Home Novel Scheme to Improve Power Factor of Slip Energy Recovery Drive by Selective Harmonic Elimination
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Novel Scheme to Improve Power Factor of Slip Energy Recovery Drive by Selective Harmonic Elimination

  • C. Ismayil EMAIL logo and M. Nanda Kumar
Published/Copyright: June 19, 2014

Abstract

In this paper, the harmonic analysis of inverter voltage of a slip energy recovery drive (SERD) is carried out and proposes a novel approach to improve the supply side power factor of the overall drive system. The proposed model is a self-commutated SERD using IGBT inverter, and a modulation technique called selective harmonic elimination (SHE) is applied to improve the supply side power factor. The complete solutions for switching patterns to eliminate the fifth and seventh harmonics are developed using genetic algorithm. SHE method is simulated in semi-open-loop mode, and the power factor of the drive is compared with conventional line commutated thyristor inverter-based SERD. Simulations have been carried out in Matlab/Simulink environment to predetermine the performance of the drive, and results show a significant improvement in the input power factor of the drive.

Acknowledgments

The first author takes this opportunity to express his deep sense of gratitude from the depth of his heart to his project guide Dr K. Sundareswaran, Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli for his invaluable guidance, moral support, kind cooperation and indispensable help throughout his PG course at the same institute.

Appendix: Parameters of the induction motor

ParameterSymbolValue
Rated powerPrat5 H.P. (3.73 kW)
Rated stator voltage*Vs,rat400 V
Rated stator current**Is,rat7.5 A
Rated frequencyfrat50 Hz
Rated slipSrat0.0667
Rated speedNrat1,400 rpm
Rated torqueTm,rat25.4 N-m
Number of pole pairsp2
Stator connectionWye/delta
Stator resistancers1.7 Ω/phase
Stator leakage reactance at 50 Hzxls2.4 Ω/phase
Stator reactance at 50 Hzxs = xls + xm68.88 Ω/phase
Stator inductanceLs0.2193 H/phase
Rotor resistancerr4.3 Ω/phase
Rotor leakage reactance at 50 Hzxlr2.4 Ω/phase
Rotor reactance at 50 Hzxr = xlr + xm68.88 Ω/phase
Rotor inductanceLr0.2193 H/phase
Magnetizing reactance at 50 HzXm66.49 Ω/phase
Magnetizing inductanceLm0.2116 H/phase
Rotor mass moment of inertiaJ0.092 N-m/(rad/s)

References

1. KrausePC, WasynczukO, HildebrandtM. Reference frame analysis of a slip energy recovery system. IEEE Trans Energy Conversion1988;3:4048.10.1109/60.4748Search in Google Scholar

2. MarquesGD. Numerical simulation method for the slip power recovery system. IEE Proc Electrical Power Appl1999;146:1724.10.1049/ip-epa:19990205Search in Google Scholar

3. AkpinarE, PillayP. A computer program to predict the performance of slip energy recovery induction motor drives. IEEE Trans Energy Conversion1990;5:35765.10.1109/60.107233Search in Google Scholar

4. KumarA, AggarwalSK, SainiLM, KumarA. Performance analysis of a microcontroller based slip power recovery drive. Int J Eng Sci Technol2011;3:2535.10.4314/ijest.v3i3.68418Search in Google Scholar

5. AkpinarE, PillayP. Modeling and performance of slip energy recovery induction motor drives. IEEE Trans Energy Conversion1990;5:20310.10.1109/60.50832Search in Google Scholar

6. DruryW, JonesBL, BrownJE. Application of controlled flywheeling to the recovery bridge of static Kramer drive. IEE Proc B1983;130:7385.10.1049/ip-b.1983.0013Search in Google Scholar

7. DruryW, JonesBL, BrownJE. Performance of current-fed inverter system with controlled flywheeling applied to supply convertor. IEE Proc B1982;129:26270.10.1049/ip-b.1982.0038Search in Google Scholar

8. ThangarajuI, MadheswaranM. Performance analysis of double inverter fed wound rotor induction motor using fuzzy and PI controller. Int J Comput Appl (0975–8887)2010;1:809.10.5120/416-614Search in Google Scholar

9. AkpinarE, PillayP, ErsakA. Calculation of the overlap angle in slip energy recovery drives using a d,q/abc model. IEEE Trans Energy Conversion1993;8:22935.10.1109/60.222709Search in Google Scholar

10. FaizJ, BaratiH, AkpinarE. Harmonic analysis and performance improvement of slip energy recovery induction motor drives. IEEE Trans Power Electron2001;16:41017.10.1109/63.923774Search in Google Scholar

11. WellsJR, NeeBM, ChapmanPL, KreinPT. Selective harmonic control: a general problem formulation and selected solutions,. IEEE Trans Power Electron2005;20:133745.10.1109/TPEL.2005.857541Search in Google Scholar

12. ChiassonJN, TolbertLM, McKenzieKJ, DuZ. A complete solution to the harmonic elimination problem. IEEE Trans Power Electron2004;19:4919.10.1109/TPEL.2003.823207Search in Google Scholar

13. GoldbergDE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization & machine learning. Delhi, India: Pearson Education, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

14. SundareswaranK, VasuM. Genetic tuning of PI controller for speed control of DC motor drive. Proc IEEE Int Conf Ind Technol2000;1:5215.Search in Google Scholar

15. SundareswaranK, LaxminarayanaD. An evolutionary approachfor speed controller design of A.C. voltage controller fed-induction motor drive. Electric Power Components Syst2002;30:100114.10.1080/15325000290085325Search in Google Scholar

16. BoseBK. Modern power electronics and AC drives. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

17. Grahame HolmesD, LipoTA. Pulse width modulation for power converters: Principles and Practice. IEEE series on power engineering. IEEE Press and John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, USA, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

18. DubeyGK. Power semiconductor controlled drives. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2014-6-19
Published in Print: 2014-8-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2013-0122/html
Scroll to top button