Startseite Impersonated personae – paralanguage, dialogism and affiliation in stand-up comedy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Impersonated personae – paralanguage, dialogism and affiliation in stand-up comedy

  • Lorenzo Logi

    Lorenzo Logi is a PhD candidate at the University of New South Wales, and is employing Systemic Functional Linguistics to research the social semiosis occurring in stand-up comedy performances. He completed his Master’s in Applied Linguistics at the University of Sydney in 2017, writing his dissertation on bonding and affiliation in television sitcoms. Recent publications include Logi, L. and M. Zappavigna (forthcoming). “Impersonated personae – paralanguage, dialogism and affiliation in stand-up comedy.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research and Logi, L. and M. Zappavigna (2019). “Dialogic resources in interactional humour.” Journal of Pragmatics 153: 1–14.

    EMAIL logo
    und Michele Zappavigna

    Michele Zappavigna is an Associate Professor in the School of Arts and Media at the University of New South Wales. Her major research interest is the discourse of social media and ambient affiliation. Recent books include: Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse (Bloomsbury 2018), Discourse of Twitter and Social Media (Bloomsbury 2012), Researching the Language of Social Media (Routledge 2014, with Ruth Page, Johann Unger and David Barton), and Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Ceremonial Redress in Youth Justice Conferencing (Palgrave 2018, with J.R. Martin). Email:m.zappavigna@unsw.edu.au.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Februar 2021
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 34 Heft 3

Abstract

This paper argues that paralinguistic resources employed by stand-up comedians to construe textual personae (impersonated characters) make a substantial contribution to the creation of humor by allowing the comedian to distance themselves from particular social values and by referencing shared cultural stereotypes. A stretch of stand-up comedy discourse is analyzed to explore how gesture and voice quality contribute to the construal of projected personae. These are mapped in relation to the interaction between comedian and audience to discern how they evoke specific social values. The results suggest that textual personae are deployed by the comedian to embody stereotypes that connote particular value positions, and that the comedian can construe blended or hybrid personae through the use of multiple semiotic resources. Impersonation thus constitutes a powerful resource for negotiating social values in order to generate tension and create humor.


Corresponding author: Lorenzo Logi, School of the Arts and Media, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, E-mail:

About the authors

Lorenzo Logi

Lorenzo Logi is a PhD candidate at the University of New South Wales, and is employing Systemic Functional Linguistics to research the social semiosis occurring in stand-up comedy performances. He completed his Master’s in Applied Linguistics at the University of Sydney in 2017, writing his dissertation on bonding and affiliation in television sitcoms. Recent publications include Logi, L. and M. Zappavigna (forthcoming). “Impersonated personae – paralanguage, dialogism and affiliation in stand-up comedy.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research and Logi, L. and M. Zappavigna (2019). “Dialogic resources in interactional humour.” Journal of Pragmatics 153: 1–14.

Michele Zappavigna

Michele Zappavigna is an Associate Professor in the School of Arts and Media at the University of New South Wales. Her major research interest is the discourse of social media and ambient affiliation. Recent books include: Searchable Talk: Hashtags and Social Media Metadiscourse (Bloomsbury 2018), Discourse of Twitter and Social Media (Bloomsbury 2012), Researching the Language of Social Media (Routledge 2014, with Ruth Page, Johann Unger and David Barton), and Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Ceremonial Redress in Youth Justice Conferencing (Palgrave 2018, with J.R. Martin). Email:.

References

Aarons, Debra, & Marcra Mierowsky. 2017. How to do things with jokes: Speech acts in standup comedy. The European Journal of Humour Research 5(4). 158–168. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2017.5.4.aarons.Suche in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 1994. Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Suche in Google Scholar

Attardo, Salvatore. 2015. Humour and Laughter. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton & D. Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 2nd ed., 168–188. Malden, MA;Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584194.ch8Suche in Google Scholar

Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhaĭlovich. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist, Trans. Michael Holquist Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. (1972). Mythologies (Annette Lavers, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Suche in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan & Andy Gibson. 2011. Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performance. Journal of SocioLinguistics 15(5). 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00517.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. (1911). Laughter: an essay on the meaning of the comic (Cloudesley Brereton & Fred Rothwell, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.10.1037/13772-000Suche in Google Scholar

Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie, Vol. 2. Jena Fischer.Suche in Google Scholar

Chovanec, Jan & Villy Tsakona. 2018. Investigating the dynamics of humor. In Villy Tsakona & Jan Chovanec (eds.), The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, Vol. 7, 1–28. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/thr.7.01choSuche in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123(3). 324. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026.Suche in Google Scholar

Dancygier, Barbara. 2005. Blending and narrative viewpoint: Jonathan Raban’s travels through mental spaces. Language and Literature 14(2). 99–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005051281.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Catherine E. 2017. Sociolinguistic approaches to humor. The Routledge handbook of language and humor, 472–488. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315731162-33Suche in Google Scholar

Dudis, Paul G. 2004. Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.009.Suche in Google Scholar

Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade. 1997. Analyzing casual conversation. New York; London: Cassell.Suche in Google Scholar

Everts, Elisa. 2003. Identifying a particular family humor style: A sociolinguistic discourse analysis. Humor 16(4). 369–412. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.021.Suche in Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alex & Flora Cornish. 2010. Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40(1). 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00419.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Glick, Douglas J. 2007. Some performative techniques of stand-up comedy: An exercise in the textuality of temporalization. Language & Communication 27(3). 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1956. The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Suche in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Andrea. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: An investigation of comic culture. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research 12(1). 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1999.12.1.33.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1989. Spoken and written language. Victoria: Deakin University.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoey, Micheal. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Hood, Susan. 2011. Body language in face-to-face teaching: A focus on textual and interpersonal meaning. Semiotic Margins: Meaning in Multimodalities. 31–52.Suche in Google Scholar

Izzard, Eddie. 1999. Dress to kill. USA: Ella Communications.Suche in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology, 79–96. Irvington Publishers: distributed by Halsted Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Keisalo, Marianna. 2016. ‘Picking People to Hate’: Reversible reversals in stand-up comedy. Suomen Antropologi: Journal of the Finnish Anthropological Society 41(4). 62–76.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1997. Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology 26(1). 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.109.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Suche in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi K. 2008. “Still cool…and american too!”: An SFL Analysis of Deferred Bonds in Internet Messaging Humour. In Nina Nørgaard (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics in use, Odense working papers in language and communication, Vol. 29.Suche in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi K. 2010. Laughing our bonds off: Conversational humour in relation to affiliation. University of Sydney Dissertation/Thesis. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2123/6656.Suche in Google Scholar

Knight, Naomi K. 2011. The interpersonal semiotics of having a laugh. In Shoshana Dreyfus, Susan Hood & Maree Stenglin (eds.), Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities, 7–30. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Kotthoff, Helga. 2000. Gender and joking: On the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1). 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00031-4.Suche in Google Scholar

Koziski, Stephanie. 1984. The standup comedian as anthropologist: Intentional culture critic. The Journal of Popular Culture 18(2). 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1984.1802_57.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther R. & Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Edward Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther R. & Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2 ed. Psychology Press.10.4324/9780203619728Suche in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York city. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lazar, Michelle M. & Cheris Kramarae. 2011. Gender and power in discourse. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, 217–240. Sage.10.4135/9781446289068.n11Suche in Google Scholar

Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. IAP.Suche in Google Scholar

Logi, Lorenzo & Michele Zappavigna. 2019. Dialogic resources in interactional humour. Journal of Pragmatics 153. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. 2004. Mourning: How we get aligned. Discourse & Society 15(2–3). 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926504041022.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. (2008). Tenderness: realisation and instantiation in a Botswanan town. Paper presented at the 34th international systemic functional congress. Odense: Syddansk University.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2007. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause, 2 ed. Bloomsbury.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Maree Stenglin. 2006. Materializing reconciliation: Negotiating difference in a transcolonial exhibition. In T. Royce & B. W. (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 215–238. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230511910Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R. & Michele Zappavigna. 2019. Embodied meaning: A systemic functional perspective on paralanguage. Functional Linguistics 6(1). 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-018-0065-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, James R., Michele Zappavigna, Paul Dwyer & Chris Cléirigh. 2013. Users in uses of language: Embodied identity in Youth Justice Conferencing. Text & Talk 33(4–5). 467–496. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0022.Suche in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2004. The evolution of language: a systemic functional exploration of phylogenetic phases. In G. Williams & A. Lukin (eds.), The development of language. Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 45–90. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2007. The multimodal page: A systemic functional exploration. In W. Bowcher & T. Royce (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 1–62.Suche in Google Scholar

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2009. Multisemiosis and context-based register typology: Registerial variation in the complementarity of semiotic systems. In The world told and the world shown, 11–38. Springer.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 2012. How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108669Suche in Google Scholar

Mintz, Lawrence E. 1985. Standup comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly 37(1). 71–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2712763.Suche in Google Scholar

Ngo, Thu, James R. Martin, Susan Hood, Claire Painter, Bradley A. Smith & Michele Zappavigna. Modelling paralanguage using systemic functional semiotics (forthcoming). Bloomsbury Academic.Suche in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 1993. Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nuyts, Jan. 2010. Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0020Suche in Google Scholar

Pao, Angela Chia-yi. 2004. False accents: Embodied dialects and the characterization of ethnicity and nationality. Theatre Topics 14(1). 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2004.0008.Suche in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey & Eve Sweetser. 2004. What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture 4(2). 197–219.10.1075/gest.4.2.05parSuche in Google Scholar

Rutter, Jason. 2001. Rhetoric in stand-up comedy: Exploring performer-audience interaction. Stylistyka 10. 307–325.Suche in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1989. An analysis of the course of a Joke’s telling in conversation. In J. Sherzer & R. Bauman (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 2 ed., 337–353. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611810.022Suche in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1998. Body torque. Social Research 65(3). 535–596.Suche in Google Scholar

Schwarz, Jeannine. 2010. Linguistic aspects of verbal humor in stand-up comedy.Suche in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1975. The logical status of fictional discourse. New Literary History 6(2). 319–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/468422.Suche in Google Scholar

Sekine, Kazuki, Miranda L. Rose, Abby M. Foster, Michelle C. Attard & Lucette E. Lanyon. 2013. Gesture production in aphasic discourse: In-depth description and preliminary predictions. Aphasology 27(9). 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.803017.Suche in Google Scholar

Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4). 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_2.Suche in Google Scholar

Stenglin, Maree. 2008. Interpersonal meaning in 3D space: How a bonding icon gets its ‘charge’. Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education, 50–66.Suche in Google Scholar

Sweetser, Eve & Kasmiri Stec. 2016. Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. In B. Dancygier, W.-l. Lu & A. Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 237–258. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110365467-011Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Sandra A. & Ryoko Suzuki. 2014. Reenactments in conversation: Gaze and recipiency. Discourse Studies 16(6). 816–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614546259.Suche in Google Scholar

Tsakona, Villy & Jan Chovanec (eds.). 2018. The dynamics of interactional humor. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/thr.7Suche in Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, Theo. 1999. Speech, music, sound. New York: St. Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-27700-1Suche in Google Scholar

Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2012. Wait till you got started. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 198–218. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084727.015Suche in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2007. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford University Press on Demand.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226702.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Verhagen, Arie. 2016. Introduction: On tools for weaving meaning out of viewpoint threads. In Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities, 1–10. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.10.1515/9783110365467-002Suche in Google Scholar

Vigouroux, Cécile B. 2015. Genre, heteroglossic performances, and new identity: Stand-up comedy in modern French society. Language in Society 44(2). 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404515000068.Suche in Google Scholar

Vološinov, Valentin Nikolaevich. (1995). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matjka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

White, Peter R. R. 2001. An introductory course in appraisal analysis.Suche in Google Scholar

White, Peter R. R. 2019. Analyzing evaluative language: Applying the appraisal framework. In Seminar series held at Sydney University.Suche in Google Scholar

Williams, Lindsay. 2019. Nurturing affiliation: The interpersonal, multimodal work of stand-up comedians. University of New England.Suche in Google Scholar

Zappavigna, Michele. 2019. Ambient affiliation and #brexit: Negotiating values about experts through censure and ridicule. In V. Koller, S. Kopf & M. Miglbauer (eds.), Discourses of Brexit, 48–68. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781351041867-4Suche in Google Scholar

Zhao, Sumin. 2011. Learning through multimedia interaction: The construal of primary social science knowledge in web-based digital learning materials. Dissertation/Thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-18
Accepted: 2020-04-16
Published Online: 2021-02-11
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 3.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2020-0023/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen