Startseite A Novel Load Shedding Scheme for Voltage Stability
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A Novel Load Shedding Scheme for Voltage Stability

  • Sunil S. Damodhar EMAIL logo und S. Krishna
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 7. Oktober 2016

Abstract

Undervoltage load shedding serves to maintain voltage stability when a majority of loads are fast acting. An undervoltage load shedding scheme should address two tasks: the detection of voltage instability following a large disturbance and the determination of the amount of load to be shed. Additionally, in case of short-term voltage instability, the scheme should be fast. This paper proposes a method to predict voltage instability arising due to a large disturbance. The amount of load to be shed to maintain voltage stability is then determined from the Thevenin equivalent of the network as seen from the local bus. The proposed method uses local measurements of bus voltage and power, and does not require knowledge of the network. The method is validated by simulation of three test systems subjected to a large disturbance. The proposed scheme is fairly accurate in estimating the minimum amount of load to be shed to maintain stability. The method is also successful in maintaining stability in cases where voltage collapse is detected at multiple buses.

Appendix

8.1 Turbine data

Data for single reheat turbine Kundur [24]: FHP=0.3,TRH=7.0 s, Speed droop R=5%.

References

1. Taylor C. Concepts of undervoltage load shedding for voltage stability. IEEE Trans Power Del 1992;7:480–8.10.1109/61.127040Suche in Google Scholar

2. Tuan T, Fandino J, Hadjsaid N, Sabonnadiere J, Vu H. Emergency load shedding to avoid risks of voltage instability using indicators. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1994;9:341–51.10.1109/59.317592Suche in Google Scholar

3. Arnborg S, Andersson G, Hill D, Hiskens I. On undervoltage load shedding in power systems. Int J Electri Power Energy Syst 1997;19:141–9.10.1016/S0142-0615(96)00040-3Suche in Google Scholar

4. Vu K, Begovic M, Novosel D, Saha M. Use of local measurements to estimate voltage-stability margin. In Power Industry Computer Applications, 1997. 20th International Conference on, 1997:318–23.10.1109/PICA.1997.599420Suche in Google Scholar

5. Xu W, Mansour Y. Voltage stability analysis using generic dynamic load models. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1994;9:479–93.10.1109/59.317575Suche in Google Scholar

6. Balanathan R, Pahalawaththa N, Annakkage U, Sharp P. Undervoltage load shedding to avoid voltage instability. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 1998b;145:175–81.10.1049/ip-gtd:19981815Suche in Google Scholar

7. Balanathan R, Pahalawaththa N, Annakkage U. A strategy for undervoltage load shedding in power systems. In Power System Technology, 1998. Proceedings. POWERCON ̓98. 1998 International Conference on, volume 2, 1998a:1494–8.10.1109/ICPST.1998.729336Suche in Google Scholar

8. Wiszniewski A. New criteria of voltage stability margin for the purpose of load shedding. IEEE Trans Power Delivery 2007;22:1367–71.10.1109/TPWRD.2006.886772Suche in Google Scholar

9. Henriques, R.M, Martins N., Ferraz, J., Martins, A.C, Pinto, H., Sandoval Carneiro Jr. Impact of induction motor loads into voltage stability margins of large systems. In 14th Power Systems Computing Conference, 2002, Sevilha, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Abe S, Fukunaga Y, Isono A, Kondo B. Power system voltage stability. IEEE Trans Power App Syst 1982;PAS-101:3830–40.10.1109/TPAS.1982.317069Suche in Google Scholar

11. Sekine Y, Ohtsuki H. Cascaded voltage collapse. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1990;5:250–6.10.1109/59.49113Suche in Google Scholar

12. Ohtsuki H, Yokoyama A, Sekine Y. Reverse action of on-load tap changer in association with voltage collapse. IEEE Power Eng Rev 1991;11:300–6.10.1109/MPER.1991.88747Suche in Google Scholar

13. Pal M. Voltage stability conditions considering load characteristics. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1992;7:243–9.10.1109/59.141710Suche in Google Scholar

14. Pal M. Voltage stability: analysis needs, modelling requirement, and modelling adequacy. IEE Proce Gener Transm Distrib 1993;140:279–86.10.1049/ip-c.1993.0041Suche in Google Scholar

15. IEEE. Standard load models for power flow and dynamic performance simulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1995;10:1302–13.10.1109/59.466523Suche in Google Scholar

16. Corsi S, Taranto G. A real-time voltage instability identification algorithm based on local phasor measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008;23:1271–9.10.1109/TPWRS.2008.922586Suche in Google Scholar

17. Abdelkader S, Morrow D. Online tracking of Thevenin equivalent parameters using PMU measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2012;27:975–83.10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2178868Suche in Google Scholar

18. Octave GNU. GNU Octave 3.2.4. Available at: http://www.octave.org.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Sauer P, Pai M. Power system dynamics and stability. Delhi: Prentice Hall, 1998.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Padiyar K. Power system dynamics. Hyderabad: BS Publications, 2002.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Power System Test Case Archive. University of Washington Power System Test Case Archive. Available at: http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Adewole AC, Tzoneva R, Apostolov A. Adaptive under-voltage load shedding scheme for large interconnected smart grids based on wide area synchrophasor measurements. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2016;10:1957–68.10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.1250Suche in Google Scholar

23. Deuse J, Dubois J, Fanna R, Hamza I. EWR under voltage load shedding scheme. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1997;12:1446–54.10.1109/59.627840Suche in Google Scholar

24. Kundur P. Power system stability and control. EPRI power system engineering series. Delhi: McGraw-Hill Education (India) Pvt Limited, 1994.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-10-7
Published in Print: 2016-12-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 17.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2015-0159/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen