Home Fractal dimension of wood pores from pore size distribution
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fractal dimension of wood pores from pore size distribution

  • Dessie T. Tibebu EMAIL logo and Stavros Avramidis
Published/Copyright: November 1, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Understanding wood pore geometry and distribution is the basis for studying its macroscopic properties. This research investigated the pore fractal dimension using the pore size distribution of selected softwoods and hardwoods. Mercury intrusion porosimetry explored the detailed structural parameters of wood pore size distributions and assessed their fractal dimension. The results revealed significant variability in pore size distribution, porosity, pore volume, and fractal dimension values. The threshold pressure extracted from porosimetry data can be used as the main parameter to distinguish the pore size distribution regions. Pore sizes ranged from 3 to 35,000 nm, with a corresponding porosity that ranged from 58 to 76%. Three pore size classes were determined and ranged as: macropores (radius 350,000–5000 nm), mesopores (radius 5000–100 nm), and micropores (radius 100–3 nm). The fractal dimension values in the corresponding macropore, mesopore, and micropore size intervals were 2.98–2.998, 2.6–2.92, and 2.53–2.72, respectively, indicating a higher degree of complexity for larger pores.


Corresponding author: Dessie T. Tibebu, Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada; and Department of Material Science and Engineering, College of Science, Bahir Dar University, P.O. Box 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

Avramidis, S. and Hatzikiriakos, S.G. (1994). Fractal dimension of wood surface from sorption isotherms. Wood Sci. Technol. 28: 275–284.10.1007/BF00204213Search in Google Scholar

Bershadskii, A.G. (1991). Percolation and diffusion in fractal turbulence. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 61: 1188–1193, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00872584.Search in Google Scholar

Burrough, P.A. (1981). Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 294: 240–242, https://doi.org/10.1038/294240a0.Search in Google Scholar

Fripiat, J.J., Gatineau, L., and Damme, H.V. (1986). Multilayer physical adsorption on fractal surfaces. Langmuir 2: 562–567, https://doi.org/10.1021/la00071a006.Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, D.M. (1977). Water potential and wood-decay fungi. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 15: 319–329, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.15.090177.001535.Search in Google Scholar

Guo, L., Cheng, H., Chen, J., Chen, W., and Zhao, J. (2020). Pore structure characterization of oak via X-ray computed tomography. Bioresources 15: 3053–3063, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.2.3053-3063.Search in Google Scholar

Hao, B. and Avramidis, S. (2001). Wood sorption fractality in the hygroscopic range. Part I. Evaluation of a modified classic BET model. Wood Fiber Sci. 33: 119–125.Search in Google Scholar

He, S., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Bao, Y., Yu, H., and Chen, Y. (2017). Compare of porous structure of moso bamboo and pinus sylvestris L. lumber. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 41: 157–162.Search in Google Scholar

Hösli, J.P. and Orfila, C. (1985). Mercury porosimetric approach on the validity of darcy’s law in the axial penetration of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 19: 347–352.10.1007/BF00350811Search in Google Scholar

Jaroniec, M., Gilpin, R., and Choma, J. (1992). Correlation between microporosity and fractal dimension of active carbons. Carbon 31: 325–331.10.1016/0008-6223(93)90037-BSearch in Google Scholar

Jingyao, Z., Lin, Y., and Yingchun, C. (2020). Combining mercury intrusion porosimetry and fractal theory to determine the porous characteristics of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 70: 377–382.Search in Google Scholar

Junghans, K., Niemz, P., and Bächle, F. (2005). Untersuchungen zum einfluss der thermischen vergütung auf die porosität von fichtenholz. Holzforschung 63: 243–344.10.1007/s00107-004-0553-3Search in Google Scholar

Kong, L., Ostadhassan, M., Liu, B., Li, C., and Liu, K. (2019). Multifractal characteristics of MIP-based pore size distribution of 3D-printed powder-based rocks: a study of post-processing effect. Transport Porous Media 129: 599–618.10.1007/s11242-018-1152-9Search in Google Scholar

Lai, J. and Wang, G. (2015). Fractal analysis of tight gas sandstones using high-pressure mercury intrusion techniques. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 24: 185–196.10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.027Search in Google Scholar

Li, K. (2010). Analytical derivation of Brooks–Corey type capillary pressure models using fractal geometry and evaluation of rock heterogeneity. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 24: 185–196.Search in Google Scholar

Li, P., Zheng, M., Bi, H., Wu, S., and Wang, X. (2017). Pore throat structure and fractal characteristics of tight oils and stone: a case study in the Ordos Basin, China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 149: 665–674.10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.015Search in Google Scholar

