Home Effects of systematic variation of wood adherend bending stiffness on fracture properties. Part 2. Revisiting traditional DCB analysis methods
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Effects of systematic variation of wood adherend bending stiffness on fracture properties. Part 2. Revisiting traditional DCB analysis methods

  • Edoardo Nicoli , David A. Dillard EMAIL logo and Charles E. Frazier
Published/Copyright: February 1, 2012
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Part 1 of the paper evaluated how the orientation and stiffness of the layers in layered beams of constant cross section used in double cantilever beams (DCB) specimens influence the stiffness variation of individual adherends along their length. The behavior of bonded DCB specimens made with such materials, of which wood is a common example, are analyzed in this part 2 of the paper to determine errors associated with common data analysis methods for mode I fracture testing: simple beam theory (SBT), corrected beam theory (CBT), experimental compliance method (ECM or Berry method), and area method (AM). In particular, the first three methods are described in British Standards (BS) 7991 (1991) or the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 3433 (1999/2005), while the AM is not suggested by the mentioned standards. SBT, CBT, and ECM, although initially developed for characterizing bonds between uniform and isotropic adherends, have also been commonly applied to other materials including wood. Nevertheless, these three standardized methods may lack precision for determining the critical strain energy release rate, , when applied to bonded wood adherends, due to the elastic stiffness variability that can occur along the length of the bonded beams. The AM yields more coherent results in the developed analytical procedure, although practical issues can limit its reliability with experimental results. Another physical problem that arises with the adherend stiffness variation is the onset of a slight mode II loading component that is not anticipated, nor accounted for, in the traditional data analysis methods.


Corresponding author. Engineering Science and Mechanics Department, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA Phone: +1-540-231-4714

Received: 2011-8-11
Accepted: 2011-12-9
Published Online: 2012-02-01
Published in Print: 2012-08-01

©2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Original Papers
  4. Anthraquinone polymer catalysts for alkaline delignification of lignocellulosic matter. Part 1. Syntheses and characterizations
  5. Anthraquinone polymer catalysts for alkaline delignification of lignocellulosic matter. Part 2. Action in soda pulping conditions on softwood and phenolic β-O-4 lignin models
  6. Anthraquinone polymer catalysts for alkaline delignification of lignocellulosic matter. Part 3. Delignification of softwood and action on a phenolic β-O-4 lignin model in kraft pulping conditions
  7. Analysis of fibre deformation processes in high-consistency refining based on Raman microscopy and X-ray diffraction
  8. Distribution of wood polymers within the cell wall of transgenic aspen imaged by Raman microscopy
  9. Chemical improvement of surfaces. Part 2: Permanent hydrophobization of wood by covalently bonded fluoroorganyl substituents
  10. Testing of the superhydrophobicity of a zinc oxide nanorod array coating on wood surface prepared by hydrothermal treatment
  11. Properties of molding plates made with albizia wood particles impregnated with alcohol-soluble PF resins prepared from phenol-liquefied lignins
  12. Within-ring movement of free water in dehydrating Norway spruce sapwood visualized by neutron radiography
  13. Influence of hygromechanical history on the longitudinal mechanosorptive creep of wood
  14. Effects of systematic variation of wood adherend bending stiffness on fracture properties: Part 1. Influence of grain angle
  15. Effects of systematic variation of wood adherend bending stiffness on fracture properties. Part 2. Revisiting traditional DCB analysis methods
  16. Determination of adhesive energy at the wood cell-wall/UF interface by nanoindentation (NI)
  17. Short Notes
  18. Distribution of extracts including 4,8-dihydroxy-5-methoxy-2-naphthaldehyde in Diospyros kaki analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry
  19. Southern pine impregnated with silicate solution containing cellulose nanofibrils
  20. Meetings
  21. Meetings
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/hf-2011-0161/html
Scroll to top button