Service leadership education for university students in Hong Kong: subjective outcome evaluation

References

1. Census and Statistics Department of HKSAR. The four key industries in the Hong Kong economy. 2013. URL: http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sc80.jsp. Accessed: June 17 2013.Search in Google Scholar

2. Government of the HKSAR. Half-yearly economic report 2011. 2011. URL: http://www.hkeconomy.gov.hk/en/pdf/er_11q2.pdf. Accessed: August 17 2011.Search in Google Scholar

3. Census and Statistics Department of HKSAR. Hong Kong monthly digest of statistics. 2013. URL: http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B10100022013MM05B0100.pdf. Accessed: June 17 2013.Search in Google Scholar

4. Vargo SL, Lusch RF. From goods to service(s): divergences and convergences of logics. Ind Market Manag 2008;37:254–59.10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.004Search in Google Scholar

5. Rost JC. Leadership for the twenty-first century. London: Praeger, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

6. Lusch RF, Vargo SL, O’Brien M. Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. J Retailing 2007;83:5–18.10.1016/j.jretai.2006.10.002Search in Google Scholar

7. Rost JC, Barker RA. Leadership education in colleges: toward a 21st century paradigm. J Leadersh Organ Stud 2000;7:3–12.10.1177/107179190000700102Search in Google Scholar

8. Barnett NJ, Parry G, Saad M, Newnes LB, Goh YM. Servitization: is a paradigm shift in the business model and service enterprise required? Strat Change 2013;22:145–56.10.1002/jsc.1929Search in Google Scholar

9. Salonen A. Service transition strategies of industrial manufacturers. Ind Market Manag 2011;40:683–90.10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.05.005Search in Google Scholar

10. Farling ML, Stone AG, Winston BE. Servant leadership: setting the stage for empirical research. J Leadersh Organ Stud 1999;6:49–72.10.1177/107179199900600104Search in Google Scholar

11. Russell RF, Stone AG. A review of servant leadership attributes: developing a practical model. Leadership Organ Dev J 2002;23:145–57.10.1108/01437730210424Search in Google Scholar

12. Spears L. On character and servant leadership: ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. J Virtues Leadership 2010; 1:25–30.Search in Google Scholar

13. Shek DT, Yu L, Ma CM, Sun RC, Liu TT. Development of a credit-bearing service leadership subject for university students in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2013;15:353–61.10.1515/ijamh-2013-0033Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Chung P. Service reborn. New York: Lexingford Publishing, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

15. Chung P. Service leadership definition. Hong Kong Institute of Leadership and Management. 2011. URL: http://hki-slam.org/index.php?r=article&catid=1&aid=11. Accessed: June 17 2013.Search in Google Scholar

16. Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JA, Lonczak HS, Hawkins JD. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2004;591:98–124.10.1177/0002716203260102Search in Google Scholar

17. Lerner RM, Almerigi JB, Theokas C, Lerner JV. Positive youth development: a view of the issues. J Early Adolescence 2005;25:10–6.10.1177/0272431604273211Search in Google Scholar

18. Roth JL, Brooks-Gunn J. What exactly is a youth development program? answers from research and practice. Appl Dev Sci 2003;7:94–111.10.1207/S1532480XADS0702_6Search in Google Scholar

19. Lerner RM, Fisher CB, Weinberg RA. Toward a science for and of the people: promoting civil society through the application of developmental science. Child Dev 2000;71:11–20.10.1111/1467-8624.00113Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Roth JL, Brooks-Gunn J, Murray L, Foster W. Promoting healthy adolescents: synthesis of youth development program evaluations. J Res Adolescence 1998;8:423–59.10.1207/s15327795jra0804_2Search in Google Scholar

21. Shek DT, Lee TY, Siu AM, Ma HK. Convergence of subjective outcome and objective outcome evaluation findings: insights based on the Project P.A.T.H.S. ScientificWorldJournal 2007;7:258–67.10.1100/tsw.2007.59Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Shek DT, Sun RC. Promoting leadership and intrapersonal competence in university students: what can we learn from Hong Kong? Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2012;11:221–8.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0037Search in Google Scholar

23. Shek DT. Subjective outcome and objective outcome evaluation findings: insights from a Chinese context. Res Social Work Prac 2010;20:293–301.10.1177/1049731509331951Search in Google Scholar

24. Hobson SM, Talbot DM. Understanding student evaluations: what all faculty should know. Coll Teach 2001;49:26–31.10.1080/87567550109595842Search in Google Scholar

25. Marsh HW. Students’ evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness. In: Perry RP, Smart JC, editors. The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: an evidence-based perspective. Netherlands: Springer, 2007:319–83.Search in Google Scholar

26. Marsh HW, Roche LA. Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective. Am Psychol 1997;52:1187–97.10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1187Search in Google Scholar

27. Cashin WE. Student ratings of teaching: recommendations for use. (IDEA paper no. 22). Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

28. Centra JA. Development of the student instructional report II. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

29. Shek DT. Secondary data analyses of subjective outcome evaluation data based on nine databases. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012. DOI: 10.1100/2012/346369.10.1100/2012/346369Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Shek DT, Ma CM. Program implementers’ evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on different datasets over time. <softenter;ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012. DOI: 10.1100/2012/918437.10.1100/2012/918437Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Shek DT, Sun RC. Participants’ evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S.: are findings based on different datasets consistent? ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012. DOI: 10.1100/2012/187450.10.1100/2012/187450Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Shek DT. Postlecture evaluation of a positive youth development subject for university students in Hong Kong. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012. DOI: 10.1100/2012/934679.10.1100/2012/934679Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Shek DT, Sun RC. Post-course subjective outcome evaluation of a course promoting leadership and intrapersonal development in university students in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2013;12:193–201.10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0136Search in Google Scholar

34. Marsh HW. Weighting for the right criteria in the instructional development an effectiveness assessment (IDEA) system: global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives: comments and reply. J Educ Psychol 1994;86:631–57.10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.631Search in Google Scholar

35. Shevlin M, Banyard P, Davies M, Griffiths M. The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: love me, love my lectures?. Assess Eval High Educ 2000;25: 397–405.10.1080/713611436Search in Google Scholar

36. Ma HK, Shek DT. Subjective outcome evaluation of a positive youth development program in Hong Kong: profiles and correlates. ScientificWorldJournal 2010;10:192–200.10.1100/tsw.2010.2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Shek DT, Ma CM, Tang CY. Predictors of subjective outcome evaluation findings in a positive youth development program in Hong Kong. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2011;10:249–55.10.1515/ijdhd.2011.040Search in Google Scholar

38. Shek DT, Sun RC. Evaluation of Project P.A.T.H.S. (Secondary 1 Program) by the program participants: findings based on the Full Implementation Phase. Adolescence 2008;43:807–22.Search in Google Scholar

39. Shek DT, Yu L, Siu AM. The Chinese adolescent egocentrism scale: psychometric properties and normative profiles. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2014;13:297–307.10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0315Search in Google Scholar

40. Shek DT, Ma CM, Lin L. The Chinese adolescent materialism scale: psychometric properties and normative profiles. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2014;13:285–95.10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0314Search in Google Scholar

41. Shek DT, Ma CM. Subjective outcome evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in different cohorts of students. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012. DOI: 10.1100/2012/493957.10.1100/2012/493957Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

42. Shek DT, Sun RC. Evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. (Extension Phase) based on the perspective of the program participants. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2013;25:405–13.10.1515/ijamh-2013-0038Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Shek DT, Sun RC. Evaluation of Project P.A.T.H.S. by the program implementers: findings based on the Extension Phase. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2013;25:415–23.10.1515/ijamh-2013-0039Search in Google Scholar PubMed