A concise and effectual method for neutral pitch identification in stuttered speech

References

1. Schuller B, Rigoll G, Lang M. Hidden markov model-based speech emotion recognition. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP ’03). 2003;2:401–4.Suche in Google Scholar

2. SUSAS – Linguistic Data Consortium. Available at: https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC99S78. Accessed December 12, 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Womack BD, Hansen JH. Stressed speech recognition using multi-dimensional hidden maskov models past research studies on stress. IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Proceedings. 1997;404–11.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Zhang JZ, Mbitiru N, Tay PC, Adams RD. Analysis of stress in speech using adaptive empirical mode decomposition. 2009 Conference Record of the Forty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 2009;361–5.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Steeneken H, Hansen J. Speech under stress conditions: overview of the effect on speech production and on system performance. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1999. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference. Phoenix, AZ, 1999;4:2079–82.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Nwe T, Foo S, De Silva C. Detection of stress and emotion in speech using traditional and FFT based log energy features. Information, Communications and Signal Processing, 2003 and Fourth Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia. Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Conference of the Fourth International Conference. 2003;3:1619–23.10.1109/ICICS.2003.1292741Suche in Google Scholar

7. Bou-ghazale SE, Hansen JH, Member S. A comparative study of traditional and newly proposed features for recognition of speech under stress. Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Transactions on 8.4, 2000:429–42.10.1109/89.848224Suche in Google Scholar

8. Berlin Database of Emotional Speech. Available at: http://www.expressive-speech.net/. Accessed March 27, 2015.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Sidorova J. Speech emotion recognition with TGI+. 2 classifier. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop, pp. 54–60. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009.10.3115/1609179.1609186Suche in Google Scholar

10. Chee LS. Automatic Detection of Prolongations and Repetitions using LPCC. International Conference for Technical Postgraduates 2009, TECHPOS. 2009:1–4.10.1109/TECHPOS.2009.5412080Suche in Google Scholar

11. Hariharan M, Vijean V, Fook CY, Yaacob S. Speech stuttering assessment using sample entropy and Least Square Support Vector Machine. In Proceedings – 2012 IEEE 8th International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA 2012:240–5.10.1109/CSPA.2012.6194726Suche in Google Scholar

12. Kishore KV, Satish PK. Emotion recognition in speech using MFCC and wavelet features. Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 2013 IEEE 3rd International. 2013:842–7.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Shukla S, Prasanna SR, Dandapat S. Stressed speech processing: human vs automatic in non-professional speakers scenario. 2011 National Conference on Communications (NCC). 2011:1–5. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1109/NCC.2011.5734704.10.1109/NCC.2011.5734704Suche in Google Scholar

14. Ramamohan S, Dandapat S. Sinusoidal model-based analysis and classification of stressed speech. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing. 2006:14:737–46.10.1109/TSA.2005.858071Suche in Google Scholar

15. Howell P, Davis S, Bartrip J. The University College London Archive of Stuttered Speech (UCLASS). J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009;52:556–69.10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0129)Suche in Google Scholar

16. Release 2. Available at: http://www.uclass.psychol.ucl.ac.uk/uclass2.htm. Accessed December 12, 2015.Suche in Google Scholar