Startseite The seriousness of ethnic jokes: Ethnic humor and social change in the Netherlands, 1995–2012
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The seriousness of ethnic jokes: Ethnic humor and social change in the Netherlands, 1995–2012

  • Giselinde Kuipers

    Giselinde Kuipers is professor of cultural sociology at the University of Amsterdam. She has published widely on the sociology of humor, popular culture, media, beauty and cultural globalization, and is the author of Good Humor, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke (Berlin/Boston 2006/2015).

    EMAIL logo
    und Barbara van der Ent

    Barbara van der Ent is a graduate student and junior lecturer at the Department of Sociology at the University of Amsterdam. She was affiliated with the Dutch Social and Cultural Planning Office, where she conducted research on ethnic relations and discrimination.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. September 2016
HUMOR
Aus der Zeitschrift HUMOR Band 29 Heft 4

Abstract

How serious are ethnic jokes? This article investigates this question by looking at the relation between ethnic jokes and ethnic relations in the Netherlands. It analyzes two corpora covering the range of ethnic jokes collected using an (almost) identical survey among high school students in 1995 (N=248) and 2012 (N=312). Finding a complex pattern of overlapping and shifting scripts, we identify three main categories of jokes with different dynamics. The first and second category, jokes about national groups and regional minorities, and sick ethnic jokes, are both in decline. The third category, jokes about ethnic minorities, is prominent in both years, and the most important category in 2012. Jokes about minorities show considerable variation and a “lag” in their reflection of societal changes. They refer to the most prominent ethnic stereotypes and ethnic discourse, and reflect the Dutch ethnic hierarchy and changes in ethnic relations over time. We argue that a single theory or approach is not sufficient to explain all ethnic humor or to assess its seriousness – or lack thereof. We conclude by suggesting two criteria to assess the seriousness of ethnic humor: the relation between jokes and actual hostility and exclusion; and the harshness of a joke cycle.

About the authors

Giselinde Kuipers

Giselinde Kuipers is professor of cultural sociology at the University of Amsterdam. She has published widely on the sociology of humor, popular culture, media, beauty and cultural globalization, and is the author of Good Humor, Bad Taste: A Sociology of the Joke (Berlin/Boston 2006/2015).

Barbara van der Ent

Barbara van der Ent is a graduate student and junior lecturer at the Department of Sociology at the University of Amsterdam. She was affiliated with the Dutch Social and Cultural Planning Office, where she conducted research on ethnic relations and discrimination.

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Jan de Wolf and Theo Meder for their support in the first wave of this study, and Herman van de Werfhorst and Poul Holleman for their helpful suggestions during the second wave. We are greatly indebted to Christie Davies for his support and inspiration from the early 1990s to this date. Finally, we are grateful to the reviewers for their excellent comments, and to René Proyer for his willingness to handle the review process, and for his detailed and thoughtful comments.

References

Andriessen Iris, Eline Nievers, Leila Faulk & Jaco Dagevos. 2012. Ethnic discrimination on the Dutch labor market: Its relationship with job characteristics and multiple group membership. Work and Occupations 39(3). 237–269.10.1177/0730888412444783Suche in Google Scholar

Billig, Michael. 2001. Humor and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan. Discourse and Society 12(3). 267–289.10.1177/0957926501012003001Suche in Google Scholar

Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and ridicule: Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446211779Suche in Google Scholar

Chow, Yiufai. 2008. Martial arts film and Dutch-Chinese masculinities: Smaller is better. China Information 22(2). 331–359.10.1177/0920203X08091549Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 1990. Ethnic humor around the world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 1998. The mirth of nations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Suche in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 2012. Jokes and targets. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar

Dundes, Alan. 1987. Cracking jokes: Studies of sick humor cycles and stereotypes. Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1964. The rules of sociological method. New York: The Free Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Duyvendak, Jan Willem. 2011. The politics of home. Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Bill. 2001. A model for collecting and interpreting World Trade Center disaster jokes. New Directions in Folklore 5. http://astro.temple.edu/~camille/wtchumor.htmlSuche in Google Scholar

Gijsberts, Merove & Miranda Vervoort. 2007. Wederzijdse beeldvorming. In Jaco Dagevos & Merove Gijsberts (eds.), Jaarrapport integratie 2007, 282–305. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Suche in Google Scholar

Gilota, David. 2013. Ethnic humor in multiethnic America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.10.36019/9780813561509Suche in Google Scholar

Jansen, F. 1984. Schelden op minderheden. Hollands Maandblad 26. 6–15.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2000. The difference between a Surinamese and a Turk: Ethnic jokes and the position of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. Humor 12(2). 141–175.10.1515/humr.2000.13.2.141Suche in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2006a. Good humor bad taste: A sociology of the joke. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110898996Suche in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2006b. The social construction of digital danger. New Media & Society 8(3). 379–400.10.1177/1461444806061949Suche in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2011. The politics of humour in the public sphere: Cartoons, power and modernity in the first transnational humour scandal. European Journal of Cultural Studies 14(1). 63–80.10.1177/1367549410370072Suche in Google Scholar

Labrador, Roderick. 2004. “We can laugh at ourselves”. Hawai’i ethnic humor, local identity and the myth of multiculturalism. Pragmatics 14(2). http://elanguage.net/journals/pragmatics/article/view/43910.1075/prag.14.2-3.11labSuche in Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul, Christie Davies, Giselinde Kuipers, Rod Martin, Elliott Oring & Victor Raskin. 2008. The Muhammad cartoons and humor research. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research 21(1). 1–46.10.1515/HUMOR.2008.001Suche in Google Scholar

Lockyer, Sharon & Michael Pickering. 2005. The ethics and aesthetics of humour and comedy. In Sharon Lockyer & Michael Pickering (eds.), Beyond a joke: The limits of humour, 1–24. London: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230236776Suche in Google Scholar

Nievers, Eline & Iris Andriessen. 2010. Discriminatiemonitor niet-westerse migranten op de arbeidsmarkt 2010. The Hague: The Netherlands Institute for Social Research.Suche in Google Scholar

Oring, Elliott. 1992. Jokes and their relations. Louisville, KY: University of Kentucky Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Oring, Elliott. 2003. Engaging humor. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Prins, Baukje. 2004. Voorbij de onschuld. Het debat over immigratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Suche in Google Scholar

Purcell, Darren, Melissa Scott-Brown & Mahmut Gokmen. 2010. Achmed the dead terrorist and humor in popular geopolitics. GeoJournal 75(4). 373–385.10.1007/s10708-009-9258-9Suche in Google Scholar

Rath, Jan. 2000. A game of ethnic musical chairs? Immigrant businesses and the formation and succession of niches in the Amsterdam economy. In Sophie Body-Gendrot & Tiestino Mariniello (eds.), Minorities in European cities. The dynamics of social integration and social exclusion at the neighbourhood level, 26–43. Houndmills: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-62841-4_3Suche in Google Scholar

van Reekum, Rogier & Jan Willem Duyvendak. 2012. Running from our shadows: The performative impact of policy diagnoses in Dutch debates on immigrant integration. Patterns of Prejudice 46(5). 445–466.10.1080/0031322X.2012.718164Suche in Google Scholar

Shifman, Limor. 2013. Memes in digital culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Shifman, Limor & Elihu Katz. 2005. “Just call me Adonai”. A case study of ethnic humor and immigrant assimilation. American Sociological Review 70(5). 843–859.10.1177/000312240507000506Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, Victor. 1982. From ritual to theatre. The human seriousness of play. New York: PAJ Publications.Suche in Google Scholar

Venbrux, Eric & Theo Meder. 1995. The false teeth in the cod. A legend in context. Contemporary Legend 5. 115–131.Suche in Google Scholar

Verkuyten, Maykel, Louk Hagendoorn & Kees Masson. 1996. The ethnic hierarchy among majority and minority youth in het Netherlands. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26(12). 1104–1118.10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01127.xSuche in Google Scholar

Weaver, Simon. 2010. Liquid racism and the Danish prophet Muhammad cartoons. Current Sociology 58(5). 675–692.10.1177/0011392110372728Suche in Google Scholar

Weaver, Simon. 2011. Jokes, rhetoric and embodied racism: A rhetorical discourse analysis of the logics of racist jokes on the internet. Ethnicities 11(4). 413–435.10.1177/1468796811407755Suche in Google Scholar

Weaver, Simon. 2013. A rhetorical discourse analysis of online anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic jokes. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(3). 483–499.10.1080/01419870.2013.734386Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-9-14
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Heruntergeladen am 21.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2016-0013/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen