Startseite Sozialwissenschaften The Contemporary Significance of Early German Romantic Philosophy
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Contemporary Significance of Early German Romantic Philosophy

  • Andrew Bowie EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Oktober 2023

Abstract

Recent interest in early German Romantic philosophy can be linked to other approaches, such as that of John Dewey, which are critical of the dominant direction of modern philosophy. The Romantics rethink the relationship between philosophy and art as a way of questioning modern philosophy’s focus on epistemology and scepticism that leads to a lack of attention to the diverse other ways in which human beings make sense of things.


Corresponding author: Andrew Bowie, Philosophy Department, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK, E-mail:

References

Berlin, I. (1999). In H. Hardy (Ed.), The roots of romanticism. Chatto & Windus.Suche in Google Scholar

Bowie, A. (1997). From Romanticism to critical theory. Routledge.10.4324/9780203289792Suche in Google Scholar

Bowie, A. (2003). Aesthetics and subjectivity: From Kant to Nietzsche (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press.10.9760/MUPOA/9780719024450Suche in Google Scholar

Bowie, A. (2022). Aesthetic dimensions of modern philosophy. Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. Perigee.Suche in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1984). The later works, 1925–1953 Volume 4: 1929. Southern University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (2012). Unmodern philosophy and modern philosophy. Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Frank, M. (1989). Einführung in die frühromantische Ästhetik. Suhrkamp.Suche in Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1965). In F. Bassenge (Ed.), Ästhetik (Vols. I and II). Aufbau.Suche in Google Scholar

Noë, A. (2015). Strange tools: Art and human nature. Hill & Wang.Suche in Google Scholar

Novalis (1978). In H.-J. Mähl (Ed.), Band 2 Das philosophisch-theoretische Werk. Hanser.Suche in Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony and solidarity. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804397Suche in Google Scholar

Schlegel, F. (1964). Philosophische Vorlesungen (1800–1807) (Kritische Friedrich Schlegel Ausgabe Volume 12). Ferdinand Schöningh.Suche in Google Scholar

Schlegel, F. (1988). In E. Behler & H. Eichner (Eds.), Kritische Schriften und Fragmente, (Studienausgabe Vols. 1–6). Schöningh.Suche in Google Scholar

Schlegel, F. (1991). In M. Elsässer (Ed.), Transcendentalphilosophie. Meiner.Suche in Google Scholar

Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy. Oxford University Press.10.1002/9780470696675Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-07-14
Accepted: 2023-09-26
Published Online: 2023-10-11
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 13.1.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2023-0086/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen