Startseite Digital consumer behaviour: insights into the perceptions of late adolescents’ consumption of digital media on cognitive health
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Digital consumer behaviour: insights into the perceptions of late adolescents’ consumption of digital media on cognitive health

  • Suzan Deenal Pinto und Malavika Anakkathil Anil ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 30. August 2023

Abstract

Objectives

Digital media has become an indispensable facet of adolescents’ everyday lives, playing a crucial role in their daily routines, encompassing various activities such as accessing information, accomplishing academic tasks, and facilitating interpersonal communication. Literature evidence on the effects of digital media on cognitive health is bi-directional, having both positive and negative impacts. The present research aimed to explore the perceptions of digital media consumption on cognitive health in late adolescents between the age of 17 and 21 years.

Methods

A self-reported online survey was administered to 173 adolescents, and the data were analysed using statistical software (SPSS 17).

Results

The findings revealed that some late adolescents recognize the importance of cognition in their daily activities and health, particularly for activities focused on cognitive, academic, personal, and social skills. Mobile phones, laptops, and television were the most commonly preferred gadgets, while e-pads, Alexa, smartwatches, Kindle, tablets, and play stations were less preferred. Interestingly, a high proportion of participants reported neutral perceptions of digital media’s influence on cognitive health, highlighting the need to create awareness and educate late adolescents on healthy digital media consumption.

Conclusions

The findings hold significant implications for the development of comprehensive guidelines and evidence-based recommendations for digital media usage among late adolescents. Additionally, the research sheds light on the strategies adopted by adolescents to regulate and optimize their consumption of digital media, thereby providing valuable insights into effective practices and potential areas for improvement.


Corresponding author: Malavika Anakkathil Anil, Research Assistant, Present Affiliation: The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. Past Affiliation: Associate Professor, Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India, Phone: +91 414 794 717, E-mail:

  1. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  2. Ethical approval: The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.

  3. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no competing of interest.

  5. Research funding: None declared.

References

1. Kelly, SA, Melnyk, BM, Jacobson, DL, O’Haver, JA. Correlates among healthy lifestyle cognitive beliefs, healthy lifestyle choices, social support, and healthy behaviors in adolescents: implications for behavioral change strategies and future research. J Pediatr Health Care 2011;25:216–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Jonathan, ST, Evans, BT. Questions and challenges for the new psychology of reasoning. Think Reas 2012;18:5–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2011.637674.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Bradley, BJ, Greene, AC. Do health and education agencies in the United States share responsibility for academic achievement and health? A review of 25 years of evidence about the relationship of adolescents’ academic achievement and health behaviors. J Adolesc Health 2013;52:523–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.008.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Fleming-Moran, M, Thiagarajah, K. Behavioral interventions and the role of television in the growing epidemic of adolescent obesity. Methods Inf Med 2005;44:303–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1633968.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Berson, MJ, Balyta, P. Technological thinking and practice in the social studies. J Comput Teach Educ 2004;20:141–50.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Dienlin, T, Johannes, N. The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2020;22:135–42. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/tdienlin.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Koehler, MJ, Mishra, P, Cain, W. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? J Educ 2013;193:13–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Prensky, M, Roubaud, F, Razafindrakoto, M. Do they really think differently? Horizon 2001;9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203987735.ch5.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Martocchio, JJ, Webster, J. Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Person Psychol 1992;45:553–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00860.x.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Small, G, Vorgan, G. Your Ibrain: how technology changes the way we think: Scientific American; 2008. http://sites.uem.br/prointe/cidade-gaucha/inscricoes-oficina-de-ingles-instrumental-1/material-das-oficinas/04-02-17/20.-Uso-do-Dicionario.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Carr, N. The shallows: how the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic Books Ltd.; 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Hembrooke, H, Gay, G. The laptop and the lecture: the effects of multitasking in learning environments. J Comput High Educ 2003;15:46–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940852.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Bowman, LL, Levine, LE, Waite, BM, Gendron, M. Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Comput Educ 2010;54:927–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Friend, A. Rewired: understanding the iGeneration and the way they learn. Int J Edu Integr 2010;6:64–6. https://doi.org/10.21913/ijei.v6i2.704.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Bauerlein, M, Walesh, SG. The dumbest generation—how the digital age stupefies young Americans and jeopardizes our future. Leader Manag Eng 2009;9:100. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1532-6748(2009)9:2(100).10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2009)9:2(100)Suche in Google Scholar

16. Atack, L. Becoming a web-based learner: registered nurses’ experiences. J Adv Nurs 2003;44:289–97. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02804.x.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Niederhauser, DS, Reynolds, RE, Salmen, DJ, Skolmoski, P. The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. J Educ Comput Res 2000;23:237–55. https://doi.org/10.2190/81BG-RPDJ-9FA0-Q7PA.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Albert, MS, Brown, DR, Buchner, D, Laditka, J, Launer, LJ, Scherr, P, et al.. The healthy brain and our aging population: translating science to public health practice. Alzheimers Dement 2007;3:S3–5 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALZ.2007.01.016.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Hendrie, HC, Albert, MS, Butters, MA, Gao, S, Knopman, DS, Launer, LJ, et al.. The NIH cognitive and emotional health project. Report of the critical evaluation study committee. Alzheimers Dement 2006;2:12–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALZ.2005.11.004.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Colcombe, SJ, Kramer, AF, Erickson, KI, Scalf, P, McAuley, E, Cohen, NJ, et al.. Cardiovascular fitness, cortical plasticity, and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:3316–21. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.0400266101.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Kleim, JA, Jones, TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008;51:225–39. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/018.Suche in Google Scholar

22. Thompson, P. The digital natives as learners: technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Comput Educ 2013;65:12–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022.Suche in Google Scholar

23. Opsenica Kostić, J, Pedović, I, Stošić, M. Predicting social media use intensity in late adolescence: the role of attachment to friends and fear of missing out. Acta Psychol 2022;229:103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTPSY.2022.103667.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Livingstone, S, Haddon, L, Hasebrink, U, Ólafsson, K, O’Neill, B, Smahel, D, et al.. EU kids online: findings, methods, recommendations. London: LSE; 2014. Available from: http://lsedesignunit. com/EUKidsOnline.Suche in Google Scholar

25. Choi, A. Emotional well-being of children and adolescents: recent trends and relevant factors. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

26. Cerniglia, L, Guicciardi, M, Sinatra, M, Monacis, L, Simonelli, A, Cimino, S. The use of digital technologies, impulsivity and psychopathological symptoms in adolescence. Behav Sci. 2019;9:82–92. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9080082.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Polit, DF, Beck, CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006;29:489–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Sparrow, B, Liu, J, Wegner, DM. Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science 2011;333:776–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1207745.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Prensky, M. Digital game-based learning. Comput Entertain 2003;1:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950596.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Kelly, EL, Tranby, E, Huang, Q. Changing work, changing health: can real work-time flexibility promote health behaviors and well-being? J Health Soc Behav 2011;52:404–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146511418979.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Twenge, JM, Martin, GN, Spitzberg, BH. Trends in U.S. Adolescents’ media use, 1976–2016: the rise of digital media, the decline of TV, and the (near) demise of print. Psychol Pop Media Cult 2018;8:329–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/PPM0000203.Suche in Google Scholar

32. vanden Abeele, MMP. Mobile lifestyles: conceptualizing heterogeneity in mobile youth culture. New Media Soc 2014;18:908–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814551349.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Internet Usage Statistics. World internet users statistics and 2022 world population stats; 2022. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm [Accessed 29 Dec 2022].Suche in Google Scholar

34. Cilliers, EJ. The challenge of teaching generation Z. People: Int J Soc Sci 2017;3:188–98. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Marciano, L, Ostroumova, M, Schulz, PJ, Camerini, AL. Digital media use and adolescents’ mental health during the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health 2022;9:2208. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPUBH.2021.793868.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

36. Singh, S, Balhara, YPL. “Screen-time” for children and adolescents in COVID-19 times: need to have the contextually informed perspective. Indian J Psychiatr 2021;63:192–5.10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_646_20Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

37. Livingstone, S, Helsper, E. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media Soc 2010;12:309–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342697.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Sasson, H, Mesch, G. Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Comput Hum Behav 2014;33:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2013.12.025.Suche in Google Scholar

39. Moreno, MA, Gannon, K. Social media and health. Adolesc Med State Art Rev 2013;24:538–52. https://doi.org/10.1542/9781581108736-social_media.Suche in Google Scholar

40. Chassiakos, YR, Radesky, J, Christakis, D, Moreno, MA, Cross, C, Hill, D, et al.. Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics 2016;138:e20162593. https://doi.org/10.1542/PEDS.2016-2593.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Hanprathet, N, Manwong, M, Khumsri, J, Yingyeun, R, Phanasathit, M. Facebook addiction and its relationship with mental health among Thai high school students. J Med Assoc Thai 2015;98:S81–90.Suche in Google Scholar

42. Yan, H, Zhang, R, Oniffrey, TM, Chen, G, Wang, Y, Wu, Y, et al.. Associations among screen time and unhealthy behaviors, academic performance, and well-being in Chinese adolescents. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 2017;14:596. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH14060596.Suche in Google Scholar

43. Etchells, PJ, Gage, SH, Rutherford, AD, Munafò, MR. Prospective investigation of video game use in children and subsequent conduct disorder and depression using data from the avon longitudinal study of parents and children. PLoS One 2016;11:e0147732. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0147732.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Parkes, A, Sweeting, H, Wight, D, Henderson, M. Do television and electronic games predict children’s psychosocial adjustment? Longitudinal research using the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Arch Dis Child 2013;98:341–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/ARCHDISCHILD-2011-301508.Suche in Google Scholar

45. Przybylski, AK. Electronic gaming and psychosocial adjustment. Pediatrics 2014;134:e716–22. https://doi.org/10.1542/PEDS.2013-4021.Suche in Google Scholar

46. Valkenburg, PM, Peter, J. Social consequences of the Internet for adolescents: a decade of research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2009;18:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8721.2009.01595.X.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-04-05
Accepted: 2023-08-07
Published Online: 2023-08-30

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 6.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2023-0045/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen