Interest of systematic tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening

References

[1] Reiser I, Sechopoulos I. A review of digital breast tomosynthesis. Med Phys Int J. 2014;2:10.Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:583–9.10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, Eben EB, Ekseth U, Haakenaasen U, et al. Prospective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:2061–71.10.1007/s00330-013-2820-3Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Haas BM, Kalra V, Geisel J, Raghu M, Durand M, Philpotts LE. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening. Radiol. 2013;269:694–700.10.1148/radiol.13130307Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, Durand MA, Plecha DM, Greenberg JS, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311:2499–507.10.1001/jama.2014.6095Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Rafferty EA, Durand MA, Conant EF, Copit DS, Friedewald SM, Plecha DM, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and nondense breasts. J Am Med Am. 2016;315:1784–6.10.1001/jama.2016.1708Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Rose SL, Tidwell AL, Bujnoch LJ, Kushwaha AC, Nordmann AS, Sexton R, Jr. Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:1401–8.10.2214/AJR.12.9672Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Lourenco AP, Barry-Brooks M, Baird GL, Tuttle A, Mainiero MB. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiol. 2015;274:337–42.10.1148/radiol.14140317Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;299:2151–63.10.1001/jama.299.18.2151Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Houssami N, Macaskill P, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, et al. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading–evidence to guide future screening strategies. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:1799–807.10.1016/j.ejca.2014.03.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Gilbert FJ, Tucker L, Gillan MG, Willsher P, Cooke J, Duncan KA, et al. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme–a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19:1–136.10.3310/hta19040Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Rafferty EA, Park JM, Philpotts LE, Poplack SP, Sumkin JH, Halpern EF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and recall rates for digital mammography and digital mammography combined with one-view and two-view tomosynthesis: results of an enriched reader study. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:273–81.10.2214/AJR.13.11240Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Michell MJ, Iqbal A, Wasan RK, Evans DR, Peacock C, Lawinski CP, et al. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:976–81.10.1016/j.crad.2012.03.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Ertas M, Yildirim I, Kamasak M, Akan A. Digital breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction using 2D and 3D total variation minimization. Biomed Eng Online. 2013;12:112.10.1186/1475-925X-12-112Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Poplack SP, Tosteson TD, Kogel CA, Nagy HM. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:616–23.10.2214/AJR.07.2231Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Spangler ML, Zuley ML, Sumkin JH, Abrams G, Ganott MA, Hakim C, et al. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:320–4.10.2214/AJR.10.4656Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Andersson I, Ikeda DM, Zackrisson S, Ruschin M, Svahn T, Timberg P, et al. Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2817–25.10.1007/s00330-008-1076-9Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Kopans D, Gavenonis S, Halpern E, Moore R. Calcifications in the breast and digital breast tomosynthesis. Breast J. 2011;17:638–44.10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01152.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Samala RK, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA. Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:7092–112.10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/7092Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Morel JC, Iqbal A, Wasan RK, Peacock C, Evans DR, Rahim R, et al. The accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with coned compression magnification mammography in the assessment of abnormalities found on mammography. Clin Radiol. 2014;69:1112–6.10.1016/j.crad.2014.06.005Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Gennaro G, Toledano A, di Maggio C, Baldan E, Bezzon E, La Grassa M, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:1545–53.10.1007/s00330-009-1699-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Mariscotti G, Durando M, Houssami N, Zuiani C, Martincich L, Londero V, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:889–95.10.1016/j.crad.2016.04.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M, Bergonzini R, Bellarosa S, Angelini O, et al. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med. 2006;111:440–8.10.1007/s11547-006-0040-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Tucker AW, Calliste J, Gidcumb EM, Wu J, Kuzmiak CM, Hyun N, et al. Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:1547–52.10.1016/j.acra.2014.07.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[25] Houssami N, Turner RM. Rapid review: estimates of incremental breast cancer detection from tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening in women with dense breasts. Breast. 2016;30:141–5.10.1016/j.breast.2016.09.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227–36.10.1056/NEJMoa062790Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Miglioretti DL, Lange J, van den Broek JJ, Lee CI, van Ravesteyn NT, Ritley D, et al. Radiation-induced breast cancer incidence and mortality from digital mammography screening: a modeling study. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:205–14.10.7326/M15-1241Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[28] Dance DR, Young KC, van Engen RE. Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:453–71.10.1088/0031-9155/56/2/011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Sechopoulos I, Sabol JM, Berglund J, Bolch WE, Brateman L, Christodoulou E, et al. Radiation dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis: report of AAPM Tomosynthesis Subcommittee Task Group 223. Med Phys. 2014;41:091501.10.1118/1.4892600Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] Baptista M, Di Maria S, Oliveira N, Matela N, Janeiro L, Almeida P, et al. Image quality and dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: a monte carlo study. Radiation Phys Chem. 2014;104:158–62.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.12.036Suche in Google Scholar

[31] Svahn TM, Houssami N, Sechopoulos I, Mattsson S. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. Breast. 2015;24:93–9.10.1016/j.breast.2014.12.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[32] Maldera A, De Marco P, Colombo PE, Origgi D, Torresin A. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Dose and image quality assessment. Phys Med. 2017;33:56–67.10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.004Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Vecchio S, Albanese A, Vignoli P, Taibi A. A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1207–13.10.1007/s00330-010-2041-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Zuley ML, Guo B, Catullo VJ, Chough DM, Kelly AE, Lu AH, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. Radiology. 2014;271:664–71.10.1148/radiol.13131530Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[35] Choi JS, Han BK, Ko EY, Ko ES, Hahn SY, Shin JH, et al. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:2538–46.10.1007/s00330-015-4083-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Skaane P, Bandos AI, Eben EB, Jebsen IN, Krager M, Haakenaasen U, et al. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Radiol. 2014;271:655–63.10.1148/radiol.13131391Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Zuckerman SP, Maidment AD, Weinstein SP, McDonald ES, Conant EF. Imaging with synthesized 2D mammography: differences, advantages, and pitfalls compared with digital mammography. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209:222–9.10.2214/AJR.16.17476Suche in Google Scholar PubMed