Subjective outcome evaluation of the community-based P.A.T.H.S Project: views of program implementers

References

1. Omer H, Lebowitz ER. Nonviolent resistance: Helping caregivers reduce problematic behaviors in children and adolescents. J Marital Fam Ther 2016;42:688–700.10.1111/jmft.12168Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Donovan JE, Jessor R. Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. J Consult Clin Psychol 1985;53:890–904.10.1037/0022-006X.53.6.890Suche in Google Scholar

3. Shek DT. Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: relevance to positive youth development programs in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:341–54.10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.3.341Suche in Google Scholar

4. Ho SM, Lee TM. Computer usage and its relationship with adolescent lifestyle in Hong Kong. Adolesc Health 2001;29:258–66.10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00261-0Suche in Google Scholar

5. Shek DT, Keung Ma H, Sun RC. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2011;11:2243–56.10.1100/2011/896835Suche in Google Scholar

6. Gil AG, Wagner EF, Tubman JG. Culturally sensitive substance abuse intervention for Hispanic and African American adolescents: empirical examples from the Alcohol Treatment Targeting Adolescents in Need (ATTAIN) Project. Addiction 2004;99(s2):140–50.10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00861.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Filazzola AD, Botvin EM. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up. Addict Behav 1990;15:47–63.10.1016/0306-4603(90)90006-JSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Sosin MR, Bruni M, Reidy M. Paths and impacts in the progressive independence model: a homelessness and substance abuse intervention in Chicago. J Addict Dis 1996;14:1–20.10.1300/J069v14n04_01Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Smith EJ. The strength-based counseling model. Couns Psychol 2006;34:13–79.10.1177/0011000005277018Suche in Google Scholar

10. Martin S. Building resilience from the grassroots up. Monit Psychol 2002;33:52–3.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Jessor R, Turbin MS, Costa FM, Dong Q, Zhang H, Wang C. Adolescent problem behavior in China and the United States: a cross-national study of psychosocial protective factors. J Res Adolesc 2003;13:329–60.10.1111/1532-7795.1303004Suche in Google Scholar

12. Shek DT, Leung JT. Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: phenomena and implications for youth service. In: Shek DT, Sun RC, eds. Development and evaluation of positive adolescent training through holistic social programs (P.A.T.H.S.). Singapore: Springer, 2013:1–13.10.1007/978-981-4451-54-3Suche in Google Scholar

13. Shek DT, Sun RC. The Project PATHS in Hong Kong: development, training, implementation, and evaluation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013;26:S2–9.10.1016/j.jpag.2013.03.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Law BM, Shek DT. Process evaluation of a positive youth development program: Project P.A.T.H.S. Res Soc Work 2011;21:539–48.10.1177/1049731511404436Suche in Google Scholar

15. Scheirer MA. Designing and using process evaluation. Handb Pract Program Eval 1994;5:40–68.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Shek DT, Ma HK, Sun RC. Interim evaluation of the Tier 1 Program (Secondary 1 Curriculum) of the Project PATHS: first year of the full implementation phase. ScientificWorldJ 2008;8:47–60.10.1100/tsw.2008.5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Shek DT, Sun RC, Kan VW. Full implementation of the Secondary 1 program of Project PATHS: observations based on the co-walker scheme. ScientificWorldJ 2009;9:982–91.10.1100/tsw.2009.116Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Schalock RL. Outcome-based evaluation. NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Shek DT, Yu L. Subjective outcome evaluation of the project PATHS (extension phase) based on the perspective of program implementer. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012:1–8.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Shek DT, Yu L, Ho VY. Subjective outcome evaluation and factors related to perceived effectiveness of the Project PATHS in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012: Article 490290, 10 pages. DOI: 10.1100/2012/490290.10.1100/2012/490290Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Shek DT, Siu AM, Lee TY. Subjective outcome evaluation of the Project PATHS: findings based on the perspective of the program implementers. ScientificWorldJ 2007;7:195–203.10.1100/tsw.2007.43Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Hofferth SL. The effects of programs and policies on adolescent pregnancy and childbearing. In Hofferth S, Yhes C, eds. Risking the future: adolescent sexuality, pregnancy and childbearing. Washington, DC, US: Department of Education, 1987:207–63.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Franklin C, Corcoran J. Preventing adolescent pregnancy: a review of programs and practices. Soc Work 2000;45:40–52.10.1093/sw/45.1.40Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Shek DT, Wu FK. The Project PATHS in Hong Kong: work done and lessons learned in a decade. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016;29:S3–11.10.1016/j.jpag.2015.10.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Shek DT, Zhu XQ, Wu FK. Subjective outcome evaluation of the community-based program of the P.A.T.H.S. project in Hong Kong. Int J Child Adolesc Health, in press.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Shek DT, Law MY. Evaluation of programs for adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: community-based Project PATHS in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Med Health, 2016. Epub ahead of print 14 Jun 2016. DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2017-3004.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Shek DT, Ng CM, Law MY. Positive youth development programs for adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: evaluation based on program implementers. Int J Child Adolesc Health, 2016. Epub ahead of print 14 Jun 2016. DOI: 10.1515/ijamh-2017-3005.10.1515/ijamh-2017-3005Suche in Google Scholar

28. Shek DT, Lin L. Project P.A.T.H.S. for adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: evaluation based on the program implementers. Int J Child Adolesc Health, in press.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Forman SG, Olin SS, Hoagwood KE, Crowe M, Saka N. Evidence-based interventions in schools: developers’ views of implementation barriers and facilitators. Sch Ment Health 2009;1:26–36.10.1007/s12310-008-9002-5Suche in Google Scholar

30. Taut S. What have we learned about stakeholder involvement in program evaluation? Stud Educ Eval 2008;34:224–30.10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.10.007Suche in Google Scholar

31. Cousins JB, Whitmore E. Framing participatory evaluation. New Dir Eval 1998;1998:5–23.10.1002/ev.1114Suche in Google Scholar

32. Greene JC. Stakeholder participation in evaluation design: is it worth the effort?. Eval Program Plann 1987;10:379–94.10.1016/0149-7189(87)90010-3Suche in Google Scholar

33. Sun RC, Shek DT. Perceived program qualities and outcomes of a youth program in Hong Kong: based on the views of the workers. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:S10–6.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.007Suche in Google Scholar

34. House ER. Stakeholder bias. New Dir Eval 2003;2003:53–6.10.1002/ev.75Suche in Google Scholar

35. Winefield HR, Barlow, JA. Client and worker satisfaction in a child protection agency. Child Abuse Negl 1995;19:897–905.10.1016/0145-2134(95)00052-ASuche in Google Scholar

36. Glass JS, Shoffner MF. Adventure-based counseling in schools. Prof Sch Couns 2001;5:42–8.Suche in Google Scholar

37. Moote Jr GT, Wodarski JS. The acquistion of life skills through adventure-based activities and programs: a review of the literature. Adolescence 1997;32:143–67.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Harris PM, Mealy L, Matthews H, Lucas R, Moczygemba M. A wilderness challenge program as correctional treatment. J Offender Rehabil 1993;19:149–64.10.1300/J076v19n03_11Suche in Google Scholar

39. Koperski H, Tucker AR, Lung DM, Gass MA. The impact of community based adventure therapy on stress and coping skills in adults. The Practitioner Scholar: J Couns Prof Psychol 2015;4:1–16.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Cyberbullying: neither an epidemic nor a rarity. Eur J Dev Psychol 2012;9:539–43.10.1080/17405629.2012.706448Suche in Google Scholar

41. Penner LA. Volunteerism and social problems: making things better or worse?. J Soc Issues 2004;60:645–66.10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00377.xSuche in Google Scholar

42. Omoto AM, Snyder M. Sustained helping without obligation: motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. J Pers Soc Psychol 1995;68:671–86.10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.671Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Allen JP, Kuperminc G, Philliber S, Herre K. Programmatic prevention of adolescent problem behaviors: the role of autonomy, relatedness, and volunteer service in the Teen Outreach Program. Am J Community Psychol 1994;22:595–615.10.1007/BF02506896Suche in Google Scholar

44. Whiston SC, Quinby RF. Review of school counseling outcome research. Psychol Sch 2009;46:267–72.10.1002/pits.20372Suche in Google Scholar

45. Eccles JS, Barber BL. Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band what kind of extracurricular involvement matters? J Adolesc Res 1999;14:10–43.10.1177/0743558499141003Suche in Google Scholar

46. Kobayashi M, Lockee B. Evidence-based approaches for self-regulated learning. Educ 2008;5:32–44.Suche in Google Scholar

47. Epstein JL, Sanders MG. Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody J Educ 2006;81:81–120.10.1207/S15327930pje8102_5Suche in Google Scholar

48. Hoover-Dempsey KV, Walker JM, Jones KP, Reed RP. Teachers involving parents (TIP): results of an in-service teacher education program for enhancing parental involvement. Teach Teach Educ 2002;18:843–67.10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00047-1Suche in Google Scholar

49. Zellman GL, Waterman JM. Understanding the impact of parent school involvement on children’s educational outcomes. J Educ Res 1998;91:370–80.10.1080/00220679809597566Suche in Google Scholar

50. Hoover-Dempsey KV, Sandler HM. Parental involvement in children’s education: why does it make a difference? Teach Coll Rec 1995;95:310–31.10.1177/016146819509700202Suche in Google Scholar

51. Shek DT, Sun RC. Implementation of a positive youth development program in a Chinese context: the role of policy, program, people, process, and place. ScientificWorldJ 2008;8:980–96.10.1100/tsw.2008.120Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

52. Shek DT, Tsui PF, Law MY. Evaluation of a school-based positive youth development program in Hong Kong: views of junior secondary school students. Int J Child Health Hum Dev 2015;8:167–79.Suche in Google Scholar

53. Miller DT, Ross M. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychol Bull 1975;82:213–25.10.1037/h0076486Suche in Google Scholar