Abstract
The amount of greenhouse gases has increased considerably in recent years. Additionally, the energy required by humanity for daily activities is also on the rise. The planet is facing one of its worst crises, characterized by the overexploitation of fossil fuels due to population growth. It is estimated that by 2050, the global population will exceed 9 billion inhabitants. Chemical looping combustion (CLC), offers a potential solution. This process involves usually two interconnected reactors, usually with a fluidized bed, where combustion takes place in an alternate way. In this process, the oxygen required for combustion is provided by a solid oxygen carrier, the capacity of this depends on the nature of the material and is crucial to define the most effective one by a comparative study. Moreover, methane emissions are a significant concern, as methane is a potent greenhouse gas with a 25 times greater impact on the atmosphere compared to carbon dioxide as greenhouse gases. To address this, methane reforming in chemical cycles, such as Steam Reforming Chemical Looping Combustion (SR-CLC) or chemical looping reforming (CLR), is proposed. Using a Gibbs reactor and oxygen carrier data reported in the literature, the analysis of NiWO4, FeMoO4, Fe2MnO4 and FeZnO4, their operation, energy yield when exposed to a methane stream and the comparison between different forms of reforming schemes, as well as the estimation of the carrier needed for the process, are presented. Results indicate that after calculations, the g-carrier/g-fuel ratio for NiWO4 is almost 100 % higher than the other carriers studied in this work. Water vapor reforming generates 30.0930 kW and a stream of pure hydrogen that can be separated while carbon dioxide reforming is a general endothermic process that requires 12.22 kW of energy for this process scheme. Once the ideal carrier has been analyzed, the proposed future work should focus on the optimal design of a reaction system that will allow it to operate efficiently under the conditions encountered. In addition, it will be necessary to find the replacement rate for the carrier that will allow us to operate our system continuously.
Funding source: Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencia y TecnologÃ-a (CONAHCYT)
Award Identifier / Grant number: 861765
Acknowledgments
MAPM thanks postgraduate studies scholarship 861765 from Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencia y Tecnología (CONAHCYT). ALO and RMY greatly appreciate research system grants (SNII-CONAHCYT). Financial support provided by CIC-UMSNH (Project 20.20) is greatly appreciated.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
-
Research funding: Postgraduate studies scholarship 861765 from Consejo Nacional de Humanidades Ciencia y Tecnología (CONAHCYT).
-
Data availability: The information is available upon reasonable request.
References
[1] C. Tang, J. Huang, D. Zhang, Q. Jiang, and G. Zhou, “CO2 utilization by dry reforming of CH4 over mesoporous Ni/KIT-6 catalyst,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1167–1178, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0006.Search in Google Scholar
[2] M. R. Allen, et al.., “Technical summary,” in Global Warming of 1.5 °C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, Incheon, Korea, IPCC, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
[3] A. Singh, K. R. Chaturvedi, and T. Sharma, “An experimental evaluation of green surfactants to stabilize silica nanofluids in saline conditions and its application in CO2 absorption,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2022-0241.Search in Google Scholar
[4] J. Rogelj and R. D. Lamboll, “Substantial reductions in non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions reductions implied by IPCC estimates of the remaining carbon budget,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 5, no. 35, p. 35, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01168-8.Search in Google Scholar
[5] S. Boubaker, Z. Liu, Y. Mu, and Y. Zhan, “Carbon dioxide emissions and environmental risks: Long term and short term,” Risk Anal., 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14281.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Sarjito, et al.., “CFD-based simulation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from industrial plants,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., vol. 17, no. 11, p. 20180215, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0063.Search in Google Scholar
[7] H. Karne, H. Raut, R. Baviskar, S. Rokde, N. Ravnang, and D. Rathod, “Biogas production from canteen waste,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1455–1463, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2022-0238.Search in Google Scholar
[8] H. A. Alalwan and A. H. Alminshid, “CO2 capturing methods: Chemical looping combustion (CLC) as a promising technique,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 788, no. 147850, p. 147850, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147850.Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] T. Czakiert, J. Krzywanski, A. Zylka, and W. Nowak, “Chemical looping combustion: A brief overview,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 1563, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041563.Search in Google Scholar
[10] P. Madejski, K. Chmiel, S. Naveneethan, and T. Kus, “Methods and techniques for CO2 capture: Review of potential solutions and applications in modern energy technologies,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 887, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030887.Search in Google Scholar
[11] V. H. Collins-Martinez, J. Cazares-Marroquin, J. M. Salinas- Gutierrez, J. C. antoja-Espinoza, A. Lopez-Ortiz, and M. J. Melendez-Zaragoza, “The thermodynamic evaluation and process simulation of the chemical looping steam methane reforming of mixed iron oxides,” RSC Adv., vol. 11, p. 684, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra08610j.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] R. Medeiros, et al.., “Double perovskite (La2-xCa-Bax) NiO4 oxygen carriers for chemical looping reforming applications,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1681–1696, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.004.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Y. Huang, J. Liu, Q. Gao, D. Elsworth, and Y.-K. Leong, “Shale gas production evaluation considering gas diffusion and dispersed distribution of kerogen,” Energy Fuels, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1083–1097, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c03774.Search in Google Scholar
[14] N. C. Shiba, X. Liu, and Y. Yao, “Advances in lower olefin production over cobalt-based catalysts via the Fischer–Tropsch process,” Fuel Process. Technol., vol. 238, p. 107489, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107489.Search in Google Scholar
[15] N. R. Ravuru, S. Patel, and A. Kumar, “Experimental studies on renewable hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol over zirconia promoted on Ni/Al2O3 catalyst,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 87–95, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2023-0002.Search in Google Scholar
[16] G. Topaloğlu, S. Yaşyerli, and G. Doğu, “Dry reforming of methane over Ni–Mg–Al and Ni–Ca–Al type hydrotalcite-like catalysts: Effects of synthesis route and Ru incorporation,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 515–528, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2023-0232.Search in Google Scholar
[17] C. H. Bartholomew, “Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation,” Appl. Catal., A, vol. 212, nos. 1–2, pp. 17–60, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(00)00843-7.Search in Google Scholar
[18] R. Roncancio and J. P. Gore, “CO2 char gasification: A systematic review from 2014 to 2020,” Energy Convers. Manag.: X, vol. 17, no. 10, p. 100060, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2020.100060.Search in Google Scholar
[19] M. A. Pérez-Méndez, G. S. Fraga-Cruz, G. Jiménez-García, R. Huirache-Acuña, F. Nápoles-Rivera, and R. Maya-Yescas, “Macroscopic analysis of chemical looping combustion with ilmenite versus conventional oxides as oxygen carriers,” Int. J. Chem. React. Eng., vol. 21, no. 4, p. 4, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2022-0108.Search in Google Scholar
[20] R. Amin, B. Liu, Z. B. Huang, and Y. C. Zhao, “Hydrogen and syn gas production via CO2 dry reforming of methane over Mg/La promoted Co–Ni/MSU-S catalyst,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 807–819, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.063.Search in Google Scholar
[21] M. M. Hossain and H. de Lasa, “Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) for inherent CO2 separations—A review,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 63, pp. 4433–4451, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.05.028.Search in Google Scholar
[22] S. Chen, Z. Xue, D. Wang, and W. Xiang, “An integrated system combining chemical looping hydrogen generation process and solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine cycle for power production with CO2 capture,” J. Power Sources, vol. 215, pp. 89–98, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.04.087.Search in Google Scholar
[23] A. Edrisi, Z. Mansoori, B. Dabir, and A. Shahnazari, “Hydrogen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide production through chemical looping using iron-based oxygen carrier – A Green plant for H2 and N2 production,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 39, no. 20, pp. 10380–10391, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.108.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Q. Guo, Y. Cheng, Y. Liu, W. Jia, and H. Ryu, “Coal chemical looping gasification for syngas generation using an iron-based oxygen carrier,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 78–86, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401568x.Search in Google Scholar
[25] V. J. Aston, B. W. Evanko, and A. W. Weimer, “Investigation of novel mixed metal ferrites for pure H2 and CO2 production using chemical looping,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, no. 22, pp. 9085–9096, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.078.Search in Google Scholar
[26] R. Siriwardane, H. Tian, and J. Fisher, “Production of pure hydrogen and synthesis gas with Cu–Fe oxygen carriers using combined processes of chemical looping combustion and methane decomposition/reforming,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 1698–1708, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.090.Search in Google Scholar
[27] R. D. Solunke and G. Veser, “Hydrogen production via chemical looping steam reforming in a periodically operated fixed-bed reactor,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 49, no. 21, pp. 11037–11044, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100432j.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Y. De Vos, M. Jacobs, P. Van Der Voort, I. Van Driessche, F. Snijkers, and A. Verberckmoes, “Development of stable oxygen carrier materials for chemical looping processes – A review,” Catalysts, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 926, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10080926.Search in Google Scholar
[29] L. Qin, Z. Cheng, M. Guo, M. Xu, J. A. Fan, and L.-S. Fan, “Impact of 1% lanthanum dopant on carbonaceous fuel redox reactions with an iron-based oxygen carrier in chemical looping processes,” ACS Energy Lett., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 70–74, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00511.Search in Google Scholar
[30] A. Lambert, et al.., “Synthesis and characterization of bimetallic Fe/Mn oxides for chemical looping combustion,” Energy Procedia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 375–381, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.051.Search in Google Scholar
[31] X. Zhao, et al.., “Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: The good, the bad and the future,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 10, pp. 1885–1910, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ee03718f.Search in Google Scholar
