Home Physical Sciences Microwave assisted synthesis of 4-quinolones and N,N′-diarylureas
Article Publicly Available

Microwave assisted synthesis of 4-quinolones and N,N′-diarylureas

  • Patricia D. Duarte

    Patricia Domingos Duarte received her PhD in Chemistry at the Federal University of São Carlos in 2012 under the supervision of Professor Arlene G. Corrêa, working on the asymmetric synthesis of alkaloids. She is currently a researcher at the USA Pharmacopeia (USP) in Barueri, Brazil.

    , Marcio W. Paixão

    Márcio Weber Paixão was born in Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brazil, in 1979. He received his BS in chemistry in 2003 from the Federal University of Santa Maria (Brazil). In 2007, he completed his PhD at the same university under the supervision of Professor A.L. Braga, working with catalytic enantioselective synthesis. He immediately started the postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of Professor J.V. Comasseto at the University of São Paulo (Brazil). Following this, he joined the Center for Catalysis (University of Aarhus – DK) where he worked under guidance of Professor Karl Anker Jørgensen. Currently, he has started his independent career at the Federal University of São Carlos (Brazil). His research interests are focused on the development of new methodologies in asymmetric catalysis.

    and Arlene G. Corrêa

    Arlene G. Corrêa received her PhD from the Federal University of São Carlos (1991) and completed her postdoctoral trainings with Professor Paul A. Wender (Stanford University, CA, 1997). She is Associate Professor in the Department of Chemistry at the University Federal of São Carlos. Her research interests are isolation, identification and synthesis of insect pheromones, synthesis of bioactive natural products and analogs employing combinatorial chemistry technologies and green chemistry.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 28, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

4-Quinolinones are an important class of alkaloids, widely used as conventional drugs to treat various infectious diseases. In this study, we report the synthesis of 4-quinolones in one step, under microwave irradiation and with diphenyl ether as a solvent, using ethyl acetoacetate and electron rich anilines. When anilines containing alkyl or electron withdrawing substituents were employed, only N,N′-diarylureas were obtained in moderate to good yields.

1 Introduction

4-Quinolinones an important class of alkaloids, are widely used as conventional drugs to treat various infectious diseases [1, 2]. They are the first choice of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of a broad range of bacterial infections, and play a pivotal role in the development of new inhibitors [3, 4]. Continuous modifications in the basic structure of quinolones have increased their antibacterial spectrum and potency, making them useful for the treatment of urinary, systemic and respiratory tract infections, resulting in second, third and fourth-generation quinolone antibiotics, which are currently on the market [5]. Besides the antibacterial activity, several reports have shown the antiparasitic activity of 4-quinolinones [6–11]. The toxicity of 4-quinolinones is comparable to other commonly used antimicrobial agents; therefore, they can be considered well-tolerated [12].

Despite the importance of the 4-quinolinone scaffold, several synthetic methods have already been reported in literature, e.g., condensation of o-nitroacetophenone with N,N-dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal, yielding enaminones, which are submitted to reductive cyclization under catalytic transfer hydrogenation conditions [13]. In a similar way, 4-quinolines 1 can also be obtained from anilines and β-ketoester, furnishing the corresponding ethyl β-anilinocrotonates 2, which undergo intramolecular cyclization under reflux of diphenyl ether [14] or microwave irradiation (Scheme 1) [15].

Since the appearance of the first article on the application of microwaves for chemical synthesis in polar solvents [16], the approach has blossomed into a useful technique for a variety of applications in organic synthesis and functional group transformations. The focus has lately shifted to less cumbersome solvent-free methods, wherein the neat reactants, often in the presence of mineral oxides or supported catalysts, undergo facile reactions to provide high yields of pure products, thus eliminating or minimizing the use of organic solvents [17].

Varma and Saini reported the conversion of 2′-aminochalcones to 2-aryl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-4-quinolones under mild and solvent-free conditions, on a montmorillonite K 10 clay surface and under microwave irradiation [18].

Darque et al. synthesized bent and linear tricyclic quinolinones by a two step method involving microwave irradiation and evaluated their biological properties [19]. Recently, we reported the synthesis of 4-quinolinones from 2′-aminoacetophenone and acyl chlorides. The corresponding acylated 2′-aminoacetophenones were submitted to microwave irradiation in the presence of potassium terc-butoxide (tBuOK) furnishing the 2-substituted-4-quinolinones [20].

Nadaraj and Selvi [15] reported that only 2-quinolone derivatives 3 are produced in one step under microwave irradiation using a domestic oven, from anilines and β-ketoester without solvent. Furthermore, Sapkal et al. described a NaHSO4/SiO2-catalyzed solvent-free synthesis of 2-methylquinolin-4(1H)-one derivatives 1 under microwave irradiation [21].

Scheme 1
Scheme 1

2 Experimental

Unless otherwise noted, all commercially available reagents were purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA). Reagents and solvents were purified when necessary according to the usual procedures described in the literature. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker ARX-400 (400 and 100 MHz, respectively). The IR spectra refer to films and were measured on a Bomem M102 spectrometer. Mass spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP5000. Elemental analyses were performed on a Fisons EA 1108 CHNS-O. Analytical thin-layer chromatography was performed on a 0.25 μm film of silica gel containing the fluorescent indicator UV254 supported on an aluminum sheet (Sigma-Aldrich). Flash column chromatography was performed using silica gel (Kieselgel 60, 230–400 mesh, E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Gas chromatography was performed in a Shimadzu GC-17A, with H2 as carrier and using a DB-5 column. Melting points were performed in Microquimica MQAPF – 301. Reactions were irradiated in a focused microwave oven CEM Discover.

3 General procedure

A mixture of aniline (1 eq), ethyl acetoacetate (1 eq), acetic acid (0.01 eq), in diphenyl ether (1 ml) was irradiated with microwave at 300 W in an open flask. The reaction development was carefully accompanied. It was observed that the temperature varied (see Tables 13) for 3–5 min, and then became stable. Then the reaction mixture was allowed to cool, and the resulting precipitate was washed with hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol. The organic phase was concentrated to give the product.

Table 1

Conditions employed in the microwave assisted reactions.

Table 1 Conditions employed in the microwave assisted reactions.
Table 2 

Synthesis of 4-quinolinones.

CompoundR1R2R3R4Temperature (°C)Yield (%)1
1aHHOMeH21075
1bHOMeHOMe20571
1cHOCH2CH2OR2=R3=OCH2CH2OH20562
1dHFHF23025

1Isolated yield after purification by filtration.

Table 3

Synthesis of N,N′-diarylureas.

CompoundR1R2Time (min)Temperature (°C)Yield (%)1
3aHF524082
3bHBr525073
3cHnPr322085
3dHH323576
3eClH525058

1Isolated yield after purification by filtration.

6-methoxy-2-methylquinolin-4(1H)-one (1a) [21]

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 2.33 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 5.87 (s, 1H), 7.25 (dd, 1H, J 2.91, 6.25 Hz), 7.44–7.46 (m, 2H), 11.54 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 19.5, 56.4, 99.3, 100.2, 111.0, 114.9, 126.7, 133.9, 148.5, 157.8, 170.4. IR (νmax,KBr): 520.7, 567.0, 829.3, 1033.7, 1081.9, 1178.4, 1222.7, 1299.9, 1384.7, 1471.5, 1510.1, 1552.5, 1596.9, 1618.1, 2983.6, 2991.3, 3105.1, 3253.6 cm-1.

5,7-dimethoxy-2-methylquinolin-4(1H)-one (1b) [22]

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 2.18 (s, 3H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 5.64 (s, 1H), 6.23 (d, 1H, J 2.08 Hz), 6.42 (d, 1H, J 2.08 Hz), 11.09 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.6, 55.2, 55.5, 91.2, 93.9, 110.2, 112.9, 144.2, 146.5, 160.8, 161.5, 176.6.

6-methyl-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-g]quinolin-8(5H)-one (1c) [23]

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 2.27 (s, 3H), 5.81 (s, 1H), 6.10 (s, 2H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 7.32 (s, 1H), 11.44 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 18.1, 92.7, 98.1, 98.4, 107.0, 124.4, 139.0, 146.6, 150.0, 152.2, 174.6. IR (νmax,KBr): 561.2, 578.6, 829.3, 937.3, 1045.3, 1213.1, 1261.3, 1413.7, 1475.4, 1523.6, 1622.0, 2771.5 cm-1.

5,7-difluoro-2-methylquinolin-4(1H)-one (1d)

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 2.27 (s, 3H), 5.82 (s, 1H), 6.97–7.04 (m, 2H), 11.64 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 19.5, 99.0, 100.1, 105.0, 117.2, 146.3, 147.0, 158.9, 159.4, 161.4, 162.1, 175.2.

1,3-bis(4-fluorophenyl)urea (3a) [24]

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.07–7.13 (m, 4H); 7.41–7.47 (m, 4H) 8.67 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 115.1, 115.3, 119.9, 120.0, 135.9, 152.6, 156.1, 158.5.IR (νmax,KBr): 516.8, 653.8, 831.2, 1211.2, 1512.0, 1573.8, 1631.6, 3292.2 cm-1.

1,3-bis(2-bromophenyl)urea (3b) [25]

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.14–7.31 (m, 6H); 7.83 (t, 2H, J 1.66 Hz); 8.93 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 111.1, 114.9, 124.2, 129.1, 131.2, 142.2, 148.5.IR (νmax,KBr): 522.6, 684.6, 788.8, 1226.6, 1286.4, 1475.4, 1546.8, 1581.5, 1635.5, 3288.3 cm-1.

1,3-bis(4-n-propylphenyl)urea (3c) [26]

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 0.94 (t, 6H, J 7.39 Hz), 1.57 (sex, 4H, J 7.39 Hz), 2.59 (t, 4H, J 7.39 Hz), 7.00 (ddd, 2H, J 1.09, 2.47, 6.43 Hz), 7.12–7.18 (m, 4H), 7.64–7.66 (m, 2H), 8.12 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 13.7, 22.5, 32.8, 123.3, 123.4, 126.0, 129.2, 133.1, 136.7, 153.5.IR (νmax,KBr): 748.3, 1120.5, 1245.9, 1448.4, 1552.5, 1585.3, 1639.3, 2869.8, 2931.5, 2960.5, 3305.7 cm-1.

1,3-diphenylurea (3d) [24]

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.07–7.14 (m, 5H); 7.44–7.49 (m, 5H); 8.69 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 118.2, 120.0, 127.8, 135.9, 152.6.IR (νmax,KBr): 520.7, 613.3, 752.1, 954.6, 1162.9, 1294.1, 1361.6, 1452.2, 1483.1, 1581.5, 1614.3, 1647.0, 3338.5 cm-1.

1,3-bis(3-chlorophenyl)urea (3e)

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.02 (dt, 2H, J 1.67, 7.29 Hz), 7.25–7.32 (m, 4H); 7.69 (t, 2H, J 1.80 Hz); 8.95 (s, 2H). 13C NMR(100 MHz, DMSO-d6): 117.2, 120.6, 121.6, 124.5, 130.6, 133.0, 141.0, 152.1.IV (νmax,KBr): 570.8, 823.5, 1029.9, 1180.3, 1243.9, 1328.8, 1456.1, 1510.1, 1541.0, 1606.5, 1650.9, 1689.5, 3276.8 cm-1.

4 Results and discussion

Based on previous results, we decided to reinvestigate the one-step synthesis of 4-quinolinones from substituted anilines and ethyl acetoacetate, using Ph2O and acetic acid under microwave irradiation. Employing electron donor substituted anilines, 4-quinolones 1 were obtained in good isolated yield after irradiation for 5 min at 205–240°C using 300 W of potency (Table 2). By using, 2,4-difluoraniline, the corresponding 4-quinolinone was obtained in only a 25% yield.

When the reaction of 4-methoxyaniline with ethyl acetoacetate in acetic acid was carried out without solvent, the corresponding 2-quinolinone was obtained in 58% isolated yield, as reported by Nadaraj and Selvi [15].

Surprisingly, with alkyl or electron withdrawing substituents as halogens, N,N′-diarylureas 3 were formed in moderate to good yields (Table 3). Sarveswari and Raja reported the synthesis of N,N′-diarylureas under microwave irradiation, using a domestic microwave oven, in solvent free conditions [27]. The proposed mechanism for the N,N′-diarylureas is the formation of acetoacetanilides as intermediates which react with a second equivalent of aniline, followed by the loss of acetone. Phenyl thiazolylurea derivatives have been reported as inhibitors of murine receptor A and B [28]. Some substituted ureas are used as antidiabetics and tranquilizing drugs, antioxidants in gasoline, corrosion inhibitors and herbicides [29].

5 Conclusion

This study showed that 4-quinolones are produced in one step, under microwave irradiation and with diphenyl ether as solvent, using two different β-ketoesters only, with electron rich anilines. When other anilines were employed, N,N′-diarylureas were obtained in moderate to good yields.


Corresponding author: Arlene G. Corrêa, Chemistry Department, Federal University of São Carlos, 13565–905 São Carlos, SP-Brazil

About the authors

Patricia D. Duarte

Patricia Domingos Duarte received her PhD in Chemistry at the Federal University of São Carlos in 2012 under the supervision of Professor Arlene G. Corrêa, working on the asymmetric synthesis of alkaloids. She is currently a researcher at the USA Pharmacopeia (USP) in Barueri, Brazil.

Marcio W. Paixão

Márcio Weber Paixão was born in Cachoeira do Sul, RS, Brazil, in 1979. He received his BS in chemistry in 2003 from the Federal University of Santa Maria (Brazil). In 2007, he completed his PhD at the same university under the supervision of Professor A.L. Braga, working with catalytic enantioselective synthesis. He immediately started the postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of Professor J.V. Comasseto at the University of São Paulo (Brazil). Following this, he joined the Center for Catalysis (University of Aarhus – DK) where he worked under guidance of Professor Karl Anker Jørgensen. Currently, he has started his independent career at the Federal University of São Carlos (Brazil). His research interests are focused on the development of new methodologies in asymmetric catalysis.

Arlene G. Corrêa

Arlene G. Corrêa received her PhD from the Federal University of São Carlos (1991) and completed her postdoctoral trainings with Professor Paul A. Wender (Stanford University, CA, 1997). She is Associate Professor in the Department of Chemistry at the University Federal of São Carlos. Her research interests are isolation, identification and synthesis of insect pheromones, synthesis of bioactive natural products and analogs employing combinatorial chemistry technologies and green chemistry.

The authors are grateful to CAPES, CNPq and FAPESP for financial support and fellowships.

References

[1] Anquetin G, Greiner J, Vierling P. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 8394–8404.10.1016/j.tet.2005.06.078Search in Google Scholar

[2] Michael JP. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21, 650–668.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ko JS, Rho MC, Chung MY, Song HY, Kang JS, Kim K, Lee HS. Planta Med. 2002, 68, 1131–1133.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lanter JC, Sui ZH, Macielag MJ, Fiordeliso JJ, Jiang W, Qiu Y, Bhattacharjee S, Kraft P, John TM, Johnson-Haynes D, Craig E, Clancy J. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 656–662.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Wube AA, Bucar F, Hochfellner C, Blunder M, Bauer R, Huefner A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 2091–2101.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Sartor CFP, Silva MFGF, Fernandes JB, Vieira PC, Fo-Rodrigues E, Cortez DAG. Phythochemistry 2003, 63, 185–192.10.1016/S0031-9422(03)00006-2Search in Google Scholar

[7] Lavaud C, Massiot G, Vasquez C, Moretti C, Sauvain M, Balderrama L. Phytochemistry 1995, 40, 317–320.10.1016/0031-9422(95)00265-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] Biavatti MW, Vieira PC, Silva MFGF, Fernandes JB, Victor SR, Pagnocca FC, Albuquerque S, Caracelli I, Zukerman-Scheptor J. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2002, 13, 66–70.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Bianciardi P, Fasanella A, Manzillo FV, Pagano TTA, Sorino S, Gradoni L, Oliva G. Parasitol. Res. 2004, 93, 486–492.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mahmoudi N, Ciceron L, Franetich J, Farhati K, Silvie O, Eling W, Sauerwein R, Danis M, Mazier D, Derouin F. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2636–2639.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Anquetin G, Rouquayrol M, Mahmoudi N, Santillana-Hayat M, Gozalbes R, Greiner J, Farhati K, Deroin F, Guedj R, Vierling P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 2773–2776.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Viola G, Facciolo L, Dall’Acqua S, Di Lisa F, Canton M, Vedaldi D, Fravolini A, Tabarrini O, Cechetti V. Toxicol. In Vitro 2004, 18, 581–592.10.1016/j.tiv.2004.01.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Tois J, Vahermo M, Koskinen A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 735–737.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Edmont D, Rocher R, Plisson C, Chenault J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 1831–1834.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Nadaraj V, Selvi T. Indian J. Chem. 2007, 46B, 1203–1207.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gedye R, Smith F, Westaway K, Ali H, Baldisera L, Laberge L, Rousell J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 279–282.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Varma RS. Green Chem. 1999, 1, 43–55.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Varma RS, Saini RK. Synlett 1997, 857–858.10.1055/s-1997-5771Search in Google Scholar

[19] Darque A, Dumètre A, Hutter S, Casano G, Robin M, Pannecouque C, Azas N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 5962–5964.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Marques EF, Bueno MA, Duarte PD, Silva LRSP, Martineli AM, Santos CY, Severino RCP, Brömme D, Vieira PC, Correa AG. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 54, 10–21.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sapkal SB, Shelke KF, Shingate BB, Shingare MS. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 54, 723–726.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Liu G-B, Xu J-L, He C-C, Chen GXQ, Xu H-X, Li J-X. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 5433–5441.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Ward TR, Turunen BJ, Haack T, Neuenswander B, Shadrick W, Georg GI. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6494–6497.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Li X-Q, Wang W-K, Han Y-X, Zhang C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2588–2598.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Clayden J, Lemiègre L, Pickworth M, Jones L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 2908–2913.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Tsuji T. Pharmac. Bull. 1954, 2, 403–411.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Sarveswari S, Raja TK. Indian J. Chem. 2006, 45B, 546–547.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Francisco GD, Li Z, Albright JD, Eudy NH, Katz AH, Petersen PJ, Labthavikul P, Singh G, Yang Y, Rasmussen BA, Lin Y-I, Mansour TS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 235–238.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Bigi F, Maggi R, Sartori G, Zambonin E. Chem. Commun. 1998, 4, 513–514.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2012-11-15
Accepted: 2012-12-11
Published Online: 2013-01-28
Published in Print: 2013-02-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Graphical abstracts
  4. In this Issue
  5. Publisher’s note
  6. Green Processing and Synthesis
  7. Editorial
  8. Scattering of disciplines towards new “composites” and “personalized education”
  9. Guest editorial
  10. 4th International IUPAC Conference on Green Chemistry
  11. Original articles
  12. Chemicals from agricultural biomass: chemoenzymatic approach for production of vinylphenols and polyvinylphenols from phenolic acids
  13. Microwave assisted synthesis of 4-quinolones and N,N′-diarylureas
  14. D-glucose catalytic oxidation over palladium nanoparticles introduced in the hypercrosslinked polystyrene matrix
  15. Joint use of microwave and glycerol-zinc (II) acetate catalytic system in the synthesis of 2-pyridyl-2-oxazolines
  16. Proline derivatives as organocatalysts for the aldol reaction in conventional and non-conventional reaction media
  17. Microwave assisted green synthesis of aryl methoxylated benzamides and 2-oxazolines from biomass
  18. University profile
  19. Tver Technical University
  20. Organization profile
  21. Fraunhofer Institute for Chemical Technology
  22. Network profile
  23. The Eurokin consortium: origin, topics and aims
  24. Conference announcements
  25. 9th European Congress of Chemical Engineering – 2nd European Congress of Applied Biotechnology (World Forum, The Hague, Netherlands, April 21–25, 2013)
  26. 2nd International Symposium on Green Chemistry (ISGC-2): Renewable Carbon and Eco-efficient Processes (May 21–24, 2013, La Rochelle, France)
  27. Green Polymer Chemistry 2013: Farm wars – how sustainable is renewable? (19–21 March 2013, Cologne, Germany)
  28. 2nd Annual International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environmental Sciences (SEES 2013), 25–26 February 2013, Singapore
  29. 8th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, September 22–27, 2013, Dubrovnik, Croatia
  30. Conferences 2013/2014
  31. Book review
  32. Biorefinery: from biomass to chemicals and fuels
Downloaded on 4.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2012-0083/html
Scroll to top button