Mandelbrot, B.B. (1984). The fractal geometry of nature, Vol. 173. New York: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Neimark, A.V. (1990). Determination of the surface fractal dimensionality from the results of an adsorption experiment. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 64: 2593–2605.Search in Google Scholar

Panshin, A.J. and de Zeeuw, C. (1980). Textbook of wood technology, 4th ed, Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 722.Search in Google Scholar

Pfeifer, P. (1986). Fractals in physics. In: Pietronero, L. and Tasatti, E. (Eds.), Proc. 6th Int. Symp. ICTP, Trieste, 25. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1647–1658.Search in Google Scholar

Pfriem, A., Zauer, M., and Wagenführ, A. (2009). Alteration of the pore structure of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) due to thermal treatment as determined by helium pycnometry and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Holzforschung 63: 94–98, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2009.027.Search in Google Scholar

Plötze, M. and Niemz, P. (2011). Porosity and pore size distribution of different wood types as determined by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 69: 649–657, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-010-0504-0.Search in Google Scholar

Rajagopal, H., Khairuddin, A.S.M., Mokhtar, N., Ahmad, A., and Yusof, R. (2019). Application of image quality assessment module to motion-blurred wood images for wood species identification system. Wood Sci. Technol. 53: 967–981, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-019-01110-2.Search in Google Scholar

Redinz, J.A. and Guimaraes, P.R.C. (1996). The fractal nature of wood revealed by water absorption. Wood Fiber Sci. 29: 333–339.Search in Google Scholar

Rouquerol, J., Avnir, D., Fairbridge, C.W., Everett, D.H., Haynes, J.M., Pernicone, N., Ramsay, J.D.F., Sing, K.S.W., and Unger, K.K. (1994). Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 66: 1739–1758, https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199466081739.Search in Google Scholar

Russ, J.C. (1994). Fractal surfaces, Vol. 1–19. New York, London: Plenum, pp. 227–259.10.1007/978-1-4899-2578-7_8Search in Google Scholar

Saporal, B. (1989). Fractal interfaces in diffusion, invasion, and corrosion. In: Fractal method to heterogeneous chemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 227–246.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, A. (1979). Beitrag zur porositätsanalyse von holz mit dem quecksilber-porosimeter. Holzforschung 37: 295–302, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02607491.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, A. and Wagner, L. (1974). Bestimmung der porengrössenverteilung in holz mit dem quecksilber-porosimeter. Holzforschung 32: 216–224, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02607257.Search in Google Scholar

Siauw, H.N. and Fairbridge, C. (1987). Fractal description fo the surface structure of coke particles. Langmuir 3: 340–345, https://doi.org/10.1021/la00075a010..Search in Google Scholar

Shi, J. and Avramidis, S. (2018). Dried cell wall nanopore conguration of Douglas-fir, western red cedar and aspen heartwoods. Wood Sci. Technol. 52: 1025–1037, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-1011-4.Search in Google Scholar

Stamm, A.J. (1964). Wood and cellulose science. New York: Ronald Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stayton, C.L. and Hart, C.A. (1965). Determining pore size distribution in softwoods with a mercury porosimeter. For. Prod. J. 15: 435–440.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, X., Hou, J., Song, S.H., Wang, D.M., Gong, L., and Ma, K. (2018). Combining pressure controlled porosimetry and rate-controlled porosimetry to investigate the fractal characteristics of full-range pores in tight oil reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 171: 353–361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.050.Search in Google Scholar

Washburn, E.W. (1921). Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7: 115, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.7.4.115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Yu, T., Wu, K., Shyu, T., Zong, T., Chen, R., and Guo, Y. (2009). Using three-dimensional fractal dimension to analyze the complexity of fetal cortical surface from magnetic resonance images. Nonlinear Dynam. 58: 745–752.10.1007/s11071-009-9515-ySearch in Google Scholar

Zauer, M., Hempel, S., Pfriem, A., Mechtcherine, V., and Wagenführ, A. (2014). Investigations of the pore-size distribution of wood in the dry and wet state by means of mercury intrusion porosimetry. Wood Sci. Technol. 48: 1229–1240, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-014-0671-y.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, J., Yang, L., and Cai, Y. (2021). Combining mercury intrusion porosimetry and fractal theory to determine the porous characteristics of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 55: 109–124, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01243-9.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, S., Yao, Y., Liu, D., Cai, Y., and Liu, Y. (2018). Characterizations of full-scale pore size distribution, porosity and permeability of coals: a novel methodology by nuclear magnetic resonance and fractal analysis theory. Int. J. Coal Geol. 196: 148–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.07.008.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-30
Accepted: 2022-09-28
Published Online: 2022-11-01
Published in Print: 2022-12-16

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hf-2021-0175/html
Scroll to top button