Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
Mexican Supreme Court at Crossroads: Three Acts of Constitutional Politics
-
Jaime Olaiz-González
Veröffentlicht/Copyright:
20. Januar 2021
Abstract
Since 2018, Mexico’s Supreme Court is facing a critical juncture. The new distribution of political power and the distinctive platform of the governing coalition endowed with massive popular support has forced the Court to redefine its role as a constitutional tribunal within unprecedented dynamics of constitutional politics. Such juncture can be summarized as being at crossroads, between desirable affirmation, strategic accommodation and concerning subordination.
Keywords: constitutional court; constitutional politics; constitutional tribunal; judicial independence; judicial reform; Supreme Court
Published Online: 2021-01-20
Published in Print: 2021-02-23
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Constitutional Courts in a 100-Years Perspective and a Proposal for a Hybrid Model of Judicial Review
- Constitutional Courts as Majoritarian Instruments
- ʻJudicial Activismʼ in Europe: Not a Neat and Clean Fit
- Constitutional Review Complaint as an Evolution of the Kelsenian Model
- Mexican Supreme Court at Crossroads: Three Acts of Constitutional Politics
- Idiosyncratic Constitutional Review in Cyprus: (Re-)Design, Survival and Kelsen
- The Relationship Between a Kelsenian Constitutional Court and an Entrenched National Ideology: Lessons from Thailand and Indonesia
- Kelsen versus Schmitt and the Role of the Sub-National Entities and Minorities in the Appointment of Constitutional Judges in Continental Systems
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
constitutional court;
constitutional politics;
constitutional tribunal;
judicial independence;
judicial reform;
Supreme Court
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Introduction: Constitutional Courts in a 100-Years Perspective and a Proposal for a Hybrid Model of Judicial Review
- Constitutional Courts as Majoritarian Instruments
- ʻJudicial Activismʼ in Europe: Not a Neat and Clean Fit
- Constitutional Review Complaint as an Evolution of the Kelsenian Model
- Mexican Supreme Court at Crossroads: Three Acts of Constitutional Politics
- Idiosyncratic Constitutional Review in Cyprus: (Re-)Design, Survival and Kelsen
- The Relationship Between a Kelsenian Constitutional Court and an Entrenched National Ideology: Lessons from Thailand and Indonesia
- Kelsen versus Schmitt and the Role of the Sub-National Entities and Minorities in the Appointment of Constitutional Judges in Continental Systems
