002;57:209.Search in Google Scholar

13. PlattS, NyströmM. Amido black staining of ultrafiltration membranes fouled with BSA. Desalination2007;214:17792.10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.027Search in Google Scholar

14. BartlettM, BirdMR, HowellJA. An experimental study for the development of a qualitative membrane cleaning model. J Membr Sci1995;105:14757.10.1016/0376-7388(95)00052-ESearch in Google Scholar

15. MulderM. Basic principles of membrane technology.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1991.10.1007/978-94-017-0835-7Search in Google Scholar

16. TolkachA, KulozikU. Fractionation of whey proteins and caseinomacropeptide by means of enzymatic crosslinking and membrane separation techniques. J Food Eng2005;67:1320.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.058Search in Google Scholar

17. OldaniM, SchockG. Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by infrared spectroscopy, esca, and contact angle measurements. J Membr Sci1989;43:24358.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)85101-7Search in Google Scholar

18. ZhuHH, NystromM. Cleaning results characterized by flux, streaming potential and FTIR measurements. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp1998;138:30921.10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00072-1Search in Google Scholar

19. FaganCC, O’DonnellCP. Application of mid-infrared spectroscopy to food processing systems. Nondestructive testing of food quality.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

20. Rabiller-BaudryM, BouzidH, ChauferB, PaugamL, DelaunayD, MekmeneO, et al. On the origin of flux dependence in pH-modified skim milk filtration. Dairy Sci Technol2009;89:36385.10.1051/dst/2009018Search in Google Scholar

21. SheldonJM, ReedIM, HawesCR. The fine-structure of ultrafiltration membranes. II. Protein fouled membranes. J Membr Sci1991;62:87102.10.1016/0376-7388(91)85006-QSearch in Google Scholar

22. Garcia-IvarsJ, Alcaina-MirandaM-I, Iborra-ClarM-I, Mendoza-RocaJ-A, Pastor-AlcañizL. Enhancement in hydrophilicity of different polymer phase-inversion ultrafiltration membranes by introducing PEG/Al2O3 nanoparticles. Sep Purif Technol2014;128:4557.10.1016/j.seppur.2014.03.012Search in Google Scholar

23. PerssonKM, GekasV, TrägårdhG. Study of membrane compaction and its influence on ultrafiltration water permeability. J Membr Sci1995;100:15562.10.1016/0376-7388(94)00263-XSearch in Google Scholar

24. PaugamL, DelaunayD, Rabiller-BaudryM. Cleaning efficiency and impact on production fluxes of oxidising disinfectants on a pes ultrafiltration membrane fouled with proteins. Food Bioprod Process2010;88:4259.10.1016/j.fbp.2010.10.005Search in Google Scholar

25. ArgüelloMA, ÁlvarezS, RieraFA, ÁlvarezR. Utilization of enzymatic detergents to clean inorganic membranes fouled by whey proteins. Sep Purif Technol2005;41:14754.10.1016/j.seppur.2004.05.005Search in Google Scholar

26. ArgüelloMA, ÁlvarezS, RieraFA, ÁlvarezR. Enzymatic cleaning of inorganic ultrafiltration membranes fouled by whey proteins. J Agric Food Chem2002;50:19518.10.1021/jf0107510Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. DaufinG, MerinU, LabbéJP, QuémeraisA, KerhervéFL. Cleaning of inorganic membranes after whey and milk ultrafiltration. Biotechnol Bioeng1991;38:829.10.1002/bit.260380111Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. PaugamL, DelaunayD, DiagneNW, Rabiller-BaudryM. Cleaning of skim milk PES ultrafiltration membrane: on the real effect of nitric acid step. J Membr Sci2013;428:27580.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.013Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-6-26
Published in Print: 2015-8-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 12.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2014-0240/html
Scroll to top button