Startseite The influence of performance expectations and personality on audience ratings of humor
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The influence of performance expectations and personality on audience ratings of humor

  • Kristopher Fried

    Kristopher Fried, a noted stand-up comedian, received his Master’s degree in Psychology from Harvard University in 2014.

    und Shelley Carson

    Shelley Carson is a lecturer and researcher at Harvard University. She earned her PhD in Psychology from Harvard in 2001. Her main research interests are in the areas of creativity, psychopathology, and resilience.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 15. August 2018
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 31 Heft 4

Abstract

Are our ratings of comics and the humor of their material affected by our perceived expectations? We tested the responses of fifty participants, recruited from comedy club audiences in the United States, who completed a standard personality test and then watched and rated video clips of stand-up comedy performances. The comedians in each clip were unknown to the viewers, and were either introduced with enhanced/exaggerated credentials (such as having experience writing for The Tonight Show or appearing on the Modern Family television series), or were given a more generic introduction, hinting that they have not yet achieved notable success. Participants rated their enjoyment of each comedian at three points during each eight-minute video clip, and rated their favorite joke and favorite comedian overall. Results indicated that expectations (based on exaggerated/enhanced credentials) affected humor ratings early in the performance but dissipated as the performance continued, suggesting that expectations only briefly affect one’s judgment of humor. Personality results indicated that the traits Extraversion and Agreeableness were significantly and positively correlated with overall performance ratings but only Extraversion affected whether viewers’ ratings were influenced by enhanced/exaggerated introductions. Agreeableness, gender, and age were more salient predictors of viewers’ humor ratings of comedians than were viewer expectations based on enhanced/exaggerated credentials.

About the authors

Kristopher Fried

Kristopher Fried, a noted stand-up comedian, received his Master’s degree in Psychology from Harvard University in 2014.

Shelley Carson

Shelley Carson is a lecturer and researcher at Harvard University. She earned her PhD in Psychology from Harvard in 2001. Her main research interests are in the areas of creativity, psychopathology, and resilience.

References

Bernardin, H. J., D. K. Cooke & P. Villanova. 2000. Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(2). 232–236.10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.232Suche in Google Scholar

Birjandi, P. & M. Siyyari. 2016. Agreeableness and conscientiousness as predictors of university students’ self/peer assessment rating error. Irish Educational Studies 35(1). 117–135.10.1080/03323315.2016.1147973Suche in Google Scholar

Blevins, T. L. 2011. Humor in Therapy: Expectations, sense of humor, and perceived effectiveness. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation abstracts international: section B: the sciences and engineering. 71(12-B).10.1037/e701762011-001Suche in Google Scholar

Dombrovskaya, I.S. 2011. The problem of psychological analysis of cultural genesis of humor. Cultural Historical Psychology 3. 54–59.Suche in Google Scholar

Donnellan, M. B., F. L. Oswald, B. M. Baird & R. E. Lucas. 2006. The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment 18. 192–203.10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192Suche in Google Scholar

Donnelly, S. 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC7WdzuqP_E&feature=youtu.beSuche in Google Scholar

Egermann, H., M.T. Pearce, G.A. Wiggins & S. McAdams. 2013. Probabilistic models of expectation violation predict psychophysiological emotional responses to live concert music. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 13(3). 533–553.10.3758/s13415-013-0161-ySuche in Google Scholar

Graziano, W.G., A.B. Feldesman & D.F. Rahe. 1985. Extraversion, social cognition, and the salience of aversiveness in social encounters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49. 971–980.10.1037/0022-3514.49.4.971Suche in Google Scholar

Greengross, G., R.A. Martin & G. Miller. 2012. Personality traits, intelligence, humor styles, and humor production ability of professional stand-up comedians compared to college students. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts 6(1). 74–82.10.1037/a0025774Suche in Google Scholar

Guo-Hai, Chen 2009. University teachers’ humor production in the classroom and student ratings of teaching effectiveness. Dissertation Abstracts: International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences69(10-A). 3855.Suche in Google Scholar

Humborstad, S.W. & B. Kuvass. 2013. Mutuality in leader-subordinate empowerment expectation: its impact on role ambiguity and intrinsic motivation. The Leadership Quarterly 24(2). 363–377.10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.003Suche in Google Scholar

Iacobucci, D., S. S. Posavac, F. R. Kardes, M. J. Schneider & D. L. Popovich. 2015. Toward a more nuanced understanding of the statistical properties of a median split. Journal of Consumer Psychology 25(4). 652–665.10.1016/j.jcps.2014.12.002Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, A.J. & K. Mistry. 2013. The effect of joke-origin-induced expectancy on cognitive humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 26(2). 321–341.10.1515/humor-2013-0011Suche in Google Scholar

Kirsch, I. 1999. How expectancies shape experience. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press.10.1037/10332-000Suche in Google Scholar

Krizan, Z. & K. Sweeny. 2012. Causes and consequences of expectation trajectories: “High” on optimism in a public ballot initiative. Psychological Science 24(5). 706–714.10.1177/0956797612460690Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, G.N. & C. D. Gray. 1996. The effects of audience laughter on men’s and women’s responses to humor. Journal of Social Psychology 136(2). 221–231.10.1080/00224545.1996.9713996Suche in Google Scholar

Martin, R., P. Puhlik-Doris, G. Larsen, J. Gray & K. Weir. 2003. Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality 37. 48–75.10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2Suche in Google Scholar

McCrae, R. & P. Costa. 2010. The five-factor theory of personality. In P. John, R. Robins & L. Pervin (ed.), Handbook of personality: theory and research (3rd edition), 159–181. New York: Guilford.Suche in Google Scholar

Mendiburo-Seguel, A., D. Páez & F. Martínez-Sánchez. 2015. Humor styles and personality: A meta-analysis of the relation between humor styles and the big five personality traits. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 56. 335–340.10.1111/sjop.12209Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, M.Z. & E. Levine. 2012. Legitimating television: media convergence and cultural status. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203847640Suche in Google Scholar

Norton, J.E., P.J. Fryer & J.A. Parkinson. 2013. The effect of reduced-fat labeling on chocolate expectations. Food Quality and Preference 28(1). 101–105.10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.08.004Suche in Google Scholar

Samson, A.C., H.L. Lackner, E.M. Weiss & I. Papousek. 2012. Perception of other people’s mental states affects humor in social anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 43(1). 625–631.10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.08.007Suche in Google Scholar

Stanley, J. T., M. Lohani & D. M. Isaacowitz. 2014. Age-related differences in judgments of inappropriate behavior are related to humor style preferences. Psychology and Aging 29(3). 528–541.10.1037/a0036666Suche in Google Scholar

Tziner, A., K. R. Murphy & J. N. Cleveland. 2005. Contextual and rater factors affecting rating behavior. Group and Organizational Management 30. 89–98.10.1177/1059601104267920Suche in Google Scholar

Wimer, D. J. & B. C. Beins. 2008. Expectations and perceived humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 21(3). 347–363.10.1515/HUMOR.2008.016Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-08-15
Published in Print: 2018-09-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2017-0137/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen