Abstract
Background
Little is known about the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and health in late adolescence. As it is difficult to measure SES in this age group directly, we used two subjective social status (SSS) scales with different reference groups for social comparison in the relatively homogeneous group of university students and analyzed the relationship with health and health behaviors.
Methods
We used two 10-rung ladders, a societal and a university one, to measure SSS in students (n = 689, 16–29 years). We compared the scales’ ratings and analyzed relationships with sociodemographic factors, health outcomes and behaviors.
Results
On average, students rated their individual SSS higher on the university scale (6.87) than on the societal one (6.41). Regarding health outcomes and behaviors, we found similar results for both scales, while sociodemographic variables were more likely to be associated with the societal scale.
Conclusion
SSS seems to be a useful measure besides the objective SES. Our data suggest that both SSS scales are helpful in the framework of health inequality but differ slightly in what they measure. More detailed research may help to determine which scale is appropriate for individual study context.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank all participants for participating in this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate: Each participant gave informed consent. The study obtained positive ethics approval by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University (2013-634N-MA).
Consent for publication
Availability of data and material: Questionnaire and data can be received from the corresponding author upon request.
Competing interests: None declared.
Funding: The NuPhA Study was partly financially supported by Institut Danone Ernährung für Gesundheit e.V. (grant number 2014/1).
Authors’ contributions: Study concept and design: KD; Acquisition of data: KD, JHi; Analysis of data: KD, JHi; Interpretation of data: KD, JHo, DS, JHi; Drafting of manuscript: KD, JHi; Critical revision: JHo, DS.
References
[1] Goodman E, Adler NE, Kawachi I, Frazier AL, Huang B, Colditz GA. Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):E31.10.1542/peds.108.2.e31Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[2] Wolff LS, Acevedo-Garcia D, Subramanian SV, Weber D, Kawachi I. Subjective social status, a new measure in health disparities research: do race/ethnicity and choice of referent group matter?. J Health Psychol. 2010;15(4):560–74.10.1177/1359105309354345Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[3] Karvonen S, Rahkonen O. Subjective social status and health in young people. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;33(3):372–83.10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01285.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[4] Hoebel J, Müters S, Kuntz B, Lange C, Lampert T. Measuring subjective social status in health research with a German version of the MacArthur Scale. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58(7):749–57.10.1007/s00103-015-2166-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[5] Adler NE, Epel ES, Castellazzo G, Ickovics JR. Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 2000;19(6):586–92.10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[6] Hegar R, Mielck A. “Subjective social status”. Importance for research and practice concerning the reduction of health inequalities. Präv Gesundheitsf. 2010;5(4):389–400.10.1007/s11553-010-0261-2Search in Google Scholar
[7] Ghaed SG, Gallo LC. Subjective social status, objective socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular risk in women. Health Psychol. 2007;26(6):668–74.10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.668Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Euteneuer F. Subjective social status and health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(5):337–43.10.1097/YCO.0000000000000083Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Euteneuer F, Süssenbach P, Schäfer SJ, Rief W. Subjective social status: MacArthur scales for the assessment of the perceived social status in the social environment (SSS-U) and in Germany (SSS-D). Verhaltenstherapie. 2015;25(3):229–32.10.1159/000371558Search in Google Scholar
[10] Hoebel J, Kuntz B, Muters S, Lampert T. Subjective social status and health-related quality of life among adults in Germany. Results from the German General Social Survey (ALLBUS 2010). Gesundheitswesen. 2013;75(10):643–51.10.1055/s-0032-1333211Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Wolff LS, Subramanian SV, Acevedo-Garcia D, Weber D, Kawachi I. Compared to whom? Subjective social status, self-rated health, and referent group sensitivity in a diverse US sample. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(12):2019–28.10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.033Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[12] Cundiff JM, Smith TW, Uchino BN, Berg CA. Subjective social status: construct validity and associations with psychosocial vulnerability and self-rated health. Int J Behav Med. 2013;20(1):148–58.10.1007/s12529-011-9206-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Haught HM, Rose J, Geers A, Brown JA. Subjective social status and well-being: the role of referent abstraction. J Soc Psychol. 2015;155(4):356–69.10.1080/00224545.2015.1015476Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[14] Goodman E, Adler NE, Daniels SR, Morrison JA, Slap GB, Dolan LM. Impact of objective and subjective social status on obesity in a biracial cohort of adolescents. Obes Res. 2003;11(8):1018–26.10.1038/oby.2003.140Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[15] Meireles AL, Xavier CC, Proietti FA, Caiaffa WT. Influence of individual and socio-environmental factors on self-rated health in adolescents. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;18(3):538–51.10.1590/1980-5497201500030002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[16] Moor I, Pfortner TK, Lampert T, Ravens-Sieberer U, Richter M, Deutschland HB-T. Socioeconomic inequalities in subjective health among 11- to 15-year-olds in Germany. A trend analysis from 2002–2010. Gesundheitswesen. 2012;74(Suppl 1):S49–55.10.1055/s-0032-1312633Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[17] Andrabi N, Khoddam R, Leventhal AM. Socioeconomic disparities in adolescent substance use: role of enjoyable alternative substance-free activities. Soc Sci Med. 2017;176:175–82.10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.032Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[18] Lui CK, Sterling SA, Chi FW, Lu Y, Campbell CI. Socioeconomic differences in adolescent substance abuse treatment participation and long-term outcomes. Addict Behav. 2017;68:45–51.10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[19] Humensky JL. Are adolescents with high socioeconomic status more likely to engage in alcohol and illicit drug use in early adulthood?. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2010;5(1):19.10.1186/1747-597X-5-19Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[20] Torikka A, Kaltiala-Heino R, Luukkaala T, Rimpela A. Trends in alcohol use among adolescents from 2000 to 2011: the role of socioeconomic status and depression. Alcohol Alcoholism. 2017;52(1):95–103.10.1093/alcalc/agw048Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[21] Huurre T, Aro H, Rahkonen O. Well-being and health behaviour by parental socioeconomic status: a follow-up study of adolescents aged 16 until age 32 years. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003;38(5):249–55.10.1007/s00127-003-0630-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Lampert T, Kuntz B. KiGGS Study Grp. Tobacco and alcohol consumption among 11-to 17-year-old adolescents. Results of the KiGGS study: first follow-up (KiGGS Wave 1). Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz. 2014;57(7):830–9.10.1007/s00103-014-1982-8Search in Google Scholar
[23] Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Lowe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):613–21.10.1016/S0033-3182(09)70864-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[24] Benner AD, Wang Y. Demographic marginalization, social integration, and adolescents’ educational success. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43(10):1611–27.10.1007/s10964-014-0151-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Varga S, Piko BF, Fitzpatrick KM. Socioeconomic inequalities in mental well-being among Hungarian adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13(1):100.10.1186/s12939-014-0100-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[26] Döring N, Bortz J. Psychometrische Einsamkeitsforschung: Deutsche Neukonstruktion der UCLA Loneliness Scale. [Psychometric research on loneliness: A new German version of the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale.]. Diagnostica. 1993;39(3):224–39.Search in Google Scholar
[27] Diaz OV, Guendelman S, Kuppermann M. Subjective social status and depression symptoms: a prospective study of women with noncancerous pelvic problems. Womens Health Issues. 2014;24(6):649–55.10.1016/j.whi.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[28] Giatti L, Camelo Ldo V, Rodrigues JF, Barreto SM. Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status - Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1096.10.1186/1471-2458-12-1096Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[29] Schubert T, Sussenbach P, Schafer SJ, Euteneuer F. The effect of subjective social status on depressive thinking: An experimental examination. Psychiatry Res. 2016;241:22–25.10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.081Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[30] De Berard MS, Spielmans GI, Julka DL. Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: a longitudinal study. Coll Stud J. 2004;38:66–80.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Deliens T, Clarys P, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B. Weight, socio-demographics, and health behaviour related correlates of academic performance in first year university students. Nutr J. 2013;12:162.10.1186/1475-2891-12-162Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[32] Vaez M, Laflamme L. Experienced stress, psychological symptoms, self-rated health and academic achievement: A longitudinal study of Swedish university students. Soc Behav Pers. 2008;36(2):183–95.10.2224/sbp.2008.36.2.183Search in Google Scholar
[33] Orth U, Trzesniewski KH, Robins RW. Self-esteem development from young adulthood to old age: a cohort-sequential longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98(4):645–58.10.1037/a0018769Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] Bolognini M, Plancherel B, Bettschart W, Halfon O. Self-esteem and mental health in early adolescence: development and gender differences. J Adolesc. 1996;19(3):233–45.10.1006/jado.1996.0022Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[35] Tavani CM, Losh SC. Motivation, self-confidence, and expectations as predictors of the academic performances among our high school students. Child Study J. 2003;33(3):141–51.Search in Google Scholar
[36] Sweeting H, Hunt K. Adolescent socio-economic and school-based social status, health and well-being. Soc Sci Med. 2014;121:39–47.10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[37] Singh-Manoux A, Marmot MG, Adler NE. Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status?. Psychosom Med. 2005;67(6):855–61.10.1097/01.psy.0000188434.52941.a0Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[38] Nielsen F, Roos JM, Combs RM. Clues of subjective social status among young adults. Soc Sci Res. 2015;52:370–88.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.02.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[39] Elgar FJ, McKinnon B, Torsheim T, Schnohr CW, Mazur J, Cavallo F, et al. Patterns of socioeconomic inequality in adolescent health differ according to the measure of socioeconomic position. Soc Indic Res. 2016;127(3):1169–80.10.1007/s11205-015-0994-6Search in Google Scholar
[40] Finch KA, Ramo DE, Delucchi KL, Liu H, Prochaska JJ. Subjective social status and substance use severity in a young adult sample. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013;27(3):901–8.10.1037/a0032900Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[41] Wilkinson AV, Shete S, Vasudevan V, Prokhorov AV, Bondy ML, Spitz MR. Influence of subjective social status on the relationship between positive outcome expectations and experimentation with cigarettes. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44(4):342–8.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.08.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[42] Allem JP, Forster M, Neiberger A, Unger JB. Characteristics of emerging adulthood and e-cigarette use: Findings from a pilot study. Addict Behav. 2015;50:40–4.10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[43] Coleman BN, Apelberg BJ, Ambrose BK, Green KM, Choiniere CJ, Bunnell R, et al. Association between electronic cigarette use and openness to cigarette smoking among US young adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(2):212–8.10.1093/ntr/ntu211Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[44] Camelo Ldo V, Giatti L, Barreto SM. Subjective social status, self-rated health and tobacco smoking: Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). J Health Psychol. 2014;19(11):1388–99.10.1177/1359105313490772Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[45] Lemeshow AR, Fisher L, Goodman E, Kawachi I, Berkey CS, Colditz GA. Subjective social status in the school and change in adiposity in female adolescents: findings from a prospective cohort study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(1):23–8.10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.11Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[46] Demakakos P, Marmot M, Steptoe A. Socioeconomic position and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the ELSA study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(5):367–78.10.1007/s10654-012-9688-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Clinical diagnostic suspicion: a key component to being a modern Argus in medicine!
- Original Articles
- Ecological perspectives on youth alcohol consumption in the Kuala Lumpur conurbation: a place-based study in Malaysia
- Pubertal assessment: targeted educational intervention for pediatric trainees
- Pediatric providers’ attitudes and practices regarding concussion diagnosis and management
- Pre- and post-exercise electrocardiogram pattern modifications in apparently healthy school adolescents in Cameroon
- Raising awareness on cyber safety: adolescents’ experience of a primary healthcare professional-led, school-based, multi-center intervention
- Comparison of different volumes of high intensity interval training on cardiac autonomic function in sedentary young women
- Rate of teenage pregnancy in Jordan and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes
- Metabolic syndrome, leptin-insulin resistance and uric acid: a trinomial foe for Algerian city-dweller adolescents’ health
- Life satisfaction and its relationship with spiritual well-being and religious practice in Iranian adolescent girls
- Subjective social status and its relationship to health and health behavior: comparing two different scales in university students
- Case Report
- Gastric cancer in a teenager: a case report
Articles in the same Issue
- Editorial
- Clinical diagnostic suspicion: a key component to being a modern Argus in medicine!
- Original Articles
- Ecological perspectives on youth alcohol consumption in the Kuala Lumpur conurbation: a place-based study in Malaysia
- Pubertal assessment: targeted educational intervention for pediatric trainees
- Pediatric providers’ attitudes and practices regarding concussion diagnosis and management
- Pre- and post-exercise electrocardiogram pattern modifications in apparently healthy school adolescents in Cameroon
- Raising awareness on cyber safety: adolescents’ experience of a primary healthcare professional-led, school-based, multi-center intervention
- Comparison of different volumes of high intensity interval training on cardiac autonomic function in sedentary young women
- Rate of teenage pregnancy in Jordan and its impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes
- Metabolic syndrome, leptin-insulin resistance and uric acid: a trinomial foe for Algerian city-dweller adolescents’ health
- Life satisfaction and its relationship with spiritual well-being and religious practice in Iranian adolescent girls
- Subjective social status and its relationship to health and health behavior: comparing two different scales in university students
- Case Report
- Gastric cancer in a teenager: a case report