Like Watching a Motorway Crash: Exploring the Embarrassment Humor of The Office

References

Aslama, Minna & MerviPantti. 2006. Talking alone. Reality TV, emotions and authenticity. European Journal of Cultural Studies9(2). 167–184.Search in Google Scholar

Billig, Michael. 2001. Humour and embarrassment: Limits of ‘nice-guy’ theories of social life. Theory Culture Society18(5). 23–43.10.1177/02632760122051959Search in Google Scholar

Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and ridicule – Towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446211779Search in Google Scholar

Bondbjerg, Ib. 1994. Narratives of reality: Documentary film and television in a cognitive and pragmatic perspective. Nordicom Review1. 65–87.Search in Google Scholar

Bore, Inger-Lise Kalviknes. 2009. Negotiating generic hybridity: Audience engagement with the office. Continuum23(1). 33–42.10.1080/10304310802570882Search in Google Scholar

Brabazon, Tara. 2005. What have you ever done on telly?’: The office, (post) reality television and (post) work. International Journal of Cultural Studies8(1). 101–117.Search in Google Scholar

Corner, John. 1999. Documentary – the transformation of a social aesthetic. In JosteinGripsrud (ed.), Television and common knowledge, 173–184. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Critchley, Simon. 2002. On humour. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 2007. And now for something completely different, the history of the British sense of humour. BBC History Magazine8(6). 38–41.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Christie. 2009. Humor theory and the fear of being laughed at. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research22(1). 49–62.10.1515/HUMR.2009.003Search in Google Scholar

Ford, Thomas E & Mark AFerguson. 2004. Social consequences of disparagement humor: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review8(1). 79–94.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0801_4Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1905/1990. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Penguin Freud Library, vol.6. Hamondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1909/1990. Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy (“little hans”). Case Histories I, Penguin Freud Library, vol. 12. Hamondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, Ricky. 2013. Derek. Channel4/Netflix.Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, Ricky & StephenMerchant. 2002a. The office – The scripts: Series 1. London: BBC Worldwide Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, Ricky & StephenMerchant. 2002b. The office – The scripts: Series 2. London: BBC Worldwide Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, Ricky & StephenMerchant. 2005. Extras. BBC Worldwide Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Gervais, Ricky & StephenMerchant. 2011. The Office – Anniversary edition DVD. BBC Worldwide Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, Frances. 2005/2009. Privacy, embarrassment and social power: British sitcom. In MichaelPickering & SharonLockyer (eds.), Beyond a joke – The limits of humour, 148–164. London: Macmillan.10.1057/9780230236776_8Search in Google Scholar

Hight, Craig. 2010. Television mockumentary – Reflexivity, satire and a call to play. Manchester: University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Annette. 2005. Reality TV – Audiences and popular factual television. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203337158Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, Michael. 1972. On acting and not-acting. The Drama Review16(1). 3–15.10.2307/1144724Search in Google Scholar

Koestenbaum, Wayne. 2011. Humiliation. London: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Giselinde. 2008. The sociology of humor. In VictorRaskin (ed.), The primer of humor research, 361–398. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.361Search in Google Scholar

Le Guay, Damien. 2005. L’empire de la tele-realite, ou comment accroitre le ‘temps de cerveau humain disponsible. Paris: Presses de le Renaissance.Search in Google Scholar

Lipkin, Steven, DerekPaget & JaneRoscoe. 2006. Docudrama and mock-documentary: Defining terms, proposing canons. In Gary D.Rhodes & JohnParis Springer (eds.), Docufictions. Essays on intersection of documentary and fictional filmmaking, 11–26. North Carolina: McFarland.Search in Google Scholar

Lockyer, Sharon. 2006. Hear the one about…applying mixed methods in humour research?International Journal of Social Research Methodology9(1). 41–59.10.1080/13645570500436155Search in Google Scholar

Marc, David. 1997. Comic visions – Television comedy & American culture. Massachusetts: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Medhurst, Andy. 2007. A national joke – Popular comedy and English cultural identities. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203022566Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Brett. 2004. Comedy vérité: Contemporary sitcom form. Screen45(1). 63–78.10.1093/screen/45.1.63Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Brett. 2005. Television sitcom. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Brett. 2009. The sitcom. Edinburgh: University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748637515.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Morrison, Andrew P. 1999. Shame, on either side of defense. Contemporary Psychoanalysis35. 91–105.Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Michael & SharonLockyer. 2005, 2009. Beyond a joke: The limits of humour. London: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Proyer, R, WRuch, MMcRorie & I ASneddon. 2009. Breaking ground in cross-cultural research on the fear of being laughed at (gelatophobia): A multinational study involving 73 countries. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research22(1). 253–279.Search in Google Scholar

Raney, Arthur A. 2004. Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory14(4). 348–369.10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rozik, Eli. 2008. Generating theatre meaning – A theory and methodology of performance analysis. Portland: Sussex Academic Press.10.2307/j.ctv3029q5vSearch in Google Scholar

Ruch, Willibald. 2008. Psychology of humor. In VictorRaskin (ed.), The primer of humor research, 17–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198492.17Search in Google Scholar

Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1943. Being and nothingness. New York: Philosophical Library. (1956).Search in Google Scholar

Senzani, Alessandra. 2010. Class and gender as a laughing matter? The case of Roseanne. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research23(2). 229–253.10.1515/humr.2010.011Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Ethan. 2007. Comedy verité? The observational documentary meets the televisual sitcom. The Velvet Light Trap60(fall). 63–72.10.1353/vlt.2007.0027Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijk, Wilco W, Jaap WOuwerkerk, Guido Mvan Koningsbruggen & Yoka MWesseling. 2012. So you wanna be a pop star?”: Schadenfreude following another’s misfortune on TV. Basic and Applied Social Psychology34. 168–174.10.1080/01973533.2012.656006Search in Google Scholar

Vidmar, Neil & MiltonRokeach. 1974. Archie bunker’s bigotry: A study in selective perception and exposure. Journal of Communication24(1). 36–47.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00353.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wagg, Stephen (ed.). 1998. Because i tell a joke or two – Comedy, politics and social difference. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Walters, Ben. 2005. BFI TV classics – The office. London: British Film Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Zillmann, Dolf & Joanne RCantor. 1972. Directionality of transitory dominance as a communication variable affecting humor appreciation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology24. 191–198.10.1037/h0033384Search in Google Scholar