Home Post-lecture subjective outcome evaluation of a university subject on leadership and positive youth development in Hong Kong
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Post-lecture subjective outcome evaluation of a university subject on leadership and positive youth development in Hong Kong

  • Daniel T.L. Shek EMAIL logo and Hildie Leung
Published/Copyright: July 21, 2014

Abstract

Post-lecture subjective outcome evaluation findings of a university subject promoting the leadership qualities and positive youth development of students at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University are reported. Students were invited to respond to a 16-item post-lecture questionnaire gauging their perceptions toward the subject, lecture, and the teachers after each of the 13 lectures. Factor analysis demonstrated that three factors were abstracted from the scale, including subject attributes, lecture attributes, and teacher attributes. Normative findings showed that students had positive perceptions on each of the dimensions throughout the lectures. Multiple regression analyses revealed that subject attributes, lecture attributes, and teacher attributes predicted global evaluation of the lecture and teacher. Based on the subjective outcome evaluation findings, the present study provides further support for the effectiveness of this subject in promoting the holistic development of the students.


Corresponding author: Daniel T.L. Shek, PhD, FHKPS, BBS, SBS, JP, Chair Professor of Applied Social Sciences, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Room HJ407, Core H, Hunghom, Hong Kong, P.R. China, E-mail: ; Centre for Innovative Programmes for Adolescents and Families, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China; Kiang Wu Nursing College of Macau, Macau, P.R. China; Department of Social Work, East China Normal University, Shanghai, P.R. China; and Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children’s Hospital, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA

Acknowledgments

The authorship of this paper is equally shared by the first author and second author. This work and the subject on “Tomorrow’s Leaders” are financially supported by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

References

1. Shek D. Development of a positive youth development subject in a university context in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:173–9.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0036Search in Google Scholar

2. Lerner RM. Liberty: thriving and civic engagement among America’s youth. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

3. Eisenberg D, Hunt J, Speer N. Mental health in American colleges and universities: variation across student subgroups and across campuses. J Nerv Ment Dis 2013;201:60–7.10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827ab077Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Stallman HM. Psychological distress in university students: a comparison with general population data. Aust Psychol 2010;45:249–57.10.1080/00050067.2010.482109Search in Google Scholar

5. Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, Hasin DS, Grant BF, Liu SM, et al. Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: results from the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008;65:1429–37.10.1001/archpsyc.65.12.1429Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Palmer RS, McMahon TJ, Moreggi DI, Rounsaville BJ, Ball SA. College student drug use: patterns, concerns, consequences, and interest in intervention. J Coll Student Dev 2012;53:124–32.10.1353/csd.2012.0014Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Witkiewitz K, Desai SA, Steckler G, Jackson KM, Bowen S, Leigh BC, et al. Concurrent drinking and smoking among college students: an event-level analysis. Psychol Addict Behav 2012;26:649–54.10.1037/a0025363Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Shek D. Adolescent developmental issues in Hong Kong: relevance to positive youth development programs in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2006;18:341–54.10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.3.341Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Wong JG, Cheung E, Chan KK, Ma KK, Tang SW. Web-based survey of depression, anxiety and stress in first-year tertiary education students in Hong Kong. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 2006;40:777–82.10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01883.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Tsui YY, Wing YK. A study on the sleep patterns and problems of university business students in Hong Kong. J Am Coll Health 2009;58:167–76.10.1080/07448480903221418Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Shek D, Ma HK, Sun RC. A brief overview of adolescent developmental problems in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2011;11:2243–56.10.1100/2011/896835Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Veselska Z, Geckova AM, Orosova O, Gajdosova B, van Dijk JP, Reijneveld SA. Self-esteem and resilience: the connection with risky behavior among adolescents. Addict Behav 2009;34: 287–91.10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.11.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Wills TA. Stress and coping in early adolescence: relationships to substance use in urban school samples. Health Psychol 1986;5:503–29.10.1037/0278-6133.5.6.503Search in Google Scholar

14. Zivin K, Eisenberg D, Gollust SE, Golberstein E. Persistence of mental health problems and needs in a college student population. J Affect Disorders 2009;117:180–5.10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Shek D, Wong KK. Do adolescent developmental issues disappear overnight? Reflections about holistic development in university students. ScientificWorldJ 2011;11:353–61.10.1100/tsw.2011.5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Shek D. Nurturing holistic development of university students in Hong Kong: where are we and where should we go? ScientificWorldJ 2010;10:563–75.10.1100/tsw.2010.62Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Shek D, Sun R. Promoting leadership and intrapersonal competence in university students: what can we learn from Hong Kong? Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:221–8.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0037Search in Google Scholar

18. Shek D, Sun R. Promoting psychosocial competencies in university students: evaluation based on a one group pretest-posttest design. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:229–34.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0039Search in Google Scholar

19. Shek D, Sun R. Process evaluation of a positive youth development course in a university setting in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:235–41.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0038Search in Google Scholar

20. Shek D, Sun R. Qualitative evaluation of a positive youth development course in a university setting in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:243–8.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0040Search in Google Scholar

21. Shek D, Sun R. Focus group evaluation of a positive youth development course in a university in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:249–54.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0035Search in Google Scholar

22. Shek D, Wu F. Reflective journals of students taking a positive youth development course in a university context in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJ 2012, Article ID 131560, 8 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/131560.10.1100/2012/131560Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Shek D, Sun R. Post-lecture evaluation of a course on leadership and intrapersonal development. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2013,12:185–9110.1515/ijdhd-2013-0011Search in Google Scholar

24. Shek D, Sun R. Post-course subjective outcome evaluation of a course promoting leadership and intrapersonal development in university students in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2013,12:193–201.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0136Search in Google Scholar

25. Shek D. Promotion of holistic development in university students. Best Pract Ment Health 2013;9:47–61.Search in Google Scholar

26. Rezler AG, Anderson AS. Focused and unfocused feedback and self-perception. J Educ Res 1971;65:61–4.10.1080/00220671.1971.10884253Search in Google Scholar

27. Brinko KT. The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: what is effective? J High Educ 1993;64:574–93.10.1080/00221546.1993.11778449Search in Google Scholar

28. Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor MS. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J App Psychol 1979;64:349–71.10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349Search in Google Scholar

29. Stillman PL, Gillers MA, Heins M, Nicholson G, Sabers DL. Effect of immediate student evaluations on a multi-instructor course. Acad Med 1983;58:172–8.10.1097/00001888-198303000-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Gendreau P, Goggin C, Smith P. The forgotten issue in effective correctional treatment: program implementation. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 1999;43:180–7.10.1177/0306624X99432005Search in Google Scholar

31. Hill Y, Lomas L, MacGregor J. Students’ perceptions of quality in higher education. Qual Assur Educ 2003;11:15–20.10.1108/09684880310462047Search in Google Scholar

32. Morton KL, Keith SE, Beauchamp MR. Transformational teaching and physical activity: a new paradigm for adolescent health promotion? J Health Psychol 2010;15:248–57.10.1177/1359105309347586Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Lee YJ. A study on the effect of teaching innovation on learning effectiveness with learning satisfaction as a mediator. World Trans Eng Technol Educ 2011;9:92–101.Search in Google Scholar

34. Feldman KA. The superior college teacher from the students view. Res Higher Educ 1976;5:243–88.10.1007/BF00991967Search in Google Scholar

35. Jackson DL, Teal CR, Raines SJ, Nansel TR, Force RC, Burdsal CA. The dimensions of students’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educ Psychol Meas 1999;59:580–96.10.1177/00131649921970035Search in Google Scholar

36. Roth J, Brooks-Gunn J, Murray L, Foster W. Promoting healthy adolescents: synthesis of youth development program evaluations. J Res Adol 1998;8:423–59.10.1207/s15327795jra0804_2Search in Google Scholar

37. Choate LH, Smith SL. Enhancing development in 1st-year college student success courses: a holistic approach. J Hum Couns Educ Dev 2003;42:178–93.Search in Google Scholar

38. Myers JE, Sweeney TJ, Witmer JM. The wheel of wellness counseling for wellness: a holistic model for treatment planning. J Couns Dev 2000;78:251–66.10.1002/j.1556-6676.2000.tb01906.xSearch in Google Scholar

39. Koehler G, Burke A. Transforming the treadmill into a staircase: preparing nontraditional, first-generation college attenders for success. (Report No. JC 960 590). Champaign, IL: ERIC report, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

40. Crosbie R. Learning the soft skills of leadership. Ind Commer Train 2005;37:45–51.10.1108/00197850510576484Search in Google Scholar

41. Heslam P, Jones I, Pollitt M. How a social capital approach can help multinationals show ethical leadership. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-8-15
Accepted: 2013-9-11
Published Online: 2014-7-21
Published in Print: 2014-11-1

©2014 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. A tale of two innovative leadership subjects in Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China
  4. Review
  5. Teaching a subject on leadership and intrapersonal development: some personal reflections
  6. Original Articles
  7. Leadership and intra-personal development: relevance to Chinese nursing students
  8. Evaluation of a subject on leadership and intrapersonal development: views of the students based on qualitative evaluation
  9. Perceptions of a university subject on leadership and intrapersonal development: reflections of the scholarship recipients
  10. Do university students change after taking a subject on leadership and intrapersonal development?
  11. Post-course subjective outcome evaluation of a subject on leadership and intrapersonal development for university students in Hong Kong
  12. Post-lecture subjective outcome evaluation of a university subject on leadership and positive youth development in Hong Kong
  13. The role of teachers in youth development: reflections of students
  14. Perceived benefits of a university subject on leadership and intrapersonal development
  15. Effectiveness of a Chinese positive youth development program: the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong
  16. The relationship between subjective outcome evaluation and objective outcome evaluation findings: evidence from China
  17. The students were happy, but did they change positively?
  18. Service leadership education for university students in Hong Kong: subjective outcome evaluation
  19. Service leadership education for university students in Hong Kong: qualitative evaluation
  20. Process evaluation of a pilot subject on service leadership for university students in Hong Kong
  21. Book Reviews
  22. European yearbook of disability law Mortsel
  23. Care of the adult with intellectual disability in primary care
Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0343/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button