Home Kinetics analysis of the forward extraction of cerium(III) by D2EHPA from chloride medium in the presence of two complexing agents using a constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow
Article Open Access

Kinetics analysis of the forward extraction of cerium(III) by D2EHPA from chloride medium in the presence of two complexing agents using a constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow

  • Jiannan Pei , Junwen Zhou , Feng Jiang , Kaihua Chen , Shaohua Yin EMAIL logo , Libo Zhang , Jinhui Peng and Yaping Lin
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The kinetic studies performed on the forward extract of cerium(III) from chloride solution with the complex agents, citric acid (H3Cit) and lactic acid (HLac) in the presence of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (D2EHPA, H2A2) have been investigated using a constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow. The effects of stirring speed, temperature, and specific interfacial area on the extraction rate are discussed separately, and the results show that the extraction process is a diffusion-controlled kinetics process with an interfacial reaction. Studies on the effect of pH value and H2A2 concentration on the extraction rate are used to obtain the rate equation. The rate-controlling step is also suggested by the predictions derived from the interfacial reaction models, and the rate equation obtained by the kinetic model is consistent with that obtained by the experimental results. The information on the extraction kinetics in this extraction system will provide some knowledge of its application.

1 Introduction

Cerium(III) is a valuable metal in high demand. Out of the entire amount of cerium that is being used worldwide, approximately 90% is utilized in producing polishing powder [1], [2]. Other ways in which it is used are for glass-fiber, catalysts, ceramics, and many others [3], [4], [5]. The most efficient method of its production is through solvent extraction, which plays an important role for the production of cerium and/or cerium compounds within the hydrometallurgy industry [6].

Currently, the researches consider cationic organophosphorous extractants, such as di-2-ethylhexyl phosphoric acid (D2EHPA) and 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-(2-ethyl hexyl) ester (HEH/EHP), as the main solvents employed to separate rare earths in the rare earth industries [7], [8], [9]. However, these extractants cannot separate or purify rare earths easily, because of the close physical and chemical properties among the rare earths [10], [11]. That is the reason for a growing interest in the development of newer extractants and also for the extraction systems used in separation of, as a group or from one another. Currently, there is considerable attention on the different complex formation constants, which is effective in the separation of lanthanides [12], [13]. The information on complex extraction in the presence of both the complex agents such as lactic acid and citric acid has been obtained from our previous studies, and the results indicate that the chelating extraction would not only improve the extraction capacity of D2EHPA and/or HEH/EHP, but also heighten its selectivity with some of the adjacent rare earths [14], [15], [16]. In fact, information on the kinetics of lanthanides(III) has been studied in many literatures, for example, the extraction kinetics of ytterbium(III), cerium(IV), and neodymium(III) using constant interfacial cell with laminar flan has been investigated by many researchers, and the effects of stirring speed, temperature, and species concentration on the extraction rate are discussed in detail; the rate-controlling step is also proposed [17], [18], [19]. However, until now, no reports on the extraction kinetics of the complexing extraction system containing two complexing agents namely lactic acid and citric acid with D2EHPA extractant are available.

Therefore, to develop a perfect separation technology, and also to improve the element pairs of selectivity being superior to the currently existing HEH/EHP and/or D2EHPA system, it is essential to obtain the information on the data of extraction kinetics in clarifying extraction mechanism and chemical reaction rate, to explain the extraction process in whole [20], [21]. This work aims to study the extraction rate of Ce(III) from aqueous phase containing two complexing agents lactic acid and citric acid as a function of the stirring speed, temperature and specific interface area, as well as the extractant concentration and aqueous acidity, to obtain the extraction regime and rate equation. In addition, a kinetic model has been elaborated.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Reagents and apparatus

D2EHPA (H2A2) extractant with sulfonated kerosene was brought from Luoyang ZhongDa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (China) A certain known amount of D2EHPA is first diluted until it has reached the required concentration having appropriate sulfonated kerosene; for a situation like this, the D2EHPA will have the ability to form a dimer H2A2, e.g. 2HAKdH2A2. As the dimerization is constant (Kd) and is defined as: Kd=[H2A2]/[HA]2, log Kd=4.42 [22], its dissociation reaction goes like this: HAKaH++A, when the dissociation constant (Ka) will be defined as: Ka=[H+][A]/[HA], pKa=1.27, at T=25°C [22].

The stock solution of aqueous phase is prepared by dissolving CeCl3 (Chengdu Aikeda Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., China) (purity >99.9%) using distilled water, and diluted to the required volume, and then analyzed by titration using a standard solution of EDTA (Tianjin Fengchuan Chemical Reagent Technologies Co., Ltd., China) at pH 5.5 using xylenol orange (Shanghai Xinshengshi Chemical Science Co., Ltd., China) as an indicator. A 1.0 mol l−1 of NaCl is used to maintain a constant ionic strength. Lactic acid (HLac, pKa=3.86, at T=25°C [23]) and citric acid (H3Cit, pKa1=3.13, pKa2=4.76, pKa3=6.40, at T=25°C [23]) are obtained from the Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd (China). All the chemicals are of analytical reagent grade.

A model of pHS-3C digital pH meter (Shanghai Rex Instruments Factory, China) is employed to measure the acidity. The cerium concentrations during extraction process are all determined using the Prodigy high dispersion inductively coupled plasma spectrometer (Leeman Labs, USA).

2.2 Experimental procedure

The constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow is used to conduct the kinetic experiment based on the principle found in the literature [24]. Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram for this constant interfacial area cell. It shows that there are two stirring impellers, one located on one side of the pool and the other at the opposite end of that impeller, the guide plates actions make the fluid reverse the laminar flow keeping the interface stable and at a smooth pace, resulting in there being no flow going towards the interface.

Figure 1: Experimental devices of kinetics (A) and the structure of constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow (B).1: Sampling aperture; 2: motor; 3: guide plate; 4: electro-thermostatic water bath; and 5: stirring paddle.
Figure 1:

Experimental devices of kinetics (A) and the structure of constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow (B).

1: Sampling aperture; 2: motor; 3: guide plate; 4: electro-thermostatic water bath; and 5: stirring paddle.

Unless it is otherwise stated, the area of the interface will be 15 cm2. An aliquot of the aqueous phase (84 ml) followed by another aliquot of organic phase are added carefully to the cell chambers using a syringe, and stirring started. Unless otherwise stated, in most experiments, the speed of the stirring in both the phases (in most experiments) will constantly stay at 300 rpm. There will be 0.2 ml taken from the aqueous phase, once the stirrer has started, and an interval every 10 min to take a sample to be analyzed. Unless otherwise stated, there will be a kinetic experiment performed at 298 K.

Equal volumes of (20 ml for everyone) the aqueous and organic phases for equilibrium experiments are mixed well by shaking for 30 min at 298±1 K.

2.3 Treatment of rate data

According to the method used by Danesi and Vandegrift [25], the experimental data were processed. Assuming the mass transfer process is considered as a pseudo-order having a reaction that is nonreversible with respect to cerium(III):

(1)Ce(a)3+koakaoCe(o)3+

where a and o are aqueous phase and organic phase, respectively. kao (cm · s−1) and koa (cm · s−1) represent the forward and backward mass transfer coefficients, respectively. kao and koa have been evaluated with the use of the theoretical treatment that had been developed in the literature.

The rate of change of the number of moles, n, with respect to time entering into the organic phase, dn/dt, is given by Eq. (2) [26]:

(2)dndt=Q(kao[Ce3+](a)koa[Ce3+](o))
(3)d[Ce3+](o)dt=QV(koa[Ce3+](o)kao[Ce3+](a))

where n represents the number of moles of Ce(III) in the organic phase; V and Q represent one or the other between the aqueous and the organic phase, as well as the interfacial area cell, respectively.

At the state of being stable, either hand will be equal to zero in Eq. (3). That is:

(4)Kd=[Ce3+]e(o)[Ce3+]e(a)=kaokoa.

According to the law of conservation of mass, after logarithm fetch on either side of the equality, it follows that:

(5)ln(1[Ce3+](o)[Ce3+](o)e)=QV(1+Kd)koat.

All the slopes in the plots in ln{1([Ce3+](o)/[Ce3+](o)e)}and against t have been used for the elevation of koa and kao. The value of distribution ratio Kd has been evaluated by determining Ce3+ concentrations that follow the contact of the two phases (20 ml each) for a time of 30 min.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Extraction studies

From the experiments of extraction kinetics, it is common to identify the extraction rates using criterion by stirring speed. When diffusion process takes control of the extraction, the rate of extraction is increased with an increased stirring speed, while there is without an effect on the extraction rate governed by chemical reactions [27]. Within this system, the plot (Figure 2) for log kao versus stirring speeds in the range of 100–400 rpm provided an increased trend, thus indicating that extraction rates are dependent on stirring speeds. Meanwhile, the linear relations of stirring speeds and log kao indicate that mass transfer process continues to be influenced by the agitation, even with 400 rpm. Therefore, mass transfer process is mostly controlled by diffusion instead of chemical process. The reason may be that chemical reaction rates are quicker than the diffusion rates, thus chemical reaction effect only possesses a small portion [15].

Figure 2: Effect of stirring speed on mass transfer rate.Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; Q=15 cm2, T=298 K.
Figure 2:

Effect of stirring speed on mass transfer rate.

Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; Q=15 cm2, T=298 K.

Additionally, if the diffusion-controlled extraction rate has a temperature effect that is more pronounced compared to rates controlled by chemical processes, the activation energy in this case does not generally exceed 20.9 kJ mol−1 [27], [28]. The method of expressing influences on temperature that are most satisfactory with extractions of Ce(III) by D2EHPA in ranges of 20°C–55°C is derivable by plotting values of log kao against the absolute temperature 1/T reciprocal. Figure 3 shows results that are represented by a straight line that obeys Arrhenius equation kao=AeEa/RT, where R is the gas constant, T represents absolute temperature, and A represents frequency factor or pre-exponential factor. The activation energy Ea is calculated using this line as the slope, determined as 13.82 kJ mol−1, indicating that the extraction of Ce(III) within the diffusion controlled investigated system, takes place in either the interface or the bulk phase.

Figure 3: Effect of temperature on mass transfer rate.Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; Q=15 cm2, stirring speed=250 rpm.
Figure 3:

Effect of temperature on mass transfer rate.

Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; Q=15 cm2, stirring speed=250 rpm.

The effects on the interfacial area have been studied by utilizing various interfacial regions within the range of 5.4–15 cm2 while each phase was fixed with a volume of 84 ml. Meanwhile, the plots (Figure 4) of various values of kao versus certain corresponding interfacial regions a̅ (a̅=interfacial area/volume of the phase) have indicated an increase in reaction rates with increases in certain interfacial area, indicating that the extraction rates of Ce(III) are dependent on variations of interfacial area, and the reaction rates takes place at the interface instead of the bulk phase, which is based on the criterion as follows: if the bulk phase encounters slow chemical reactions, initial rates are independent of certain interfacial areas. Otherwise, reactions occurring in the interfacial zone indicate direct proportionality between the certain interfacial area and rate.

Figure 4: Effect of specific interfacial area on mass transfer rate.Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; stirring speed=250 rpm, T=298 K.
Figure 4:

Effect of specific interfacial area on mass transfer rate.

Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; stirring speed=250 rpm, T=298 K.

3.2 Extraction rate equation

In addition, our previous investigation indicates that the complexing agents lactic acid and citric acid do not involve the extraction process, on the contrary, they retain in the raffinate. Based on general kinetic equations for formation of metal chelates [22], the rate Rf reaching the extraction equilibrium is expressed as Eq. (6):

(6)Rf=kf[Mn+][L]n=kf[Mn+][KHL(HL)(o)[H+]λ]n

where HL, kf, λ, and KHL are acidic extractant, rate constant, partition ratio of extractant between the interface and organic phase, and ionization constant, respectively.

Based on the experimental results, plots for ln{1([Ce3+](o)/[Ce3+](o)e)} versus time (t) yield straight lines every time, which indicates that first-order reactions are mass transfers being pseudo-first-order reversible reactions.

The effects of pH values and the concentration of the extractant H2A2 on the rate of extraction are investigated separately (Figures 5 and 6). Results indicate that the extraction rate increases as the pH values and H2A2 concentrations increases, with a slope of 0.9800≈1.0 and a slope of 1.086≈1.0, respectively. Furthermore, the line slopes show that the extraction of Ce(III) is inverse first-order dependent on [H+] as well as first order with respect to H2A2 concentration. The rate constant of extraction can be calculated in accordance with the intercepts shown in Figures 5 and 6, kf=10−2.31. Based on the experimental results, the rate equation of Ce(III) extraction with H2A2 can be written as follows:

Figure 5: Effect of pH value in the aqueous phase on extraction rate.Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; Q=15 cm2, stirring speed=250 rpm, T=298 K.
Figure 5:

Effect of pH value in the aqueous phase on extraction rate.

Aqueous phase: [CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, [HLac]=0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1; organic phase: [H2A2]=0.60 mol l−1; Q=15 cm2, stirring speed=250 rpm, T=298 K.

Figure 6: Effect of extractant concentration on extraction rate.[CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]= 0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1, stirring speed=250 rpm, Q=15 cm2, T=298 K.
Figure 6:

Effect of extractant concentration on extraction rate.

[CeCl3]=0.10 mol l−1, pH=2.00, [HLac]= 0.3 mol l−1, [H3Cit]=0.03 mol l−1, stirring speed=250 rpm, Q=15 cm2, T=298 K.

(7)Rf=d[Ce3+](o)dt=102.31[Ce3+](a)[H2A2](o)[H+](a)1.

3.3 Extraction mechanism and kinetic model

According to the above-mentioned analysis, the stoichiometry of the complex formation reactions between H2A2 and Ce shows the following formula of CeA3 · 3HA(o). Also, the complex agents H3Cit and HLac are not extracted in the organic phase in the extraction process, which has been certified in the prior studies [18].

The stepwise metathetical reaction mechanism has been applied for analyzing the rate controlling phase (Table 1). Therefore, the following equations can be used to represent the process of extraction.

Table 1:

The stepwise metathetical reaction mechanism for the extraction system.

All rates of each of the stepsFast or slowEq. no
H2A2(o)K1H2A2(i)K22HA(i)Fast(8)
Ce(a)3++HA(i)k1k1CeA(i)2++H(a)+Fast(9)
CeA(i)2++HA(i)k2k2CeA2(i)++H(a)+Slow(10)
CeA2(i)++HA(i)Ke1CeA3(i)+H(a)+Fast(11)
CeA3(i)+32H2A2(o)Ke2CeA33HA(o)Fast(12)
  1. Where: subscripts a, o, and i are the aqueous, organic, and interface phases, respectively; k1, k2, k−1, and k−2 are forward and reverse rate constants for the reactions. K1 is the dimeric extractant partition ratio between the interface and organic phase. K2 is the dissociation constant. Ke1 and Ke2 are equilibrium constants.

According to Eq. (8), the following equation can be obtained:

(13)K1=[H2A2(i)][H2A2(o)]K2=[HA(i)]2[H2A2(i)][HA(i)]2=K2[H2A2(i)]=K2K1[H2A2(o)].

If the instantaneous state is assumed, while the k−2 rate constant is ignored, the concentration of [CeA(i)2+]can be calculated from Eq. (14):

(14)d[CeA(i)2+]dt=k1[Ce(a)3+][HA(i)]k1[CeA(i)2+][H(a)+]k2[CeA(i)2+][HA(i)].

By assuming interfacial is a steady state that is instantaneous, i.e.d[CeA(i)2+]dt=0.

It follows that:

(15)[CeA(i)2+]=k1[Ce(a)3+][HA(i)]k1[H(a)+]+k2[HA(i)].

By assuming that Eq. (10) is the rate-controlling step, the following rate law is obtained:

(16)Rf=k2[CeA(i)2+][HA(i)]=k1k2K1K2[Ce(a)3+][H2A2(o)]k1[H(a)+]+k2[HA(i)].

By assuming that Ce3+ rate transfers from aqueous to the organic phase, it could be faster than the reverse rate, k1[H+]>>k2[HA(i)], therefore, the extraction rate equation can be written as:

(17)Rf=k2[CeA(i)2+][HA(i)]=kf[Ce(a)3+][H2A2(o)][H(a)+]1,

where k1k2K1K2/k−1=kf.

The above mechanism is in accordance with Eq. (7) that is obtained by experimental results. The identity of the reaction zone and extraction regime confirms that liquid–liquid interface reaction zones and diffusion control regime occur under these conditions. Thus, the rate-controlling phase takes place in the liquid-liquid interface.

The extraction process of Ce3+ results in diffuses from the bulk of aqueous to reaction zones that are located within the layer of aqueous diffusion that adheres to the organic/aqueous interface. Additionally, the dimeric D2EHPA extractant (H2A2) diffuses from organic to interface reaction zones while ionizing into monomeric acid. Then, CeA(i)2+ species are formed firstly at the interface, and the CeA3(i) species are formed last, step by step. Meanwhile, three hydrogen ions are released. The CeA3(i) species is extracted using H2A2 within the organic phase from the last CeA3·3HA(o) complex, meanwhile, the hydrogen ions are released and combined with H2Cit and Lac for forming HLac and H3Cit for buffering effects of higher acidy changes on extraction.

According to the expression above, Figure 7 shows the interface geometry model.

Figure 7: Model of the extraction interface.
Figure 7:

Model of the extraction interface.

4 Conclusions

The Ce3+ extraction kinetics from chloride solution with two complex agents H3Cit and HLac are performed. It was discovered as following:

  1. Kinetic investigations show that controlling reactions of Ce3+ extraction by D2EHPA in kerosene with a chloride medium occurs with a controlled diffusion at the interface level instead of in bulk phase, under conditions of stirring speed ranging from 100 to 400 rpm, temperature ranging from 20°C to 55°C and interfacial regions ranging from 5.4 to 15 cm2.

  2. According to correlated experimental data as the concentration function of pH value and H2A2 extractant, the equation rate of Ce3+ extraction using H2A2 is obtained as Rf=d[Ce3+](o)dt=102.31[Ce3+](a)[H2A2](o)[H+](a)1.

  3. Predictions collected from interfacial reaction models provided the rate-determining step along with the proposed interfacial consecutive reaction model.

Acknowledgments

Financial aid from the following programs is gratefully acknowledged: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51504116), and the Kunming University of Science and Technology Personnel Training Fund (KKSY201452088).

References

[1] Wang Q, Yue M, Zhong Q, Cui MS, Huang XW, Hou YK, Wang L, Yang YX, Long ZQ, Feng ZY. J. Rare Earths 2016, 34, 695–703.10.1016/S1002-0721(16)60081-9Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wu WY, Li SW, Chen J, Yang GS, Tu GF. J. Rare Earths 2007, 25, 125–128.10.1016/S1002-0721(07)60539-0Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tao F, Yang SS, Yang P, Shi ZN, Zhou RX. J. Rare Earths 2016, 34, 381–389.10.1016/S1002-0721(16)60037-6Search in Google Scholar

[4] Yahi N, Menad S, Rodriguez Ramos I. Green Process. Synth. 2015, 4, 479–486.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Cen P, Wu WY, Bian X. Green Process. Synth. 2016, 5, 427–434.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Cheng DH, Chen XW, Shu Y, Wang JH. Talanta 2008, 75, 1270–1278.10.1016/j.talanta.2008.01.044Search in Google Scholar

[7] James EQ, Karin HS, Geoffrey WS. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 169, 621–628.10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.04.003Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lu YC, Wei HQ, Zhang ZF, Li YL, Wu GL, Liao WP. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 163, 192–197.10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.04.008Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ahmed AA, Susumu N, Fumio K, Katsuroku T. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 26, 265–272.10.1016/S1383-5866(01)00180-0Search in Google Scholar

[10] Sun XB, Meng SL, Li DQ. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81, 755–760.10.1002/jctb.1487Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhang ZF, Li HF, Guo FQ, Meng SL, Li DQ. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63, 348–352.10.1016/j.seppur.2008.05.023Search in Google Scholar

[12] Yin SH, Li SW, Zhang B, Peng JH, Zhang LB. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 161, 160–165.10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.01.016Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yin SH, Li SW, Zhang B, Peng JH, Zhang LB. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2015, 104, 92–97.10.1016/j.cherd.2015.07.022Search in Google Scholar

[14] Liu JJ, Wang YL, Li DQ. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 949–955.10.1002/jctb.1768Search in Google Scholar

[15] Wang XL, Meng SL, Li DQ. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 71, 50–55.10.1016/j.seppur.2009.11.001Search in Google Scholar

[16] He WW, Liao WP, Wang WW, Li DQ, Niu CJ. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 83, 1314–1320.10.1002/jctb.1950Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yin SH, Wu WY, Bian X, Zhang FY. Hydrometallurgy 2013, 131, 133–137.10.1016/j.hydromet.2012.11.005Search in Google Scholar

[18] Yin SH, Wu WY, Bian X, Luo Y, Zhang FY. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 8558–8564.10.1021/ie400403wSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Yin SH, Li SW, Wu WY, Bian X, Peng JH, Zhang LB. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 59997–60001.10.1039/C4RA10143JSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Xie F, Dreisinger D, Doyle F. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2013, 34, 387–411.10.1080/08827508.2012.695303Search in Google Scholar

[21] Konyratbekova SS, Baikonurova A, Akcil A. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2015, 36, 198–212.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Szymanowski J, Cote G, Blondet I, Bouvier C, Bauer D, Sabot JL. Hydrometallurgy 1997, 44, 163–178.10.1016/S0304-386X(96)00040-0Search in Google Scholar

[23] Shen LS. Chemical Analysis Handbook, Water Resources and Electric Power Press: Beijing, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zheng Z, Li DQ. In Value Adding Through Solvent Extraction(Proceedings ISEC 96), Shallcross, DC, Paimin, R, Prvcic, LM, Eds., University of Melbourne: Australia, 1996, Vol. 1, pp. 171–176.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Danesi PR, Vandegrift GF. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 3646–3651.10.1021/j150624a024Search in Google Scholar

[26] Vandegrift GF, Horwitz EP. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1977, 39, 1425–1432.10.1016/0022-1902(77)80310-2Search in Google Scholar

[27] Danesi PR, Chiarizia R. Anal. Chem. 1980, 10, 1–126.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Yu JF, Ji C. Chem. J.Chin. Univ. 1992, 13, 224–226.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-05-11
Accepted: 2017-08-01
Published Online: 2017-09-26
Published in Print: 2018-07-26

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Original articles
  4. Life cycle assessment of solvent extraction as a low-energy alternative to distillation for recovery of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone from process waste
  5. Toxicological study of some ionic liquids
  6. A new approach for the polymerization of tetraphenyltetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane by an environmentally friendly catalyst called Maghnite-H+
  7. Catalytic oxidation of lignin to dicarboxylic acid over the CuFeS2 nanoparticle catalyst
  8. One-pot, three-component, selective synthesis of the polyfunctionalized 4H-pyran and 4H-benzo[b]pyran derivatives in the presence of a highly efficient molecular sieve-supported zinc catalyst
  9. Production of novel applicable derivatives from biodiesel glycerin
  10. Sulfates of Sorghum vinegar residue waste as potential catalysts
  11. Valorization of human hair as methylene blue dye adsorbents
  12. Pyrrolidinium salt based binary and ternary deep eutectic solvents: green preparations and physiochemical property characterizations
  13. Influence of rare-earth metal on the zinc oxide nanostructures: application in the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and p-nitro phenol
  14. Green bio-inspired synthesis, characterization and activity of silver nanoparticle forms of Centaurea virgata Lam. and the isolated flavonoid eupatorin
  15. Kinetics analysis of the forward extraction of cerium(III) by D2EHPA from chloride medium in the presence of two complexing agents using a constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow
  16. Book review
  17. Hazardous reagent substitution: a pharmaceutical perspective
Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2017-0035/html
Scroll to top button