Home Toxicological study of some ionic liquids
Article Open Access

Toxicological study of some ionic liquids

  • Eduardo Perales

    Eduardo Perales obtained his degree in Pharmacy (2013) from the Universidad San Jorge. He also received a Master’s degree in Environmental Management for Business (2014). Currently, he is a PhD student at the Universidad San Jorge and is part of the GREENLIFE research group. He is an author of three manuscripts in international journals and an author of 19 national and international congress publications. Furthermore, he has participated in one R&D&I project funded in competitive calls.

    , Laura Lomba

    Laura Lomba holds degrees in Chemistry (2008) and Pharmacy (2013) and obtained a PhD Degree in Environmental Sciences at the Universidad San Jorge (2014). She is a lecturer at Universidad San Jorge and is part of the GREENLIFE research group. She is an author of 18 manuscripts in scientific journals and 32 publications of national and international congresses. Furthermore, she has participated in two R&D&I projects funded in competitive calls.

    , María García-Escudero

    María García-Escudero received her degree in Pharmacy from Universidad San Jorge (Zaragoza, Spain). She holds a Master’s degree in Pharmaceutical Industry and Parapharmacy from CESIF (Barcelona). She is an expert at Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory, Universidad Complutense (Madrid) and has experience with animal and human cell culture experiments. Her professional life is linked to the pharmaceutical industry sector, where she has developed her competencies in R&D, validation of manufacturing processes, and quality assurance.

    , Esther Sarasa

    Esther Sarasa obtained her degree in Biochemistry at Universidad de Zaragoza in 2009. She is a laboratory technician at Universidad San Jorge and is part of the GREENLIFE research group. She is an author of 12 national and international congress publications and obtained two awards for the best poster. Her main research is focused on the ecotoxicological and toxicological characterization of drugs and solvents.

    , Carlos E. Lafuente

    Carlos E. Lafuente studied Chemistry at the University of Zaragoza where he completed his PhD degree in 1995. After a post-doctoral stay at Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal (CNRS, Bordeaux), he became an Associate Professor of Physical Chemistry at the University of Zaragoza in 2000. His research is mainly focused on thermophysical properties of liquid systems (single liquids and mixtures). He has co-authored more than 170 publications in peer-reviewed journals.

    and Beatriz Giner

    Beatriz Giner obtained her PhD Degree in Physical Chemistry at the Universidad de Zaragoza in 2007. Currently, she is a lecturer at Universidad San Jorge and is the principal investigator of the GREENLIFE research group. She has participated in seven R&D&I projects funded in competitive calls. She is an author of 64 peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals from SCR (40% in Q1) and three book chapters. Her scientific network is supported by publications with 40 distinct authors from diverse affiliations.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 5, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The increasing interest in the development of new environment-friendly solvents has led to the synthesis of new materials that minimize the impact of solvents on the environment. However, most of the published studies on green solvents focus primarily on their physicochemical properties, with limited emphasis on their toxicological risk in the environment. In this study, the acute toxicities of five ionic liquids, 1-propylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate, 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate, 1-butyl-2-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate, 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate and 1-butyl-4-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate, on Vibrio fischeri and Daphnia magna are evaluated. In the latter bioassay, the presence and position of a methyl group on the pyridinium ring or the length of the chain attached to the nitrogen atom seem to be the key factors for toxicity. In the Vibrio fischeri study, the alkyl chain attached to the nitrogen atom has a considerable influence on EC50 values. Moreover, quantitative structure activity relationship studies are performed to relate their physicochemical properties with their acute toxicity.

1 Introduction

Due to their unique properties, such as negligible vapor, pressure, high thermal stability, ability to solvate compounds of widely varying polarities, and the possibility of tailoring their properties, ionic liquids (ILs) have attracted growing interest [1] because they are considered “green solvents” and ideal substitutes for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].

However, recent studies have shown that ILs may not keep all the characteristics required for a “perfect” green solvent, i.e. to be biodegradable, recyclable, cheap, readily available and especially nontoxic. The first warning signs came when the toxicities of some ILs were carefully studied and compared to those of the solvents they were supposed to replace [7]. In some cases, the toxicities of the ILs were much higher than expected [8]. Although a huge amount of environmental toxicological information on ILs exists [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], data on the toxicology of most of these compounds have not yet been fully evaluated in standardized bioassays.

Thus, a toxicological study in the aquatic media of five members of the N-alkylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate family has been performed. The selected ILs were the following: 1-propylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (P), 1-butylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (B), 1-butyl-2-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (BM2), 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (BM3) and 1-butyl-4-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (BM4). This selection allows for systematically evaluating the effect of the lengths and positions of the substituents on the ring. To the best of our knowledge, no previous studies on the toxicity of these ILs in Daphnia magna (D. magna) and Vibrio fischeri (V. fischeri) have been reported. Additionally, a quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) study was performed using published physicochemical properties of the studied ILs [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] and the toxicological and physicochemical data of previous ILs [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32].

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Chemicals

B, BM2, BM3 and BM4 with purities of 99% and P with a purity of 98% were provided by IoliTec (Heilbronn, Germany), dried for 24 h under vacuum (ca. 0.05 kPa), and stored in a desiccator.

2.2 Inhibition of bioluminescence in V. fischeri

Lyophilized V. fischeri (strain NRRL-B-11177) were purchased from Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany). The experimental bioluminescence inhibition tests were performed in triplicate with re-activated bacteria according to UNE-EN ISO 2009 [33] norm, with positive (phenol, 40 mg l−1) and negative controls [34]. A stock solution of each of the five ILs at concentrations of 2% NaCl were prepared and the pH adjusted to 7–7.5 with 0.1 mol l−1 HCl or 0.1 mol l−1 NaOH.

Aliquots of 0.5 ml of the reactivated bacterial suspension was transferred to each cuvette and kept for 10 min at 15°C. The first measurements were then taken to obtain the initial luminescence with a luminometer (Biofix® Lumi-10, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), equipped with an ultra-fast single photon counter detector covering the 380–660 nm spectral range, using the acute mode (Biotox B). Subsequently, 0.5 ml of each of the tested dilutions was added to the cuvette. After 30 min, the inhibition of luminescence was measured again and the percentages of inhibition were calculated.

2.3 Daphnia magna acute immobilization test

Daphnia magna vials (ref. DM090812, Vidrafoc, Barcelona, Spain) were stored at 4°C. OCDE 202 protocols were employed [35], [36] according to the test conditions. First, the media for the ephippia were prepared in accordance with the supplier specifications. Next, the eggs were incubated for 72 h at 20°C–22°C with 6000 lux in an incubator (model CH-0120D-AC/DC, TOXKIT, ECOTEST, Valencia, Spain). The obtained neonates were fed 2 h prior to the bioassay by adding a Spirulina vial.

Solutions of the studied ILs were prepared in stock solution with inorganic salts provided in vials by ECOTEST (Valencia, Spain). Positive controls were tested with K2Cr2O7 (EC50 values range between 0.6 and 2.1 mg l−1). Negative controls were accepted if <10% of the individuals were immobilized after the assay. The pH levels of the solutions were adjusted to fall between 7 and 7.5 using 0.1 mol l−1 NaOH or 0.1 mol l−1 HCl solutions. A total of 20 neonate organisms (aged <24 h) divided into four groups of five organisms were exposed to each concentration after 2 h of feeding. Daphnids were incubated in complete darkness for 24 h at 20°C–22°C.

The immobilization of the daphnids was measured according to the operating protocol. The daphnids were considered immobilized when they were unable to swim for 15 s after gentle stirring.

2.4 Statistics and graphical representation

The experimental results were fitted using the least squares method to EC50 values and standard deviations (SD):

(1)%I=100/(1+10(alogc)b),

where %I denotes % bioluminescence inhibition, c is the concentration (in mg l−1) and a and b are adjustable parameters.

One-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed to compare between pairs of ILs in each biondicator. As for ethical approval, the biotests were carried out according to internationally accepted guidelines.

3 Results and discussion

The EC50 values obtained for V. fischeri and D. magna with their respective standard deviations are shown in Table 1. These results are graphically represented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively.

Table 1:

Physicochemical data for ILs and their corresponding EC50 values on luminescence inhibition of Vibrio fischeri and immobilization of Daphnia magna.

Chemicalσ (mN·m–1)Cp (J·K–1 mol–1)μ (mPa·s)V. fischeriD. magna
EC50 (mg l–1)nEC50 (mg l–1)n
P50.97 [19]363 [19]119.5 [19]790±4.62055±4.321
B46.58 [17]395 [17]160.3 [17], [18]1300±5.43943±5.627
BM245.66 [16]380 [16]389.4 [16], [18]540±4.72027±3.924
BM344.86 [15]412 [15]176.9 [15]760±4.72725±3.521
BM445.45 [15]414 [15]199.9 [15], [18]1400±5.11615±3.418
Figure 1: Dose-response in Vibrio fischeri for the studied ionic liquids (A) BM2, (B) BM3, (C) BM4, (D) B, (E) P.
Figure 1:

Dose-response in Vibrio fischeri for the studied ionic liquids (A) BM2, (B) BM3, (C) BM4, (D) B, (E) P.

Figure 2: Dose-response in Daphnia magna for studied ionic liquids (A) BM2, (B) BM3, (C) BM4, (D) B, (E) P.
Figure 2:

Dose-response in Daphnia magna for studied ionic liquids (A) BM2, (B) BM3, (C) BM4, (D) B, (E) P.

3.1 Toxicity of ILs in V. fischeri

All of the studied ILs slightly affected the bioluminescence of the bacteria, and differences in the EC50 values between most of the ILs could be detected. The action mechanism of the luminescence emission is related to the modification of protein and lipid biosynthetic pathways, which are relevant in cellular respiration [37].

The most toxic chemical studied was BM2 followed by BM3, P, B and BM4. All the EC50 values were significantly different except BM2 and BM3, BM2 and P, BM3 and P, BM4, and B (ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). The toxicity increased as the length of the substituent at nitrogen decreased. The presence of an extra methyl substituent in position 4 did not seem to substantially affect the toxicity; however, an extra methyl substituent in positions 2 or 3 increased the toxicity. Clearly, the closer the methyl substituent is to the nitrogen atom, the more toxic the IL.

According the Passino and Smith classification [38], which evaluates the acute toxicity of chemical compounds in the aquatic environment, BM2, BM3 and P could be considered as practically harmless for V. fischeri as their EC50 values with this biondicator are in the range of 100–1000 mg l−1. Furthermore, B and BM4 are clearly harmless because their EC50 values are higher than 1000 mg l−1.

Table 2 provides V. fischeri toxicity data of some conventional solvents for comparison [39] and Figure 3 shows this information in V. fischeri. There are solvents that are more harmful for this biondicator than the studied ILs, i.e. o-xylene, toluene or phenol. These chemicals can be classified as slightly or moderately toxic, according the Passino and Smith classification [38]. However, there are also VOCs that are much less harmful, such as methanol, acetone or dichloromethane, which are harmless for V. fischeri, such as BM4 or B. Regarding other ILs [21], [22] against the studied ones, just 1-propyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate is less toxic for V. fischeri than the selected ILs. The rest of the exposed ILs are more harmful for this biondicator. According to the Passino and Smith classification [38], their aquatic toxicity includes several ranges of toxicity, i.e. 1-decyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate and 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride could be considered as highly toxic for D. magna. However, 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate or 1-pentyl-3-ethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate can be considered practically harmless.

Table 2:

EC50 values and their codification (Figures 3 and 4) for different traditional solvents and imidazolium based ILs in Vibrio fischeri and Daphnia magna bioassays during 30 min and 24 h exposure, respectively.

CodeChemical compoundEC50 (mg l–1)
V. fischeriD. magna
1O-xylene9.2 [39]
2Phenol30.8 [39]
3Toluene31.7 [39]7 [40]
4Benzene108 [39]
5Chloroform1199 [39]573 [41]
6Dichloromethane2532 [39]223 [21]
7Acetone19,311 [39]13,615 [21]
8Methanol101,068 [39]22,682 [21]
91,4-Dioxane8450 [42]
10Ethanol9847 [21]
11Isopropanol9959 [21]
12Acetonitrile10,076 [21]
131-Decyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate0.204 [22]
141-Nonyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate1.55 [22]
151-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate7.25 [22]
161-Hexyl-3-ethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate37.8 [22]
171-Heptyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate73.8 [22]
181-Butyl-3-ethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate151 [22]
191-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate284 [21]13.9 [21]
201-Pentyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate331 [22]
211-Pentyl-3-ethylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate350 [22]
221-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate385 [22]3.4 [21]
231-Propyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate1850 [22]
241-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride0.8 [21]
251-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate1.3 [21]
261-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride2.5 [21]
271-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride12.4 [21]
281-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide13.2 [21]
291-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate31 [29]
Figure 3: Log EC50 graphical comparison of toxicity in Vibrio fischeri.The codification is shown in Table 2. Pointed bars correspond with imidazolium ILs, squared bars correspond with traditional solvents and grey bars correspond with the studied ILs. The dashed line shows the limit between slightly toxic and practically harmless compounds according to Passino and Smith classification.
Figure 3:

Log EC50 graphical comparison of toxicity in Vibrio fischeri.

The codification is shown in Table 2. Pointed bars correspond with imidazolium ILs, squared bars correspond with traditional solvents and grey bars correspond with the studied ILs. The dashed line shows the limit between slightly toxic and practically harmless compounds according to Passino and Smith classification.

Furthermore, according to the literature, pyridinium ILs in bioluminescence assay with V. fischeri are less toxic than the corresponding imidazolium, with the same anion, in QSPR studies [43]. This statement can be confirmed with the EC50 values of the Table 2 [21], [22], where almost all of the imidazolium ILs have lower EC50 values than the studied pyridinium compounds. For example, comparing the toxicity of the cations 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium and 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium with the same anion tetrafluoroborate, the imidazolium is more toxic than the pyridinium IL. It is also interesting to note that, although a direct correlation between the length of the alkyl chain of methylimidazolium-based ILs and toxicity has been previously shown [44], our results do not follow this trend. Thus, extrapolations of behavior in this sense are a matter of concern.

3.2 Toxicity of ILs in Daphnia magna

Each of the studied ILs strongly affected the mobility of D. magna. Although the mechanisms of action are still unknown, several authors have noted that ILs have the potential to cause enzyme inhibition, disruption of membrane permeability, structural damage and oxidative stress [9], [45].

The most toxic IL studied was BM4, followed by BM2/BM3, B and P. Only the BM2 and BM3 EC50 values are not significantly different from each other (ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). In general, the presence of an extra methyl substituent increased the observed toxicity. As it pertains to the length of the substituent of at nitrogen, B is moderately more toxic than P. All of these ILs are included in the category of “slightly toxic” for D. magna, according the Passino and Smith classification [38].

The D. magna toxicities of conventional solvents are shown in Table 2 [21], [40], [41], [42] and compared to one another in Figure 4. The EC50 values of the studied ILs are lower to chloroform and dichloromethane, although higher than toluene. In comparison with other ILs, as shown in Table 2 [21], [29], pyridinium compounds are, at least, as toxic for the aquatic environment as imidazolium ILs, i.e. 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide. These are in the same range of aquatic toxicity than the studied pyridinium chemicals according the Passino and Smith classification [38]. Others, like 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride and 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, are considered as moderately toxic or highly toxic, respectively. These results confirmed the Couling QSAR modeling [43] as those equations predicted that the toxicity increases with the number of aromatic atoms in the cation ring.

Figure 4: Log EC50 graphical comparison of toxicity in Daphnia magna.The codification is shown in Table 2. Pointed bars correspond with imidazolium ILs, squared bars correspond with traditional solvents and grey bars correspond with the studied ILs. The dashed line shows the limit between slightly toxic and practically harmless compounds according to Passino and Smith classification.
Figure 4:

Log EC50 graphical comparison of toxicity in Daphnia magna.

The codification is shown in Table 2. Pointed bars correspond with imidazolium ILs, squared bars correspond with traditional solvents and grey bars correspond with the studied ILs. The dashed line shows the limit between slightly toxic and practically harmless compounds according to Passino and Smith classification.

In general, our results agree with the reported toxicity behavior of ILs in D. magna. There is a well-established link between toxicity and alkyl-chain length [8]. Furthermore, our results also agree with quantitative structure–toxicity relationship (QSTR) modelling, which predicts an increase in toxicity due to the methylation of the aromatic carbons [46].

3.3 Toxicity of ILs according other biomodels

There are not much available data about these ILs with biomodels corresponding to other trophic levels. Ranke et al. [47] analyzed BM2, BM3, BM4 and B in IPC-81 rat cell model during 48 h, obtaining their EC50 values. According to these results, the distance of the methyl group to the nitrogen in the pyridinium cation does not have a direct relationship with the toxicity, with BM4 being the most cytotoxic IL (221 mg l−1), followed by B (322 mg l−1), BM2 (421 mg l−1) and BM3 (473 mg l−1). On the other side, there are also previous data for the acetylcholinesterase inhibition assay for BM2, BM3 and B [8]. In this case, the progression of the toxicity is in full agreement with our results in V. fischeri. Stock et al. [48] also performed the acetylcholinesterase inhibition assay with several ILs, including two pyridinium-based ILs, 1-butyl-3-methylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (BM3) and hexafluorophosphate. The EC50 values found for this biomarker are very similar to each other (8 mg l−1 and 8.3 mg l−1, respectively), and are also lower than in our studied biomodels. Thus, there is no clear relationship among biomodels with this type of ILs. These observations indicate the high disparity of the results in this type of solvents and, therefore, remarking the relevance to evaluate the toxicity in several biomodels to ensure the harmlessness of future industrial solvents [49].

3.4 QSAR studies

The development of QSAR helps in understanding how the toxicities, properties, or activities of chemicals vary with structural composition. We have applied the QSAR concept to provide a mathematical model derived from the available physicochemical properties [50], [51], with respect to two specific endpoints in V. fischeri and D. magna. As a first approximation, the relationships between several physicochemical properties (viscosity, surface tension and heat capacity, at 298.15 K) and the acute effective concentrations for the V. fischeri bioindicator and D. magna were investigated. Then, a multiregression expression was derived. For this study, we have included both the toxicological information obtained in this work and previous bibliographic data of other ILs in order to increase the number of input data and make the model reliable. To select the properties that give higher signals in the multiregression analysis, we performed an initial screening using different combinations of the physicochemical properties. Finally, the selected properties were surface tension (mN·m−1) and viscosity (mPa·s). All of the data required for the calculations are presented in Table 1 for the studied compounds [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], and Tables 3 (for V. fischeri) and 4 (for D. magna) for the previous referenced ILs [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32].

Table 3:

Physicochemical and toxicological (Vibrio fischeri) properties used in the QSAR for previously studied ILs.

ChemicalV. fischeri EC50 (mg l–1)σ (mN·m–1)Cp (J·K–1 mol–1)η (mPa·s)
1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate6236.06 [20]54.4 [23]308.1 [26]66.5 [27]
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate284.54 [21]46.6 [24]367.1 [26]279.86 [28]
1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate46.18 [21]43.4 [24]425 [26]585 [24]
1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate7.25 [22]32.7 [25]497.8 [26]325 [25]
1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate3.03 [21]36.5 [24]851 [26]682 [24]
Table 4:

Physicochemical and toxicological (Daphnia magna) properties used in the QSAR for previous studied ILs.

ChemicalD. magna EC50 (mg l–1)σ (mN·m–1)Cp (J·K–1 mol–1)η (mPa·s)
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide13.2 [21]39.4 [30]311 [26]1486.49 [28]
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate13.9 [21]46.6 [24]367.1 [26]279.86 [28]
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate31 [29]43 [31]408.7 [26]273.94 [31]
1-Hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate3.4 [21]40.4 [32]431 [26]220 [32]
1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate1.3 [21]32.7 [25]497.8 [26]325 [25]

The simple relationships between the selected properties and acute effective concentrations for the V. fischeri bioindicator and D. magna, as well as the R coefficient, are shown in the following individual structure-projected toxicity-parameter expressions:

(2)Log EC50V.fischeriQSAR1=0.15σ4.4R=0.81
(3)Log EC50V.fischeriQSAR2=0.0057cp+4.9R=0.65
(4)Log EC50V.fischeriQSAR3=0.0044η+3.7R=0.68
(5)Log EC50D.magnaQSAR1=0.087σ2.6R=0.76
(6)Log EC50D.magnaQSAR2=0.0065cp+3.8R=0.40
(7)Log EC50D.magnaQSAR3=0.00015η+1.2R=0.014

The global multiregression expressions, along with the statistical indicator R2 are as follows:

(8)Log EC50V.fischeriQSAR=1.7+0.10σ0.0022η    R2=0.91
(9)Log EC50D.magnaQSAR=3.1+0.096σ+0.00031η    R2=0.81

In Figure 5, plots of the experimental values versus those calculated with the regression models are shown. It may be noted that small correlations for direct relationships between each physicochemical property are found, except for surface tension that seems to carry the strongest signal. The property is closely related to intermolecular interactions between the ions. With regards the global multiregression analysis, despite the small sample size and the very different molecular structures tested, the overall correlation using basic QSAR displays acceptable values for the coefficients of determination, with better results found for the bioindicator V. fisheri. The IL showing the highest deviations in the correlation study are P in the case of V. fischeri and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate in the case of D. magna.

Figure 5: Plots of predicted vs. experimental values of log EC50 as calculated through multiregression analysis in Vibrio fischeri (A) and Daphnia magna (B).
Figure 5:

Plots of predicted vs. experimental values of log EC50 as calculated through multiregression analysis in Vibrio fischeri (A) and Daphnia magna (B).

4 Conclusions

Toxicity of several pyridinium-based ILs with tetrafluoroborate anions was evaluated with D. magna and V. fischeri. As it pertains to V. fischeri toxicity, the shorter the alkyl chain is, the more toxic the molecule is. The presence of a methyl group in the aromatic ring increases the toxicity of the ILs, with the exception of BM4, for which no relevant changes is observed with respect to the parent compound. Specifically, the methyl group in position 2 induces higher toxicity than when it is placed in position 3.

In the case of D. magna toxicity, longer alkyl chains lead to more toxic ILs. The presence of a methyl group on the aromatic ring increases the toxicity, with BM4 being the most toxic compound. The position of the methyl substituent on the aromatic ring and the length of the alkyl attached to the nitrogen slightly influences the toxicity of these compounds in D. magna.

The QSAR study indicates that small correlations are found between the individual physicochemical properties of the ILs and (eco)toxicity, except for surface tension. The overall correlation allows the description of (eco)toxic behavior with high coefficient of determination values.

About the authors

Eduardo Perales

Eduardo Perales obtained his degree in Pharmacy (2013) from the Universidad San Jorge. He also received a Master’s degree in Environmental Management for Business (2014). Currently, he is a PhD student at the Universidad San Jorge and is part of the GREENLIFE research group. He is an author of three manuscripts in international journals and an author of 19 national and international congress publications. Furthermore, he has participated in one R&D&I project funded in competitive calls.

Laura Lomba

Laura Lomba holds degrees in Chemistry (2008) and Pharmacy (2013) and obtained a PhD Degree in Environmental Sciences at the Universidad San Jorge (2014). She is a lecturer at Universidad San Jorge and is part of the GREENLIFE research group. She is an author of 18 manuscripts in scientific journals and 32 publications of national and international congresses. Furthermore, she has participated in two R&D&I projects funded in competitive calls.

María García-Escudero

María García-Escudero received her degree in Pharmacy from Universidad San Jorge (Zaragoza, Spain). She holds a Master’s degree in Pharmaceutical Industry and Parapharmacy from CESIF (Barcelona). She is an expert at Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory, Universidad Complutense (Madrid) and has experience with animal and human cell culture experiments. Her professional life is linked to the pharmaceutical industry sector, where she has developed her competencies in R&D, validation of manufacturing processes, and quality assurance.

Esther Sarasa

Esther Sarasa obtained her degree in Biochemistry at Universidad de Zaragoza in 2009. She is a laboratory technician at Universidad San Jorge and is part of the GREENLIFE research group. She is an author of 12 national and international congress publications and obtained two awards for the best poster. Her main research is focused on the ecotoxicological and toxicological characterization of drugs and solvents.

Carlos E. Lafuente

Carlos E. Lafuente studied Chemistry at the University of Zaragoza where he completed his PhD degree in 1995. After a post-doctoral stay at Centre de Recherche Paul Pascal (CNRS, Bordeaux), he became an Associate Professor of Physical Chemistry at the University of Zaragoza in 2000. His research is mainly focused on thermophysical properties of liquid systems (single liquids and mixtures). He has co-authored more than 170 publications in peer-reviewed journals.

Beatriz Giner

Beatriz Giner obtained her PhD Degree in Physical Chemistry at the Universidad de Zaragoza in 2007. Currently, she is a lecturer at Universidad San Jorge and is the principal investigator of the GREENLIFE research group. She has participated in seven R&D&I projects funded in competitive calls. She is an author of 64 peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals from SCR (40% in Q1) and three book chapters. Her scientific network is supported by publications with 40 distinct authors from diverse affiliations.

Acknowledgments

The GREENLIFE research group acknowledges financial support from MINECO (CTQ2013-44867-P), Dirección General de Aragón (Grupo consolidado E105), and FEDER. We also gratefully acknowledge the support provide by Pinares de Venecia División Energética and Brial (ENATICA). Both business groups are committed to sustainable developments through environmental studies.

  1. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

[1] Zhang S, Sun N, He X, Lu X, Zhang X. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2006, 35, 1475–1517.10.1063/1.2204959Search in Google Scholar

[2] Earle MJ, Seddon KR. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 1397–1398.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rakita P. In Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents, Rogers RD, Seddon KR, Eds., American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Rogers RD, Holbrey JD, Spear SK, Turner MB. Abstr. Pap. Am. Chem. S. 2004, 227, U310.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Yang Z, Pan WB. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2005, 37, 19–28.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.02.014Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zhao H, Xia HSQ, Ma PS. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 1089–1096.10.1002/jctb.1333Search in Google Scholar

[7] Swatloski RP, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 361–363.10.1039/b304400aSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Pham TPC, Cho CW, Yun YS. Water Res. 2010, 44, 352–372.10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Bernot RJ, Brueseke MA, Evans-White MA, Lamberti GA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 87–92.10.1897/03-635.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Bernot RJ, Kennedy EE, Lamberti GA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 1759–1765.10.1897/04-614R.1Search in Google Scholar

[11] Bubalo MC, Radosevic K, Redovnikovic IR, Halambek J, Sreck VG. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 99, 1–12.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.10.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Cho CW, Pham TPT, Jeon YC, Yun YS. Green Chem. 2008, 10, 67–72.10.1039/B705520JSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Deetlefs M, Seddon KR. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 17–30.10.1039/B915049HSearch in Google Scholar

[14] Stolte S, Matzke M, Arning J, Böschen A, Pitner WR, Welz-Biermann U, Jastorff B, Ranke J. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 1170–1179.10.1039/b711119cSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Bandrés I, Giner B, Royo FM, Lafuente C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 3077–3084.10.1021/jp077259pSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Bandrés I, Pera G, Martín S, Castro M, Lafuente C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113,11936–11942.10.1021/jp906133tSearch in Google Scholar

[17] Bandrés I, Royo F, Gascón I, Castro M, Lafuente C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 3601–3607.10.1021/jp9120707Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bandrés I, Alcalde C, Lafuente C, Atilhan M, Aparicio S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 12499–12513.10.1021/jp203433uSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Bandrés I, López MC, Castro M, Barbera J, Lafuente C. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2012, 44, 148–153.10.1016/j.jct.2011.08.015Search in Google Scholar

[20] Yu ZY, Mo LY, Zhang J, Liu SS. Chemosphere. 2016, 163, 452–460.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.061Search in Google Scholar

[21] García MT, Gatherwood N, Scamells PJ. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 9–1410.1039/b411922cSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Ranke J, Mölter K, Stock F, Bottin-Weber U, Poczobutt J, Hoffmann J, Ondruschka B, Filser J, Jastorff B. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2004, 58, 396–404.10.1016/S0147-6513(03)00105-2Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhou ZB, Matsumoto H, Tatsumi K. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, 1324–1332.10.1002/cphc.200500094Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Huddleston JG, Visser AE, Reichert WM, Willauer HD, Broker GA, Rogers RD. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 156–164.10.1039/b103275pSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Restolho J, Serro AP, Mata JL, Saramago B. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2009, 54, 950–955.10.1021/je800727fSearch in Google Scholar

[26] Paulechka YU. J. Phys.Chem. Ref. Data 2010, 39, 33108.10.1063/1.3463478Search in Google Scholar

[27] Bogdanov MG, Kantelehner W. Z. Naturforsch. 2009, 64, 215–222.10.1515/znb-2009-0212Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kim KS, Shin BK, Lee H. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2004, 21, 1010–1014.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Perales E, García CB, Lomba L, Aldea L, García JI, Giner B. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2016, 132, 429–434.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.05.021Search in Google Scholar

[30] Lisal M. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 214701.10.1063/1.4833335Search in Google Scholar

[31] AlTuwaim MS, Alkahldi KHA, Al-Jimaz AS, Mohammad AA. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 1955−1963.10.1021/je500093zSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Beigi AAM, Abdous M, Yousefi M, Pourmortazavi SM, Vahid A. J. Mol. Liq. 2013, 177, 361–368.10.1016/j.molliq.2012.10.025Search in Google Scholar

[33] International Standard Organisation (ISO). 11348-3 Water Quality, Determination of the Inhibitory Effect of Water Samples on the Light Emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent Bacteria Test), Part 3: Method Using Freeze-Dried Bacteria. Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Jennings VL, Rayner-Brandes MH, Bird DJ. Water Res. 2001, 35, 3448–3456.10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00067-7Search in Google Scholar

[35] OC SE TG 202 2004 (European C2 method as described in the EU Regulation 440/2008).Search in Google Scholar

[36] OECD 202 (1984) Guideline for Testing of Chemicals No. 202, Daphnia sp., acute immobilisation test and reproduction test. Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Onorati F, Mecozzi M. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 678–687.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.09.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Passino DRM, Smith SB. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1987, 6, 901–907.10.1002/etc.5620061111Search in Google Scholar

[39] Docherty KM, Kulpa CF. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 185–189.10.1039/b419172bSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Galassi S, Mingazzini M, Vigano L, Cesareo D, Tosato ML. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1988, 16, 158–169.10.1016/0147-6513(88)90030-9Search in Google Scholar

[41] Lilius H, Hästbacka T, Isomaa B. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1995, 14, 2085–2088.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bringmann G, Kühn R. Z. Wasser. Abwass. For. 1982, 15, 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Couling DJ, Bernot RJ, Docherty KM, Dixon JK, Maginn EJ. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 82–90.10.1039/B511333DSearch in Google Scholar

[44] Romero A, Santos A, Tojo J, Rodríguez A. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 268–273.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.079Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[45] Yu M, Wang SH, Luo YR, Han YW, Li XY, Zhang BJ, Wang JJ. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 1798–1804.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.05.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Roy K, Das RN. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 254–255, 166–178.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Ranke J, Müller A, Bottin-Webber U, Stock F, Stolte S, Arning J, Störmann R, Jastorff B. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 67, 430–438.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.08.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Stock F, Hoffmann J, Ranke J, Störmann R, Ondruschka B, Jastorff B. Green Chem. 2004, 6, 286–290.10.1039/B402348JSearch in Google Scholar

[49] Levet A, Bordes C, Clément Y, Mignon P, Morell C, Chermette H, Marote P, Lantéri P. J. Mol. Model. 2016, 22, 288.10.1007/s00894-016-3156-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Lacrama AM, Putz MV, Ostafe V. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2007, 8, 842–863.10.3390/i8080842Search in Google Scholar

[51] Putz MV, Lazea M, Sandjo LP. Molecules. 2011, 16, 6603–6620.10.3390/molecules16086603Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2017-02-23
Accepted: 2017-06-06
Published Online: 2017-09-05
Published in Print: 2018-07-26

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Original articles
  4. Life cycle assessment of solvent extraction as a low-energy alternative to distillation for recovery of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone from process waste
  5. Toxicological study of some ionic liquids
  6. A new approach for the polymerization of tetraphenyltetramethylcyclotetrasiloxane by an environmentally friendly catalyst called Maghnite-H+
  7. Catalytic oxidation of lignin to dicarboxylic acid over the CuFeS2 nanoparticle catalyst
  8. One-pot, three-component, selective synthesis of the polyfunctionalized 4H-pyran and 4H-benzo[b]pyran derivatives in the presence of a highly efficient molecular sieve-supported zinc catalyst
  9. Production of novel applicable derivatives from biodiesel glycerin
  10. Sulfates of Sorghum vinegar residue waste as potential catalysts
  11. Valorization of human hair as methylene blue dye adsorbents
  12. Pyrrolidinium salt based binary and ternary deep eutectic solvents: green preparations and physiochemical property characterizations
  13. Influence of rare-earth metal on the zinc oxide nanostructures: application in the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and p-nitro phenol
  14. Green bio-inspired synthesis, characterization and activity of silver nanoparticle forms of Centaurea virgata Lam. and the isolated flavonoid eupatorin
  15. Kinetics analysis of the forward extraction of cerium(III) by D2EHPA from chloride medium in the presence of two complexing agents using a constant interfacial area cell with laminar flow
  16. Book review
  17. Hazardous reagent substitution: a pharmaceutical perspective
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2017-0031/html
Scroll to top button