Startseite Existence of Synergistic Effects During Co-pyrolysis of Petroleum Coke and Wood Pellet
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Existence of Synergistic Effects During Co-pyrolysis of Petroleum Coke and Wood Pellet

  • Pratik Toshniwal und Vimal Chandra Srivastava EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. Juli 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This study attempts to comprehend the thermal degradation behaviour of different blends of petroleum coke (denoted as PC) and wood pellets (denoted as WP) (1:0, 3:1, 1:1. 1:3 and 0:1) using thermogravimetric (denoted as TG) analysis under N2 atmosphere with constant particle size range of 500–850 µm and at constant heating rate of 5 °C/min. TG experiments indicated that it is difficult to predict the pyrolysis characteristics of their blends accurately based on individual components and blending ratios. The non-additive behaviour of TG curves of the blends indicates presence of synergistic effects which could further promote the volatile yields during the co-pyrolysis process. The mixed model including homogeneous reaction model (denoted as HRM) and shrinking core model (denoted as SCM) models were used to predict the variation in kinetic parameters (activation energy and pre-exponential factor) with different blend ratios. The most obvious synergistic effects were observed when the blending ratio was 25 % on account of maximum mass loss rate from the differential thermogravimetry (denoted as DTG), maximum deviation based on root mean square (denoted as RMS) value as well as divergence in the differential thermogravimetric analysis (denoted as DTA) curve.

References

1. 1. Aboyade, A.O., Gorgens, J.F., Carrier, M., Meyer, E.L., Knoetze, J.H., 2013. Thermogravimetric Study of the Pyrolysis Characteristics and Kinetics of Coal Blends with Corn and Sugarcane Residues. Fuel Process Technol. 106, 310–320.10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.08.014Suche in Google Scholar

2. 2. Acosta, R., Tavera, C., Gauthier-Maradei, P., Nabarlatz, D. 2015. Production of Oil and Char by Intermediate Pyrolysis of Scrap Tyres: Influence on Yield and Product Characteristics. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 13(2), 189–200.10.1515/ijcre-2014-0137Suche in Google Scholar

3. 3. Chowdhury, R., Sarkary, A., 2012. Reaction Kinetics and Product Distribution of Slow Pyrolysis of Indian Textile Wastes. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. A 67, 1–21.10.1515/1542-6580.2662Suche in Google Scholar

4. 4. Edreis, E.M.A, Luo, G.Q., Li, A.J., Xu, C.F., Yao, H., 2014. Synergistic Effects and Kinetics Thermal Behaviour of PC/Biomass Blends During H2O Cogasification. Energy Convers. Manage. 79, 355–366.10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.043Suche in Google Scholar

5. 5. Fermoso, J., Arias, B., Gil, M., Plaza, M., Pevida, C., Pis, J., Rubiera, F., 2010. Cogasification of Different Rank Coals with Biomass and Petroleum Coke in a High Pressure Reactor for H2-Rich Gas Production. Bioresour. Technol. 101(9), 3230–3235.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.035Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. 6. Gil, M., Casal, D., Pevida, C., Pis, J., Rubiera, F., 2010. Thermal Behaviour and Kinetics of Coal/Biomass Blends during Co-combustion. Bioresour. Technol. 01(14), 5601–5608.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. 7. Haykiri-Acma, H., Yaman, S., 2007. Synergy in Devolatilization Characteristics of Lignite and Hazelnut Shell During Co-pyrolysis. Fuel 86, 373–380.10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.005Suche in Google Scholar

8. 8. Haykiri-Acma, H., Yaman, S., 2009. Thermogravimetric Investigation on the Thermal Reactivity of Biomass During Slow Pyrolysis. Int. J. Green Energy 6, 333–342.10.1080/15435070903106959Suche in Google Scholar

9. 9. Idris, S.S., Rahman, N.A., Ismail, K., Alias, A.B., Rashid, Z.A., Aris, M.J., 2010. Investigation on Thermochemical Behaviour of Low Rank Malaysian Coal, Oil Palm Biomass and their Blends during Pyrolysis via Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA). Bioresour. Technol. 101(12), 4584–4592.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.059Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. 10. Jones, M.J., Kubacki, M., Kubica, K., Ross, A.B., Williams, A., 2005. Devolatilization Characteristics of Coal and Biomass Blends. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 74, 502–511.10.1016/j.jaap.2004.11.018Suche in Google Scholar

11. 11. Kai, J.Q., Wang, Y.P., Zhou, L.M., Huang, Q.W., 2008. Thermogravimetric Analysis and Kinetics of Coal/Plastic Blends During Co-pyrolysis in Nitrogen Atmosphere. Fuel Process Technol. 89, 21–27.10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.06.006Suche in Google Scholar

12. 12. Kempegowda, R., Assabumrungrat, S., Laosiripojana, N., 2010. Thermodynamic Analysis for Gasification of Thailand Rice Husk with Air, Steam, and Mixed Air/Steam for Hydrogen-Rich Gas Production. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 8, A158, 1–29.10.2202/1542-6580.2378Suche in Google Scholar

13. 13. Lazaro, M.J., Moliner, R., Suelves, I., 1998. Non-Isothermal versus Isothermal Technique to Evaluate Kinetic Parameters of Coal Pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 47(2), 111–125.10.1016/S0165-2370(98)00083-7Suche in Google Scholar

14. 14. Li, Z., Chen, Z., Liu, C., Hu, Z., Zhao, W., Zhao, G., 2011. Study on Pyrolysis Characteristics of Corn Straw. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. A46, 1–14.10.1515/1542-6580.2420Suche in Google Scholar

15. 15. Liu, M., Duan, Y., Ma, X., 2014. Effect of Surface Chemistry and Structure of Sludge Particles on Their Co-slurrying Ability with Petroleum Coke. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 12(1), 429–439.10.1515/ijcre-2014-0033Suche in Google Scholar

16. 16. Mi, T., Wu, Z.S., Shen, B.X., Chen, H.P., Liu. D.C., 2002. An Experimental Study of Combustion Characteristics of Petroleum Coke. Dev. Chem. Eng. Mineral Process 10(5/6), 601–614.10.1002/apj.5500100611Suche in Google Scholar

17. 17. Molina, A., Mondragón, F., 1998. Reactivity of Coal Gasification with Steam and CO2. Fuel 77(15), 1831–1839.10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00123-9Suche in Google Scholar

18. 18. Nowak, B., Karlström, O., Backman, P., Brink, A., Zevenhoven, M., Voglsam, S., 2013. Mass Transfer Limitation in Thermogravimetry of Biomass Gasification. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 111, 183–192.10.1007/s10973-012-2400-9Suche in Google Scholar

19. 19. Park, D.K., Kim S.D., Lee, S.H., Lee, J.G., 2010. Co-pyrolysis Characteristics of Sawdust and Coal Blend in TGA and a Fixed Bed Reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 6151–6156.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.087Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. 20. Roberts, D.G., Harris, D.J., Wall, T.F., 2003. Effects of High Pressure and Heating Rate During Coal Pyrolysis on Char Gasification Reactivity. Energy Fuels 17, 887–895.10.1021/ef020199wSuche in Google Scholar

21. 21. Schnial, M., Lulz, J., 1982. Kinetics of Coal Gasification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 21, 256–266.10.1021/i200017a008Suche in Google Scholar

22. 22. Soncini, R.M., Means, N.C., Weiland, N.T., 2013. Co-pyrolysis of Low Rank Coals and Biomass: Product Distributions. Fuel 112, 74–82.10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.073Suche in Google Scholar

23. 23. Song, Y.Y., Tahmasebi, A., Yu, J.L., 2014. Co-pyrolysis of Pine Sawdust and Lignite in a Thermogravimetric Analyzer and a Fixed-Bed Reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 174, 204–211.10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.027Suche in Google Scholar

24. 24. Thanatawee, P., Rukthong, W., Sunphorka, S., Piumsomboon, P., Chalermsinsuwan, B., 2016. Effect of Biomass Compositions on Combustion Kinetic Parameters Using Response Surface Methodology. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 14(1), 517–526.10.1515/ijcre-2015-0082Suche in Google Scholar

25. 25. Ulloa, C.A., Gordon, A.L., Garcia, X.A., 2009. Thermogravimetric Study of Interactions in the Pyrolysis of Blends of Coal with Radiata Pine Sawdust. Fuel Process Technol. 90, 583–590.10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.12.015Suche in Google Scholar

26. 26. Vhathvarothai, N., Ness, J., Yu, Q.M.J., 2014. An Investigation of Thermal Behaviour of Biomass and Coal During Copyrolysis using Thermogravimetric Analysis. Int. J. Energy Res. 38, 1145–1154.10.1002/er.3120Suche in Google Scholar

27. 27. Vuthaluru, H.B., 2003. Thermal Behaviour of Coal/Biomass Blends During Co-Pyrolysis. Fuel Process. Technol. 85, 141–155.10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00112-7Suche in Google Scholar

28. 28. Wang, J., Zhang, S.Y., Guo, X., Dong, A.X., Chen, C., Xiong, S.W., 2012. Thermal Behavior and Kinetics of Pingshuo Coal/Biomass Blends During Copyrolysis and Cocombustion. Energy Fuels 26, 7120–7126.10.1021/ef301473kSuche in Google Scholar

29. 29. Wang, W., Zhang, X., Li, Y., 2013. Study of Co-pyrolysis Characteristics of Lignite and Rice Husk in a TGA and a Fixed Bed Reactor. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 11(1), 479–488.10.1515/ijcre-2013-0049Suche in Google Scholar

30. 30. Wu, Z.Q., Wang, S.J., Zhao, J., Chen, L., Meng, H.Y., 2014. Thermal Behavior and Char Structure Evolution of Bituminous Coal Blends with Edible Fungi Residue During Co-pyrolysis. Energy Fuels 28, 1792–1801.10.1021/ef500261qSuche in Google Scholar

31. 31. Yaman, S., 2004. Pyrolysis of Biomass to Produce Fuels and Chemical Feedstocks. Energy Convers. Manage. 45, 651–671.10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00177-8Suche in Google Scholar

32. 32. Yan, W.P., Chen, Y.Y., 2007. Interaction Performance of Co-pyrolysis of Biomass Mixture and Coal of Different Rank. Proc CSEE 27, 80–86.Suche in Google Scholar

33. 33. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D.H., Zheng, C., 2007. Characteristics of Hemicellulose, Cellulose and Lignin Pyrolysis. Fuel 86, 1781–1788.10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013Suche in Google Scholar

34. 34. Yangali, P., Goldfarb, J.L., Celaya, A.M., 2014. Co-pyrolysis Reaction Rates and Activation Energies of West Virginia Coal and Cherry Pit Blends. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 108, 203–211.10.1016/j.jaap.2014.04.015Suche in Google Scholar

35. 35. Yuan, S., Dai, Z.H., Zhou, Z.J., Chen, X.L., Yu, G.S., Wang, F.C., 2012. Rapid Co-pyrolysis of Rice Traw and a Bituminous Coal in a High-Frequency Furnace and Gasification of the Residual Char. Bioresour. Technol. 109, 188–197.10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2016-07-19
Published in Print: 2017-04-01

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Articles
  2. Genetic Programming based Drag Model with Improved Prediction Accuracy for Fluidization Systems
  3. Catalytic Photodegradation of Rhodamine B in the Presence of Natural Iron Oxide and Oxalic Acid under Artificial and Sunlight Radiation
  4. Esterification of Lauric Acid with Glycerol in the Presence of STA/MCM-41 Catalysts
  5. Existence of Synergistic Effects During Co-pyrolysis of Petroleum Coke and Wood Pellet
  6. Photocatalytic Treatment of Binary Mixture of Dyes using UV/TiO2 Process: Calibration, Modeling, Optimization and Mineralization Study
  7. Aqueous Phase Biosorption of Pb(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II) onto Cabbage Leaves Powder
  8. Design and Simulation of a Chaotic Micromixer with Diamond-Like Micropillar Based on Artificial Neural Network
  9. Experimentally Validated CFD Model for Gas-Liquid Flow in a Round-Bottom Stirred Tank Equipped with Rushton Turbine
  10. Pyrolysis Products Characterization and Dynamic Behaviors of Hydrothermally Treated Lignite
  11. Pd/ZrO2: An Efficient Catalyst for Liquid Phase Oxidation of Toluene in Solvent Free Conditions
  12. Micro-reactor for Non-catalyzed Esterification Reaction: Performance and Modeling
  13. Mathematical Modeling of Carbon Nanotubes Formation in Fluidized Bed Chemical Vapor Deposition
  14. Electrogeneration of Active Chlorine in a Filter-Press-Type Reactor Using a New Sb2O5 Doped Ti/RuO2-ZrO2 Electrode: Indirect Indigoid Dye Oxidation
  15. Adsorptive Removal of As(III) from Aqueous Solution by Raw Coconut Husk and Iron Impregnated Coconut Husk: Kinetics and Equilibrium Analyses
  16. Synthesis and Optical Properties of Sb-Doped CdS Photocatalysts and Their Use in Methylene Blue (MB) Degradation
Heruntergeladen am 30.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0046/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen