Using theory of planned behavior for prediction of delivery mode among pregnant women: a theory-based cross-sectional research

References

[1] Cunningham F, leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Abortion. Williams obstetrics. New York: McGraw Hill, 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Rep. 2010;30:1–31.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Laluei A, Kashanizadeh N, Teymouri M. The influence of academic educations on choosing preferable delivery method in obstetrics medical team: investigating their viewpoints. Int J Med Educ. 2009;9(1):69–78.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] World Health Statistic. Available from: http://www.who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS2012_Full.pdf. [Accessed May 4, 2013]. 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Statistics of Iranian Ministry of Health. Health, Care and Education Office. Available from: http://behdasht.gov.ir/. [Accessed May 4, 2012]. 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Harper MA, Byington RP, Espeland MA, Naughton M, Meyer R, Lane K. Pregnancy-related death and health care services. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(2):273–8.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–9.10.1056/NEJMoa040405Suche in Google Scholar

[8] Dietz H, Lanzarone V, Simpson J. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27(4):409–15.10.1002/uog.2731Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y. Believing in birth–choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(8):1561–1570.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01747.xSuche in Google Scholar

[10] Fathian Z, Sharifirad GR, Hasanzadeh A, Fathian Z. Study of the effects of behavioral intention model education on reducing the cesarean rate among pregnant women of Khomeiny-Shahr, Isfahan, in 2006. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2007;9(2):123–31.Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Fenwick J, Gamble J, Hauck Y. Believing in birth–choosing VBAC: the childbirth expectations of a self-selected cohort of Australian women. J Clin Nurs. 2007;16(8):1561–70.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01747.xSuche in Google Scholar

[12] Bernstein SN, Matalon-Grazi S, Rosenn BM. Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean: are patients making an informed decision? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(3):201–6.10.1097/OGX.0b013e31827d7bccSuche in Google Scholar

[13] Lowe RH, Frey JD. Predicting Lamaze childbirth intentions and outcomes: an extension of the theory of reasoned action to a joint outcome. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1983;4(4):353–72.10.1207/s15324834basp0404_5Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Mohammadpourasl A, Asgharian P, Rostami F, Azizi A, Akbari H. Investigating the choice of delivery method type and its related factors in pregnant women in Maragheh. Knowledge Health. 2009;4(1):36–9.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Negahban T, Ansari Jaberi A, Kazemi M. Preference method of delivery and it’s relevant causes in view of pregnant women referring to public and private clinics in Rafsanjan city. JRUMS. 2006;5(3):161–8.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Pakenham S, Chamberlain SM, Smith GN. Women’s views on elective primary caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28(12):1089–94.10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32335-0Suche in Google Scholar

[17] Ridley RT, Davis PA, Bright JH, Sinclair D. What influences a woman to choose vaginal birth after cesarean? J Obst Gyn Neo. 2002;31(6):665–72.10.1177/0884217502239212Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Sharifirad GR, Fathian Z, Tirani M, Mahaki B. Study on behavioral intention model (BIM) to the attitude of pregnant women toward normal delivery and cesarean section in province of Esfahan–Khomeiny shahr-1385. J Ilam Univ Med Sci. 2007;15(1):19–23.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] Smart DA. Attitudes, social support, and self-efficacy (ASE): a predictive model for vaginal birth intentions. Loma Linda: Loma Linda University; 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

[20] Fardi AZ, Jafari SM. A survey for determining factors on women’s attitudes toward vaginal and cesarean delivery. Med J Tabriz Univ Med Sci. 2003;59(3):66.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] Fathian Z, Sharifirad GR, Fathian Z, Pezeshkihebi F. Frequency of cesarean section and its related factors in Khomeinyshahr-Isfahan province 2005. Health Serv Res. 2011;6(4):786–93.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] Fertman CI, Allensworth DD. Health promotion programs: from theory to practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Francis JJ, Eccles MP, Johnston M, Walker A, Grimshaw J, Foy R, et al. Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne; 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] Hajian S, Vakilian K, Shariati M, Esmaeel AM. Attitude of pregnant women, midwives, obstetricians and anesthesiologists toward mode of delivery: a qualitative study. Payesh. 2011;10(1):39–48.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Kringeland T, Daltveit AK, Møller A. How does preference for natural childbirth relate to the actual mode of delivery? A population-based cohort study from Norway. Birth. 2010;37(1):21–7.10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00374.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Saffari M, Shojaeizadeh D, Ghofranipour F, Heydarnia A, Pakpour A. Health education and promotion-theories, models and methods. Tehran, Iran: Sobhan Publication; 2009. p. 55–7.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Yari P, Abadi A, Eetemad K. Study of effective factors on delivery mode selection in pregnant women referring in to the Tehran hospitals. J Knowledge Health. 2010;5(1):130–5.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] Chu K-H, Tai C-J, Hsu C-S, Yeh M-C, Chien L-Y. Women’s preference for cesarean delivery and differences between Taiwanese women undergoing different modes of delivery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):1.10.1186/1472-6963-10-138Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central