Startseite Evaluation of Lycopene Loss and Colour Values in Convective Drying of Tomato by Surface Response Methodology
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Evaluation of Lycopene Loss and Colour Values in Convective Drying of Tomato by Surface Response Methodology

  • Karen Coelho , Bruna R. Costa und Luiz Antonio de Almeida Pinto EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 9. Juli 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The increasing interest in the antioxidant activity of lycopene has been to promote the consumption of tomato and tomato-based products. The aim of this work was to evaluate tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) drying in thin layer through response surface methodology. The independent variables investigated in this study were drying air temperature (60, 70 and 80°C) and wet sample thickness (3, 5 and 7 mm). The drying condition with the lower colour value (Hue angle) and higher lycopene content was 60°C and sample thickness of 3 mm. In this condition, the responses for the colour (Hue angle) and lycopene content values were 47.7 0.2° and 301.9 3.1 μg g1, respectively. The lycopene loss was similar to that reported in the literature (30–50%) using more expensive methods of tomato drying such as freeze-drying and lyophilization.

References

1. Willcox JK, Catignani GL, Lazarus S. Tomatoes and cardiovascular diseases. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2003;43:1–18.10.1080/10408690390826437Suche in Google Scholar

2. Tapiero H, Townsend DM, Tew KD. The role of carotenoids in the prevention of human pathologies. Biomed Pharmacother 2004;58:100–10.10.1016/j.biopha.2003.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

3. Giovannucci E. Tomato products, lycopene, and prostate cancer: a review of the epidemiological literature. J Nutr 2005;135:2030S–1S.10.1093/jn/135.8.2030SSuche in Google Scholar

4. Davoodi MG, Vijayanand P, Kulkarni SG, Ramana KVR. Effect of different pre-treatments and dehydration methods on quality characteristics and storage stability of tomato powder. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2007;40:1832–40.10.1016/j.lwt.2006.12.004Suche in Google Scholar

5. Liu F, Cao X, Wang H, Liao X. Changes of tomato powder qualities during storage. Powder Technol 2010;204:159–66.10.1016/j.powtec.2010.08.002Suche in Google Scholar

6. Shi J, Le Maguer M, Kakuda Y, Liptay A, Niekamp F. Lycopene degradation and isomerization in tomato dehydration. Food Res Int 1999;32:15–21.10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00059-9Suche in Google Scholar

7. Cernîsev S. Effects of conventional and multistage drying processing on non-enzymatic browning in tomato. J Food Eng 2010;96:114–8.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.07.002Suche in Google Scholar

8. Hii CL, Law CL, Cloke M, Suzannah S. Thin layer drying kinetics of cocoa and dried product quality. Biosyst Eng 2009;102:153–61.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.10.007Suche in Google Scholar

9. Kaya A, Aydın O, Demirtaş C. Drying kinetics of red delicious apple. Biosyst Eng 2007;96:517–24.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.12.009Suche in Google Scholar

10. Chirife J. Fundamentals of the drying mechanism during air dehydration of foods. In: Mujumdar A, editor. Advances in drying, Vol. 3. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1983:73–102.Suche in Google Scholar

11. AOAC. Official methods of analysis, 16th ed. Arlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1995.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Georgé S, Tourniaire F, Gautier H, Goupy P, Rock E, Caris-Veyrat C. Changes in the contents of carotenoids, phenolic compounds and vitamin C during technical processing and lyophilisation of red and yellow tomatoes. Food Chem 2011;124:1603–11.10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.08.024Suche in Google Scholar

13. Buret M. Tomato sampling for quality assessment. Milan: IVTPA, 1991.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Lime BJ, Griffiths FP, O’Connor RT, Heinzelman DC, McCall ER. Spectrophotometric methods for determining pigmentation – beta-carotene and lycopene – in ruby red grapefruit. J Agric Food Chem 1957;5:941–4.10.1021/jf60082a008Suche in Google Scholar

15. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd ed. NewYork: JohnWiley & Sons, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Sacilik K, Unal G. Dehydration characteristics of kastamonu garlic slices. Biosyst Eng 2005;92:207–15.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.06.006Suche in Google Scholar

17. Zanoni B, Pagliarini E, Foschino R. Study of the stability of dried tomato halves during shelf-life to minimise oxidative damage. J Sci Food Agricult 2000;80:2203–8.10.1002/1097-0010(200012)80:15<2203::AID-JSFA775>3.0.CO;2-WSuche in Google Scholar

18. Labuza TP. Kinetics of lipid oxidation in foods. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1971;2:355–405.10.1080/10408397109527127Suche in Google Scholar

19. Arias R, Lee TC, Logendra L, Janes H. Correlation of lycopene measured by HPLC with the L*, a*, b* color readings of a hydropomic tomato and the relationship of maturity with color and lycopene content. J Agric Food Chem 2000;49:1676–97.10.1021/jf990974eSuche in Google Scholar

20. Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Response surfaces: designs and analyses, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Sharma GP, Prasad S. Optimization of process parameters for microwave drying of garlic cloves. J Food Eng 2006;75:441–6.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.04.029Suche in Google Scholar

22. Karabulut I, Topcu A, Duran A, Turan S, Ozturk B. Effect of hot air drying and sun drying on color values and b-carotene content of apricot (Prunus armenica L.). LWT-Food Sci Technol 2007;40:753–8.10.1016/j.lwt.2006.05.001Suche in Google Scholar

23. Wojdylo A, Figiel A, Oszmianski J. Effect of drying methods with the application of vacuum microwaves on the bioactive compounds, color, and antioxidant activity of strawberry fruits. J Agric Food Chem 2009;57:1337–43.10.1021/jf802507jSuche in Google Scholar

24. Zanoni B, Peri C, Nani R, Lavelli V. Oxidative heat damage o tomato halves as affected by drying. Food Res Int 1999;31:395–401.10.1016/S0963-9969(98)00102-1Suche in Google Scholar

25. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG. Stability of lycopene during spray drying of tomato pulp. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2005;38:479–87.10.1016/j.lwt.2004.07.020Suche in Google Scholar

26. Ching-Hui C, Hsing-Yu L, Chi-Yue C, Yung-Chuan L. Comparisons on the antioxidant properties of fresh, freeze-dried and hot-air-dried tomatoes. J Food Eng 2006;77:478–85.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.06.061Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-07-09

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Heruntergeladen am 2.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2012-0202/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen