Home Technology Real Time Harmonic Mitigation Using Fuzzy Based Highly Reliable Three Dual-Buck Full-Bridge APF for Dynamic Unbalanced Load
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Real Time Harmonic Mitigation Using Fuzzy Based Highly Reliable Three Dual-Buck Full-Bridge APF for Dynamic Unbalanced Load

  • Ranjeeta Patel EMAIL logo and Anup Kumar Panda
Published/Copyright: March 20, 2018

Abstract

This study presents a highly reliable 3-phase 4-wire, three dual-buck full-bridge shunt active power filter (3 DB FB APF) for distribution system. The proposed topology uses three single phase dual buck full bridge inverter sharing the same dc-link capacitor with high utilization of dc-bus voltage. The dual buck inverter circuit composed of one power switch and one diode leg instead of two power switches conventional inverter leg effectually eliminate the undesirable “shoot-through” phenomenon occurs in conventional inverter circuit. The fuzzy and adaptive hysteresis current controller based id-iq control strategy has been adopted to generate optimized switching frequency. For validation, the proposed topology is implemented in the OPAL-RT LAB using OP5142-Spartan 3 FPGA. The dynamic performance of the proposed 3 DB FB APF is assessed for sinusoidal, unbalanced and non-sinusoidal voltage source condition with unbalanced non-linear load that is when both three-phase and single-phase loads are present in the system. Besides, the results with proportional-integral (PI) controller are compared with FLC in terms of harmonic compensation. Furthermore, a comparison has been made between split capacitor dual buck half bridge active power filter (2C DB HB APF) and proposed 3 DB FB APF based on switch power rating.

References

[1] Khadkikar V, Chandra A, Singh B. Digital signal processor implementation and performance evaluation of split capacitor, four leg and three H-bridge-based three-phase four-wire shunt active filters. IET Power Electron. 2011;4(4):463–70.10.1049/iet-pel.2010.0198Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chen Z, Chen M. Active filter solutions with high reliability for more electric aircraft. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Montreal, QC, Oct. 2012:197–20310.1109/IECON.2012.6388808Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chen Z, Chen M. Interleaved buck cell based full-bridge shunt active power filter. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conversion congress and Exposition (ECCE), Phoenix, AZ, Raleigh, NC, Sept. 2012:996–100710.1109/ECCE.2012.6342710Search in Google Scholar

[4] Patel R, Panda AK. Real time implementation of PI and fuzzy logic controller based 3-phase 4-wire interleaved buck active power filter for mitigation of harmonics with the id-iq control strategy. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2014;59:66–78.10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.01.021Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gnanasambandam K, Rathore AK, Edpuganti A. Current-Fed multilevel converters: an overview of circuit topologies, modulation techniques, and applications. IEEE Trans Power Electronics. 2017;32(5):3382–401.10.1109/TPEL.2016.2585576Search in Google Scholar

[6] Rathore AK, Holtz J, Boller T. Generalized optimal pulse width modulation of multilevel inverters for low-switching-frequency control of medium-voltage high-power industrial AC drives. IEEE Trans Ind Electronics. 2013;60(10):4215–24.10.1109/TIE.2012.2217717Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ciro A, Giuseppe T. Predictive compensation of dead-time effects in VSI feeding induction motors. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 2001;37(3):856–63.10.1109/28.924768Search in Google Scholar

[8] Stanley GR. Opposed current power converter. U.S. Patent, Applicat. No. 5657219, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ken T, Feng T, Xing C. Method and system for shoot-through protection. U.S. Patent US8749939 B2, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zargari NR, Ziagos PD, Geza J. A two-switch high –performance current regulated DC/AC converter module. IEEE Trans Ind Appl. 1995;31(3):583–89.10.1109/28.382119Search in Google Scholar

[11] Yao Z, Xiao L, Yan Y. Dual-buck full-bridge inverter with hysteresis current control. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2009;56(8):3153–60.10.1109/TIE.2009.2022072Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chen L, Peng FZ. Dead-time elimination for voltage source inverters. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2008;23(2):574–80.10.1109/TPEL.2007.915766Search in Google Scholar

[13] Stanley GR, Bradshaw KM. Precision DC-to-AC conversion by optimization of the output current waveform – the half-bridge revisited. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 1999;14(2):372–80.10.1109/63.750191Search in Google Scholar

[14] Boller T, Holtz J, Rathore AK. Optimal pulsewidth modulation of a dual three-level inverter system operated from a single DC link. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2012;48:1610–15.10.1109/ECCE.2011.6064229Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gruzs TM. A survey of neutral currents in three-phase computer power systems’. IEEE Trans Appl. 1990;26:719–25.10.1109/28.55999Search in Google Scholar

[16] Campanhol LBG, Oliveira Da Silva SA, Goedtel A. Application of shunt active power filter for harmonic reduction and reactive power compensation in three-phase four-wire systems. IET Power Electron. 2014;7(11):2825–36.10.1049/iet-pel.2014.0027Search in Google Scholar

[17] Panda AK, Patel R. Adaptive hysteresis and fuzzy logic controlled-based shunt active power filter resistant to shoot-through phenomenon. IET Power Electron. 2015;8(10):1963–77.10.1049/iet-pel.2014.0680Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chauhan SK, Shah MC, Tiwari RR, Tekwani PN. Analysis, design and digital implementation of a shunt active power filter with different schemes of reference current generation. IET Power Electron. 2014;7(3):627–39.10.1049/iet-pel.2013.0113Search in Google Scholar

[19] Soares V, Verdelho P, Marques GD. An instantaneous active and reactive current component method for active filters. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2000;15(4):660–69.10.1109/63.849036Search in Google Scholar

[20] Bose BK. An adaptive hysteresis-band current control technique of a voltage-fed PWM inverter for machine drives system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 1990;35(5):402–08.10.1109/IECON.1988.665779Search in Google Scholar

[21] Kale M, Ozdemir E. An adaptive hysteresis band current controller for shunt active power filter. Electric Power Syst Research. 2005;73(2):113–19.10.1016/j.epsr.2004.06.006Search in Google Scholar

[22] Narongrit T, Areerak K, Areerak K. New design approach of fuzzy controller for shunt active power filter. Elect Power Comp Syst. 2015;43(6):685–94.10.1080/15325008.2014.996680Search in Google Scholar

[23] Mikkili S, Panda AK. Simulation and real time implementation of shunt active filter id-iq control strategy for mitigation of harmonics with different membership functions. IET Power Electron. 2012;5(9):1856–72.10.1049/iet-pel.2012.0254Search in Google Scholar

[24] Dongrui W, Mendel JM. On the continuity of type-1 and interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems. 2011;19(1):179 –92.10.1109/TFUZZ.2010.2091962Search in Google Scholar

[25] RT-Lab Professional. <http://www.opal-rt.com/product/rt-lab-professionals>.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-8-15
Accepted: 2018-1-29
Published Online: 2018-3-20

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2017-0167/html
Scroll to top button