Home Volume Averaged Equations for Mass Transport and Reaction for In-Situ Combustion
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Volume Averaged Equations for Mass Transport and Reaction for In-Situ Combustion

  • Carlos G. Aguilar-Madera EMAIL logo , Octavio Cazarez-Candia and Francisco J. Valdés-Parada
Published/Copyright: August 31, 2017

Abstract

In-situ combustion (ISC) is an oil recovery technique where many phenomena can take place simultaneously such as: chemical reactions, phase change, heat transfer, mass transport, thermodynamic equilibrium, and so on. Each one of these phenomena may have important contributions over the ISC behavior at any scale of interest as lab-scale, inter-wells or reservoir-scale. In this work, a mass transport study is presented. Firstly, the appropriate phase and interface governing equations at pore-scale are set up. Later, the volume averaged equations valid at macroscale are rigorously derived using the volume averaging method (VAM). The theoretical analysis is general and applies for typical oil-water-gas-rock systems found in petroleum reservoirs, and for any number of chemical species distributed in the phases. The model also allows the existence of several heterogeneous and homogeneous chemical reactions. From this general point of view, the volume averaged equations governing species and phase mass transport at macroscale, along its closure scheme to predict the effective transport parameters, are presented. We have clearly identified the length scale constraints and assumptions that support our derivations. In future works, we shall expand the range of applicability of the model by relaxing some of these assumptions. To demonstrate the applicability of the average models, we numerically predicted the longitudinal mass dispersion of oxygen for passive and reactive mass transport problems at lab-scale. The general trends of theoretical results are in concordance with previous works.

Acknowledgements

The author CGAM really thanks the postdoctoral fellowship from the Mexican Institute of Petroleum through the project Y.00101.

A Volume averaging theory

In order to carry out an up-scaling procedure to the mass transport problem, we need to define a Representative Elementary Volume (REV) where primary variables as mass fractions will be averaged. The size of REV must be large enough to smooth fluctuations from the microscale over the averaged variables, and in turn, small enough to avoid significant variations from changes in the medium structure (macroscale heterogeneities). In a qualitatively way, these requirements of REV are written as

(116)lα\lt\ltr0\lt\ltL,α=o,g,w,r

Here l is the characteristic length of phases, whilst L is the size of the multiphase system (see Figure 2) and r0 is the size of the REV. Here it must be clarified that for fractured reservoirs, L is the length of homogeneous zones as cores, or zones with weakly position-dependent porosity and permeability. This length -scale constraint allows neglecting terms that are larger than the first one when expanding volume-averaged quantities about the centroid of the averaging domain (Whitaker 1999). This is convenient, since it leads to local volume-averaged models, in which volume-averaged quantities can be treated as constants within the averaging domain.

Let us define the superficial average operator acting over the variable ψα defined in the α-phase as,

(117)ψα(x,t)=1|V|Vα(x,t)ψα(x+yα,t)dV

Here x is a vector position locating the centroid of REV whilst yα is a vector position locating the α-phase inside the REV with respect to its centroid. In the above equation |V| is the REV volume and Vα is the portion of the REV occupied by the α-phase.

As seen, the notation used in eq. (117) may be complicated, and hereinafter we will use a simplified version. For instance, instead of eq. (117) we will just write

(118)ψα=1|V|VαψαdV

Another useful operator is the intrinsic average given by

(119)ψαα=1|Vα|VαψαdV

Both types of averaging operators are related as

(120)ψα=εαψαα

Here εα is the volume fraction of α-phase inside the REV.

It is worth noting that the volume |V| is independent of time, but the same is not true for the phases-volumes inside the REV. Thus, when the integral operators are applied to governing equations, two important theorems will be necessary in order to interchange integration and derivation. These are the spatial averaging theorem (Howes and Whitaker 1985; Soria and De Lasa 1991 )

(121)ψα=ψα+ββα1|V|Aαβ(ψαnαβ)dA,α=o,g,w,β=o,g,w,r

and the general transport theorem

(122)ψαt=ψαtββα1|V|Aαβ(ψαwαβ)nαβdA,α=o,g,w,β=o,g,w,r

From these theorems we can obtain the spatial and time variations of volume fraction as follows

(123)εα=ββα1|V|AαβnαβdA,α=o,g,w,β=o,g,w,r
(124)εαt=ββα1|V|Aαβ(wαβnαβ)dA,α=o,g,w,β=o,g,w,r

Appendix

B Definitions

The definitions of source-like terms appearing in eq. (52) are:

(125)Φiα,conv=(ραω~iαv~α),i=1,,n1,α=o,g,w
(126)Φiα,diffx=[ραDiα(ββα1|V|Aαβω~iαnαβdA)],i=1,,n1,α,β=o,g,w
(127)Φiα,diffT=[Diα,T(ββα1|V|AαβT~αnαβdA)],i=1,,n1,α,β=o,g,w
(128)Φiα,inter=Diα,T(ββα1|V|AαβT~αnαβdA)+Diαρα(ββα1|V|Aαβω~iαnαβdA)(εα)1vα[ρα(ββα1|V|Aαβω~iαnαβdA)]ρα{ββα1|V|Aαβω~iα(v~αwαβ)nαβdA}ραωiαα(ββα1|V|Aαβv~αnαβdA),i=1,,n1,α,β=o,g,w

Here we have taken into account that integrals, containing spatial derivatives of average variables, are zero. In addition, integrals of products of spatial deviations have been kept because such quantities are generally non-zero. In addition, in the above equations we have considered that density and diffusivity coefficients are constants inside the REV.

Now, the Γ-coefficients of eq.(64) are defined as follows,

(129)Γα,I=(ραv~α)+ρα(ββα1|V|Aαβv~αnαβdA),α,β=o,g,w
(130)Γiα,II=(εα)1εαραDiαραv~α,i=1,,n1,α=o,g,w
(131)Γiα,III=(εα)1εαDiα,T,i=1,,n1,α=o,g,w
(132)Γiα,IV=(εα)1(ραω~iαv~α)(εα)1Diαραββα1|V|Aαβ(ω~iα)nαβdA+(εα)2vα(ραββα1|V|Aαβω~iαnαβdA)+(εα)1ραββα1|V|Aαβω~iα(v~αwαβ)nαβdA(εα)1Diα,Tββα1|V|AαβT~αnαβdA(εα)1(Φiα,diffx+Φiα,diffT),i=1,,n1,α=o,g,w

The Ω parameters appearing in eqs (69) and (70) are expressed as,

(133)Ωiαβ=k=1n[ω~kαωkα(MαKiαβMβ)|+ω~kβωkβ(MαKiαβMβ)|]+T~αTα(MαKiαβMβ)|+p~αpα(MαKiαβMβ)|+p~βpβ(MαKiαβMβ)|+,i=1,,n1,α=o,w,β=g,w,αβ
(134)Ωiαr=k=1kin(ω~kαkiαrωkα|)+k=1n(ω~kαrkiαrωkαr|)+T~αrkiαrTαr|+p~αrkiαrpαr|+,i=1,,n1,α=o,g,w

The effective parameters of eq. (78) are defined in terms of closure variables as follows:

(135)Diα,α=Diα[I+ββα(1|Vα|Aαβbiα,3nαβdA)]1|Vα|Vαbiα,3v~αdV+,i=1,,n,α,β=o,g,w
(136)Diα,β=ββα[Diα|Vα|Aαβbiα,f(β)nαβdA]1|Vα|Vαbiα,f(β)v~αdV+,i=1,,n,α,β=o,g,w
(137)Diα,α,T=Diα,T{I+ββα[1|Vα|Aαβ(sα,1+ραDiαDiα,Tbiα,5)nαβdA]}ρα|Vα|Vαbiα,5v~αdV+,i=1,,n,α,β=o,g,w
(138)Diα,β,T=ρα[ββα(Diα|Vα|Aαβbiα,f(β)nαβdA)1|Vα|Vαbiα,f(β)v~αdV]+,i=1,,n,α,β=o,g,w
(139)aαβκiαβ=1|V|Aαβ[Diαραbiα,f(β)ραbiα,f(β)(vαwαβ)]nαβdA+,i=1,,n,α,β=o,g,w,βα

In these definitions we have just written the most relevant contributions as demonstrated elsewhere (Aguilar-Madera et al. 2011; Quintard, Kaviany, and Whitaker 1997; Valdés-Parada, Aguilar-Madera, and Alvarez-Ramirez 2011; Whitaker 1999). However, it is expected the inclusion of more terms related with other macroscale sources as written in eq. (77).

References

Aguilar-Madera, C.G., F.J. Valdés-Parada, B. Goyeau, and J.A. Ochoa-Tapia. 2011. “One-Domain Approach for Heat Transfer between a Porous Medium and a Fluid.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 54 (9–10): 2089–2099.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2010.12.020Search in Google Scholar

Alkindy, A., Y. Al-Wahaibi, B. Bijeljic, and A.H. Muggeridge. 2010. “Investigation of Longitudinal and Transverse Dispersion in Stable Displacements with a High Viscosity and Density Contrast between the Fluids.” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology.10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.06.006Search in Google Scholar

Ambastha, A.K., and M. Kumar. (1999).New Insights into In-Situ Combustion Simulation for Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA.10.2118/56543-MSSearch in Google Scholar

Anaya, I., R.E. La Cruz, A.J. Alvarez, D. Gutierrez, F.A. Skoreyko, and C. Card. (2010).Simulation Study for Designing an In-Situ Combustion Pilot in the Orinoco Belt of Venezuela: From Laboratory Studies to the Field Scale. Paper presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.10.2118/137491-MSSearch in Google Scholar

Aris, R 1956. “On the Dispersion of a Solute in a Fluid Flowing through a Tube.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 235 (1200): 67–77.10.1098/rspa.1956.0065Search in Google Scholar

Awoleke, O.G., L.M. Castanier, and A.R. Kovscek. (2010).An Experimental Investigation of In-Situ Combustion in Heterogeneous Media. Paper presented at the Canadian Unconventional Resources & International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.10.2118/137608-MSSearch in Google Scholar

Baz-Rodríguez, S.A., R. Ocampo-Pérez, J.P. Ruelas-Leyva, and C.G. Aguilar-Madera. 2012. “Effective Transport Properties for the Pyridine-Granular Activated Carbon Adsorption System.” Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 29 (3): 599–611.10.1590/S0104-66322012000300017Search in Google Scholar

Belgrave, J.D.M., and R.G. Moore. 1992. “A Model for Improved Analysis of In-Situ Combustion Tube Tests.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 8: 75–88.10.1016/0920-4105(92)90046-4Search in Google Scholar

Bird, R.B., W.E. Stewart, and E.N. Lightfoot. 1998. Fenómenos De Transporte. México: Editorial Reverté.Search in Google Scholar

Cinar, M., L.M. Castanier, and A.R. Kovscek. 2009. “Isoconversional Kinetic Analysis of the Combustion of Heavy Hydrocarbons.” Energy & Fuels 23: 4003–4015.10.1021/ef900222wSearch in Google Scholar

Edwards, D.A., M. Shapiro, and H. Brenner. 1993. “Dispersion and Reaction in Two-Dimensional Model Porous Media.” Physical Fluids A 5 (4): 837–848.10.1063/1.858631Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Paredes, G 2010. “Instantaneous Equations for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media without Length-Scale Restrictions Using a Non-Local Averaging Volume.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 240: 1160–1185.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.01.018Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Paredes, G 2014. “Heat Transfer Processes Upscaling in Geoenergy Fields.” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects 36 (20): 2254–2262.10.1080/15567036.2011.565308Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Paredes, G 2015. “Diffusive Transport in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs: Averaging Equations.” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects 37 (15).10.1080/15567036.2011.642059Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Paredes, G., J.R. Varela-Ham, and E.G. Espinosa-Martínez. 2015. “Multiphase Flow in a Naturally Fractured Reservoir: Equation of Continuity.” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects 37: 10.10.1080/15567036.2011.601801Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Paredes, G., A. Vázquez-Rodríguez, E.G. Espinosa-Martínez, O. Cazarez-Candia, M. Díaz-Viera, and A. Moctezuma-Berthier. 2013a. “A Numerical Analysis of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamic Effects in Oil Field: Two-Equation Model.” Petroleum Science and Technology 31 (2): 192–203.10.1080/10916466.2010.525579Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Paredes, G., A. Vázquez-Rodríguez, E.G. Espinosa-Martínez, H. Romero-Paredes, R. Vázquez-Rodríguez, J.R. Varela-Ham, J.J. Ambriz-García, and E. Torijano-Cabrera. 2012. “A Three-Equation Model for the Heat Transfer Process in an Oil Field.” Petroleum Science and Technology 30 (3): 327–338.10.1080/10916466.2010.481654Search in Google Scholar

Espinosa-Paredes, G., A. Vázquez-Rodríguez, E.G. Espinosa-Martínez, H. Romero-Paredes, R. Vázquez-Rodríguez, J.R. Varela-Ham, J.J. Ambriz-García, and E. Torijano-Cabrera. 2013b. “The One-Equation Model for Heat Transfer Process in an Oil Field.” Petroleum Science and Technology 31 (1): 13–22.10.1080/10916466.2010.485163Search in Google Scholar

Fadaei, H.. “ Etude de la récuperation de bruts lourds en réservoir carbonaté fracturé par le procédé de combustion in situ.”. Toulouse, France: Université de Toulouse, 2009. Ph.D.Search in Google Scholar

Fadaei, H., L. Castanier, A.M. Kamp, G. Debenest, M. Quintard, and G. Renard. 2011. “Experimental and Numerical Analysis of In-Situ Combustion in a Fractured Core.” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 16 (2): 358–373.10.2118/141117-PASearch in Google Scholar

Fatemi, S.M., and R. Kharrat. 2008. “Feasibility Study of Top-Down In-Situ Combustion in Fractured Carbonate Systems.” Brazilian Journal of Petroleum and Gas 2 (3): 96–105.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, W.G 1975. “A Derivation of the Equations for Multiphase Transport.” Chemical Engineering Science 30: 229–233.10.1016/0009-2509(75)80010-8Search in Google Scholar

Gutierrez, D., R.G. Moore, S.A. Mehta, M.G. Ursenbach, and F. Skoreyko. 2009. “The Challenge of Predicting Field Performance of Air Injection Projects Based on Laboratory and Numerical Modelling.” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 48 (4): 23–34.10.2118/09-04-23-DASearch in Google Scholar

Howes, F.A., and S. Whitaker. 1985. “The Spatial Averaging Theorem Revisited.” Chemical Engineering Science 40 (8): 1387–1392.10.1016/0009-2509(85)80078-6Search in Google Scholar

Kök, M.V., and C. Acar. 2006. “Kinetics of Crude Oil Combustion.” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 83 (2): 445–449.10.1007/s10973-005-7152-3Search in Google Scholar

Kök, M.V., G. Guner, and S. Bagci. 2008. “Combustion Kinetics of Oil Shales by Reaction Cell Experiments.” Oil Shale 25 (1): 5–16.10.3176/oil.2008.1.02Search in Google Scholar

Leahy-Dios, A., and A. Firoozabadi. 2007. “Unified Model for Nonlinear Multicomponent Molecular Diffusion Coefficients.” AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers 53 (11): 2932–2939.10.1002/aic.11279Search in Google Scholar

Mamora, D.D.. “ Kinetics of in situ combustion.”. Ann Arbor, USA: Standford University, 1993. Ph.D. Doctoral dissertation.10.2172/10175378Search in Google Scholar

Nield, D.A., and A. Bejan. 2006. Convection in Porous Media., 3. USA: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Ochoa-Tapia, J.A., J.A. Del Río, and S. Whitaker. 1993. “Bulk and Surface Diffusion in Porous Media: An Apllication of the Surface-Averaging Theorem.” Chemical Engineering Science 48 (11): 2061–2082.10.1016/0009-2509(93)80082-2Search in Google Scholar

Ochoa-Tapia, J.A., and S. Whitaker. 1997. “Heat Transfer at the Boundary between a Porous Medium and a Homogeneous Fluid.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 40 (11): 2691–2707.10.1016/S0017-9310(96)00250-5Search in Google Scholar

Oskouei, S.J.P., R.G. Moore, B. Maini, and S.A. Mehta. 2011. “Feasibility of In-Situ Combustion in the SAGD Chamber.” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 50 (4): 31–44.10.2118/137832-PASearch in Google Scholar

Plumb, O.A., and S. Whitaker. 1988. “Dispersion in Heterogeneous Porous Media. I. Local Volume Averaging and Large-Scale Averaging.” Water Resources Research 24 (7): 913–926.10.1029/WR024i007p00913Search in Google Scholar

Porta, G.M., M. Riva, and A. Guadagnini. 2012. “Upscaling Solute Transport in Porous Media in the Presence of an Irreversible Bimolecular Reaction.” Advances in Water Resources 35: 151–162.10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Quintard, M., M. Kaviany, and S. Whitaker. 1997. “Two-Medium Treatment of Heat Transfer in Porous Media: Numerical Results for Effective Properties.” Advances in Water Resources 20: 77–94.10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00024-3Search in Google Scholar

Quintard, M., and S. Whitaker. 1998. “Transport in Chemically and Mechanically Heterogeneous Porous media-IV. Large-Scale Mass Equilibrium for Solute Transport with Adsorption.” Advances in Water Resources 22 (1): 33–57.10.1016/S0309-1708(97)00027-4Search in Google Scholar

Sarathi, P.S 1999. In-Situ Combustion Handbook- Principles and Practices. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: National Petroleum Technology Office.10.2172/3175Search in Google Scholar

Schulte, W.M., and A.S. De Vries. 1985. “In-Situ Combustion in Naturally Fractured Heavy Oil Reservoirs.” Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal 25 (1): 67–77.10.2118/10723-PASearch in Google Scholar

Soria, A., and H.I. De Lasa. 1991. “Averaged Transport Equations for Multiphase Systems with Interfacial Effects.” Chemical Engineering Science 46 (8): 2093–2111.10.1016/0009-2509(91)80167-WSearch in Google Scholar

Turta, A.T., S.K. Chattopadhyay, R.N. Bhattacharya, A. Condrachi, and W. Hanson. (2005).Current Status of the Commercial in Situ Combustion (ISC) Projects and New Approaches to Apply ISC. Paper presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.10.2118/2005-002Search in Google Scholar

Valdés-Parada, F.J., C.G. Aguilar-Madera, and J. Alvarez-Ramirez. 2011. “On Diffusion, Dispersion and Reaction in Porous Media.” Chemical Engineering Science 66 (10): 2177–2190.10.1016/j.ces.2011.02.016Search in Google Scholar

Valdés-Parada, F.J., M.L. Porter, and B.D. Wood. 2010. “The Role of Tortuosity in Upscaling.” Transport in Porous Media.10.1007/s11242-010-9613-9Search in Google Scholar

Vital-Ocampo, A.G.. “ Modelo matemático promediado en volumen para la transferencia de calor en medios porosos con tres fases.”. Cenidet, Cuernavaca, México: , 2011. Ph.D.Search in Google Scholar

Whitaker, S 1992. “The Species Mass Jump Condition at a Singular Surface.” Chemical Engineering Science 47 (7): 1677–1685.10.1016/0009-2509(92)85015-4Search in Google Scholar

Whitaker, S 1999. The Method of Volume Averaging. Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-3389-2Search in Google Scholar

Whitaker, S 2009. “Derivation and Application of the Stefan-Maxwell Equations.” Revista Mexicana De Ingeniería Química 8 (3): 213–243.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, B.D 2007. “Inertial Effects in Dispersion in Porous Media.” Water Resources Research 43 (12):. W12S16.10.1029/2006WR005790Search in Google Scholar

Wood, B.D., and F.J. Valdés-Parada. 2013. “Volume Averaging: Local and Nonlocal Closures Using a Green’s Function Approach.” Advances in Water Resources 51: 139–167.10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.06.008Search in Google Scholar

Zanotti, F., and R.G. Carbonell. 1984. “Development of Transport Equations for Multiphase Systems-I. General Development for Two Phase Systems.” Chemical Engineering Science 39: 263–278.10.1016/0009-2509(84)80026-3Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L., and N.A. Seaton. 1994. “The Application of Continuum Equations to Diffusion and Reaction in Pore Networks.” Chemical Engineering Science 49 (1): 41–50.10.1016/0009-2509(94)85032-1Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Z., M. Bazargan, A. Lapene, M. Gerritsen, L. Castanier, and A. Kovscek. (2011).Upscaling for Field-Scale In-Situ Combustion Simulation. Paper presented at the SPE Western Regional Meeting Anchorage. Alaska, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-8-31

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Special Issue in Honor of J. Alberto Ochoa-Tapia
  3. Research Articles
  4. The Scientific Achievements of J. Alberto Ochoa-Tapia
  5. Volume Averaged Equations for Mass Transport and Reaction for In-Situ Combustion
  6. Non-Isothermal Effectiveness Factor for Catalytic Particles with Non-Fickian Diffusion
  7. Finite Time Estimation for Switched Nonlinear Systems: Application to Stirred Tank Bioreactor
  8. Numerical Solution for a System of Fractional Differential Equations with Applications in Fluid Dynamics and Chemical Engineering
  9. Characterization and Evaluation of Sorbent Materials Obtained from Orange Peel as an Alternative of Sustainable Materials for Water Treatment
  10. Metal complexes supported on activated carbon as catalysts for the hydrogenation of anthracene
  11. Iron Supported on Ion Exchange Resin as Source of Iron for Fenton Reagent: A Heterogeneous or a Homogeneous Fenton Reagent Generation?
  12. Stokes Flow Inside Topographically Patterned Microchannel Using Boundary Element Method
  13. Degradation and Mineralization of a Cationic Dye by a Sequential Photo-Sono Catalytic Process
  14. Preparation of Mo/HZSM-5/Bentonite Catalyst for Methane Aromatization in a Fluidized Bed Reactor
  15. On the Understanding of the Adsorption of 2-Phenylethanol on Polyurethane-Keratin based Membranes
  16. La-, Mn- and Fe-Doped Zirconia Washcoats Deposited on Monolithic Reactors via Sol-Gel Method: Characterization and Evaluation of their Mass Transfer Phenomena and Kinetics in Trichloroethylene Combustion
  17. State Estimation Based on Nonlinear Observer for Hydrogen Production in a Photocatalytic Anaerobic Bioreactor
Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2017-0124/html
Scroll to top button