A New Method for Setting Calculation Sequence of Directional Relay Protection in Multi-Loop Networks

References

1. Jenkins L, Khincha HP, S Shivakumar, P. K. Dash. An application of functional dependencies to the topological analysis of protection schemes. Trans Power Delivery 1992;7(1):77–83.10.1109/61.108892Search in Google Scholar

2. Madani SM, Rijanto H. A new application of graph theory for coordination of protective relays. IEEE Power Eng Rev 1998;18(6):43–5.10.1109/MPER.1998.1236740Search in Google Scholar

3. Guochen C, guowei C, Haijun W. Problems and solutions in relay setting and coordination. Proc CSEE 2003;21(10):51–6.Search in Google Scholar

4. Zhihui D, Zengping W, Yanjun J, Shujiang C. Probabilistic assessment method for failure risk of stepped protection philosophy. Trans China Electrotech Soc 2012;27(6):175–82.Search in Google Scholar

5. Chen Ji, Feipeng Lü, Shuya H. A novel algorithm for network partition of relay coordination in a complicated multi-loop power networks. Relay 2006;34(23):6–10.Search in Google Scholar

6. Yinhong Li, Xianzhong D. Study on the simple loop formation method in relay coordination. Proce CSEE 2003;23(2):20–5.Search in Google Scholar

7. Feipeng Lü, Linshu Mi, Kexun J. Neural approach to determine minimum breakpoint set for optimal coordination of directional protective relays in multiloop networks. Proce CSEE 1997;17(3):184–9.Search in Google Scholar

8. Quanming Y, Weiyong Yu, Yan X, Ying Y. A practical algorithm to determination minimum breakpoint set for option coordination of directional protective relaying in multiloop networks. Autom Electr Power Syst 2004;28(7):71–4.Search in Google Scholar

9. Zhigang Lu, Xiaowei X, Xuping Li. A new method of solving optimal breakpoint sets for protection coordination in multiloop network. Autom Electr Power Syst 2012;38(7):86–91.Search in Google Scholar

10. Shaoqun S, Yongli Z, Xiaozhe W. A practical algorithm for determining breakpoint set of directional relay in multiloop power networks. Autom Electr Power Syst 2007;31(2):65–9.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dan L, Feipeng L. A novel method for determining minimum breakpoint set based on network graph simplification and coordination relationships of relays. Autom Electr Power Syst 2008;32(16):24–7.Search in Google Scholar

12. Jing Ma, Donghua Ye, Tong W, Z Wang, X Chen. Calculation of minimum breakpoint set for multi-area complex loop network of power system. Proce CSEE 2011;31(28):104–11.Search in Google Scholar

13. Xiangliang Z, Feipeng Lu, Yunkun Li, Y Zhang, QI Qi. A method for selecting a minimum breakpoint set (MBPS) from multi-MBPS with the same cardinal number based on evaluation of relay protection importance. Autom Electr Power Syst 2012;36(10):90–3.10.1049/cp.2012.0933Search in Google Scholar

14. Feipeng L. A novel method for determining the optimal coordination sequence of directional relays in a complicated multi-loop power networks based on coordination relationships of relays. Autom Electr Power Syst 2005;29(24):65–9.Search in Google Scholar

15. Wen-Yue Z., Fei-Peng L, Xiao-Jun L. Artificial bee colony algorithm based determination of minimum breakpoint set for coordination of directional protective relay in multi-loop networks. Power Syst Prot Control 2013;41(6):77–81.Search in Google Scholar

16. Longxing J, Yihong L, D Shi, Z Yang, Y Wang. Computing of minimum breakpoint set using optimization algorithm considering its space distribution characteristics. Autom Electr Power Syst 2013;37(7):60–5.Search in Google Scholar

17. Ji C, Feipeng L, Shuya H. An improved discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm to determine minimum breakpoint set of directional protection for multi-loop network. Power Syst Technol 2008;32(12):90–4.Search in Google Scholar

18. Longxing J, Yihong L. A method for updating minimum breakpoint set adaptive to arbitrary topology change. Autom Electr Power Syst 2013;37(14):95–100.Search in Google Scholar

19. Winter K. Formalising behaviour trees with CSP. Integr Formal Methods 2004;2999:148–67.10.1007/978-3-540-24756-2_9Search in Google Scholar

20. Sejrsgaard-Jacobsen K, Larsen S, Olsen T, Jonas Groth, Long Huy Phan. Applying behavior trees to starcraft AI [EB/OL]. Available at: http://projekter.aau.dk/projekter/files/42802565/Rapport.pdf: Accessed 12 Jul 2013.Search in Google Scholar

21. Swigart J. Omni-bot: building flexible AI for ENEMY TERRITORY and multiplayer action games [EB/OL]. Available at: http://aigamedev.com/plus/interview/omnibot-enemy-territory: Accessed 12 Jul 2013.Search in Google Scholar

22. Colvin RJ, Hayes IJ. A semantics for behavior trees using CSP with specification commands. J Sci Comput Programming 2011;76(10):891–914.10.1016/j.scico.2010.11.007Search in Google Scholar

23. ZhiLiang W, Xia Y, ChuanMing J. A formal method to real-time protocol interoperability testing. Sci China Ser F Inf Sci 2008;51:1723–44.10.1007/s11432-008-0153-7Search in Google Scholar

24. Sun J, Liu Y, Dong JS, X, Zhang. Verifying stateful timed CSP using implicit clocks and zone abstraction. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods: Formal Methods and Software Engineering. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009:581–600.10.1007/978-3-642-10373-5_30Search in Google Scholar

25. Colvin R, Grunske L, Winter K. Timed BT for failure mode and effects analysis of time-critical systems. J Syst Software 2008;81(12):2163–82.10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.035Search in Google Scholar