[32] M. Tian, C. Wang, Y. Han, and X. Wang, “Recent advances of oxygen carriers for chemical looping reforming of methane,” Chem. Cat. Chem., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1615–1637, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202001481.Search in Google Scholar
[33] M. Meshksar, M. R. Rahimpour, S. Daneshmand-Jahromi, and A. Hafizi, “Synthesis and application of cerium-incorporated SBA-16 supported Ni-based oxygen carrier in cyclic chemical looping steam methane reforming,” Catalyst, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 18, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8010018.Search in Google Scholar
[34] M. Meshksar, S. Daneshmand-Jahromi, and M. R. Rahimpour, “Synthesis and characterization of cerium promoted Ni/SBA-16 oxygen carrier in cyclic chemical looping steam methane reforming,” J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., vol. 76, pp. 73–82, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.04.012.Search in Google Scholar
[35] Y. Wang, et al.., “Syngas production modified by oxygen vacancies over CeO2-ZrO2-CuO oxygen carrier via chemical looping reforming of methane,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 481, pp. 151–160, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.050.Search in Google Scholar
[36] A. More and G. Veser, “Physical mixtures as simple and efficient alternative to alloy carriers in chemical looping processes,” AIChE J., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 51–59, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15380.Search in Google Scholar
[37] L. Protasova and F. Snijkers, “Recent developments in oxygen carrier materials for hydrogen production via chemical looping processes,” Fuel, vol. 181, pp. 75–93, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.110.Search in Google Scholar
[38] P. E. González-Vargas, J. M. Salinas-Gutiérrez, M. J. Meléndez-Zaragoza, J. C. Pantoja-Espinoza, A. López-Ortíz, and V. Collins-Martínez, “Reduction and oxidation kinetics of NiWO4 as an oxygen carrier for hydrogen storage by a chemical looping process,” RSC Adv., vol. 11, no. 47, pp. 29453–29465, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra05077j.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[39] Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 2024. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-production-natural-gas-reforming#:∼:text=Most%20hydrogen%20produced%20today%20in,source%2C%20such%20as%20natural%20gas [accessed: Mar. 10, 2024].Search in Google Scholar
[40] H. Chulliyil, et al.., “Catalytic dehydrogenation of methane to hydrogen and carbon nanostructures with Fe–Mo bimetallic catalysts,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3853–3866, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c03895.Search in Google Scholar
[41] N. Mishra, B. Bhui, and P. Vairakannu, “Comparative evaluation of performance of high and low ash coal fuelled chemical looping combustion integrated combined cycle power generating systems,” Energy, vol. 169, pp. 305–318, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.043.Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Preface of the special issue dedicated to the International Energy Conference (IEC 2023): Energy and Climate Change
- Review
- Biodegradation of atrazine, a review of its metabolic pathways
- Articles
- Effect of Ni/tire rubber carbon as catalyst in the hydrodeoxygenation of used vegetable oil: biofuel evaluation in the reduction of atmospheric emissions
- Thermochemical energy storage with the solid-gas reaction of SrCO3 improved with CaCO3
- Open-loop response of Fischer–Tropsch reactions to manipulation of temperature and pressure
- Design and simulation of a full-order robust adaptive observer for monitoring of the biogas process
- Comparison of composite metal oxides as oxygen carrier for methane chemical looping reforming
- Gas phase carbon dioxide photoreduction to produce value-added chemicals using graphene oxide-based catalysts
- Numerical simulation of a chemical looping combustion system using 2D computational fluid dynamics
- Hydrogen production by photocatalysis using formic acid and black sand
- Carbon dioxide adsorption modeling to determine breakthrough curves in a fixed bed: isotherm and temperature effects
- Short Communications
- Communication Regarding Articles from the 2023 International Engineering Conference (IEC-2023), held in Zacatecas City, Mexico, from September 18–23, 2023, already published in the International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering in 2024
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Preface
- Preface of the special issue dedicated to the International Energy Conference (IEC 2023): Energy and Climate Change
- Review
- Biodegradation of atrazine, a review of its metabolic pathways
- Articles
- Effect of Ni/tire rubber carbon as catalyst in the hydrodeoxygenation of used vegetable oil: biofuel evaluation in the reduction of atmospheric emissions
- Thermochemical energy storage with the solid-gas reaction of SrCO3 improved with CaCO3
- Open-loop response of Fischer–Tropsch reactions to manipulation of temperature and pressure
- Design and simulation of a full-order robust adaptive observer for monitoring of the biogas process
- Comparison of composite metal oxides as oxygen carrier for methane chemical looping reforming
- Gas phase carbon dioxide photoreduction to produce value-added chemicals using graphene oxide-based catalysts
- Numerical simulation of a chemical looping combustion system using 2D computational fluid dynamics
- Hydrogen production by photocatalysis using formic acid and black sand
- Carbon dioxide adsorption modeling to determine breakthrough curves in a fixed bed: isotherm and temperature effects
- Short Communications
- Communication Regarding Articles from the 2023 International Engineering Conference (IEC-2023), held in Zacatecas City, Mexico, from September 18–23, 2023, already published in the International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering in 2024