Startseite Lexical priming in humorous satirical newspaper headlines
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Lexical priming in humorous satirical newspaper headlines

  • Stephen Skalicky

    Stephen Skalicky received his PhD from the Department of Applied Linguistics at Georgia State University in 2018. His research focuses on variables that affect the comprehension and production of figurative language using psycholinguistic, corpus, and natural language processing methods. His work has appeared in Language Learning, Discourse Processes, and Journal of Pragmatics.

    EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 8. August 2018
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 31 Heft 4

Abstract

Satire is a type of discourse commonly employed to mock or criticize a satirical target, typically resulting in humor. Current understandings of satire place strong emphasis on the role that background and pragmatic knowledge play during satire recognition. However, there may also be specific linguistic cues that signal a satirical intent. Researchers using corpus linguistic methods, specifically Lexical Priming, have demonstrated that other types of creative language use, such as irony, puns, and verbal jokes, purposefully deviate from expected language patterns (e.g. collocations). The purpose of this study is to investigate whether humorous satirical headlines also subvert typical linguistic patterns using the theory of Lexical Priming. In order to do so, a corpus of newspaper headlines taken from the satirical American newspaper The Onion are analyzed and compared to a generalized corpus of American English. Results of this analysis suggest satirical headlines exploit linguistic expectations through the use of low-frequency collocations and semantic preferences, but also contain higher discourse and genre level deviations that cannot be captured in the surface level linguistic features of the headlines.

About the author

Stephen Skalicky

Stephen Skalicky received his PhD from the Department of Applied Linguistics at Georgia State University in 2018. His research focuses on variables that affect the comprehension and production of figurative language using psycholinguistic, corpus, and natural language processing methods. His work has appeared in Language Learning, Discourse Processes, and Journal of Pragmatics.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Dr Ute Römer who provided me with the guidance and insight necessary to complete this analysis.

References

Abrams, Meyer Howard & Geoffrey Harpham. 2009. A glossary of literary terms, 9th edn. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.Suche in Google Scholar

Boukes, Mark, Hajo G. Boomgaarden, Marjolein Moorman & Claes H De Vreese. 2015. At odds: laughing and thinking? The appreciation, processing, and persuasiveness of political satire. Journal of Communication 65(5). 721–744.10.1111/jcom.12173Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2008. The corpus of contemporary American English. BYE, Brigham Young University.Suche in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2009. Humorous garden-paths: A pragmatic-cognitive study. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Forabosco, Giovannantonio. 1992. Cognitive aspects of the humor process: the concept of incongruity. Humor 5(1/2). 45–68.10.1515/humr.1992.5.1-2.45Suche in Google Scholar

Forabosco, Giovannantonio. 2008. Is the concept of incongruity still a useful construct for the advancement of humor research?. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(1). 45–62.10.2478/v10016-008-0003-5Suche in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 2012. Meaning and humour. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791536Suche in Google Scholar

Goatly, Andrew. 2017. Lexical priming in humorous discourse. European Journal of Humour Research 5(1). 52–68.10.7592/EJHR2017.5.1.goatlySuche in Google Scholar

Hanks, Patrick. 2013. Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hoey, Michael. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London; New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnson, Ann, Esteban Del Rio & Alicia Kemmitt. 2010. Missing the joke: A reception analysis of satirical texts. Communication, Culture & Critique 3(3). 396–415.10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01077.xSuche in Google Scholar

LaMarre, Heather L., K. D. Landreville & M. A. Beam. 2009. The irony of satire: Political ideology and the motivation to see what you want to see in The Colbert Report. The International Journal of Press/Politics 14(2). 212–231.10.1177/1940161208330904Suche in Google Scholar

LaMarre, Heather L., Kristen D Landreville, Dannagal Young & Nathan Gilkerson. 2014. Humor works in funny ways: Examining satirical tone as a key determinant in political humor message processing. Mass Communication and Society 17(3). 400–423.10.1080/15205436.2014.891137Suche in Google Scholar

Lee, Hoon & Nojin Kwak. 2014. The affect effect of political satire: Sarcastic humor, negative emotions, and political participation. Mass Communication and Society 17(3). 307–328.10.1080/15205436.2014.891133Suche in Google Scholar

Louw, Bill. 1993. Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Mona Baker, Francis Gill & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and Technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 157–176. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.64.11louSuche in Google Scholar

Nilsen, Alleen & Don Nilsen. 2008. Literature and humor. In Victor Raskin (ed.), The primer of humor research, 243–280. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.243Suche in Google Scholar

Partington, Alan. 2007. Irony and reversal of evaluation. Journal of Pragmatics 39(9). 1547–1569.10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.009Suche in Google Scholar

Partington, Alan. 2009. A linguistic account of wordplay: The lexical grammar of punning. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9). 1794–1809.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.025Suche in Google Scholar

Partington, Alan. 2011a. “Double-speak” at the White House: A corpus-assisted study of bisociation in conversational laughter-talk. Humor 24(4). 371–398.10.1515/humr.2011.023Suche in Google Scholar

Partington, Alan. 2011b. Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6). 1786–1800.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

Ritchie, Graeme. 2004. The linguistic analysis of jokes. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203406953Suche in Google Scholar

Ritchie, Graeme. 2009. Variants of Incongruity Resolution. Journal of Literary Theory 3(2). 313–332.10.1515/JLT.2009.017Suche in Google Scholar

Simpson, Paul. 2003. On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humour. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lal.2Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus, and discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203594070Suche in Google Scholar

Skalicky, Stephen & Scott Crossley. 2015. A statistical analysis of satirical Amazon.com product reviews. The European Journal of Humour Research 2(3). 66–85.10.7592/EJHR2014.2.3.skalickiSuche in Google Scholar

Stewart, Craig O. 2013. Strategies of verbal irony in visual satire: Reading The New Yorker’s “Politics of Fear” cover. Humor 26(2). 197–217.10.1515/humor-2013-0022Suche in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Suche in Google Scholar

Suls, Jerry. 1983. Cognitive processes in humor appreciation. In Paul E McGhee & Jeffrey H Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of humor research, 39–57. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_3Suche in Google Scholar

Tsiamita, Fanie. 2009. Polysemy and lexical priming: The case of drive. In Ute Römer & Rainer Schulze (eds.), Exploring the lexis-grammar interface, 247–264. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.35.16tsiSuche in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2003. Humor and the search for relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 35(9). 1295–1331.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00179-0Suche in Google Scholar

Yus, Francisco. 2017. Incongruity-resolution cases in jokes. Lingua 197. 103–122.10.1016/j.lingua.2017.02.002Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-08-08
Published in Print: 2018-09-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 21.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2017-0061/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen