Startseite Influence of Drying on the Properties of Pears of the Rocha Variety (Pyrus communis
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Influence of Drying on the Properties of Pears of the Rocha Variety (Pyrus communis

  • Sandra C. R. V. L. Santos , Raquel P. F. Guiné EMAIL logo und Ana I. A. Barros
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. Juli 2013
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Rocha pear (Pyrus communis L.) is the main cultivar produced in Portugal, usually consumed in fresh. However, the drying of the pear can be an opportunity for development and enables the provision of alternative products to consumers. This work evaluates the effect of drying on some chemical and physical properties of pears of the Rocha variety. Furthermore, the origin of the pears was also a variable studied. For the completion of this work, pears from five different locations were analysed in fresh and after convective air drying at two different temperatures, 40 and 60°C. The properties analysed were dimensions of pears in terms of height and diameter, total solids content, acidity, maturation index, processing yields, colour and textural attributes.The results showed that the peel had lower acidity and higher maturation index, when compared to the pulp and that drying greatly reduced acidity, either in the pulp or in the peel. However, this variation was not influenced by the drying temperature. With respect to colour, total colour differences between 25 and 50 were observed (for the dried pears in relation to the fresh) and in this case increasing the drying temperature caused evident variations in the peel but not in the pulp. As to the textural attributes, hardness and chewiness were the ones that showed the higher changes with drying, increasing considerably with drying temperature.

References

1. Abreu M, Beirão-da-Costa S, Gonçalves EM, Beirão-da-Costa ML, Moldão-Martins M. Use of mild heat pre-treatments for quality retention of freshcut “Rocha” pear. Postharvest Biol Technol 2003;30:153–60.10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00105-4Suche in Google Scholar

2. Salta J, Martins A, Santos RG, Neng NR, Nogueira JMF, Justino J, et al. Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of Rocha pear and other pear cultivars – a comparative study. J Funct Foods 2010;2:153–7.10.1016/j.jff.2010.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

3. Ashoor SH, Kanox JM. Determination of organic acids in foods by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 1982;299:288–92.10.1016/S0021-9673(01)97843-4Suche in Google Scholar

4. Komes D, Ganic KK. Flavors of dried pears. In: Hui YH, Chen F, Nollet LML, Guiné RPF, Martin-Belloso O, Minguez-Mosquera MI, et al., editors. Handbook of fruit and vegetable flavors. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2010:557–571.10.1002/9780470622834.ch31Suche in Google Scholar

5. Guiné R. Influence of drying method on density and porosity of pears. Food Bioproducts Process 2006;84:179–85.10.1205/fbp.05106Suche in Google Scholar

6. Guiné R, Lopes P, Barroca MJ, Ferreira DMS. Effect of ripening stage on the solar drying kinetics and properties of S. Bartolomeu pears (Pyrus communis L.). Int J Acad Res 2009;1:46–52.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Anchía IA, Hernandes JAM. Alimentos. Composición y propriedades, 2nd ed. Madrid, Spain: McGraw-Hill/Interamerica de Espanã S.A.U.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Abdullah MZ, Guan LC, Lim KC, Karim AA. The applications of computer vision system and tomographic radar imaging for assessing physical properties of food. J Food Eng 2001;61:125–35.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00194-8Suche in Google Scholar

9. Mendoza F, Dejmekb P, Aguilera JM. Calibrated color measurements of agricultural foods using image analysis. Postharvest Biol Technol 2006;41:285–95.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.04.004Suche in Google Scholar

10. Billy L, Mehinagic E, Royer G, Renard CMGC, Arvisenet G, ProstnC, et al. Relationship between texture and pectin composition of two apple cultivars during storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 2008;47:315–24.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.07.011Suche in Google Scholar

11. Sams CE. Preharvest factors affecting postharvest texture. Postharvest Biol Technol 1999;15:249–54.10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00098-2Suche in Google Scholar

12. Bourne MC. Texture evaluation of horticultural crops. HortScience 1980;15:51–6.10.21273/HORTSCI.15.1.51Suche in Google Scholar

13. Harker FR, Gunson FA, Triggs CM. Apple firmness: creating a tool for product evaluation based on a sensory instrumental relationship. Postharvest Biol Technol 2006;39:327–30.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2005.10.013Suche in Google Scholar

14. Caine WR, Aalhus JL, Best DR, Dugan MER, Jeremiah LE. Relationship of texture profile analysis and Warner–Bratzler shear force with sensory characteristics of beef rib steaks. Meat Sci 2003;64:333–9.10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00110-9Suche in Google Scholar

15. Barroca MJ, Guiné RPF, Pinto A, Gonçalves FM, Ferreira DMS. Chemical and microbial characterization of Portuguese varieties of pears. Food Bioproducts Process 2006;84:109–13.10.1205/fbp.05200Suche in Google Scholar

16. Mahmutoglu T, Emir F, Saygi YB. Sun/solar drying of differently treated grapes and storage stability of dried grapes. J Food Eng 1996;29:289–300.10.1016/0260-8774(96)00006-4Suche in Google Scholar

17. Duangmal K, Saicheua B, Sueeprasan S. Colour evaluation of freeze-dried roselle extract as a natural food colorant in a model system of a drink. LWT 2008;41:1437–45.10.1016/j.lwt.2007.08.014Suche in Google Scholar

18. Perera CO. Selected quality attributes of dried foods. Drying Technol 2005;23:710–30.10.1081/DRT-200054180Suche in Google Scholar

19. Jaeger H, Janositz A, Knorr D. The Maillard reaction and its control during food processing. The potential of emerging technologies. Pathol Biol 2010;58:207–13.10.1016/j.patbio.2009.09.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Laurila E, Kervinen R, Ahvenainen R. The inhibition of enzymatic browning in minimally processed vegetables and fruits. Postharvest News Inf 1998;9:53N–66N.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Franck C, Lammertyn J, Ho QT, Verboven P, Verlinden B, Nicolaï BM. Browning disorders in pear fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol 2007;43:1–13.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.08.008Suche in Google Scholar

22. Galvis-Sánchez AC, Fonseca SC, Morais AMMB, Malcata FX. Effects of preharvest, harvest and postharvest factors on the quality of pear (cv. “Rocha”) stored under controlled atmosphere conditions. J Food Eng 2004;64:161–72.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.027Suche in Google Scholar

23. Vámos-Vigyázó L. Polyphenol oxidase and peroxidise in fruits and vegetables. Critical Rev Food Sci Nutr 1981;15:49–127.10.1080/10408398109527312Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Dixon RA, Paiva NL. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995;7:1085–97.10.2307/3870059Suche in Google Scholar

25. Nicolas JJ, Richard-Forget FC, Goupy PM, Amiot M, Aubert S. Enzymatic browning reactions in apple and apple products. Critical Rev Food Sci Nutr 1994;34:109–57.10.1080/10408399409527653Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Guiné R. Variation of textural attributes of S. Bartolomeu pears at maturation, storage, and drying. International Journal of Food Properties 2013;16(1):180–192.10.1080/10942912.2010.535191Suche in Google Scholar

27. Veltman RH, Kho RM, van Schaik ACR, Sanders MG, Oosterhaven J. Ascorbic acid and tissue browning in pears (Pyrus communis L. vs Rocha and Conference) under controlled atmosphere conditions. Postharvest Biol Technol 2000;19:129–37.10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00095-8Suche in Google Scholar

28. Cavaco AM, Pinto P, Antunes MD, Silva JM, Guerra R. “Rocha” pear firmness predicted by a Vis/NIR segmented model. Postharvest Biol Technol 2009;51:311–9.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.08.013Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-07-02

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Heruntergeladen am 2.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijfe-2012-0171/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen