Home Linguistics & Semiotics “Some Species of Contrasts”: British Graphic Satire, the French Revolution, and the Humor of Horror
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Some Species of Contrasts”: British Graphic Satire, the French Revolution, and the Humor of Horror

  • Amanda Lahikainen is an Assistant Professor of Art History at Aquinas College in Grand Rapids, Michigan. She holds a Ph.D. from Brown University in the history of art and architecture and recently completed a Kluge Fellowship at the Library of Congress (2012–2013)

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 3, 2015

Abstract

Partly in response to the French Revolution, British political satirists in the 1790s re-imagined some visual techniques found in earlier European graphic art, including contrast, incongruity, and distortion, but with the addition of irony and violence. These satires demonstrate the deep structural similarity of humor with emotions often considered its opposites, such as horror, fear, and disgust, and visualize a phenomenon that was also theorized by philosophers of incongruity such as Joseph Priestley and Francis Hutcheson. The humor of art-horror grew in both theory and practice during the latter half of the eighteenth century and indicates the importance of incongruity in assessing modern life. These satires exemplify an obsession with death and offer an important precedent for modern political satires that engage violence and victimization for humorous effect. Extreme incongruity invites a range of different viewer responses and gives modern satire an uneasy edge.

About the author

Amanda Lahikainen

Amanda Lahikainen is an Assistant Professor of Art History at Aquinas College in Grand Rapids, Michigan. She holds a Ph.D. from Brown University in the history of art and architecture and recently completed a Kluge Fellowship at the Library of Congress (2012–2013)

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Rabelais and his world. HélèneIswolsky (trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Banerji, Christiane and DianaDonald. 1999. Gillray observed: The earliest account of his caricatures in London and Paris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bindman, David. 1989. Shadow of the guillotine. London: British Museum.Search in Google Scholar

Bindman, David. 2003. How the French Became Frogs: English Caricature and a National Stereotype. Apollo 158(498). 15–20.Search in Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. 1790. Reflectionson the revolution in France. London.Search in Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. 1796. Aletter from the right honorable Edmund Burke to a noble lord. London.Search in Google Scholar

Carroll, Noël. 1999. Horror and humor. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism57(2). 145160.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac57.2.0145Search in Google Scholar

Colley, Linda. 1992. Britons: Forging the nation, 1707–1837. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cruikshank, George. 1846. Comicalmanack. London.Search in Google Scholar

Cuno, James (ed.). 1988. French caricature and the French revolution. Los Angeles, CA: Grunwald Center for the Graphic Arts, Wight Art Gallery, University of California, Los Angeles.Search in Google Scholar

Donald, Diana. 1996. The age of caricature: Satirical prints in the reign of George III. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gatrell, Vic. 2006. City of laughter: Sex and satire in eighteenth-century London. London: Atlantic Books.Search in Google Scholar

George, Mary Dorothy. 1942. Catalogue of political and personal satires in the British museum VII. London: Trustees of the British Museum.Search in Google Scholar

George, Mary Dorothy. 1967. Hogarth to Cruikshank: Social change in graphic satire. London: Allen Lane, Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Grigsby, Darcy Grimaldo. 2002. Extremities: Painting empire in post-revolutionary France. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hartley, David. 1801 [1749]. Observationson man. London.Search in Google Scholar

Haskins, Casey. 2001. Art, morality, and the holocaust: The aesthetic riddle of Benigni’s life is beautiful. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism59(4). 373384.Search in Google Scholar

Hogarth, William. 1791. Theanalysis of beauty. London.Search in Google Scholar

Ingebretsen, Edward. 2003. At stake: Monsters and the rhetoric of fear in public culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jouve, Michel. 1978. L’image du sans-culotte dans la caricature politique anglaise: Création d’un stéréotype pictural. Gazette Des Beaux-Arts91. 187196.Search in Google Scholar

Kriz, Kay Dian. 2008. Slavery, sugar, and the culture of refinement: Picturing the British West Indies, 1700–1840. New Haven, CT, & London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krumbhaar, E. B. 1966. Isaac Cruikshank: A catalogue Raisonné. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9781512817416Search in Google Scholar

Kunzle, David. 1973. The early comic strip: Narrative strips and pictures stories in the European broadsheet from c. 1450–1825. Berkeley, CA & London: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leith, James A. 1989. Face à face: French and English caricatures of the French revolution and its aftermath. Toronto: Art Gallery of Ontario.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul. 1997. The killing jokes of the American eighties. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research10(3). 251284.10.1515/humr.1997.10.3.251Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul. 2006. Cracking up: American humor in a time of conflict. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Macy, Joanna. 1983. Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.10.1037/e511752011-006Search in Google Scholar

Mellor, Anne K. 1980. English romantic irony. Cambridge, MA & London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674420717Search in Google Scholar

Morreall, John. 1987. The philosophy of laughter and humor. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nash, Richard. 1995. Satyrs and satire in Augustan England. In Brian A.Connery and KirkCombe (eds.), Theorizing satire: Essays in literary criticism. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Search in Google Scholar

Newman, Gerald. 1987. The rise of English nationalism: A cultural history 1740–1830. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Search in Google Scholar

OED Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/76362 (accessed 26 August 2013).Search in Google Scholar

Oring, Elliott. 2003. Engaging humor. Urbana, IL & Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Paulson, Ronald. 1983. Representations of revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Paulson, Ronald. 1997. William Hogarth: The analysis of beauty. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pressly, William L. 1999. The French revolution as blasphemy: Johan Zoffany’s paintings of the massacre at Paris, August 10, 1792. Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, & London: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520920309Search in Google Scholar

Priestley, Joseph. 1968 [1777]. Priestley, A course of lectures on oratory and criticism. Menston, England: The Scolar Press Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Rauser, Amelia. 2008. Caricature unmasked: Irony, authenticity and individualism in eighteenth-century English prints. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald. 2008. Psychology of humor. In VictorRaskin (ed.), The primer of humor research. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.17Search in Google Scholar

Tave, Stuart. 1960. The amiable humorist: A study in the comic theory and criticism of the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

1788. The Times. London.Search in Google Scholar

Trumble, Angus. 2004. A brief history of the smile. New York, NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-2-3
Published in Print: 2015-2-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 23.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humor-2014-0143/html
Scroll to top button