Abstract
In this work, cadmium sulfide (CdS) nanoparticles were synthesized from a new Cd-octanoate complex via a simple thermal decompose method. The crystallinity of the product was obtained from X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern. The morphology and product size were analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Also Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy was used to investigate the CdS surface purity. Finally, the optical properties of the product were obtained from photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy.
Introduction
II–VI binary compound semiconductors have drawn considerable attention due to their interesting electronic and optical properties. They play important roles in both basic science and application fields. It has been well accepted that size and morphology of nanomaterials are crucial issues for their application and great efforts have been devoted to achieve size and morphological controllable syntheses of semiconductor nanocrystals [1]. Cadmium sulfide (CdS), a direct band gap material with Eg of 2.42 eV at room temperature, has vital applications in the optoelectronic devices [2–4]. And it receives a wide range of research interest because of their unique properties and their wide variety of potential applications. For instance, potential applications for laser light-emitting diodes, solar cells, non-linear optical, optoelectronic and electronic devices are in discussion [5–9]. During the past decades, various methods have been applied to fabricate CdS nanocrystalline, such as electrochemically induced deposition [10, 11], thermal decomposition [12], laser-assisted catalytic growth method [13], ultrasound irradiation [13], solvothermal method [14–17] and hydrothermal method [18, 19].
Most of the products have different morphologies such as dendrites [20], flakes [21], spheres [22], nanorods [23, 24], nanowires [25, 26], triangular and hexagonal plates [27], flower-like shape [28] and sea-urchin-like shape [29]. In this method, the organic surfactant, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), coated on the surface of the particles, plays key roles in determining not only the size but also the shape of the products during the synthetic procedures; and the obtained particles are relatively stable and can be re-dispersed in nonpolar solvents easily.
Experiment
Materials
All the chemical reagents used in our experiments such as PEG, elemental sulfur (99.95 %) and absolute ethanol were of analytical grade and were used as received without further purification. The precursor complex, [bis(octanoate)cadmium(II)], was prepared according to the procedure described previously [30]. The water used in this work was distilled and de-ionized. In this paper, we report on the synthesis of CdS nanoparticles by thermal decomposition of [bis(octanoate)cadmium(II)], in the presence of PEG. PEG was used as both the medium and the stabilizing reagents.
Characterization
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded by a Rigaku D-max C III, X-ray diffractometer using Ni-filtered Cu-Kα radiation. Elemental analyses were obtained from Carlo ERBA Model EA 1108 analyzer. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on Shimadzu Varian 4300 spectrophotometer in KBr pellets. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained on Philips XL-30 ESEM equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Room temperature photoluminescence (PL) was studied on an F-4500 fluorescence spectrophotometer. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained on a Philips EM208S TEM with an accelerating voltage of 100 kV.
Preparation of CdS nanoparticles
CdS nanoparticles were synthesized in a three-neck flask under argon atmosphere. In a typical synthesis process, the [Cd(oct)2]–PEG complex was prepared by reaction of 0.5 g of [Cd(oct)2] and 8 ml of PEG. The mixed solution was placed into the flask under stirring and then 0.28 g sulfur was added to the solution. The mixture was heated up to 170 °C approximately 120 min. The color of the solution changed from green to black. The black solution was cooled to room temperature. The nanoparticles were separated upon the addition of excess ethanol and centrifuged. The samples were washed with absolute ethanol and dichloromethane and dried in vacuum oven at room temperature. Scheme 1 shows the schematic of CdS nanoparticles formation.

Schematic of CdS nanoparticles preparation.
Results and discussions
X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern of the as-prepared sample is shown in Figure 1. The XRD pattern is consistent with the spectrum of CdS. The reflections of CdS can be indexed well to hexagonal CdS (space group: P63mc; JCPDS No. 06-0314). The crystallite sizes of the as-synthesized CdS, Dc, was calculated from the major diffraction peaks of the base of (110) using the Scherrer formula: Dc=K λ/β cos θ; where K is a constant (ca. 0.9) (33); λ is the X-ray wavelength used in XRD (1.5418 Å); β is the Bragg angle; θ is the pure diffraction broadening of a peak at half-height, that is, broadening due to the crystallite dimensions. The diameter of the nanoparticles calculated by the Scherrer formula is 31 nm.

XRD pattern of CdS nanoparticles.
The morphology of the product is examined by SEM analysis, as shown in Figure 2. The product is composed from very tiny particles. The size of particles examined by SEM was about 30–40 nm.

SEM image of CdS nanoparticles.
The main reason for decreasing the particle size of CdS nanostructure is the presence of PEG and octanoate that act as surfactant agent. In fact they cap the particle surfaces and prevent from aggregation. The TEM image of the product is given in Figure 3. The size of the nanocrystals obtained from the TEM is 30 nm.

TEM image of CdS nanoparticles.
To investigate whether the surface of the nanoparticles was capped with organic surface the FT-IR of the as-synthesized samples was performed. Typically, Figure 4 shows the FT-IR spectra of CdS nanoparticles. The spectra of CdS nanoparticles show weak stretch vibration at 1150 cm–1 attributing to the C–O stretching model of the PEG, two weak stretch vibrations at 2,920 and 2,885 cm–1 attributing to the C–H stretching models of the PEG carbon chain indicating PEG molecules are absorbed on the surface of nanoparticles [31–38]. There was no evidence of free precursor, [Cd(oct)2], in the sample, so the PEG serves as the capping ligand that controls growth.

FT-IR spectra of CdS nanoparticles.
PL measurement was carried out at room temperature with wavelength of 392 nm (Figure. 5). The PL spectrum consists of one strong peak at 393 nm that can be ascribed to a high-level transition in CdS semiconductor crystallites. It has been reported that this kind of band edge luminescence arises from the recombination of excitons and/or shallowly trapped electron–hole pairs.

PL spectra of CdS nanoparticles
Conclusion
CdS nanostructures with very tiny particles were synthesized via a simple thermal decomposition method with a new precursor. The octanoate complex and PEG acted as surfactant and increased steric effect and subsequently the particles size decreases. SEM and TEM analyses proved that the synthesized CdS was composed from very tiny particles. FT-IR spectra showed that PEG was capped on the nanoparticles surface. The optical properties were obtained from PL spectra. A strong peak was seen in 393 nm that can be attributed to recombination of excitons and/or shallowly trapped electron–hole pairs.
Funding statement: Funding: The authors are grateful to the council of University of Kashan for supporting this work by Grant No. 159271/651.
References
[1] S.A. Empedocles, R. Neuhauser, K. Shimizu and M.G. Bawendi, Adv. Mater., 11 (1999) 1243–1256.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:15<1243::AID-ADMA1243>3.0.CO;2-2Search in Google Scholar
[2] M. Sabet, M. Salavati-Niasari and O. Amiri, Electrochim. Acta, 117 (2014) 504–520.10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.176Search in Google Scholar
[3] O. Amiri, M. Salavati-Niasari, A. Rafiei and M. Farangi, RSC Adv., 4 (2014), 62356–62361.10.1039/C4RA10316ESearch in Google Scholar
[4] O. Amiri, M. Salavati-Niasari, S. M. Hosseinpour-Mashkani, A. Rafiei and S. Bagheri, Mater. Sci. Semiconduct. Process., 27 (2014), 261–266.10.1016/j.mssp.2014.06.020Search in Google Scholar
[5] X. Duan, Y. Huang, R. Agarwal and C.M. Lieber, Nature, 421 (2003) 241–245.10.1038/nature01353Search in Google Scholar
[6] M.V. Artemyev, V. Sperling and U. Woggon, J. Appl. Phys., 81 (1997) 6975–6977.10.1063/1.365261Search in Google Scholar
[7] A. Hagfeldt and M. Gratzel, Chem. Rev., 95 (1995) 49–68.10.1021/cr00033a003Search in Google Scholar
[8] V.L. Colvin, M.C. Schlamp and A.P. Alivisatos, Nature, 370 (1994) 354–357.10.1038/370354a0Search in Google Scholar
[9] X.G. Peng, M.C. Schlamp, A.V. Kadavanich and A.P. Alivisatos, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 119 (1997) 7019–7029.10.1021/ja970754mSearch in Google Scholar
[10] D.S. Xu, Y.J. Xu, D.P. Chen, G.L. Guo, L.L. Gui and Y.Q. Tang, Adv. Mater., 12 (2000) 520–522.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200004)12:7<520::AID-ADMA520>3.0.CO;2-#Search in Google Scholar
[11] H.Q. Cao, Y. Xu, J.M. Hong, H.B. Liu, G. Yin, B.L. Li, C.Y. Tie and Z. Xu, Adv. Mater., 13 (2001) 1393–1394.10.1002/1521-4095(200109)13:18<1393::AID-ADMA1393>3.0.CO;2-CSearch in Google Scholar
[12] Y.W. Jun, S.M. Lee, N.J. Kang and J. Cheon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123 (2001) 5150–5151.10.1021/ja0157595Search in Google Scholar
[13] X. Duan and C.M. Lieber, Adv. Mater., 12 (2000) 298–302.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200002)12:4<298::AID-ADMA298>3.0.CO;2-YSearch in Google Scholar
[14] S.M. Zhou, Y.S. Feng and L.D. Zhang, Mater. Lett., 57 (2003) 2936–2939.10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01400-3Search in Google Scholar
[15] Y.D. Li, H.W. Liao, Y. Ding, Y.T. Qian, L. Yang and G.E. Zhou, Chem. Mater., 10 (1998) 2301–2303.10.1021/cm970789lSearch in Google Scholar
[16] Y.D. Li, H.W. Liao, Y. Ding, Y. Fan, Y. Zhang and Y.T. Qian, Inorg. Chem., 38 (1999) 1382–1387.10.1021/ic980878fSearch in Google Scholar
[17] Y.D. Li, H.W. Liao, Y. Fan, L.Q. Li and Y.T. Qian, Mater. Chem. Phys., 58 (1999) 87–89.10.1016/S0254-0584(98)00254-5Search in Google Scholar
[18] J. Yang, J.H. Zeng, S.H. Yu, L. Yang, G.E. Zhou and Y.T. Qian, Chem. Mater., 12 (2000) 3259 –3263.10.1021/cm0000144Search in Google Scholar
[19] P. Zhang and L. Gao, Langmuir, 19 (2003) 208–210.10.1021/la0206458Search in Google Scholar
[20] H. Zhang, X.Y. Ma, Y.J. Ji, J. Xu and D. Yang, Chem. Phys. Lett., 377 (2003) 654–657.10.1016/S0009-2614(03)01242-9Search in Google Scholar
[21] A.M. Qin, Y.P. Fang, W.X. Zhao, H.Q. Liu and C.Y. Su, J. Cryst. Growth, 283 (2005) 230–241. Chem. 175 (2003) 322–327.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.05.056Search in Google Scholar
[22] N. Gao and F. Guo, Mater. Lett., 60 (2006) 3697–3700.10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.091Search in Google Scholar
[23] F.H. Zhao, Q. Su, N.S. Xu, C.R. Ding and M.M. Wu, J. Mater. Sci., 41 (2006) 1449–1454.10.1007/s10853-006-7459-xSearch in Google Scholar
[24] C. Bao, M. Jin, R. Lu, P. Xue, Q. Zhang, D. Wang and Y. Zhao, J. Solid State, 175 (2003) 322–327.10.1016/S0022-4596(03)00298-6Search in Google Scholar
[25] W. Qingqing, Z. Gaoling and H. Gaorong, Mater. Lett., 59 (2005) 2625–2629.10.1016/j.matlet.2005.04.004Search in Google Scholar
[26] C. Cheng, G. Xu, H. Zhang, H. Wang, J. Cao and H. Ji, Mater. Chem. Phys., 97 (2006) 448–451.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.08.045Search in Google Scholar
[27] X. Guo-yue, W. Han, C. Chuan-wei, Z. Hai-qian, C. Jie-ming and J. Guangbin, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 16 (2006) 105–109.Search in Google Scholar
[28] M. Chen, L. Pan, J. Cao, H. Ji, G. Ji, X. Ma and Y. Zheng, Mater. Lett., 60 (2006) 3842–3845.10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.125Search in Google Scholar
[29] L. Wang, L. Chen, T. Luo and Y. Qian, Mater. Lett., 60 (2006) 3627–3630.10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.072Search in Google Scholar
[30] X. Liu, Mater. Chem. Phys., 91 (2005) 212–216.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.11.015Search in Google Scholar
[31] D. Ghanbari, M. Salavati-Niasari, S. Karimzadeh and S. Gholamrezaei, J. NanoStruct., 4 (2014) 227–232.Search in Google Scholar
[32] G. Nabiyouni, S. Sharifi, D. Ghanbari and M. Salavati-Niasari, J. NanoStruct., 4 (2014) 317–323.Search in Google Scholar
[33] M. Panahi-Kalamuei, M. Mousavi-Kamazani and M. Salavati-Niasari, J. NanoStruct., 4 (2014) 459–465.Search in Google Scholar
[34] F. Beshkar and M. Salavati-Niasari, J. NanoStruct., 5 (2015) 17–23.10.1007/s40097-014-0124-zSearch in Google Scholar
[35] M. Goudarzi, D. Ghanbari and M. Salavati-Niasari, J. NanoStruct., 5 (2015) 110–115.Search in Google Scholar
[36] S. Moshtaghi, M. Salavati-Niasari and D. Ghanbari, J. NanoStruct., 5 (2015) 169–174.10.1007/s40097-015-0147-0Search in Google Scholar
[37] L. Nejati-Moghadam, A. Esmaeili Bafghi-Karimabad, M. Salavati-Niasari and H. Safardoust, J. NanoStruct., 5 (2015) 47–53.Search in Google Scholar
[38] H. R. Momenian, M. Salavati-Niasari, D. Ghanbari, B. Pedram, F. Mozaffar and S. Gholamrezaei, J. NanoStruct., 4 (2014) 99–104.10.1007/s40097-014-0099-9Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Effects of Extrusion–Shear Process Conditions on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy
- Degradation of TiB2/TiC Composites in Liquid Nd and Molten NdF3–LiF–Nd2O3 System
- Investigation of Oxygen Diffusion in Irradiated UO2 with MD Simulation
- Grain Size Effect on Fracture Behavior of the Axis-Tensile Test of Inconel 718 Sheet
- Modeling Superionic Behavior of Plutonium Dioxide
- Influence of Grain Refinement on Oxidation Behavior of Two-Phase Cu–Cr Alloys at 973–1,073 K in Air
- Synthesis and Characterization of Cadmium Sulfide Nanoparticles via a Simple Thermal Decompose Method
- Short Communication
- Simple Thermal Decompose Method for Synthesis of Nickel Disulfide Nanostructures
- Research Articles
- Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior of Ti22Al25Nb Alloy during Hot Isothermal Deformation
- Reduction Smelting Low Ferronickel from Pre-concentrated Nickel-Iron Ore of Nickel Laterite
- Physics-Based Constitutive Model to Predict Dynamic Recovery Behavior of BFe10-1-2 Cupronickel Alloy during Hot Working
- Influence of Oxides on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Steel Weld Joint
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Effects of Extrusion–Shear Process Conditions on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy
- Degradation of TiB2/TiC Composites in Liquid Nd and Molten NdF3–LiF–Nd2O3 System
- Investigation of Oxygen Diffusion in Irradiated UO2 with MD Simulation
- Grain Size Effect on Fracture Behavior of the Axis-Tensile Test of Inconel 718 Sheet
- Modeling Superionic Behavior of Plutonium Dioxide
- Influence of Grain Refinement on Oxidation Behavior of Two-Phase Cu–Cr Alloys at 973–1,073 K in Air
- Synthesis and Characterization of Cadmium Sulfide Nanoparticles via a Simple Thermal Decompose Method
- Short Communication
- Simple Thermal Decompose Method for Synthesis of Nickel Disulfide Nanostructures
- Research Articles
- Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior of Ti22Al25Nb Alloy during Hot Isothermal Deformation
- Reduction Smelting Low Ferronickel from Pre-concentrated Nickel-Iron Ore of Nickel Laterite
- Physics-Based Constitutive Model to Predict Dynamic Recovery Behavior of BFe10-1-2 Cupronickel Alloy during Hot Working
- Influence of Oxides on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of High-Strength Steel Weld Joint