Abstract
Understanding wood pore geometry and distribution is the basis for studying its macroscopic properties. This research investigated the pore fractal dimension using the pore size distribution of selected softwoods and hardwoods. Mercury intrusion porosimetry explored the detailed structural parameters of wood pore size distributions and assessed their fractal dimension. The results revealed significant variability in pore size distribution, porosity, pore volume, and fractal dimension values. The threshold pressure extracted from porosimetry data can be used as the main parameter to distinguish the pore size distribution regions. Pore sizes ranged from 3 to 35,000 nm, with a corresponding porosity that ranged from 58 to 76%. Three pore size classes were determined and ranged as: macropores (radius 350,000–5000 nm), mesopores (radius 5000–100 nm), and micropores (radius 100–3 nm). The fractal dimension values in the corresponding macropore, mesopore, and micropore size intervals were 2.98–2.998, 2.6–2.92, and 2.53–2.72, respectively, indicating a higher degree of complexity for larger pores.
-
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
Avramidis, S. and Hatzikiriakos, S.G. (1994). Fractal dimension of wood surface from sorption isotherms. Wood Sci. Technol. 28: 275–284.10.1007/BF00204213Search in Google Scholar
Bershadskii, A.G. (1991). Percolation and diffusion in fractal turbulence. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 61: 1188–1193, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00872584.Search in Google Scholar
Burrough, P.A. (1981). Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature 294: 240–242, https://doi.org/10.1038/294240a0.Search in Google Scholar
Fripiat, J.J., Gatineau, L., and Damme, H.V. (1986). Multilayer physical adsorption on fractal surfaces. Langmuir 2: 562–567, https://doi.org/10.1021/la00071a006.Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, D.M. (1977). Water potential and wood-decay fungi. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 15: 319–329, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.15.090177.001535.Search in Google Scholar
Guo, L., Cheng, H., Chen, J., Chen, W., and Zhao, J. (2020). Pore structure characterization of oak via X-ray computed tomography. Bioresources 15: 3053–3063, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.2.3053-3063.Search in Google Scholar
Hao, B. and Avramidis, S. (2001). Wood sorption fractality in the hygroscopic range. Part I. Evaluation of a modified classic BET model. Wood Fiber Sci. 33: 119–125.Search in Google Scholar
He, S., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Bao, Y., Yu, H., and Chen, Y. (2017). Compare of porous structure of moso bamboo and pinus sylvestris L. lumber. J. Nanjing For. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 41: 157–162.Search in Google Scholar
Hösli, J.P. and Orfila, C. (1985). Mercury porosimetric approach on the validity of darcy’s law in the axial penetration of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 19: 347–352.10.1007/BF00350811Search in Google Scholar
Jaroniec, M., Gilpin, R., and Choma, J. (1992). Correlation between microporosity and fractal dimension of active carbons. Carbon 31: 325–331.10.1016/0008-6223(93)90037-BSearch in Google Scholar
Jingyao, Z., Lin, Y., and Yingchun, C. (2020). Combining mercury intrusion porosimetry and fractal theory to determine the porous characteristics of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 70: 377–382.Search in Google Scholar
Junghans, K., Niemz, P., and Bächle, F. (2005). Untersuchungen zum einfluss der thermischen vergütung auf die porosität von fichtenholz. Holzforschung 63: 243–344.10.1007/s00107-004-0553-3Search in Google Scholar
Kong, L., Ostadhassan, M., Liu, B., Li, C., and Liu, K. (2019). Multifractal characteristics of MIP-based pore size distribution of 3D-printed powder-based rocks: a study of post-processing effect. Transport Porous Media 129: 599–618.10.1007/s11242-018-1152-9Search in Google Scholar
Lai, J. and Wang, G. (2015). Fractal analysis of tight gas sandstones using high-pressure mercury intrusion techniques. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 24: 185–196.10.1016/j.jngse.2015.03.027Search in Google Scholar
Li, K. (2010). Analytical derivation of Brooks–Corey type capillary pressure models using fractal geometry and evaluation of rock heterogeneity. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 24: 185–196.Search in Google Scholar
Li, P., Zheng, M., Bi, H., Wu, S., and Wang, X. (2017). Pore throat structure and fractal characteristics of tight oils and stone: a case study in the Ordos Basin, China. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 149: 665–674.10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.015Search in Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B.B. (1984). The fractal geometry of nature, Vol. 173. New York: W. H. Freeman.Search in Google Scholar
Neimark, A.V. (1990). Determination of the surface fractal dimensionality from the results of an adsorption experiment. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 64: 2593–2605.Search in Google Scholar
Panshin, A.J. and de Zeeuw, C. (1980). Textbook of wood technology, 4th ed, Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 722.Search in Google Scholar
Pfeifer, P. (1986). Fractals in physics. In: Pietronero, L. and Tasatti, E. (Eds.), Proc. 6th Int. Symp. ICTP, Trieste, 25. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1647–1658.Search in Google Scholar
Pfriem, A., Zauer, M., and Wagenführ, A. (2009). Alteration of the pore structure of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) due to thermal treatment as determined by helium pycnometry and mercury intrusion porosimetry. Holzforschung 63: 94–98, https://doi.org/10.1515/hf.2009.027.Search in Google Scholar
Plötze, M. and Niemz, P. (2011). Porosity and pore size distribution of different wood types as determined by mercury intrusion porosimetry. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 69: 649–657, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-010-0504-0.Search in Google Scholar
Rajagopal, H., Khairuddin, A.S.M., Mokhtar, N., Ahmad, A., and Yusof, R. (2019). Application of image quality assessment module to motion-blurred wood images for wood species identification system. Wood Sci. Technol. 53: 967–981, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-019-01110-2.Search in Google Scholar
Redinz, J.A. and Guimaraes, P.R.C. (1996). The fractal nature of wood revealed by water absorption. Wood Fiber Sci. 29: 333–339.Search in Google Scholar
Rouquerol, J., Avnir, D., Fairbridge, C.W., Everett, D.H., Haynes, J.M., Pernicone, N., Ramsay, J.D.F., Sing, K.S.W., and Unger, K.K. (1994). Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 66: 1739–1758, https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199466081739.Search in Google Scholar
Russ, J.C. (1994). Fractal surfaces, Vol. 1–19. New York, London: Plenum, pp. 227–259.10.1007/978-1-4899-2578-7_8Search in Google Scholar
Saporal, B. (1989). Fractal interfaces in diffusion, invasion, and corrosion. In: Fractal method to heterogeneous chemistry. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 227–246.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1979). Beitrag zur porositätsanalyse von holz mit dem quecksilber-porosimeter. Holzforschung 37: 295–302, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02607491.Search in Google Scholar
Schneider, A. and Wagner, L. (1974). Bestimmung der porengrössenverteilung in holz mit dem quecksilber-porosimeter. Holzforschung 32: 216–224, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02607257.Search in Google Scholar
Siauw, H.N. and Fairbridge, C. (1987). Fractal description fo the surface structure of coke particles. Langmuir 3: 340–345, https://doi.org/10.1021/la00075a010..Search in Google Scholar
Shi, J. and Avramidis, S. (2018). Dried cell wall nanopore conguration of Douglas-fir, western red cedar and aspen heartwoods. Wood Sci. Technol. 52: 1025–1037, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-1011-4.Search in Google Scholar
Stamm, A.J. (1964). Wood and cellulose science. New York: Ronald Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stayton, C.L. and Hart, C.A. (1965). Determining pore size distribution in softwoods with a mercury porosimeter. For. Prod. J. 15: 435–440.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Hou, J., Song, S.H., Wang, D.M., Gong, L., and Ma, K. (2018). Combining pressure controlled porosimetry and rate-controlled porosimetry to investigate the fractal characteristics of full-range pores in tight oil reservoirs. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 171: 353–361, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.050.Search in Google Scholar
Washburn, E.W. (1921). Note on a method of determining the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 7: 115, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.7.4.115.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Yu, T., Wu, K., Shyu, T., Zong, T., Chen, R., and Guo, Y. (2009). Using three-dimensional fractal dimension to analyze the complexity of fetal cortical surface from magnetic resonance images. Nonlinear Dynam. 58: 745–752.10.1007/s11071-009-9515-ySearch in Google Scholar
Zauer, M., Hempel, S., Pfriem, A., Mechtcherine, V., and Wagenführ, A. (2014). Investigations of the pore-size distribution of wood in the dry and wet state by means of mercury intrusion porosimetry. Wood Sci. Technol. 48: 1229–1240, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-014-0671-y.Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Yang, L., and Cai, Y. (2021). Combining mercury intrusion porosimetry and fractal theory to determine the porous characteristics of wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 55: 109–124, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01243-9.Search in Google Scholar
Zheng, S., Yao, Y., Liu, D., Cai, Y., and Liu, Y. (2018). Characterizations of full-scale pore size distribution, porosity and permeability of coals: a novel methodology by nuclear magnetic resonance and fractal analysis theory. Int. J. Coal Geol. 196: 148–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2018.07.008.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- Intra-species variation in maximum moisture content, cell-wall density and porosity of hardwoods
- Fractal dimension of wood pores from pore size distribution
- Fatigue testing of wood up to one billion load cycles
- The influence of vacuum heat treatment on the pore structure of earlywood and latewood of larch
- The relationship between color and mechanical properties of heat-treated wood predicted based on support vector machines model
- Effect of water/moisture migration in wood preheated by hot press on sandwich compression formation
- Quercetin-grafted modification to improve wood decay resistance
- Organosolv delignification of birch wood (Betula pendula): DMSO/water pulping optimization
- Alkali lignin as a pH response bifunctional material with both adsorption and flocculation for wastewater treatment
- Evaluation of the mechanical properties of different parts of bending bamboo culm by nanointendation
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Original Articles
- Intra-species variation in maximum moisture content, cell-wall density and porosity of hardwoods
- Fractal dimension of wood pores from pore size distribution
- Fatigue testing of wood up to one billion load cycles
- The influence of vacuum heat treatment on the pore structure of earlywood and latewood of larch
- The relationship between color and mechanical properties of heat-treated wood predicted based on support vector machines model
- Effect of water/moisture migration in wood preheated by hot press on sandwich compression formation
- Quercetin-grafted modification to improve wood decay resistance
- Organosolv delignification of birch wood (Betula pendula): DMSO/water pulping optimization
- Alkali lignin as a pH response bifunctional material with both adsorption and flocculation for wastewater treatment
- Evaluation of the mechanical properties of different parts of bending bamboo culm by nanointendation