Startseite A New Perspective on Humanity in the Cosmic Future: A Critical Reflection on Some Transhumanist Visions
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

A New Perspective on Humanity in the Cosmic Future: A Critical Reflection on Some Transhumanist Visions

  • Martin Farbák ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Zlatica Plašienková ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. Februar 2023

Abstract

The authors of this article critically consider selected transhumanist views of new perspectives on humanity in the cosmic future. Their focus is on philosophical and ethical thinking about the futuristic concepts of Cyborgs and Cosmic Beings promoted by Ted Chu. They weight up the possible negative consequences of radical human enhancement and analyse the utilitarian roots of the conceptions discussed. The theory of planetary and cosmic personality appears to be a safer alternative to radical human enhancement but they also pinpoint drawbacks to the theory. The authors conclude that a more conservative and authentic approach to human enhancement is found in the truly human enhancement proposed by Nicholas Agar and consider life-centred ethics an appropriate ethical standpoint in the search for humans’ place in the cosmic future.


Corresponding author: Martin Farbák, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University in Bratislava, Gondova 2, 811 02Bratislava, Slovakia, E-mail:

Funding source: Slovak Research and Development Agency

Award Identifier / Grant number: APVV-18-0103: Paradigmatic Changes in the Understanding of Universe and Man from Philosophical, Theological, and Physical Perspectives.

  1. Research funding: This research was funded by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract no. APVV-18-0103: Paradigmatic Changes in the Understanding of Universe and Man from Philosophical, Theological, and Physical Perspectives.

  2. Declaration: All individuals listed as authors qualify as authors and have approved the submitted version. Their work is original and is not under consideration by any other journal. They have permission to reproduce any previously published material.

References

Agar, N. (2014). Truly human enhancement: A philosophical defense of limits. MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262026635.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Bazaluk, O., & Blazhevich, T. (2012). Cosmic education: Formation of a planetary and cosmic personality. Philosophy and Cosmology, 1(10), 147–160.Suche in Google Scholar

Carrel, A. (1959). Man, the unknown. Wilco Publishing House.Suche in Google Scholar

Chu, T. (2014). Human purpose and transhuman potential: Cosmic vision for our future evolution. Origin Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2004). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cottingham, John. (2005). The spiritual dimension: Religion, philosophy and human value. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614866Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, Fiona. (2014). God, value & nature. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714125.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrando, F. (2016). A feminist genealogy of posthuman aesthetics in the visual arts. Palgrave Commun, 2(16011), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.11Suche in Google Scholar

Frankl, V. E. (1984). Man’s search for meaning. Washington Square Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hughes, J. (2011). After happiness. Cyborg virtue. Free Inquiry, 32(1), 1–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Viking.Suche in Google Scholar

Mautner, N. M. (2009). Life-centered ethics, and the human future in space. Bioethics, 23(8), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00688.xSuche in Google Scholar

Metz, Thaddeus. (2013). Meaning in life. An analytic study. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599318.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Paulech, T. (2022). Vesmírne ambície ľudstva [Humanity’s space ambitions]. RAN, 25(2), 6–17.Suche in Google Scholar

Plašienková, Z., & Farbák, M. (2020). Chemical dehumanisation of love vs authentic evolution of love. Philosophy and Public Issues, 10(3), 227–252.Suche in Google Scholar

Savulescu, J., & Persson, I. (2012). Moral enhancement, freedom, and the God machine. The Monist, 95(3), 399–421. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201295321Suche in Google Scholar

Spaemann, R. (1995). Základní mravní pojmy a postoje [Basic moral concepts and attitudes]. Svoboda.Suche in Google Scholar

Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1957). Ľ hominisation [the hominization]. In P. Teilhard de Chardin (Ed.), La vision du Passé (Oeuvres III.) (pp. 75–111). Éditions du Seuil.Suche in Google Scholar

Warwick, K. (2013). Cyborgs in space. Acta Futura, 6, 25–35.Suche in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, M. (2014). Ted Chu’s human purpose and transhuman potential: A cosmic vision of our future evolution. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 24(2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.55613/jeet.v24i2.24Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-12-14
Revised: 2023-01-17
Accepted: 2023-01-17
Published Online: 2023-02-16
Published in Print: 2023-06-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 28.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2022-1020/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen