Home Physical Sciences Mono- and double carbonylation of iodobenzene in the presence of reusable supported palladium catalysts
Article Open Access

Mono- and double carbonylation of iodobenzene in the presence of reusable supported palladium catalysts

  • Máté Papp

    Máté Papp is currently an undergraduate student of Chemistry at the University of Pannonia. He is a member of the research group of Professor Rita Skoda-Földes. His research topic is the investigation of aminocarbonylation reactions with recyclable heterogeneous catalysts.

    , Béla Urbán

    Béla Urbán is currently a graduate student in the Doctoral School of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences at the University of Pannonia. He is a member of the research group of Professor Rita Skoda-Földes. His research topic is the investigation of aminocarbonylation reactions with recyclable heterogeneous catalysts.

    , Eszter Drotár

    Eszter Drotár has worked since 2010 for the Research Centre for Natural Sciences as a geologist and recently as a research fellow. Their laboratory contains a transmission electron microscope (FEI MORGAGNI 268D type) and a scanning electron microscope(ZEISS EVO 40XVP type).

    and Rita Skoda-Földes

    Rita Skoda-Földes obtained her PhD from the University of Pannonia in 1996. Since 2009, she has been a Professor of Chemistry there. Her current research interests include the investigation of palladium-catalysed reactions under homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions, synthesis of steroid derivatives, and ferrocene-labelled molecules.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 11, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Various silica-supported palladium catalysts were prepared and tested in the carbonylation of aryl iodides in the presence of aliphatic amines and aniline. In the former reaction, the main products are the α-ketoamides, whereas monocarbonylation is favoured with aniline. Small modification of the support, of the palladium precursor, or of the conditions of immobilisation were found to affect considerably the outcome of the reactions and recyclability of the catalysts. Under optimum conditions, the phosphine-free palladium catalysts can be reused six to ten times without considerable loss of activity. By the proper selection of the solvent, the leaching of palladium into the reaction mixtures can be reduced considerably.

1 Introduction

Transition metal catalysed carbonylation and coupling reactions are widely used in synthetic chemistry. Reaction of amines, aryl halides, and carbon monoxide in the presence of a palladium catalyst leads to amides and α-ketoamides, via mono- and double carbonylation processes, respectively. Both types of products have practical importance: the amide functionality is an important motif in a lot of biologically active molecules [1] and some α-ketoamides also show interesting pharmacological properties, such as anti-HIV activity [2] or HCV protease inhibition [3].

In most cases, carbonylations are carried out under homogeneous conditions [1, 4], which hinder industrial applications because of problems in catalyst recovery and recycling. One of the possibilities to overcome these difficulties is the use of catalysts immobilised on solid supports [5].

Synthesis of amides via monocarbonylation by heterogeneous catalysts is usually effected under moderate CO pressure (3–20 bar). A great variety of supported palladium catalysts were tested, such as Pd/C [6], a polymer- [7] or silica-supported palladium-N-heterocyclic carbene- [8], palladium-Schiff base- [9] or palladium-phosphine complex, [10], a palladium-phenantroline derivative encaged in Y-zeolite [11], and Pd nanoparticles immobilised on a zeolitic imidazole framework [12] or on carbon nanotubes [13]. In some cases, carbonylation could be carried out at atmospheric pressure, e.g., in the presence of palladium complexes with bidentate ligands anchored on MCM-41 [14] or on silica [15–17], as well as using palladium nanoparticles supported on a metal-organic framework [18] or on a siliceous mesocellular foam [19]. Whereas an efficient recycling can be achieved in most cases at elevated pressure [7–9, 11–19], under atmospheric conditions a substantial drop of activity was often observed upon the reuse of the catalyst [18, 19].

Double carbonylation reactions catalysed by heterogeneous palladium catalysts are still rare. α-Ketoamides were synthesised under 30–40 bar CO pressure with a silica-supported polytitazane-palladium (Ti-N-Pd) complex [20], a Pd/C+PPh3 system [21] with palladium nanoparticles supported on a cross-linked functional polymer [22] or with palladium-phosphine complexes grafted onto mesoporous silica (SBA-15) [23]. A commercially available supported Pd(PPh3)4 catalyst was used efficiently under flow conditions [24]. In all of these double carbonylation reactions, a competing monocarbonylation, leading to amides, was observed. Interestingly, double carbonylation as a side reaction of monocarbonylation under heterogeneous conditions was reported only in one case [11], in spite of the fact that homogeneous catalytic aminocarbonylation may lead to α-ketoamides in considerable amounts even at atmospheric pressure [25].

Despite the growing number of reports on aminocarbonylation under heterogeneous conditions, little is known about the true nature of the catalysts, and it is difficult to compare the results obtained by different catalytic systems.

Recently, we reported on the excellent recyclability of phosphine-free silica-palladium catalysts stabilised by ionic liquids in double carbonylation reactions [26]. Similar systems supported on silica [8, 27] or a polymer [7] were applied for monocarbonylation by others. However, there was no indication why those particular sets of conditions (PdCl2 precursor immobilised in acetonitrile on silica functionalised by imidazolium chloride [8, 27] and Pd(OAc)2 precursor supported in DMF and aq. Na2CO3 on a similarly modified Merrifield resin [7]) were used during the preparation of the heterogeneous catalysts.

According to our own results, modification of the support, of the palladium precursor, or of conditions of immobilisation may affect considerably the selectivity and recyclability of the catalysts. The catalytic systems can really be very complicated, as both palladium nanoparticles and palladium complexes formed under catalytic conditions may play a role in the aminocarbonylation. Moreover, palladium either adsorbed on the surface of the support or dissolved in the reaction mixture (or both) may be involved.

In the present paper, the main emphasis is on the detailed investigation of the influence of immobilisation methodology on the activity, selectivity, and recyclability of the catalysts. In case of the most suitable catalysts, carbonylation conditions are also optimised.

2 Materials and methods

Reagents, solvents and catalyst precursors were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Budapest, Hungary (Pd2(dba)3*CHCl3, Pd(OAc)2, PdCl2, Pd(PPh3)4, PPh3, [BMIM]BF4, aryl iodides, aniline, pyrrolidine, morpholine, DMF, Et3N); Merck, Budapest, Hungary (piperidine, diethylamine, acetonitrile, THF, ethanol, diethylether), and Messer, Budapest, Hungary (CO).

2.1 Preparation of the supported catalysts

2.1.1 Preparation of CAT-1/1:

200 mg [BMIM][BF4] and 0.02 mmol (20.7 mg) Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3 were dissolved in a mixture of 2 ml acetonitrile and 2 ml THF. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Then, 550 mg silica [Kieselgel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm), Merck, pre-treated by heating for 5 h at 250°C] was added under stirring and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the catalyst was dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h and was stored under argon until use. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.40% (determined by ICP).

2.1.2 Preparation of CAT-1/2:

200 mg [BMIM][BF4] and 0.04 mmol (8.7 mg) Pd(OAc)2 were dissolved in a mixture of 2 ml acetonitrile and 2 ml THF. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Then 550 mg silica [Kieselgel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm), Merck, pre-treated by heating for 5 h at 250°C] was added under stirring, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the catalyst was dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h and was stored under argon until use. The palladium content of the catalyst: 0.49% (determined by ICP).

2.1.3 Preparation of CAT-1/3:

200 mg [BMIM][BF4] and 0.04 mmol (15.3 mg) dichloro-bis(1-butyl-3-methylimidazol-2-ylidene)palladium(II), (Pd(BMIM)2Cl2), prepared by a known method [28]) were dissolved in a mixture of 2 ml acetonitrile and 2 ml THF. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Then 550 mg silica (Kieselgel 60 (0.040-0.063 mm), Merck, pre-treated by heating for 5 h at 250°C) was added under stirring, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the catalyst was dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h and was stored under argon until use. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.36% (determined by ICP).

2.1.4 Preparation of CAT-1/4:

Two hundred milligrams [BMIM][BF4] and 0.04 mmol (46.2 mg) Pd(PPh3)4 were dissolved in a mixture of 2 ml acetonitrile and 2 ml THF. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Then 550 mg silica [Kieselgel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm), Merck, pre-treated by heating for 5 h at 250°C] was added under stirring and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the catalyst was dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h and was stored under argon until use. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.55% (determined by ICP).

2.1.5 Preparation of CAT-1/5:

Two hundred milligrams [BMIM][BF4], 0.04 mmol (46.2 mg) Pd(PPh3)4 and 0.08 mmol (21.0 mg) PPh3 were dissolved in a mixture of 2 ml acetonitrile and 2 ml THF. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Then 550 mg silica (Kieselgel 60 (0.040-0.063 mm), Merck, pre-treated by heating for 5 h at 250°C) was added under stirring and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo, and the catalyst was dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h and was stored under argon until use. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.54% (determined by ICP).

2.1.6 Preparation of CAT-2/1:

The silica-supported ionic liquid phase SILP-2 was prepared as described previously [26].

A solution of 8.95 μmol (9.3 mg) Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3 in 2 ml acetonitrile, and 2 ml THF was stirred for 15 min. Then, 500 mg of SILP-2 was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. After evaporation of the solvents, the catalyst was dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.29% (determined by ICP).

2.1.7 Preparation of CAT-2/2:

A solution of 17.9 μmol (4 mg) Pd(OAc)2 in 2 ml EtOH was stirred for 15 min. Then, 500 mg of SILP-2 was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The catalyst was filtered, washed with ethanol (2 ml) and diethylether (2 ml), and dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.77% (determined by ICP).

2.1.8 Preparation of CAT-2/3:

A solution of 17.9 μmol (3.2 mg) PdCl2 in 2 ml EtOH was stirred for 15 min. Then, 500 mg of SILP-2 was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The catalyst was filtered, washed with ethanol (2 ml) and diethylether (2 ml), and dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.26% (determined by ICP).

2.1.9 Preparation of CAT-2/4:

A solution of 20 μmol (3.5 mg) PdCl2 in 1 ml acetonitrile was refluxed in an inert atmosphere for 2 h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was dissolved in 2 ml EtOH, and the mixture was stirred for 15 min. Then 400 mg of SILP-2 was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The catalyst was filtered, washed with ethanol (2 ml) and diethylether (2 ml) and dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.38% (determined by ICP).

2.1.10 Preparation of CAT-2/5:

A solution of 14.8 μmol (15.3 mg) Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3 in 2 ml EtOH was stirred for 15 min. Then, 500 mg of SILP-2 was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 5 days at room temperature. The catalyst was filtered, washed with ethanol (2 ml), and diethylether (2 ml) and dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.44% (determined by ICP).

2.1.11 Preparation of Pd/silica:

A total of 0.02 mmol (20.7 mg) Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3 was dissolved in a mixture of 2 ml acetonitrile, and 2 ml THF. The mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Then 550 mg silica [Kieselgel 60 (0.040-0.063 mm), Merck, pre-treated by heating for 5 h at 250°C] was added and the resulting mixture was stirred for 24 h. The solvents were removed in vacuo and the catalyst was dried at 35°C in vacuo for 3 h and was stored under argon until use. Palladium content of the catalyst: 0.55% (determined by ICP).

2.2 Catalytic reactions

2.2.1 Catalytic reactions at atmospheric pressure:

In a typical experiment, a solution containing the palladium catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content) was placed in a Schlenk-tube. Under argon, 0.2 mmol (22.5 μl) iodobenzene (1), 0.5 mmol (44 μl) morpholine (2a), 0.25 mmol (35 μl) triethylamine, and 1 ml DMF was added, and the atmosphere was changed to carbon monoxide. The reaction was conducted for 3 h at 100°C. The reaction mixture was analysed by gas chromatography.

2.2.2 Catalytic reactions at elevated pressure:

In a typical experiment, the catalyst (containing 3.6 or 6 μmol Pd) was placed in a stainless steel autoclave. Aryl iodides (1 and 6a-f) (0.2 mmol), the amine (2a-e) (0.5 mmol), 0.25 mmol (35 μl) or 0.7 mmol (100 μl) triethylamine and solvent (1 ml) were transferred into it under an inert atmosphere. It was charged with carbon monoxide (30 bar or 5 bar) and heated with stirring in an oil bath at 100°C. After cooling to room temperature, the liquid phase was removed with a syringe. The reaction mixture was analysed by gas chromatography and the catalyst was reused.

2.3 Analytical measurements

Reaction mixtures were analysed by gas chromatography (Hewlett Packard 5890) and GC-MS (Hewlett Packard 5971A GC-MSD, HP-1 column). Conversions and selectivities of the reactions were determined by GC using ferrocene as internal standard. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) investigations were carried out by a FEI MORGAGNI 268D Transmission Electron Microscope (accelerating voltage: 100kV, W-filament). NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on a Varian Inova 400 spectrometer at 400 MHz. The palladium-content of the catalysts and palladium leaching were determined by ICP on a Perkin Elmer Optima 2000 DV instrument.

The products were identified on the basis of their MS spectra. The main products, 3a, 3c–e, 4b and 7a–f were also characterised by 1H NMR. Spectra of 3a, 3c–e, 7a and 7d correspond well to literature data [29].

3a:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.96–7.93 (m, 2H); 7.67–7.63 (m, 1H); 7.54–7.49 (m, 2H), 3.79–3.77 (m, 4H); 3.65–3.63 (m, 2H); 3.38–3.36 (m, 2H). MS (m/z/rel.int.): 219(M+)/6; 105/100; 77/54; 51/22

3c:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.92–7.89 (m, 2H); 7.64–7.59 (m, 1H); 7.51–7.47 (m, 2H), 3.71–3.65 (m, 2H); 3.25 (t, J=5.6 Hz, 2H); 1.69–1.63 (m, 4H); 1.53–1.49 (m, 2H). MS (m/z/rel.int.): 217(M+)/5; 112/100; 105/54; 84/10; 77/33; 69/61; 51/11; 41/29.

3d: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.99–7.96 (m, 2H); 7.64–7.60 (m, 1H); 7.51–7.47 (m, 2H); 3.64 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H); 3.41 (t, J=7.0 Hz, 2H); 1.98–1.90 (m, 4H). MS (m/z/rel.int.): 203(M+)/3; 202/6; 105/71; 98/100; 77/52; 70/31; 55/56.

3e:1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.88–7.85 (m, 2H); 7.62–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.49–7.44 (m, 2H); 3.50 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.19 (q, J=7.2 Hz, 2H); 1.23 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H), 1.10 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H). MS (m/z/rel.int.): 205(M+)/5; 105/61; 100/100; 77/42; 72/74; 51/21.

4a: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 191(M+)/11; 190/34; 176/9; 160/6; 105/100; 86/12; 77/68; 51/24

4b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.96–7.94 (brs, 1H);7.89–7.86 (m, 2H); 7.65–7.62 (m, 2H); 7.55–7.51 (m, 1H); 7.48–7.43 (m, 2H); 7.37–7.32 (m, 2H); 7.17–7.11 (m, 1H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 197(M+)/42; 105/100; 77/52; 51/14.

4c: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 189(M+)/36; 188/100; 105/97; 84/9; 77/56; 51/12.

4d: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 175(M+)/46; 174/35; 146/19; 105/100; 77/58; 51/16.

4e: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 177(M+)/13; 176/36; 105/100; 77/39; 51/11.

5: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.78–7.75 (m, 2H); 7.54–7.49 (m, 1H); 7.40–7.36 (m, 2H); 2.97 (s, 3H); 2.81 (s, 3H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 177 (M+)/6; 106/6; 105/100; 77/44; 72/48; 51/17; 50/6

7a: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.82 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H); 7.66 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H); 3.80–3.75 (m, 4H); 3.66–3.64 (m, 2H); 3.38–3.53 (m, 2H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 299(M+)/6; 297(M+)/6; 185/100; 183/100; 157/20; 155/20; 114/93; 86/31; 76/22; 75/19; 70/83; 42/27.

7b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 8.10 (ddd, J=0.3 Hz, 1.6 Hz, 1.9 Hz, 1H); 7.88 (ddd, J=1.1 Hz, 1.6 Hz, 7.8 Hz, 1H); 7.77 (ddd (J=1.1 Hz, 1.9 Hz, 8.0 Hz, 1H); 7.40 (ddd, J=0.3 Hz, 7.8 Hz, 8.0 Hz, 1H); 3.80–3.76 (m, 4H); 3.67–3.65 (m, 2H); 3.39–3.36 (m, 2H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 299(M+)/5; 297(M+)/5; 185/28; 183/28; 157/11; 155/11; 114/100; 86/14; 76/15; 75/12; 70/63; 42/20.

7c: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.94 (ddd, J=0.4 Hz, 1.8 Hz, 2.1 Hz, 1H); 7.84 (ddd, J=1.1 Hz, 1.8 Hz, 7.8 Hz, 1H); 7.62 (ddd, J=1.1 Hz, 2.1 Hz, 8.0 Hz, 1H); 7.47 (ddd, J=0.4 Hz, 7.8 Hz, 8.0 Hz, 1H); 3.80–3.78 (m, 4H); 3.67–3.66 (m, 2H); 3.40–3.37 (m, 2H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 255(M+)/3; 253(M+)/9; 141/20; 139/61; 114/100; 111/26; 86/13; 75/16; 70/69; 42/20.

7d: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.74 (ddd, J=1.0 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 7.7 Hz, 1H); 7.66 (dddd, J=0.4 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 2.6 Hz, 8.9 Hz, 1H); 7.51 (dddd, J=0.4 Hz, 5.3 Hz, 7.7 Hz, 8.2 Hz, 1H); 7.35 (dddd, J=1.0 Hz, 2.6 Hz, 8.1 Hz, 8.2Hz, 1H); 3.80–3.78 (m, 4H); 3.67–3.65 (m, 2H); 3.39–3.37 (m, 2H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 237(M+)/9; 123/70; 114/100; 95/39; 86/12; 75/15; 70/77; 42/22.

7e: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.91 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 2H); 6.97 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 2H); 3.88 (s, 3H); 3.77–3.76 (m, 4H); 3.65–3.62 (m, 2H); 3.38–3.35 (m, 2H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 249(M+)/3; 135/100; 92/10; 77/15; 70/8.

7f: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ (ppm): 7.71–7.69 (brs, 1H); 7.66 (dd, J= 1.9 Hz, 7.8 Hz, 1H); 7.26 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 1H); 3.78–3.76 (m, 4H); 3.64–3.61 (m, 2H); 3.36–3.33 (m, 2H); 2.33 (s, 3H); 2.31 (s, 3H). MS(m/z/rel.int.): 247(M+)/3; 133/100; 105/24; 79/9; 77/9; 70/9.

8a: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 271(M+)/17; 270/41; 269(M+)/17; 268/42; 185/99; 183/100; 157/28; 155/28; 104/12; 86/41; 76/34; 75/26; 72/11; 56/54; 50/18; 42/12.

8b: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 271(M+)/26; 270/55; 269(M+)/26; 268/55; 256/16; 254/16; 185/92; 183/92; 157/42; 155/42; 104/14; 86/74; 77/12; 76/63; 75/42; 74/11; 72/16; 1; 56/100; 55/11; 50/30; 42/24.

8c: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 227(M+)/5; 226/13; 225(M+)/16; 224/36; 212/4; 210/12; 141/32; 139/100; 113/16; 111/48; 86/36; 75/26; 56/50; 42/9.

8d: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 209(M+)/14; 208/28; 123/100; 95/53; 86/24; 75/18; 56/41; 42/6.

8e: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 221(M+)/10; 220/16; 135/100; 92/10; 77/15.

8f: MS(m/z/rel.int.): 219(M+)/11; 218/17; 133/100; 105/20; 79/11; 77/12.

3 Results and discussion

Catalysts (Table 1) were prepared either by physisorption of the ionic liquid on silica gel (SILP-1, Figure 1) or by anchoring the ionic liquid covalently to the support (grafting, SILP-2).

Figure 1: SILP phases used for the preparation of supported catalysts.
Figure 1:

SILP phases used for the preparation of supported catalysts.

Table 1:

Supported palladium catalysts used during the carbonylation reactions.

CatalystSupportPd-precursorSolventPd-content (%)a
Pd/silicaSilicaPd2(dba)3.CHCl3THF, CH3CN0.55
CAT-1/1SILP-1Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3THF, CH3CN0.40
CAT-1/2SILP-1Pd(OAc)2THF, CH3CN0.49
CAT-1/3SILP-1Pd(BMIM)2Cl2THF, CH3CN0.36
CAT-1/4SILP-1Pd(PPh3)4THF, CH3CN0.55
CAT-1/5SILP-1Pd(PPh3)4bTHF, CH3CN0.54
CAT-2/1SILP-2Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3THF, CH3CN0.29
CAT-2/2SILP-2Pd(OAc)2EtOH0.77
CAT-2/3SILP-2PdCl2EtOH0.26
CAT-2/4SILP-2Pd(CH3CN)2Cl2EtOH0.38
CAT-2/5SILP-2Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3EtOH0.44

a(Mg Pd/mg catalyst)*100. bWith additional two eq. PPh3.

Palladium was immobilised using different precursors (Table 1) and solvents. Pd(II) compounds may be reduced to catalytically active Pd(0) during the aminocarbonylation reaction with the help of CO [30], Et3N [31], or by the solvent (e.g., DMF [32]). In the case of CAT-2/2CAT-2/4 heterogenisation was carried out in EtOH to facilitate reduction of Pd(II) to Pd(0) [33] prior to carbonylation.

Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with morpholine (2a) as the nucleophilic reaction partner was chosen as the model reaction (Scheme 1) to test the selectivity and recyclability of the catalysts.

Scheme 1: Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with morpholine (2a) as the nucleophile.
Scheme 1:

Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with morpholine (2a) as the nucleophile.

3.1 Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with morpholine (2a) as the nucleophilic reagent

In this carbonylation reaction only the awaited α-ketomide (3a) and amide (4a) products were formed in the presence of most of the catalysts prepared in the THF/acetonitrile solvent mixture (CAT-1/1, CAT-1/2, CAT-1/3, CAT-1/4, and CAT-2/1). At the same time, ketoamide 5 as a side product was detected in the reaction mixtures obtained with catalysts CAT-1/3, CAT-2/2CAT-2/5 when aminocarbonylation was carried out in DMF that could serve as a source of dimethylamine [34].

As some of the catalysts reported before were shown to be active in apolar solvents, such as toluene [8, 9, 13, 19, 22], whereas others gave good results only in polar media [11, 24], the catalysts were tested in aminocarbonylation using DMF, acetonitrile and toluene as solvent.

3.1.1 Aminocarbonylation in DMF

In case of catalysts obtained with physically adsorbed ionic liquid (SILP-1), a substantial loss of [BMIM][BF4] (>95% of the original amount, based on the 1H NMR analysis of the reaction mixtures) was observed in the first runs of aminocarbonylations carried out in DMF.

Interestingly, phosphine-free palladium-catalysts (CAT-1/1CAT-1/3) showed better performance than Pd/silica (Figure 2) especially concerning recyclability, despite the greater loss of palladium observed in the reactions of the former catalysts (Table 2, entries 1, 2, and 4). The beneficial effect of the ionic liquid might be due to a stabilisation of the initially formed palladium nanoparticles at the beginning of the reaction. Imidazolium ionic liquids are frequently used as template, stabiliser, and immobilising agent for catalytic transition-metal nanoparticles to prevent aggregation [35]. TEM image (Figure 3) of spent CAT-1/1 proves the presence of palladium nanoparticles and shows some residual ionic liquid despite the great loss of [BMIM][BF4] in the first cycle.

Figure 2: Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts immobilised on silica or SILP-1 in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 30 bar CO, 100°C].
Figure 2:

Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts immobilised on silica or SILP-1 in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 30 bar CO, 100°C].

Figure 3: TEM images of spent CAT-1/1 (left) and CAT-2/1 (right) after two runs (with 8-h reaction time).
Figure 3:

TEM images of spent CAT-1/1 (left) and CAT-2/1 (right) after two runs (with 8-h reaction time).

Table 2:

Leaching of palladium during recirculation experiments for the aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with morpholine (2)a.

EntryCatalystR. time (h)Pd leaching (%)b
1Pd/silica34.3
2CAT-1/135.3
3CAT-1/183.9
4CAT-1/238.7
5CAT-1/4c35.4
6CAT-2/133.9
7CAT-2/183.1
8CAT-2/5d81.5

aReaction conditions: 0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content) in 1 ml DMF, 30 bar CO pressure, 100°C. bAn average of six runs, determined by ICP [(mmol Pd in the reaction mixture/ mmol Pd on the fresh catalyst)x100]. cAn average of three runs. dIn acetonitrile.

When comparing the performance of catalysts obtained from different precursors, [Pd2(dba)3.CHCl3 (CAT-1/1), Pd(OAc)2 (CAT-1/2) and Pd(BMIM)2Cl2 (CAT-1/3)], CAT-1/1 showed the lowest activity. The application of the Pd-NHC precursor led to a catalyst (CAT-1/3) with high activity but lower selectivity to the α-ketomide (3a). In addition, a considerable amount of side product 5 was formed when the catalyst was reused.

In our group, an enhanced activity of palladium catalysts with excess phosphine ligands, with a P/Pd ratio of 6–10, was observed before in aminocarbonylations using ionic liquids as solvents [36]. As a consequence, the efficiency of Pd(PPh3)4 was also tested (CAT-1/4). After initial high activity, a great decrease in product yields was observed. The latter could be reduced to some extent by an increase in the phosphine/palladium ratio (Figure 2, CAT-1/5). The loss of activity may be caused by the leaching of PPh3 into the reaction mixture (90% of the original amount in the first run, according to 1H NMR measurements). It should be mentioned however, that the great loss of ligand was not accompanied by an unusually high loss of palladium (Table 2, entry 5), that was found to be almost the same as in case of CAT-1/1. The great drop of activity after the first run may be explained by the formation of inactive palladium complexes after the loss of phosphine ligands.

All of the catalysts obtained from silica or SILP-1 showed high selectivity towards the α-ketoamide (3a), which even increased in the recycling experiments with the exception of CAT-1/3. A similar phenomenon was observed before by Li and Yuan [11] in double carbonylation with palladium supported on a cross-linked functional polymer.

A higher activity and better recyclability of the catalyst (CAT-2/1), prepared by a similar method but immobilised on the support with grafted ionic liquid (SILP-2), was observed both in experiments with shorter and longer reaction times (Figure 4). Selectivity towards the α-ketoamide (3a) was found to be a bit lower in the first five runs but it was improved during recycling and complete conversion of iodobenzene (1) to product 3a was observed in the 9th and 10th cycles (reaction time: 8 h). Better performance upon reuse may be partly due to a lower loss of palladium (Table 2, entries 6, 7) compared to CAT-1/1 and CAT-1/2.

Figure 4: Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts immobilised on SILP-2 in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content], 1 ml DMF, 30 bar CO, 100°C).
Figure 4:

Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts immobilised on SILP-2 in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content], 1 ml DMF, 30 bar CO, 100°C).

Also, an increase in the reaction time resulted in an excellent recyclability and led to a 100% yield of product 3a, even in the 10th run. A better conversion can be achieved in longer reaction times, and this can be explained by a dissolution/reprecipitation mechanism proposed by Köhler [37]. Even if soluble palladium complexes or palladium nanoparticles are involved in the catalytic cycle, they can return to the surface of the support in the form of nanoparticles after the reaction is completed. The reprecipitation of palladium is supported by the smaller leaching of the catalysts in longer reactions (Table 2). The higher activity of the recycled catalyst (CAT-2/1) in the longer experiments can also be proved. Mixtures obtained after a 1-h reaction time in the second run with spent catalysts of the 3-h and 8-h experiments showed 38% and 47% conversions, respectively (Table 3, entries 1, 2). A smaller difference in the results was observed in the second runs of a similar experiment performed in the presence of CAT-2/5 in acetonitrile (entries 3,4).

Table 3:

Recirculation testsa.

EntryCatalystSolventFirst runSecond runb
R. time (h)Conv. of 1 (%)cR. time (h)Conv. of 1 (%)c
1CAT-2/1DMF3100138
28100147
3CAT-2/5CH3CN385126
48100129

aReaction conditions: 0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml solvent, 30 bar CO, 100°C. bSpent catalyst and fresh reaction mixture: 0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, 1 ml solvent, 30 bar CO, 100°C. cDetermined by GC.

The TEM image of the spent catalyst again shows the presence of palladium nanoparticles (Figure 3). To obtain information about the homogeneous or heterogeneous nature of the catalytic reaction, hot filtration and mercury poisoning tests were carried out in the reaction of CAT-2/1 (Table 4). The catalytic mixture was filtered after 30 min. One half of the mixture was heated further in a CO atmosphere, and the other half was treated similarly but in the presence of mercury.

Table 4:

Hot filtration and mercury poisoning testsa.

EntryCatalystSolventFirst stepSecond step
R. time (h)Conv. of 1 (%)bRatio of 3a:4abHgR. time (h)Conv. of 1 (%)bRatio of 3a:4ab
1CAT-1/3DMF0.56196:4-47896:4
2+46593:7
3CAT-2/1DMF0.51274:26-43088:12
4+41274:26
5CAT-2/5CH3CN0.53695:5-44393:7
6+43794:6

aReaction conditions: 0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml solvent, 30 bar CO, 100oC. b: determined by GC.

According to the results, a low conversion of iodobenzene (1) could be observed after the removal of the heterogeneous catalyst, and the reaction could be completely stopped by the addition of mercury (Table 4, entries 3, 4). This shows that a small amount of catalytically active palladium nanoparticles had leached to the reaction mixture.

For comparison, a similar experiment was carried out with catalyst CAT-1/3 obtained from a Pd-NHC precursor (Table 4, entries 1, 2). Although in this case some further reaction could be observed in the filtrate, even in the presence of mercury, conversion was much lower than without the addition of the catalyst poison. This supports the presence of some complexes and nanoparticles in the reaction mixture.

According to previous reports, although the presence of palladium-carbene complexes was observed in 1,3-dialkylimidazolium-chloride solutions of Pd(II) salts, ionic liquids with [BF4]- or [PF6]- anions facilitated the formation of palladium nanoparticles [38]. In addition, palladium nanoparticles were shown to be formed in ionic liquids under thermal decomposition conditions without the addition of a reducing agent, starting from Pd(dba)2 and Pd(OAc)2, as well as from palladium-carbene complexes [39]. Therefore, although the role of palladium-carbene complexes as catalysts cannot be excluded, they may also serve as reservoirs for catalytically active palladium nanoparticles under carbonylation conditions.

Catalysts obtained from SILP-2 in EtOH (CAT-2/2CAT-2/5) exerted high activity in the conversion of iodobenzene. Acceptable results were obtained upon recycling, but a considerable amount of side-product 5 was formed in DMF in each case.

3.1.2 Aminocarbonylation in acetonitrile

The efficiency of another polar solvent, acetonitrile, was also investigated in reactions with some of the catalysts immobilised either on SILP-1 (CAT-1/1, CAT-1/5) or SILP-2 (CAT-2/3, CAT-2/4, CAT-2/5). Good conversion of iodobenzene (1) was achieved with the first group of catalysts in the first runs, but unfortunately, a great loss of activity was observed upon recycling, even carrying out the carbonylation for a longer reaction time. CAT-2/3, CAT-2/4 and CAT-2/5 showed lower activity in acetonitrile than in DMF (Figure 5) but compounds 3a and 4a were the only products in the reaction mixtures, and the catalysts could be reused with only a small loss of activity. When the reaction time was increased to 8 h, the conversion of iodobenzene dropped below 90%, but only in the 9th run in the presence of CAT-2/5. Contrary to the reactions in DMF, there is no appreciable change in the selectivity of aminocarbonylation in the recycling experiments. As another advantage, the amount of leached palladium is considerably lower here than in case of reactions carried out in DMF (Table 2, entry 8).

Figure 5: Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in acetonitrile [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml acetonitrile, 30 bar CO, 100°C].
Figure 5:

Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in acetonitrile [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml acetonitrile, 30 bar CO, 100°C].

Hot filtration and mercury poisoning tests (Table 4, entries 5, 6) showed that the conversion of iodobenzene (1) was very slow after the removal of the heterogeneous catalyst, and it could be completely stopped by the addition of mercury. These results are in good accordance with the small amount of leached palladium detected during aminocarbonylation of this catalyst (Table 2, entry 8).

3.1.3 Aminocarbonylation in toluene

Some previous reports show the excellent activity of immobilised palladium catalysts in toluene [8, 9, 13, 19, 22], so the possibility of the use of this solvent was also taken into account. As it was observed before in the case of CAT-1/1 and CAT-2/1 [26], the use of an apolar solvent reduced catalytic efficiency considerably in all of the catalysts investigated (Figure 6). At the same time, under these conditions, the main product was amide 4a despite the use of a high CO pressure (30 bar). This probably can be explained by the fact that, although the formation of amides is thought to occur via neutral complexes, ionic species are involved in the catalytic cycle of double carbonylation. As a consequence, polar solvents may enhance the rate of the latter reaction by stabilisation of the ionic intermediates in the presence of apolar ones, and monocarbonylation is favoured.

Figure 6: Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in toluene [0.2 mmol 1a, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml toluene, 30 bar CO, 100°C].
Figure 6:

Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in toluene [0.2 mmol 1a, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml toluene, 30 bar CO, 100°C].

Despite the fact that no loss of ionic liquid was observed, even when catalysts were prepared with SILP-1, recyclability is poor with the exception of CAT-2/3, where there is only a moderate loss of activity in the first three runs.

3.1.4 Aminocarbonylation at lower pressure

Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with morpholine (2a) was attempted using lower carbon monoxide pressure [5 bar (Figure 7) and 1 bar (Figure 8)]. A good selectivity towards the α-ketoamide (3a) was observed at 5 bar, and double carbonylation was found to take place even under atmospheric conditions. The catalysts could be recycled with some loss of activity when moderate pressure was used, but a great drop of activity was observed in the atmospheric reactions when catalyst recycling was attempted. The formation of side-product 5 could be detected in reaction mixtures obtained with catalysts prepared in EtOH.

Figure 7: Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF at 5 bar [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 5 bar CO, 100°C].
Figure 7:

Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF at 5 bar [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 5 bar CO, 100°C].

Figure 8: Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF at atmospheric pressure [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 1 bar CO, 100°C].
Figure 8:

Selectivity and recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation carried out in DMF at atmospheric pressure [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2a, 0.25 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 1 bar CO, 100°C].

3.2 Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with aniline (2b) as the nucleophilic reagent

Some of the heterogeneous catalysts were tested in another model reaction using an aromatic amine, aniline (2b), as the nucleophile. In contrast to the reaction of morpholine, in this case a selective monocarbonylation was observed in each case, and amide 4b was the only product that could be detected in the reaction mixture (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2: Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with aniline (2b) as the nucleophile.
Scheme 2:

Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with aniline (2b) as the nucleophile.

Efficient recycling of the catalysts can be achieved by the use of either CAT-1/1 or CAT-2/4 even in relatively short reaction times (Figure 9). Surprisingly, CAT-2/1 gave excellent results in the aminocarbonylation with morpholine, but showed lower activity and could be reused only with a considerable loss of activity. As another interesting feature, no side product formation was observed, even with catalysts prepared in EtOH (CAT-2/2CAT-2/4). It should be mentioned that at atmospheric pressure, only a low conversion of iodobenzene was achieved (26% conversion in 4 h in the presence of CAT-2/2).

Figure 9: Recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with aniline (2b) at 30 bar [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2b, 0.7 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 30 bar CO, 100°C].
Figure 9:

Recyclability of catalysts in aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with aniline (2b) at 30 bar [0.2 mmol 1, 0.5 mmol 2b, 0.7 mmol Et3N, catalyst (with 6 μmol Pd-content), 1 ml DMF, 30 bar CO, 100°C].

3.3 Aminocarbonylation of other substrates

To show the efficiency of the heterogeneous catalysts, aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) in the presence of other aliphatic amines (2c–2e, Scheme 3) as well as the reactions of other aryl iodides (6a–6f, Scheme 4) with morpholine (2a) was investigated in the presence of CAT-2/5 (Table 5). A total conversion of the aryl iodides and good selectivity towards ketoamide products (3c–e, 7a–f) were observed in each case, even after catalyst recycling.

Scheme 3: Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with aliphatic amines (2c–e).
Scheme 3:

Aminocarbonylation of iodobenzene (1) with aliphatic amines (2c–e).

Scheme 4: Aminocarbonylation of aryl iodides (6a-f) with morpholine (2a).
Scheme 4:

Aminocarbonylation of aryl iodides (6a-f) with morpholine (2a).

Table 5:

Aminocarbonylation of other substratesa.

EntryAryl iodideAmineRun 1Run 2
Conv. (%)bRatio of products (%)bConv. (%)bRatio of products (%)b
11a2c10092 (3c)/8 (4c)9894 (3c)/6 (4c)
21a2d10084 (3d)/16 (4d)10088 (3d)/12 (4d)
31a2e10093 (3e)/7 (4e)10094 (3e)/6 (4e)
46a2a10090 (7a)/10(8a)10088 (7a)/12 (8a)
56b2a10088 (7b)/12(8b)10090 (7b)/10 (8b)
66c2a10087 (7c)/13 (8c)10088 (7c)/12 (8c)
76d2a10092 (7d)/8(8d)10092 (7d)/8 (8d)
86e2a10096 (7e)/4 (8e)10096 (7e)/4 (8e)
96f2a10092 (7f)/8 (8f)10094 (7f)/6 (8f)

aReaction conditions: 0.2 mmol aryl iodide, 0.5 mmol amine, 0.25 mmol Et3N, CAT-2/5 (with 3.6 μmol Pd-content) in 1 ml acetontirile, 30 bar CO pressure, 100°C. bDetermined by GC using ferrocene as internal standard.

4 Conclusions

Various silica-supported palladium catalysts were prepared and tested in the double carbonylation of iodobenzene (1) in the presence of morpholine (2a) or aniline (2b) as nucleophilic reagents.

It was shown that small alterations in the immobilisation procedure may greatly affect the efficiency of the catalysts.

Modification of the support with ionic liquids, even by physisorption, results in more active catalysts than that obtained from silica itself. CAT-2/1 and CAT-2/5, prepared by silica-grafted ionic liquid as support, were found to be the most efficient catalysts with excellent recyclability. With the first catalyst, total conversion of iodobenzene to ketoamide 3a was achieved even in the 10th run. At the same time, good recycling results, together with a considerably lower loss of palladium, were obtained in carbonylations with the latter catalyst. This shows the efficiency of the application of EtOH as solvent during palladium-immobilisation. As another advantage, no change in the selectivity of the reaction in the subsequent runs could be observed with CAT-2/5.

The use of catalysts with higher activity leads to the formation of a by-product when carbonylation is carried out in DMF due to the decomposition of the solvent. As the presence of polar solvents were proved to be essential to obtaining optimum results, acetonitrile was found to be the solvent of choice in these cases.

The catalysts were effective when reactions were performed under CO pressure, but the application of 30 bar of pressure was necessary for efficient recycling. Under these conditions, α-ketoamide 3a was obtained as the main product in the reaction of iodobenzene (1) with morpholine (2a) in all cases. Although at atmospheric pressure amide 4a was the main product, the formation of a considerable amount of double carbonylation product 3a could also be observed in each case. CAT-2/5 could be used efficiently for the synthesis of a number of α-ketoamides, starting from other aliphatic amines, as well as substituted aryl iodides.

Contrary to the reaction of aliphatic amines, selective monocarbonylation was obtained in the presence of aniline (2b) as the nucleophile, even under CO pressure. Also, in this reaction CAT-1/1 was found to be the catalyst with best activity and recyclability that shows that the composition of the catalyst should be fine-tuned according to the nature of the substrates.


Corresponding author: Rita Skoda-Földes, Institute of Chemistry, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Pannonia, H-8201 Veszprém, P.O.Box 158, Hungary, e-mail:

About the authors

Máté Papp

Máté Papp is currently an undergraduate student of Chemistry at the University of Pannonia. He is a member of the research group of Professor Rita Skoda-Földes. His research topic is the investigation of aminocarbonylation reactions with recyclable heterogeneous catalysts.

Béla Urbán

Béla Urbán is currently a graduate student in the Doctoral School of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences at the University of Pannonia. He is a member of the research group of Professor Rita Skoda-Földes. His research topic is the investigation of aminocarbonylation reactions with recyclable heterogeneous catalysts.

Eszter Drotár

Eszter Drotár has worked since 2010 for the Research Centre for Natural Sciences as a geologist and recently as a research fellow. Their laboratory contains a transmission electron microscope (FEI MORGAGNI 268D type) and a scanning electron microscope(ZEISS EVO 40XVP type).

Rita Skoda-Földes

Rita Skoda-Földes obtained her PhD from the University of Pannonia in 1996. Since 2009, she has been a Professor of Chemistry there. Her current research interests include the investigation of palladium-catalysed reactions under homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions, synthesis of steroid derivatives, and ferrocene-labelled molecules.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Hungarian National Science Foundation (OTKA K105632) and project TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0071 for their support, realised through support by the Hungarian Government and the European Union with co-funding by the European Social Fund.

References

[1] Roy S, Roy S, Gribble GW. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 9867–9923.10.1016/j.tet.2012.08.065Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wang T, Zhang Z, Wallace OB, Deshpande M, Fang H, Yang Z, Zadjura LM, Tweedie DL, Huang S, Zhao F, Ranadive S, Robinson BS, Gong YF, Ricarrdi K, Spicer TP, Deminie C, Rose R, Wang HH, Blair WS, Shi PY, Lin PF, Colonno RJ, Meanwell NA. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4236–4239.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Chatel-Chaix L, Baril M, Lamarre D. Viruses 2010, 2, 1752–1765.10.3390/v2081752Search in Google Scholar

[4] Brennführer A, Neumann H, Beller M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4114–4133.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Gadge ST, Bhanage BM. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 10367–10389.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Salvadori J, Balducci E, Zaza S, Petricci E, Taddei M. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1841–1847.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Qureshi ZS, Revankar SA, Khedkar MV, Bhanage BM. Catal. Today 2012, 198, 148–153.10.1016/j.cattod.2012.03.039Search in Google Scholar

[8] Khedkar MV, Sasaki T, Bhanage BM. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 287–293.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Islam SM, Ghosh K, Roy AS, Molla RA. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 38986–38999.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mansour A, Portnoy M. J. Mol. Catal. A 2006, 250, 40–43.10.1016/j.molcata.2006.01.029Search in Google Scholar

[11] Mei H, Hu J, Xiao S, Lei Y, Li G. Appl. Catal. A 2014, 475, 40–47.10.1016/j.apcata.2014.01.010Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dang TT, Zhu Y, Ngiam JSY, Ghosh SC, Chen A, Seayad AM. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1406–1410.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Biying AO, Yuanting KT, Hosmane NS, Yinghuai Z. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 747, 184–188.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hao W, Sha J, Sheng S, Cai M. Catal. Comm. 2008, 10, 257–260.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Cai M, Huang Y, Hu R, Song C. J. Mol. Catal. A 2004, 208, 17–20.10.1016/S1381-1169(03)00534-XSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Cai M, Huang Y, Hu R, Song C. J. Mol. Catal. A 2004, 212, 151–154.10.1016/j.molcata.2003.09.030Search in Google Scholar

[17] Cai M, Zhao H, Huang Y. J. Mol. Catal. A 2005, 238, 41–45.10.1016/j.molcata.2005.05.009Search in Google Scholar

[18] Dang TT, Zhu Y, Ghosh SC, Chen A, Chai CLL, Seayad AM. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1805–1807.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Tinnis F, Verho O, Gustafson KPJ, Tai CW, Bäckvall JE, Adolfsson H. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 5885–5889.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Yan YY, Zuo HP, Jin ZL. React. Func. Polym. 1997, 32, 21–24.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Liu J, Zheng S, Su W, Xia C. Chin. J. Chem. 2009, 27, 623–627.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Chen B, Li F, Huang Z, Lu T, Yuan G. Appl. Catal. A 2014, 481, 54–63.10.1016/j.apcata.2014.05.001Search in Google Scholar

[23] Genelot M, Villandier N, Bendjeriou A, Jaithong P, Djakovitch L, Dufaudz V. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 1886–1893.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Balogh J, Kuik Á, Ürge L, Darvas F, Bakos J, Skoda-Földes R. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2009, 302, 76–79.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Takács E, Varga C, Skoda-Földes R, Kollár L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2453–2456.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Papp M, Skoda-Földes R. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2013, 378, 193–199.10.1016/j.molcata.2013.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[27] Khedkar MV, Shinde AR, Sasaki T, Bhanage BM. J. Mol. Catal. A 2014, 385, 91–97.10.1016/j.molcata.2014.01.018Search in Google Scholar

[28] özdemir I, Demir S, Gök Y, Çetinkaya E, Çetinkaya B. J. Mol. Catal. A 2004, 222, 97–102.10.1016/j.molcata.2004.07.024Search in Google Scholar

[29] Liu J, Zhang R, Wang S, Sun W, Xia C. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1321–1324.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Negishi E, Ed., Handbook of Organopalladium Chemistry for Organic Synthesis, Wiley: New York, 2002, pp. 47–65.10.1002/0471473804Search in Google Scholar

[31] Trzeciak AM, Ciunik Z, Ziółkowski JJ. Organometallics 2002, 21, 132–137.10.1021/om010541cSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Serp P, Hernandez M, Richard B, Kalck P. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 2327–2336.10.1002/1099-0682(200109)2001:9<2327::AID-EJIC2327>3.0.CO;2-DSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Kume Y, Qiao K, Tomida D, Yokoyama C. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 369–375.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Muzart J. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8313–8323.10.1016/j.tet.2009.06.091Search in Google Scholar

[35] Astruc D. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1884–1894.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Skoda-Földes R, Takács E, Horváth J, Tuba Z, Kollár L. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 643–645.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Heidenreich RG, Krauter JGE, Pietsch J, Köhler K. J. Mol. Catal. A 2002, 182–183, 499–509.10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00499-XSearch in Google Scholar

[38] Hamill NA, Hardacre C, McMath SEJ. Green Chem. 2002, 4, 139–142.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Prechtl MHG, Scholten JD, Dupont J. Molecules 2010, 15, 3441–3461.10.3390/molecules15053441Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-11-14
Accepted: 2015-2-5
Published Online: 2015-3-11
Published in Print: 2015-4-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Editorial
  4. Enough time for inspiration?
  5. GreenChemSE 2014
  6. 1st International Conference on Green Chemistry and Sustainable Engineering (GreenChemSE)
  7. Comparative study of different catalysts for the direct conversion of cellulose to sorbitol
  8. The effect of TiO2 surface modification on the photovoltaic properties of hybrid bulk heterojunction solar cells based on MEH-PPV/CdS/TiO2 active layer
  9. Carboxylation of hydroxyarens with metal alkyl carbonates
  10. Opportunities for Nannochloropsis gaditana biomass through the isolation of its components and biodiesel production
  11. Mono- and double carbonylation of iodobenzene in the presence of reusable supported palladium catalysts
  12. Separation of ethylbenzene and n-octane using deep eutectic solvents
  13. Ultrasound-assisted green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their incorporation in antibacterial cellulose packaging
  14. Can mitochondrial malondialdehyde content be a useful tool to evaluate sea lamprey juveniles’ capacity to seawater acclimatization?
  15. Effects of atrazine, isoproturon and diuron on glutathione metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
  16. Organization profile
  17. Cluster profile CLIB2021
  18. Conference announcements
  19. 10th European Congress of Chemical Engineering (ECCE10)/3rd European Congress of Applied Biotechnology (ECAB3)/5th European Process Intensification Conference (EPIC5) – Nice, France, September 27-October 1, 2015
  20. Microfluidics: From Laboratory Tools to Process Development (Rueil-Malmaison, France, November 4–5, 2015)
  21. Conferences 2015–2017
  22. Book reviews
  23. Chemistry of the climate system
  24. Renewable resources for biorefineries
  25. Corrigendum
  26. Corrigendum to: Biorefineries and chemical processes: design, integration and sustainability analysis
Downloaded on 30.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2014-0093/html
Scroll to top button