Article
Publicly Available
Frontmatter
Published/Copyright:
February 12, 2021
Published Online: 2021-02-12
Published in Print: 2021-02-23
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Constitutional Courts in a 100-Years Perspective and a Proposal for a Hybrid Model of Judicial Review
- Constitutional Courts as Majoritarian Instruments
- ʻJudicial Activismʼ in Europe: Not a Neat and Clean Fit
- Constitutional Review Complaint as an Evolution of the Kelsenian Model
- Mexican Supreme Court at Crossroads: Three Acts of Constitutional Politics
- Idiosyncratic Constitutional Review in Cyprus: (Re-)Design, Survival and Kelsen
- The Relationship Between a Kelsenian Constitutional Court and an Entrenched National Ideology: Lessons from Thailand and Indonesia
- Kelsen versus Schmitt and the Role of the Sub-National Entities and Minorities in the Appointment of Constitutional Judges in Continental Systems
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Constitutional Courts in a 100-Years Perspective and a Proposal for a Hybrid Model of Judicial Review
- Constitutional Courts as Majoritarian Instruments
- ʻJudicial Activismʼ in Europe: Not a Neat and Clean Fit
- Constitutional Review Complaint as an Evolution of the Kelsenian Model
- Mexican Supreme Court at Crossroads: Three Acts of Constitutional Politics
- Idiosyncratic Constitutional Review in Cyprus: (Re-)Design, Survival and Kelsen
- The Relationship Between a Kelsenian Constitutional Court and an Entrenched National Ideology: Lessons from Thailand and Indonesia
- Kelsen versus Schmitt and the Role of the Sub-National Entities and Minorities in the Appointment of Constitutional Judges in Continental Systems
