Startseite Simulation of a kinetic model integrated with variable catalyst holdup applied in industrial fluid catalytic cracking risers
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Simulation of a kinetic model integrated with variable catalyst holdup applied in industrial fluid catalytic cracking risers

  • K. Harish Kiri Sivakumar und Kannan Aravamudan ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. September 2021
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The importance of the axial catalyst holdup on the accurate prediction of reaction yields from Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) risers was explored in this study. The Kunii and Levenspiel model was incorporated in the FCCU riser simulations for predicting the solid holdup. Two approaches were compared – the popular one assuming Constant Holdup (CH) and the other incorporating Variable Holdup (VH) in the reaction kinetics models. Simulation predictions using these two approaches were fitted to the yield profiles obtained from industrial plant data reported in the literature. The kinetic parameter estimates, including frequency factors and coking parameters obtained from these two approaches, were quite similar, indicating insensitivity to catalyst holdup. However, the kinetic model incorporating VH expression could predict the plant conversion and yield to within ±10% error throughout the riser. In contrast, the CH model led to predictions that were rather erroneous (>±25%) at the riser bottom as the catalyst particle acceleration zone was neglected. Temperature, gas density, catalyst particle, and gas phase velocity profiles obtained from the VH approach were considerably different from those obtained using the CH approach. The VH approach showed that the slip factor, especially, was quite distinct as it reached a peak value before decaying exponentially. On the other hand, the CH model showed a monotonic increase in slip factor along the riser.


Corresponding author: Kannan Aravamudan, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Ali, H., S. Rohani, and J. P. Corriou. 1997. “Modelling and Control of a Riser Type Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Unit.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 75 (4): 401–12, https://doi.org/10.1205/026387697523868.Suche in Google Scholar

Ancheyta-Juárez, J., F. López-Isunza, E. Aguilar-Rodríguez, and J. C. Moreno-Mayorga. 1997. “A Strategy for Kinetic Parameter Estimation in the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 36 (12): 5170–4, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie970271r.Suche in Google Scholar

Arena, U., A. Cammarota, and L. Pistone. 1986. “High Velocity Fluidization Behavior of Solids in a Laboratory Scale Circulating Bed.” In Circulating Fluidized Bed Technology, 119–25. New York: Pergamon Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-031869-1.50014-4Suche in Google Scholar

Bader, R., J. Findlay, and T. M. Knowlton. 1988. “Gas/Solids Flow Patterns in a 30.5-cm-Diameter Circulating Fluidized Bed.” In Circulating Fluidized Bed Technology, 123–37. New York: Pergamon Press.10.1016/B978-0-08-036225-0.50016-2Suche in Google Scholar

Bai, D., A. S. Issangya, J. X. Zhu, and J. R. Grace. 1997. “Analysis of the Overall Pressure Balance Around a High-Density Circulating Fluidized Bed.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 36 (9): 3898–903. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie970011+.10.1021/ie970011+Suche in Google Scholar

Bai, D., and K. Kato. 1999. “Quantitative Estimation of Solids Holdups at Dense and Dilute Regions of CFB.” Powder Technology 101: 183–90.10.1016/S0032-5910(98)00159-4Suche in Google Scholar

Berruti, F., T. S. Pugsley, L. Godfroy, J. Chaouki, and G. S. Patience. 1995. “Hydrodynamics of Circulating Fluidized Bed Risers: A Review.” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 73 (5): 579–602, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450730502.Suche in Google Scholar

Berry, T. A., T. R. McKeen, T. S. Pugsley, and A. K. Dalai. 2004. “Two-dimensional Reaction Engineering Model of the Riser Section of a Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43 (18): 5571–81, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0306877.Suche in Google Scholar

Corella, J., A. Fernandez, and J. M. Vidal. 1986. “Pilot Plant for the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process: Determination of the Kinetic Parameters of Deactivation of the Catalyst.” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development 25 (4): 554–62, https://doi.org/10.1021/i300024a009.Suche in Google Scholar

Dasila, P. K., I. R. Choudhury, S. Singh, S. Rajagopal, S. J. Chopra, and D. N. Saraf. 2014. “Simulation of an Industrial Fluid Catalytic Cracking Riser Reactor Using a Novel 10-lump Kinetic Model and Some Parametric Sensitivity Studies.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 53 (51): 19660–70, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie5006433.Suche in Google Scholar

Derouin, C., D. Nevicato, M. Forissier, G. Wild, and J. R. Bernard. 1997. “Hydrodynamics of Riser Units and Their Impact on FCC Operation.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 36 (11): 4504–15, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie970432r.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. C., X. Li, and J. B. Riggs. 1998. “Modeling and Optimization of a Model IV Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit.” AIChE Journal 44 (9): 2068–79, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690440914.Suche in Google Scholar

Godfroy, L., G. S. Patience, and J. Chaouki. 1999. “Radial Hydrodynamics in Risers.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 38 (1): 81–9, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie960784i.Suche in Google Scholar

Gupta, A., and D. Subba Rao. 2001. “Model for the Performance of a Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) Riser Reactor: Effect of Feed Atomization.” Chemical Engineering Science 56 (15): 4489–503, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(01)00122-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Han, I. S., and C. B. Chung. 2001a. “Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of a Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Process. Part I: Process Modeling.” Chemical Engineering Science 56 (5): 1951–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00493-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Han, I. S., and C. B. Chung. 2001b. “Dynamic Modeling and Simulation of a Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Process. Part II: Property Estimation and Simulation.” Chemical Engineering Science 56 (5): 1973–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00494-2.Suche in Google Scholar

John, Y. M., M. A. Mustafa, R. Patel, and I. M. Mujtaba. 2019. “Parameter Estimation of a Six-Lump Kinetic Model of an Industrial Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit.” Fuel 235: 1436–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.033.Suche in Google Scholar

Kunii, D., and O. Levenspiel. 1991. High-Velocity Fluidization. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.10.1016/B978-0-08-050664-7.50014-7Suche in Google Scholar

Kuo, R. 2016. Troubleshooting Catalyst Losses in the FCC Unit. Mumbai: Refcomm. Also available at https://refiningcommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Troubleshooting-Catalyst-Losses-in-the-FCC-Unit-Kou-BASF-FCCU-Galveston-2016.pdf. https://refiningcommunity.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Troubleshooting-Catalyst-Losses-in-the-FCC-Unit-Kou-BASF-FCCU-Galveston-2016.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, L.-S., Y.-W. Chen, T.-N. Huang, and W.-Y. Pan. 1989. “Four-lump Kinetic Model for Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process.” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 67 (4): 615–9, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450670414.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, M. P., C. Derouin, P. Turlier, M. Forissier, G. Wild, and J. R. Bernard. 1992. “Catalytic Cracking in Riser Reactors: Core-Annulus and Elbow Effects.” Chemical Engineering Science 47 (9–11): 2319–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(92)87054-T.Suche in Google Scholar

McCabe, W. L., J. C. Smith, and P. Harriott. 1993. Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Suche in Google Scholar

Ouyang, S., and O. E. Potter. 1993. “Consistency of Circulating Fluidized Bed Experimental Data.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 32 (6): 1041–5, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00018a008.Suche in Google Scholar

Pan, S., H. Jiang, and H. Weng. 2008. “Feeding Methanol in an FCC Unit.” Petroleum Science and Technology 26 (2): 170–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/10916460600805152.Suche in Google Scholar

Patience, G. S., J. Chaouki, F. Berruti, and R. Wong. 1992. “Scaling Considerations for Circulating Fluidized Bed Risers.” Powder Technology 72 (1): 31–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(92)85018-Q.Suche in Google Scholar

Pitault, I., M. Forissier, and J.-R. Bernard. 1995. “Détermination de constantes cinétiques du craquage catalytique par la modélisation du test de microactivité (MAT).” Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 73 (4): 498–504, https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450730409.Suche in Google Scholar

Pitault, I., D. Nevicato, M. Forissier, and J. R. Bernard. 1994. “Kinetic Model Based on a Molecular Description for Catalytic Cracking of Vacuum Gas Oil.” Chemical Engineering Science 49 (24 PART A): 4249–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(05)80018-1.Suche in Google Scholar

Pugsley, T. S., and F. Berruti. 1996. “A Predictive Hydrodynamic Model for Circulating Fluidized Bed Risers.” Powder Technology 89 (1): 57–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(96)03154-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Sadeghbeigi, R. 2000. Fluid Catalytic Cracking Handbook: Design, Operation, and Troubleshooting of FCC Facilities. http://books.google.com/books?id=z0qNlKizu5sC&pgis=1.10.1016/B978-088415289-7/50009-3Suche in Google Scholar

Theologos, K. N., and N. C. Markatos. 1993. “Advanced Modeling of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Riser‐type Reactors.” AIChE Journal 39 (6): 1007–17, https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690390610.Suche in Google Scholar

Viitanen, P. I. 1993. “Tracer Studies on a Riser Reactor of a Fluidized Catalyst Cracking.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 32 (4): 577–83.10.1021/ie00016a001Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, W., Y. Liu, Z. Liu, and S. Tian. 2016. “Detailed Chemical Composition of Straight-Run Vacuum Gas Oil and its Distillates as a Function of the Atmospheric Equivalent Boiling Point.” Energy & Fuels 30 (2): 968–74, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b02803.Suche in Google Scholar

Wong, R., T. Pugsley, and F. Berrut. 1992. “Modelling the Axial Voidage Profile and Flow Structure in Risers of Circulating Fluidized Beds.” Chemical Engineering Science 47 (9–11): 2301–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(92)87051-Q.Suche in Google Scholar

Yingxun, S. 1991. “Deactivation by Coke in Residuum Catalytic Cracking.” Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 68 (100): 327–31.10.1016/S0167-2991(08)62651-8Suche in Google Scholar

Youchou, L., and M. Kwauk. 1980. “The Dynamics of Fast Fluidization.” In Fluidization. Springer, Vol. 24, Issue 12, edited by J. R. Grace and J. M. Matsen. Boston: Springer.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0100).


Received: 2021-04-29
Accepted: 2021-08-17
Published Online: 2021-09-02

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 16.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2021-0100/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen