Home An experiment-based comparison of different cooling methods for photovoltaic modules
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An experiment-based comparison of different cooling methods for photovoltaic modules

  • Ayman Abdel-raheim Amr ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Ali A. M. Hassan , Mazen Abdel-Salam and Abou Hashema M. El-Sayed
Published/Copyright: April 26, 2024

Abstract

Temperature effect on the performance of a photovoltaic module represents a major concern for expanding the use of solar energy, especially in hot areas. Cooling the PV module is considered an effective method of increasing efficiency by reducing the module cell temperature. An experimental set-up is developed to investigate the effectiveness of different cooling techniques including air cooling, evaporative cooling and water cooling. A comparative study is made among the cooling techniques by simultaneous recording – for the first time – the performance the modules cooled by the different techniques. Experimental measurements dictated that the reduction of the module cell temperature recorded 5 %, 16 %, 17.25, 39.6 % and 44.8 % for passive air cooling, active air cooling, water cooling, evaporative cooling using sprinkler and nozzles, respectively. The best cooling conditions were achieved by evaporative cooling using film of domestic tap-water from nozzles with flow rate of 90–190 L/h/module. The experimental results showed an increase in electrical efficiency of 1.8 % for continuous- against 1.7 % for intermittent-evaporative cooling using water-film from nozzles. The corresponding increase in electrical efficiency on using evaporative cooling by sprinkler is 1.6 % for continuous- against 1.3 % for intermittent cooling. This means there is no significant difference in efficiency values between continuous and intermittent evaporative cooling. This favors the use of intermittent cooling decreases the cost without sacrificing the efficiency value. This makes it possible to identify the recommended method for cooling modules serving in areas of hot weather and moderate climates.


Corresponding author: Ayman Abdel-raheim Amr, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia, Egypt, E-mail:
Mazen Abdel-Salam: IEEE Fellow, IET Fellow, IOP Fellow.
  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Author contributions: The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: Not applicable.

  4. Research funding: Not applicable.

  5. Data availability: Not applicable.

Appendix

Economic analysis details

  1. Passive air cooling

    1. Materials:

    2. The aluminum sheet to fabricate fins has a cost of $110.

    3. Power:

    4. No power consumed.

    5. Operation & Maintenance: None.

    6. Total initial costs equal $110 [41], [42], [43].

  2. Active air cooling

    1. Materials:

    2. The Galvanized sheet to fabricate fins and air duct, dumper, and blower motor cost $40.0, 95.0, 75.0 and 60.0 (The blower motor cost $180.0 enough for three modules). The total cost for materials is $270.

    3. Total initial costs equal $270.

    4. Power consumed for cooling: 100 W/h/module has a cost $0.14(the global average of $0.14 per kilowatt-hour) = ($0.14*6 h*30 days) = $25.2/month.

    5. Operation & Maintenance: $2000.0 per month for operation and maintenance of 250 modules. Thus, the monthly O & M cost per module is $8.0.

    6. The running costs per month per module is assumed equal to$33.2 [41], [42], [43], [44].

  3. Evaporative cooling using sprinkler

    1. Materials:

    2. The sprinkler, conduit and valves cost about $18.0.

    3. Total initial costs are equal to $18.0.

    4. Water consumption is equal to 24 L/h, i.e., about 240 L/day = 7200 L/month per module at cost equal to $3.6.

    5. Operation and maintenance: $8.0

    6. The running costs are assumed to be equal to $11.6/month per module [41], [42], [43].

  4. Evaporative cooling using nozzles

    1. Materials:

    2. The nozzles, conduit and valves cost about $27.0.

    3. Total initial costs equal $27.0.

    4. Power: None

    5. Water consumption is equal to 176 L/h, i.e., about 1760 L/day = 52,800 L/month at cost equal to $26.4. In case of using the cooling water again for irrigation purpose.

    6. On reusing 70 % of the amount of water for irrigation, the cost will be decreased by 70 %.

    7. Operation and maintenance: $8.0

    8. The running cost is assumed equal (26.4*30 %+$8) = $15.92/month per module [41], [42], [43].

  5. Water cooling

    1. Materials:

    2. Trough with fins, perforated cupper tube, conduit and valves cost about $165.

    3. Total initial costs equal $165.

    4. Power: No power

    5. Water consumption is equal to 180 L/h about 1800 L/day = 54,000 L/month $27.0. In case of not used the water again in domestic purposes.

    6. Operation and maintenance: $8.0

    7. The running cost is assumed to be equal to $35.0/month per module [41], [42], [43].

References

1. Dorobantu, L, Popescu, MO. Increasing the efficiency of photovoltaic plants through cooling water film. UPB Sci Bull Series C 2013;75:223–32.Search in Google Scholar

2. Amr, AA, Hassan, AAM, Abdel-Salam, M, El-Sayed, AM. Enhancement of photovoltaic system performance via passive cooling: theory versus experiment. Renew Energy 2019;40:88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.048.Search in Google Scholar

3. Tonui, JK, Tripanagnostopoulos, Y. Improved PV/T solar collectors with heat extraction by forced or natural air circulation. Renew Energy 2007;32:623–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

4. Tonui, JK, Tripanagnostopoulos, Y. Air-cooled PV/T solar collectors with low cost performance improvements. Sol Energy 2007;81:498–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2006.08.002.Search in Google Scholar

5. bin Azahari, MA, Long, CY, YitYan, K. Performance analysis of photovoltaic module with different passive cooling methods. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021;945:012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/945/1/012016.Search in Google Scholar

6. Ahmad, EZ, Sopian, K, Jarimi, H, Fazlizan, A, ElbrekiA, A, Abd Hamid, A, et al.. Recent advances in passive cooling methods for photovoltaic performance enhancement. Int J Electr Comput Eng 2021;11:146–54. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v11i1.pp146-154.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dubey, S, Sandhu, GS, Tiwari, GN. Analytical expression for electrical efficiency of PV/T hybrid air collector. Appl Energy 2009;86:697–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

8. Teo, HG, Lee, PS, Hawlader, MNA. An active cooling system for photovoltaic modules. Appl Energy 2012;90:309–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.017.Search in Google Scholar

9. Touafek, K, Khelifa, A, Boutina, L, Tabet, I, Haddad, S. Theoretical study and experimental validation of energetic performances of photovoltaic/thermal air collector. Int J Photo Energy 2018;2018:2794068. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2794068.Search in Google Scholar

10. Maghrabie, HM, Mohamed, ASA, Ahmed, MS. Experimental investigation of a combined photovoltaic thermal system via air cooling for summer weather of Egypt. J Thermal Sci Eng Appl 2020;12:041022. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046597.Search in Google Scholar

11. Abdolzadeh, M, Ameri, M. Improving the effectiveness of photovoltaic water pumping system by spraying water over the front of photovoltaic cells. Renew Energy 2009;34:91–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.03.024.Search in Google Scholar

12. Moharram, KA, Abd-Elhady, MS, Kandil, HA, El-Sherif, H. Enhancement for performance of photovoltaic panels by water cooling. Ain Shams Eng J 2013;4:869–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2013.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

13. Abdolzadeh, M, Ameri, M, Mehrabian, MA. Effects of water spray over the photovoltaic modules on the performance of a photovoltaic water pumping system under different operation condition. Energy Sources A 2011;33:1546–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2010.499416.Search in Google Scholar

14. Salih, SM, Ibrahim, O, Abid, KW. Performance enhancement of PV array based on water spraying technique. Int J Sustain Green Energy 2015;4:8–13.Search in Google Scholar

15. Nizetic, S, Coko, D, Yada, A, Grubisic-Cabo, F. Water spray cooling technique applied on a photovoltaic panel: the performance response. Energy Convers Manag 2016;108:287–91.10.1016/j.enconman.2015.10.079Search in Google Scholar

16. Benato, A, Stoppato, A, Vanna, FD, Schiro, F. Spraying cooling system for PV modules: experimental measurements for temperature trends assessment and system design feasibility. Designs 2021;5:25. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs5020025.Search in Google Scholar

17. Krauter, S. Increased electrical yield via water flow over the front of photovoltaic panels. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 2004;82:131–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.01.011.Search in Google Scholar

18. Tabaei, H, Ameri, M. Improving the effectiveness of a photovoltaic water pumping system by using booster reflector and cooling array surface by film of water. Trans Mech Eng 2015;39:51–60.Search in Google Scholar

19. Hachicha, AA, Ghenai, C, Hamid, AK. Enhancing the performance of a photovoltaic module using different cooling methods. World Academy Sci Eng Technol Int J Environ Chem Ecol 2015;9:1106–9.Search in Google Scholar

20. Harahap, HA, Dewi, T, Rusdianasari. Automatic cooling system for efficiency and output enhancement of a PV system application in Palembang, Indonesia. J Phys Conf Ser 2019; 1167:012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1167/1/012027.Search in Google Scholar

21. Lubon, W, Pelka, G, Janowski, M, Pajak, L, Stefaniuk, M, Kotyza, J, et al.. Assessing the impact of water cooling on PV modules efficiency. Energies 2020;13:2414. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102414.Search in Google Scholar

22. Govardhanan, MS, Kumaraguruparan, G, Kameswari, M, Saravanan, R, Vivar, M, Srithar, K. Photovoltaic module with uniform water flow on top surface. Hindawi Int J Photoenergy 2020; 2020:8473253. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8473253.Search in Google Scholar

23. Silva, V, Martinez, J, Heideier, R, Bernal, J, Gimenes, A, Udaetaand, M, et al.. A long-term analysis of the architecture and operation of water film cooling system for commercial PV modules. Energies 2021;14:1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061515.Search in Google Scholar

24. Mehrotra, S, Rawat, P, Debbarma, M, Sudhakar, K. Performance of a Solar panel with water immersion cooling technique. Int J Sci Environ Technol 2014;3:1161–72.Search in Google Scholar

25. Sivakumar, B, Navakrishnan, S, Ravi Cibi, M, Senthil, R. Experimental study on the electrical performance of a solar photovoltaic panel by water immersion. Environ Sci Pollut Control Ser 2021;28:42981–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15228-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Tang, X, Quan, Z, Zhao, Y. Experimental investigation of solar panel cooling by a novel micro heat pipe array. Energy Power Eng 2010;2:171–4. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2010.23025.Search in Google Scholar

27. Bhattacharjee, S, Acharya, S, Potar, | A, Meena, A, Bairwa, DS, Meena, D, et al.. An investigational back surface cooling approach with different designs of heat-absorbing pipe for PV/T system. Int J Energy Res 2017;42:1921–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.3977.Search in Google Scholar

28. Shalaby, SM, Elfakharany, MK, Moharram, BM, Abosheiasha, HF. Experimental study on the performance of PV with water cooling. Energy Rep 2022;8:957–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.155.Search in Google Scholar

29. Abdelrahman, M, Abdellatif, O. Experimental investigation of different cooling methods for photovoltaic module. In: 11th international energy conversion engineering conference. San Jose, CA, USA; 2013.10.2514/6.2013-4096Search in Google Scholar

30. Idoko, L, Anaya-Lara, O, McDonald, A. Enhancing PV modules efficiency and power output using multi-concept cooling technique. Energy Rep 2018;4:357–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

31. Dwivedi, P, Sudhakar, K, Soni, A, Solomin, E, Kirpichnikova, I. Advanced cooling techniques of P.V. modules: a state of art. Case Stud Therm Eng 2020;21:100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2020.100674.Search in Google Scholar

32. Adil Khan, M, Ko, B, Nyari, A, Eugene Park, S, Je Kim, H. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic solar system with different cooling methods and a Bi-reflector with different cooling methods and a Bi-reflector PV system (BRPVS): an experimental study and comparative analysis. Energies 2017;10:826.10.3390/en10060826Search in Google Scholar

33. Ali, AH, Abdalrahman, KHM, Swahid, S. Studying the influence of different cooling techniques on photovoltaic-cells performance. J. Modern Res 2019;1:13–18. https://doi.org/10.21608/jmr.2019.12713.1002.Search in Google Scholar

34. Agyekum, EB, Kumar, SE, Alwan, NT, Velkin, VI, Shcheklein, SE, Yaqoob, SJ. Experimental investigation of the effect of a combination of active and passive cooling mechanism on the thermal characteristics and efficiency of solar PV module. Inventions 2021;6:63. https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions6040063.Search in Google Scholar

35. Chandan, D, Arunachala, UC, Varun, K. Improved energy conversion of a photovoltaic module thermos electric generator hybrid system with different cooling techniques: indoor and outdoor performance comparison. Int J Energy Res 2022;46:9498–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.7820.Search in Google Scholar

36. Suntech. Polycrystalline solar module STP 250-20/wd 250W. Available from: www.suntech-power.com, IEC-STD -WD-No1.01-Rev (2013).Search in Google Scholar

37. Skoplaki, E, Palyvos, JA. On the temperature dependence of photovoltaic module electrical performance: a review of efficiency/power correlations. Sol Energy 2009;83:614–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2008.10.008.Search in Google Scholar

38. Duffie, JA, Beckman, WA. Solar engineering of thermal processes, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, INC; 2013.10.1002/9781118671603Search in Google Scholar

39. Sarhaddi, F, Farahat, S, Ajam, H, Behzadmehr, A, Adeli, MM. An improved thermal and electrical model for a solar photovoltaic thermal (PV/T) air collector thermal (PV/T) air collector. Appl Energy 2010;87:2328–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

40. Modern Waters Systems Production DRIPPER PC. Comer BY NEISCO. Available from: https://www.neiscoegypt.com.Search in Google Scholar

41. Macaluso, J. RS means, cost data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Available from: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/joe-macaluso/13/62/3a5.Search in Google Scholar

42. World Bank country classification by income level 2020 – 2021. Available from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/ar/open data/new- world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2020-2021.Search in Google Scholar

43. Average salary in United States 2023. Available from: http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?loc=229&loctype=1.Search in Google Scholar

44. The global average price per kilowatt of electricity. Available from: https://www.electricrate.com/data-center/electricity-prices-by-country; https://ar.globalpetrolprices.com/USA/electricity_prices.//.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-12-23
Accepted: 2024-04-08
Published Online: 2024-04-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2023-0477/html
Scroll to top button