Home Research on the relationship between articulation levels and social skills of Turkish children between the ages of 4 and 5 years
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Research on the relationship between articulation levels and social skills of Turkish children between the ages of 4 and 5 years

  • Nebi Mustafa Gumus , Sevil Eryilmaz , Selim Ünsal , Ali Yildirim EMAIL logo , Sevda Yuksel , Mustafa Yuksel and Mehmet Gunduz
Published/Copyright: August 17, 2016

Abstract

Objective:

This study aims to investigate whether there is a relationship between articulation levels and social skills of normally developing children at the ages of 4 and 5 years and to determine whether articulation levels and social skills are differentiated with regard to variable factors.

Methods:

A relational screening model was used in this study. Eighty-seven boys and 73 girls (160 children in total) who were educated at four preschools were selected according to simple random sampling in Kütahya province, Turkey. The mean age of the children was 4.6 years. The Ankara Articulation Test (AAT) was used to specify the articulation levels of children and the Preschool Social Skills Rating Scale [PSSRS, Okul Öncesi Sosyal Beceri Değerlendirme Ölçeği (OSBED)] was used to evaluate the social skills of the children.

Findings:

The results of the study revealed that the articulation mistakes decrease and social skills increase as the age of children rises. It was found that girls had better results in both social skills and articulation levels than boys. Analysis of the socio-economic statuses of the children showed no significant differences between articulation levels and social skills. Correlation analysis showed that children with articulation disorders have lower social skills rankings than children without articulation disorders, and speech is one of the factors that affect social skills ranking.

Results:

This study is important because of its observations about speech, communication, and social skills in children, as well as for raising awareness among parents and teachers of preschool children.

References

1. Bleile KM. Manual of Articulation and Phonological Disorders: Infancy Through Adulthood. Cengage Learning, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

2. Topbaş S. Türkçe sesletim–sesbilgisi testi geçerlik-güvenirlik ve standardizasyon çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 2006;21:39–56 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

3. Gresham FM, Elliot SN. The relationship between adaptive behavior and social skills issues in definition and assessment. J Spec Educ 1987;21:167–81.10.1177/002246698702100115Search in Google Scholar

4. Yüksel G. Sosyal beceri envanteri el kitabı. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2004 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

5. Gresham FM, Sugai G, Horner RH. Interpreting outcomes of social skills training for students with high incidence disabilities. Except Child 2001;67:331–44.10.1177/001440290106700303Search in Google Scholar

6. Özkafacı A. Annenin çocuk yetiştirme tutumu ile çocuğun sosya beceri düzeyin arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. İstanbul: İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2012 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

7. Ege P, Acarlar F, Turan F. Ankara artikülasyon testi el kitabı. Ankara: Key Design Tasarim, 2004 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

8. Ömeroğu E, Büyüköztürk Ş, Çakan M, Karayol S. Okul öncesi sosyal beceri değerlendirme ölçeği anne-baba formuna ait norm değerlerinin belirlenmesi ve yorumlanması. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2014;4:102–15 (in Turkish).10.14230/joiss69Search in Google Scholar

9. Korkmaz B. Konuşma özellikleri ve bozuklukları dil ve beyin, çocuklarda dil ve konuşma bozuklukları. Tavaslı Matbaası, 2005 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

10. Kemaloğlu Y. İlkokul çağı çocuklarda artikülasyon bozuklukları. Türk Otorinolarengoloji 18. Ulusal Kongresi Özetleri, 2005;31 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

11. Yılmaz E, Tepeli K. 60–72 aylık çocukların sosyal problem çözme becerilerinin duyguları anlama becerileri açısısndan incelenmesi. Türkiye Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2013;17:117–30 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

12. Gierut JA. Treatment efficacy functional phonological disorders in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998;41:85–100.10.1044/jslhr.4101.s85Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Priester GH, Post WJ, Goorhuis-Brouwer SM. Problems in speech sound production in young children: an inventory study of the opinions of speech therapists. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:1100–4.10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Cavalhiero LG, Brancalioni AR, Keske-Soares M. Prevalence of phonological disorders in children from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras fonoaudiol 2012;17:441–6 (in Turkish).10.1590/S1516-80342012000400013Search in Google Scholar

15. Müürsep I, Aibast H, Gapeyeva H, Paasuke M. Motor skills, haptic perception and social abilities in children with mild speech disorders. Brain Dev 2012;34:128–32.10.1016/j.braindev.2011.02.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Aydoğan Y, Koçak N. Okul öncesi çocukların dil gelişimlerine etki eden faktörlerin incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi 2003;159:76–81 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

17. Koçak N, Ergin B, Yalçın H. 60–72 aylık çocukların Türkçe dil kullanımı düzeyleri ve etki eden faktörlerin incelenmesi. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 2014;4:100–6 (in Turkish).10.18493/kmusekad.95564Search in Google Scholar

18. Karacan E. Çocuklarda kekemelik ve diğer iletişim bozuklukları. Psikiyatri Dünyası 2000;4:18–21 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

19. Ege P. Türkçe’deki ünsüzlerin edinimi: bir norm çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 2010;25:16–34 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

20. Yıldırım İ. Klinik ses bozuklukları solunum anatomi fiyolojisi. Adana: Nobel Yayınevi, 2008 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

21. Arriga RI, Fenson L, Cronan T, Pethick SJ. Scores on the MacArthur communicative development inventory of children from lowand middle-income families. Appl Psycholinguist 1998;19:209–23.10.1017/S0142716400010043Search in Google Scholar

22. Biemmiller A, Slonim N. Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. J Educ Psychol 2001;93:498.10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.498Search in Google Scholar

23. Dollaghan CA, Campbell TF, Paradise JL, Feldman HM, Janosky JE, Pitcairn DN, et al. Maternal education and measures of early speech and language. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999;42: 1432–43.10.1044/jslhr.4206.1432Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Hoff-Ginsberg E. The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to children’s language experience and language development. Appl Psycholinguist 1998;19:603–29.10.1017/S0142716400010389Search in Google Scholar

25. Hoff E. The specifity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Dev 2003;74:1368–78.10.1111/1467-8624.00612Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Rowe ML. Child-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status, knowledge of child development and child vocabulary skill. J Child Lang 2008;35:185–205.10.1017/S0305000907008343Search in Google Scholar

27. Demir ÖE, Küntay AC. Dil ve iletişim becerilerinin gelişiminde ana baba etkileri. In: Yağmurlu B, Sayıl M. Ana babalık kuram ve araştırma. İstanbul: Colorist Akademi Matbaacılık, 2012: 295–327 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

28. Erkan P. Farklı sosyoekonomik ve eğitim düzeyleri farklı olan ailelerin 48–60 aylar arasındaki çocukların dil yapılarının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 1990 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

29. Keskin F, Ömeroğlu E, Okur A. 0–6 yaş arasındaki çocuklara sözcük öğretimi ile ilgili çalışmaların incelenmesi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi 2015;3:80–95 (in Turkish).10.16916/aded.81304Search in Google Scholar

30. Seng SH. Cognitive and social development of preschoolers: gender differences ınstitute of education. San Francisco, CA: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

31. Snowling MJ, Bishop DV, Stothard SE, Chipchase B, Kaplan C. Psychosocial outcomes at 15 years of children with a preschool history of speech‐language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2006;47:759–65.10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01631.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Ergin B. 5–6 yaş çocuklarının dil gelişim düzeyleri ile sosyal kabul durumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Dissertation. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2012 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

33. Walker S, Irving K, Berthelsen D. Gender influences on preschool children’s social problem-solving strategies. J Genet Psychol 2002;163:197–209.10.1080/00221320209598677Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Kapıkıran NA, İvrendi AB, Adak A. Okul öncesi çocuklarında sosyal beceri: durum saptaması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 2006;19:19–27 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

35. Akbaş C. Okulöncesi eğitime devam eden altı yaş grubu çocukların sosyal problem çözme becerilerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2005 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

36. Sönmez AŞ. Zihinsel engelli çocukların sosyal becerileri ile artikülasyon düzeylerini arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi. Dissertation. İstanbul Marmara Üniversitesi Zihinsel Engelliler Öğretmenliği Anabilim Dalı, 2011 (in Turkish).Search in Google Scholar

37. McCabe PC. Social and behavioral correlates of preschoolers with specific language impairment. Psychol Schools 2005;42:373–87.10.1002/pits.20064Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-3-14
Accepted: 2016-7-27
Published Online: 2016-8-17

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0018/html
Scroll to top button