Startseite Constitutional Courts’ Helpdesk: The Venice Commission’s Advisory Role in Constitutional Adjudication
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Constitutional Courts’ Helpdesk: The Venice Commission’s Advisory Role in Constitutional Adjudication

  • Serkan Yolcu ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 22. November 2022

Abstract

This article aims to analyse how constitutional courts make use of advisory opinions of the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Despite that national constitutional courts significantly engage with the advisory work of the Venice Commission, the causes and effects of this engagement remain less explored in constitutional law scholarship. In order to address this gap, this article, from a macro perspective, examines the case law in which the Venice Commission is referred to by constitutional courts, drawn from the Venice Commission’s constitutional adjudication database (CODICES). In addition, appropriate data from the case law of the Constitutional Court of Turkey is examined in particular to expand the scope of the research through micro lens. The article argues that constitutional advice has some advantages for constitutional judges given that it provides a strategic tool for determining reasoning. Despite its non-binding nature, the Venice Commission’s constitutional advice is occasionally considered by constitutional courts, depending on the strategic preferences of the courts, and the judges in a given jurisdiction.


Corresponding author: Serkan Yolcu, Faculty of Law, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey, E-mail:

Published Online: 2022-11-22
Published in Print: 2022-12-16

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 23.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/icl-2021-0044/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen