Home Effect of Reductant Type on the Metallothermic Magnesium Production Process
Article Open Access

Effect of Reductant Type on the Metallothermic Magnesium Production Process

  • Mehmet Bugdayci EMAIL logo , Ahmet Turan , Murat Alkan and Onuralp Yucel
Published/Copyright: February 1, 2017

Abstract

This paper is a contribution to the theoretical and quantitative understanding of the processes for the production of magnesium metal by metallothermic process in vacuum (Pidgeon Process). In the present study, effects of reductant type and amount were investigated. CaC2 is a low-cost alternative to FeSi (ferrosilicon) which is the common reductant in the Pidgeon Process. CaC2 slightly decreases the Mg recovery ratios but it remarkably decreases the process cost. The experimental study, conducted with the change of mass % FeSi–CaC2 ratio at 1,250 °C for 360 min, the optimum Mg recovery was measured as 94.7 % at 20 % CaC2 addition. Also aluminum, as a reductant, allows conducting the process at lower temperatures than that of FeSi. For the experiments conducted with Al addition, the highest Mg recovery ratio was measured as 88.0 % in the conditions for 300 min process duration and 100 % stoichiometric Al addition at 1,200 °C.

Introduction

Mg is a silver grey metal which has a dense hexagonal crystal structure and it has two valance electrons. Melting point and boiling point of magnesium are 650±2 °C (923 K=650 °C) and 1,107±10 °C respectively [1].

The consumption of magnesium in many fields, such as aircrafts, rockets and automobile industry, is expected to increase rapidly for the next decade, because magnesium has the lowest density as 1.738 g/cm3 in all structural metals and its strength/density ratio is very high. It was reported by the USGS in 2015 that the World’s total magnesium production was approximately 878,000 t in 2013 and 907,000 t in 2014, thus the annual supply change is about 3 %. On the other hand, the World’s demand for magnesium increases nearly 10 % per year [2, 3, 4, 5].

Dolomite ore is the most important source to produce metallic magnesium. It is a compound of magnesium carbonate and calcium carbonate with a chemical formula as CaCO3.MgCO3. It theoretically consists of 45.3 % MgCO3 and 54.7 % CaCO3 by weight. Additionally dolomite is used in various industries such as metallurgy, glass, chemical and paper [6].

The major part of magnesium production is conducted via the Pidgeon Process which is a metallothermic (silicothermic) method [7]. Metallothermic reduction reactions are normally highly exothermic. Thus, the propagation of reactions and the yield of reaction products continue in a self-sustaining mode without requiring any additional heat [8]. On the other hand, the Pidgeon Process is highly endothermic (~ΔH298 is about 209 kJ mole of Mg), and heat supply is a critical consideration in industrial retorts (reactors). Magnesium is in gaseous phase at the temperature which is reduced, and it is collected in the form of crown at the cooling part of the retort [9]. The Pidgeon Process is conducted through the reduction of magnesium from calcined dolomite via silicothermic reduction under vacuum atmosphere. Powdered calcined dolomite, ferrosilicon (as reductant) and a slight amount of fluorspar (CaF2 as catalyst) are mixed prior to the reduction process as raw materials [7, 10]. Morsi et al. investigated to produce magnesium metal from dolomite ore under inert atmosphere in 2002. The highest recovery rate was achieved as 92 % when charge is containing 2.5 mass % CaF2, CaO/MgO molar ratio was 1.6. Furthermore, Si/MgO ratio was 1.45. The experiment was conducted at 1,300 °C for 5 h [20]. Minic et al. carried out the results of the characterization and thermal analysis of the slag from the magnesium plant named Bela Stena in Serbia. Dicalcium silicate based structure was determined in the solidified slag. Magnesium was mostly in the form of periclase, merwinite and melilite minerals [21]. In 2015, a one-step method, involving dolomite decomposition and magnesium reduction, was examined by Zhang et al. The results showed that the one-step developed technology is effective for both reducing process duration and saving energy [22].

Although Turkey has 16 billion tones (detected and probable) of World’s dolomite reserves [11], Turkey had not produced magnesium metal until 2015. The new Turkish magnesium plant using the silicothermic process has been started with 15,000 t/year production capacity [12]. Yucel et al. have investigated the parameters affecting the silicothermic reduction of calcined dolomite by using Turkish ores since 2002 [4].

In silicothermic Mg production processes, silicon or silicon based materials are used as the reductant of MgO based raw materials such as calcined magnesite and dolomite. Reduction of Mg is generally carried out via Pidgeon process. Mg is in the gas phase at reduction temperatures. The reaction in question is shown by the eq. (1) [6].

(1)2MgOCaO+Si2Mg+Ca2SiO4

This method is inefficient when the Mg source is MgO due to the reaction product which is in the form of MgO.SiO2. The formation of that compound stops the reduction [13]. To avoid MgO.SiO2 formation, SiO2 activity must be decreased with some additives. In this case CaO is the most suitable additive which is provided by using calcined dolomite as reactant. The reduction of Mg from MgO becomes easier and the reduction efficiency of Mg increases in accordance with the formation of CaO.SiO2 structure in reaction products. Because of that reason, in industrial silicothermic process calcined dolomite is used as a raw material instead of MgO [14].

If ferrosilicon (FeSi) contains higher than 65 mass % Si, activity of Si in ferrosilicon is close to the activity of pure silicon (0.97) at 1,200 °C. Because of the lower price of ferrosilicon, the use of FeSi is more preferable than silicon in commercial applications [15, 16]. The net reaction between ferrosilicon and dolomite is given in eq. (2).

(2)2MgOCaO+FeSi2Mg+Ca2SiO4+Fe

Al can be also used as a reductant in the Pidgeon Process, because it has thermodynamically several advantages. In the aluminothermic reduction process, reduction occurs at lower temperatures than the condition which is FeSi used as a reductant. This situation is explained in detail in the Thermodynamic Background of the present article. Aluminothermic reduction is not preferable for industrial application due to economic reasons. On the other hand some solutions, such as the use of FeAl, can be suggested to make the use of aluminum feasible [14]. The reaction for the use of Al to reduce Mg from calcined dolomite as shown in eq. (3).

(3)2MgOCaO+2Al2Mg+Ca2Al2O4

Although the use of FeSi is more economical than Si, in the common silicothermic process, it is still needed to reduce the cost of reductant. This work aims to evaluate the possibility of reducing the cost of magnesium production by using CaC2 with ferrosilicon as much as possible. According to Suchy and Seliger [17], MgO reduction with CaC2 is possible, but the residue of this process is highly entrained with Mg vapor. Mg vapor has the adverse effect on the reduction when it conjugate with residue, so Mg and lime must be separated from each other in order to obtain high recovery ratios. In addition, there is another disadvantage, the residue caused agglomeration of charge and the reaction mixture substrates are adapted to this agglomeration during reduction. To avoid the agglomeration silica and alumina preferably are added to mixture. With the addition of SiO2 or Al2O3 at the reaction temperature, lime converts into calcium silicate or calcium aluminate. Thus, residue of mixture does not include Mg [17]. In the experiments, increasing proportion of CaC2 was used with ferrosilicon. Process duration and temperature were carried out as variables in order to obtain high Mg recovery ratios. The reaction for the use of CaC2 to reduce Mg from dolomite gives metallic magnesium of 3 moles as shown in eq. (4).

(4)3MgOCaO+CaC23Mg+4CaO+2CO

Theoretical background

Thermodynamical investigations were conducted by using FactSage 6.4 software. Figure 1 was plotted to understand the change of the reduction conditions of Mg from MgO by Si, Al and CaC2 under 1 bar and 1 mbar pressures respectively. According to the thermodynamical investigations, the formation temperatures of the reactions are very high under 1 bar atmosphere pressure. In the condition which Al is used as a reductant, reaction begins at 1,475 °C where its Gibbs free energy is 0. The reduction temperatures with others are higher than Al, these are 2,143 °C, 1,789 °C, 1,847 °C for Si, FeSi and CaC2 respectively. On the other hand, in accordance with the nature of Pidgeon Process, reactions occur at lower temperatures around 1 mbar process pressure than that of 1 bar [4]. According to FactSage 6.4 software, the reaction beginning temperatures are 850 °C for Al, 1,155 °C for FeSi, 1,200 °C for CaC2 and 1,325 °C for Si under 1 mbar pressure. The effect of vacuum and different reductants on the beginning reduction temperatures of MgO and calcined dolomite is detailed shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. This temperatures are slightly low for the reduction of Mg from calcined dolomite under the reaction pressure of 1 mbar (842 °C for Al, 1,098 °C for FeSi, 1,191 °C for CaC2 and 1,318 °C for Si).

Figure 1: The change of gibbs free energies for the reactions between MgO and Si-CaC2-Al under 1 mbar and 1 bar reaction pressures.
Figure 1:

The change of gibbs free energies for the reactions between MgO and Si-CaC2-Al under 1 mbar and 1 bar reaction pressures.

Table 1:

Minimum reduction temperatures of MgO and calcined dolomite for different reductants at 1 bar and 1 mbar.

Reductant typeMinimum reduction temperature, °C
MgOCalcined dolomite
1 bar1 mbar1 bar1 mbar
Si2,1431,3252,4891,318
Al1,4758501,427842
FeSi1,7891,1551,8701,098
CaC21,8471,2001,8281,191

The change of reaction products with increasing temperature is given in Figure 2 for the reduction of Mg from calcined dolomite by using FeSi, CaC2 and Al as reductant. The diagrams were plotted for the 100 % stoichiometry of the reductants under 1 mbar. Predominance phases in the reaction products are Ca2SiO4, Mg and a slight amount of iron (between 800–1,400 °C) for the use of FeSi as reductant Figure 2(a). CaO, Mg and CO with a slight amount of Ca2SiO4 are determined as the products for CaC2 as a reductant Figure 2(b). Ca3Al2O6 and Mg phases exist in the reaction products of in the case of use Al as a reductant Figure 2(c). Moreover, a very low concentration of Ca2SiO4 phase occurred up to 1,300 °C and, the phase in question converted to Ca3SiO5 at the temperatures above 1,300 °C. According to Figure 2(b), CO(g) exists with Mg(g) in the gaseous products. The amount of collected Mg in the form of crown decreases in the presence of CO in the retort. It is predicted that the occurrence of CO in the retort increases the process pressure. Thus, Mg recovery ratio drops via reduction in vapor phase and condensation.

Figure 2: The change of reaction products with increasing process temperature for different reductant types: (a) FeSi, (b) CaC2 and (c) Al (Diagrams was plotted for the 100 % of the stoichiometrically required reductant addition and at 1 mbar atmosphere).
Figure 2:

The change of reaction products with increasing process temperature for different reductant types: (a) FeSi, (b) CaC2 and (c) Al (Diagrams was plotted for the 100 % of the stoichiometrically required reductant addition and at 1 mbar atmosphere).

In the study which was conducted by Ramachandran and Reddy in 2015 [18], the predominance diagram for Mg-O-C system was calculated and plotted at a constant pO2 of 10–20 as shown in Figure 3. The diagram shows MgO is stable at lower temperatures and lower CO pressure values. But at the temperatures above 1,600 °C, Mg is the reaction product. MgC2 is the stable phase under the conditions which the reaction temperature is above 850 °C and the reaction pressure is above nearly 1 bar. The experimental studies in this study, an average process pressure of 1 mbar was used and the process temperature was up to 1,250 °C. Thus, it is clear to see that the formation of MgC2 phase is not possible under the condition of CaC2 used as a reductant.

Figure 3: Predominance diagram for Mg-O-C System [18].
Figure 3:

Predominance diagram for Mg-O-C System [18].

Experimental

Calcined dolomite was provided from domestic sources of Turkey. It was milled by using a laboratory scale Siebtechnic vibratory cup mill. Particle size of milled dolomite was measured by using Malvern Instruments Mastersizer 2000 particle size analyzer and it is calculated in a large distribution varying from 1.855 μm to 74.715 μm. Particle size distribution of milled calcined dolomite is given in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Particle size distribution of calcined dolomite ore after milling.
Figure 4:

Particle size distribution of calcined dolomite ore after milling.

Calcined dolomite was analyzed by using chemical analysis and AAS (Perkin Elmer Analyst 800) techniques. Chemical analysis of calcined dolomite is given in Table 2. FeSi (75.0 % Si, 24.0 % Fe, 0.9 % Al, 0.1 % Ca by mass), Si (99.2 % by mass) was used as reductants and ETI Elektrometalurji grade CaC2 (min. 97.0 % CaC2 by mass) was also employed as a reductant aiming to decrease the amount of FeSi.

Table 2:

Chemical analysis of calcined dolomite.

CaOMgOFe2O3SiO2Al2O3Na2OK2O
58.5740.550.130.450.120.040.03

The XRD pattern of calcined dolomite ore was obtained by using PANalytical PW3040/60 XRD. XRD pattern is given in Figure 5. The dolomite ore comprises mainly CaO and MgO according to the XRD pattern.

Figure 5: XRD pattern of calcined dolomite ore.
Figure 5:

XRD pattern of calcined dolomite ore.

Experiments were carried out in cylindrical retorts which are made of stainless steel. The yield magnesium vapor condenses and forms the crown in the water cooled region of the furnace. To obtain vacuum atmosphere in the retort, a two stages integrated rotary vane pump ILMVAC -PK8D used which can hold a final pressure of 2×10−4 mbar. ILMVAC PIA 100 piezoelectric sensor was used in order to evaluate the extent of vacuum. The retort was externally heated by using a SiC resistance furnace having a maximum temperature of 1,350 °C. The details of the experimental set up can be found elsewhere [4]. Reduction experiments were conducted at two different temperatures, 1,200 °C and 1,250 °C, under vacuum atmosphere. At the end of the reduction, the retort was left in the furnace at the same vacuum values and it was cooled to room temperature. Then, the cover was opened and the condensed magnesium metal on the cooling section was taken. The residue left in the boat were weighted and analyzed. The degree of Mg metal recovery was calculated both from residue and collected metallic magnesium crown by using two different formulas given below.

(5)Mgrecovery%(fromresidue)={[(Mg0%×W0)-(Mg1%×W1)/(Mg0%×W0)}×100
(6)Mgrecovery%fromcrown=Mg2%×W2/Mg0%×W0×100

Where W0 is the weight of dolomite, Mg0 % is the weight percentage of magnesium in dolomite, W1 is the weight of residue, and Mg1 % is the weight percentage of magnesium in residue, W2 is the weight of crown magnesium, Mg2 % is the weight percentage of magnesium in crown.

In the present study, experimental sets were developed to understand the effects of reductants type on the Pidgeon Process of calcined dolomite. In the first set, the change of Mg recovery was investigated with the increase in charge (reactant) weights in the case FeSi was used as reductant. Two different retorts were used in this experimental set. The experiment with 50 g charge weight was carried out in 1 liter (l) retort, others (2,000 g, 3,000 g and 5,000 g charges) were executed in 10 liter retort at 1,250 °C under 1 mbar. In all experiments process durations were 6 h. In the second experimental set, effects of Si, FeSi and Al reductants were examined. The experiments were conducted in 1 liter retort. Effect of process duration on Mg recovery was investigated for 60, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min. In the third experimental set, 100 % stoichiometric 50 g mixtures were prepared. Stoichiometric amount of the reducing agent was calculated through sum of the reducible oxides (MgO + FeO + SiO2) contents in the calcined dolomite. The mixture stoichiometric ratios were changed from 100 % FeSi – 0 % CaC2 to 50 % FeSi – 50 % CaC2 with 10 % intervals. The change of Mg recovery with increasing CaC2 addition ratio in FeSi was carried out at 1,200 °C and 1,250 °C under 1 mbar vacuum atmosphere for 6 h. In the last experimental set, the experiments were conducted with increasing CaC2 addition and in different volumes of retorts as 1 l and 10 l.

Results and discussion

In the first group experimental set, effect of charge amount was investigated on magnesium recovery. Calcined dolomite–FeSi100 % stoichiometric powder mixtures were prepared and experiments were conducted in different charge (reactant) amounts varying from 50 g to 5,000 g, 2,000 g and 3,000 g charge amounts respectively presented the highest recovery rates which were calculated from residue. In all experiments 2.5 % CaF2 by mass added to charge mixtures to improve Mg recovery. The optimum results were given in the research article where effect of CaF2 was investigated, which was reported by Demiray et al. [19]. The highest Mg recovery was detected from the charge amount of 50 g as 98 %. In this experiment, crown Mg efficiency cannot be calculated, because crown Mg amount was not enough to carry out analyses. On the other hand, the highest Mg recovery calculated from crown was determined as 90 % for the experiment conducted with 3,000 g charge amount. Figure 6 shows the change of Mg recovery with the increase in charge weight. When the difference is evaluated between the Mg recovery rates calculated from residue and crown for the same conditions (such as reactant weight of 50 g) show that Mg was highly reduced, but the conditions were not enough to collect in the form of crown in a high recovery ratio. It was understood that increasing charge weight firstly affected Mg recovery negatively it reduced from 98 % to 90 % which calculated from residue. Mg recovery increased from 90 % to 92 %. According to the results, reduction duration must be extended with increasing amount of charge.

Figure 6: The change of Mg recovery calculated both from residue and crown with the increase in charge weight. 50 g Experiment was carried out in 1 l retort, others in 10 l retort (1,250 °C, 1 mbar and 6 h).
Figure 6:

The change of Mg recovery calculated both from residue and crown with the increase in charge weight. 50 g Experiment was carried out in 1 l retort, others in 10 l retort (1,250 °C, 1 mbar and 6 h).

In the second experimental set, the effects of Si, FeSi and Al addition and process duration were investigated. In these experiments, the effects of stoichiometric Si, FeSi and Al addition on Mg recovery were examined, and the results were compared to each other. All experiments were conducted under vacuum atmosphere at 1,200 °C and in 1 l retort. Mg amounts in the residues and Mg recovery ratios were given in Figure 7. From the results, the highest recovery was detected at silicon experiments 96 %. It is clear to see that increasing process duration and the use of Al as a reductant instead of FeSi have a positive effect on the recovery of Mg. The highest Mg recovery ratio was determined as 88 % at the experiment conducted with the use of Al and for the process duration of 300 min.

Figure 7: Mg amounts in residues and Mg recovery ratios for Si, FeSi and Al reductants with increasing process duration and 2.5 % CaF2 addition at 1,200 °C (50 g, 1 l, 1 mbar). Reductants are Si (□, ■), Al (Δ, ▲) and FeSi (○, ●).
Figure 7:

Mg amounts in residues and Mg recovery ratios for Si, FeSi and Al reductants with increasing process duration and 2.5 % CaF2 addition at 1,200 °C (50 g, 1 l, 1 mbar). Reductants are Si (□, ■), Al (Δ, ▲) and FeSi (○, ●).

In the third experimental set, the effect of CaC2 addition and the change of reaction temperature were investigated. In these experiments, CaC2 was added to charge mixtures in specific proportions. Stoichiometric FeSi/CaC2 ratio changed from 100 % FeSi – 0 % CaC2 to 50 % FeSi – 50 % CaC2. All experiments were conducted under vacuum atmosphere at two different reaction temperatures as 1,200 °C and 1,250 °C. Figure 8 presents effect of CaC2 amount and reaction temperature on Mg recovery ratio. The experiments show that increasing of CaC2 addition in the charge decreases the Mg recovery to 82.0 % for CaC2 addition of 50 % at 1,250 °C. The decrease in terms of Mg recovery with the use of CaC2 reductant was previously explained. [17].

Figure 8: The change of Mg recovery calculated from residue with increasing CaC2 addition ratios at different temperatures (1,200 °C–1,250 °C, 1 mbar and 6 h).
Figure 8:

The change of Mg recovery calculated from residue with increasing CaC2 addition ratios at different temperatures (1,200 °C–1,250 °C, 1 mbar and 6 h).

In the last stage of the experiments, effects of CaC2 addition on different retort volumes were investigated. Magnesium recovery ratios were calculated both from residue and crown. 1 l retort, 10 l retort residue and crown recovery ratios were compared in Figure 9. According to Figure 9, the highest Mg recovery was determined for 1 l retort 100 % FeSi added experiment as 98.2 %. On the other hand, the experiments conducted in the 10 l retort, the highest recovery was calculated at 10 % CaC2 added experiment as 95.2 % from residue and 94.7 % from crown. Chemical analysis results of all experiments are given in Table 3. The highest MgO amount in residue was obtained in the experiment conducted with 50 % FeSi – 50 % CaC2 addition ratio as 6.81 %. According to chemical analysis of residues, CaC2 addition affected amount of MgO in residue, minimum amount of MgO detected in stochiometric 90 % FeSi–10 % CaC2 experiment with 1.73 %.

Figure 9: The change of Mg recovery calculated with increasing CaC2 addition ratios for different experimental volumes conducted in 1 l and 10 l retorts (1,250 °C, 1 mbar and 6 h).
Figure 9:

The change of Mg recovery calculated with increasing CaC2 addition ratios for different experimental volumes conducted in 1 l and 10 l retorts (1,250 °C, 1 mbar and 6 h).

Table 3:

Chemical analysis results of residues obtained from the experiments which FeSi and CaC2 were used as reductants at different temperatures (1,200 °C–1,250 °C, 1 mbar, 2.5 % CaF2 addition and 6 h).

RunExperimentTemp.,°CWeight, gFeOAl2O3CaOMgOSiO2
1100 % FeSi-0 % CaC21,20011.005.181.4968.671.4023.34
290 % FeSi-10 % CaC211.500.150.4955.401.7338.49
380 % FeSi-20 % CaC212.100.430.9661.742.6033.52
470 % FeSi-30 % CaC213.203.271.3167.943.0724.36
560 % FeSi-40 % CaC212.902.801.4465.703.7927.48
650 % FeSi-50 % CaC214.103.081.5761.757.0826.90
7100 % FeSi-0 % CaC21,2506.606.212.3873.451.3316.12
890 % FeSi-10 % CaC210.500.290.7161.971.7835.07
980 % FeSi-20 % CaC213.000.881.4566.751.8428.68
1070 % FeSi-30 % CaC212.506.720.6750.152.9039.09
1160 % FeSi-40 % CaC214.002.161.0763.753.3429.53
1250 % FeSi-50 % CaC213.200.490.8960.126.8127.66

Conclusion

The reduction of Mg from calcined dolomite ores was investigated by using different reductants (FeSi, Si, Al and CaC2) for process pressure of 1 mbar at 1,200 °C and 1,250 °C temperatures for varying process durations up to 360 min. According to the results of experimental studies, obtained crown Mg was nearly pure and included trace amounts of Fe, Ca, Al and Si. The highest Mg recovery, calculated from residue, was obtained as 98.17 % at the experiment with 50 g charge weight and the use of 100 % stoichiometric FeSi in 1 l retort at 1,250 °C. The use of Al as a reductant was also examined and, 88.0 % Mg recovery ratio was measured at the experiment conducted for 300 min process duration for 100 % Al stoichiometry at 1,200 °C. Although the use of Al is not a cheap choice, it was determined that Al is a more effective reductant than FeSi and it can be evaluated if a low-cost Al source, like FeAl, can be used. During the experiments, increasing amount of charge and increasing CaC2 quantity reduced Mg recovery. For example, the use of 40 % CaC2 with 60 % FeSi at the experiment conducted in 1 l retort, Mg recovery was measured as 89.2 %. Thus, when the costs of FeSi and CaC2 (nearly half of FeSi) are compared, it is clear to understand the use of CaC2 makes the process economically feasible.

References

1 K. Andreassen, T.K. Aune, T. Haugerod, N.O. Hoy-Petersen, D. Oymo, O. Skane and T. Vralstad, in Handbook of Extractive Metallurgy, Volume II edited by F. Habashi, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (1997), pp. 981–982.Search in Google Scholar

2 R.E. Brown, Adv. Mater. Process., 167(1) (2009) 31–33.Search in Google Scholar

3 J. Milshtein, E. Gratz, S. Patic, A.C. Powell and U. Pal, J. Min. Metall. Sect. B-Metall., 49B(2) (2013) 183–190.10.2298/JMMB120809005MSearch in Google Scholar

4 O. Yücel, S. Yiğit and B. Derin, Mater. Sci. Forum., 488–489 (2005) 39–42.Search in Google Scholar

5 U.S. Geological Survey, 2015, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2015: U.S. Geological Survey, pp. 98–99, http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/70140094.10.3133/70140094Search in Google Scholar

6 B.K. Shahraki, B. Mehrabi and R. Dabiri, J. Min. Metall. Sect. B-Metall., 45B(1) (2009) 35–44.10.2298/JMMB0901035SSearch in Google Scholar

7 W. Wulandari, G.A. Brooks, M.A. Rhamdhani and B.J. Monaghan, Can. Metall. Q., 53(1) (2014) 17–25.10.1179/1879139513Y.0000000096Search in Google Scholar

8 A. Turan, M. Bugdayci and O. Yucel, High Temp. Mater. Proc., 34(2) (2015) 185–193.Search in Google Scholar

9 J.R. Wynnyckyj, D.B. Rao and G.S. Mueller, Can. Metall. Q., 16(1) (1977) 73–81.10.1179/cmq.1977.16.1.73Search in Google Scholar

10 C. Wang, C. Zhang, S.J. Zhang and L.J. Guo, Int. J. Miner. Process., 142 (2015) 147–153.Search in Google Scholar

11 K.T. Sarıkavak, İTÜ Vakfı Dergisi, 1 (69) (2015) 22–27.Search in Google Scholar

12 D.C. Brown, Magnesium Monthly Review Comprehensive Report. Vol. 44, No. 12, ISSN 0047–5491Search in Google Scholar

13 F. Habashi, Principles of Extractive Metallurgy, Vol. 3: New York: Pyrometallurgy, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, (1986), p. 328.Search in Google Scholar

14 A. Çetin, M.Sc. Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, 2005, p. 40.Search in Google Scholar

15 L.M. Pidgeon. Patent Nr. CA 1943 2330143, “Method and Apparatus for Producing Magnesium”, http://patft.uspto.govSearch in Google Scholar

16 L.M. Pidgeon and W.A. Alexandar. Thermal production of magnesium-pilot plant studies on the retort, ferrosilicon process, AIME, 159 (1944).Search in Google Scholar

17 R. Suchy and H. Seliger, Process for the production of Magnesium (1941), United States Patent Office, 2,240,584.Search in Google Scholar

18 M. Ramachandran and R.G. Reddy, Miner. Metall. Proc., 32(1) (2015) 30–37.10.1007/BF03402355Search in Google Scholar

19 Y. Demiray and O. Yucel, High Temp. Mater. Proc., 31 (2012) 251–257.Search in Google Scholar

20 I.M. Morsi, K.A. Elbarawy, M.B. Morsi and S.R. Abdel-Gawad, Can. Metall. Q., 41(1) (2002) 15–28.10.1179/cmq.2002.41.1.15Search in Google Scholar

21 D. Minic, D. Manasijevic, J. Dokic, D. Zivkovic and Z. Zivkovic, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 93(2) (2008) 411–415.Search in Google Scholar

22 C. Zhang, C. Wang, S. Zhang and L. Guo, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 54 (2015) 8883–8892.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-9-9
Accepted: 2016-12-23
Published Online: 2017-2-1
Published in Print: 2018-1-26

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 8.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2016-0197/html
Scroll to top button