Home The diagnostic challenge of ovarian carcinoma in normal-sized ovaries: a report of two cases
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The diagnostic challenge of ovarian carcinoma in normal-sized ovaries: a report of two cases

  • Soon Leong Yong ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Safilah Dahian , Aznim Hani Ramlan and Marcus Kang
Published/Copyright: August 11, 2018

Abstract

Normal-sized ovarian carcinoma syndrome (NOCS) is a rare condition characterised by malignancy identified in ovaries of normal size with abdominal metastasis. We report two cases of advanced ovarian carcinoma with ovaries of normal size. The first case was a 13-year-old adolescent with malignant ascites and bilateral normal sized multicystic ovaries detected on ultrasound. Serum cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) and lactate dehydrogenase were markedly raised. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed the presence of thick omental cake but no ovarian tumour. An ultrasound-guided biopsy of the omental cake was undertaken. A histopathological examination and immunohistochemical studies of omentum caking confirmed a diagnosis of high-grade serous carcinoma of ovarian in origin. Despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy, she deteriorated rapidly with acute renal failure and respiratory distress. She succumbed to her disease 10 weeks after diagnosis. The second case, a 69-year-old postmenopausal female presented with malignant ascites and ultrasound evaluation showed hydrometra and bilateral atrophic ovaries. CA 125 was significantly raised. A laparoscopic biopsy of the left ovary and endometrial sampling were performed. A diagnosis of synchronous primary high grade papillary serous ovarian cystadenocarcinoma and endometrial adenocarcinoma were revealed. Relapse occurred despite ongoing adjuvant chemotherapy. We concluded that a preoperative definitive diagnosis of NOCS is difficult. Strong clinical suspicion is needed when all the important causes of malignant ascites are excluded. Radiological-guided biopsy and laparoscopic biopsy are useful to achieve the diagnosis of NOCS.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Director General of Health Malaysia for permission to publish this paper. The authors are also grateful to Dr. Zhong Wei Ong for his valuable contribution in preparation of the case images.

Author Statement

  1. Research funding: Authors state no funding involved.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals.

  4. Ethical approval: This case report had been registered to National Medical Research Register (under Ministry of Health Malaysia) and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained. The Research Identification Number given was NMRR-17-1524-37172.

  5. Submission declaration: This case report was presented at the 25th Congress of the Obstetrical and Gynaecological Society of Malaysia, in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on 28 July 2017.

References

[1] Feuer GA, Shevchuk M, Calanog A. Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73(5 Pt 1):786–92.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Kanda M, Sonoyama A, Ohara N. Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome (NOCS) detected with FDG-PET/CT. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35:597–9.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Suga K, Kawakami Y, Hiyama A, Kusano T, Nawata S. F-18 FDG PET-CT findings in a case of normal-sized ovarian cancer syndrome. Clin Nucl Med. 2009;34:706–9.10.1097/RLU.0b013e3181b534a4Search in Google Scholar

[4] McCluggage WG, Wilkinson N. Metastatic neoplasms involving the ovary: a review with an emphasis on morphological and immunohistochemical features. Histopathology. 2005;47:231–47.10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02194.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Bloss JD, Liao SY, Buller RE, Manetta A, Berman ML, McMeekin S, et al. Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a case-control retrospective comparison to papillary adenocarcinoma of ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;50:347–51.10.1006/gyno.1993.1223Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] McGonigle KF, Dudzinski MR. Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary presenting with an enlarged inguinal lymph node without evidence of abdominal carcinomatosis. Gynecol Oncol. 1992;45:225–8.10.1016/0090-8258(92)90291-PSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Emoto M, Fujimitsu R, Iwasaki H, Kawarabayashi T. Diagnostic challenges in patients with tumors: case 3. Normal-sized ovarian cancer detected by color doppler ultrasound using a microbubble contrast agent. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3703–5.10.1200/JCO.2003.01.083Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Deka P, Shrivastava S, Barmon D, Kataki AC, Sarma A. Ovarian carcinoma in normal size ovaries with inguinal lymph node metastasis: a case report. J Cancer Res Ther. 2013;2:3.10.7243/2049-7962-2-3Search in Google Scholar

[9] Naz S, Hashmi AA, Ali R, Faridi N, Hussian SD, Edhi MM, et al. Role of peritoneal washing cytology in ovarian malignancies: correlation with histopathological parameters. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:315.10.1186/s12957-015-0732-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Spencer JA, Anderson K, Weston M, Wilkinson N, Hewitt M. Image guided biopsy in the management of cancer of the ovary. Cancer Imaging. 2006;6:144–7.10.1102/1470-7330.2006.0022Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Weber S, McCann CK, Boruta DM, Schorge JO, Growdon WB. Laparoscopic surgical staging of early ovarian cancer. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4:117–22.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Cao LQ, Li X, Li XG. Clinical analysis of 9 cases of the normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome. Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2002;27:275–6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Yao Z, Li L, Yang H. Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome – clinical and pathological analysis of 11 cases. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 1998;20:383–6.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Yamazaki T, Hatano H, Suzuki A, Sugase M, Nakamura M, Sekiya M, et al. Normal-sized ovary carcinoma syndrome: histopathological analysis of 14 cases. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1995;47:27–34.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-06-11
Accepted: 2018-06-22
Published Online: 2018-08-11

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hmbci-2018-0043/html
Scroll to top button