Skip to main content
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Subjunctions as Discourse Markers? About Appropriate Arguments on the Topic ‘Insubordinate Subordination’

  • EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 13, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The present paper is about types of seeming subordination (i.e. subordination by form), which in fact bears all distributional assets of insubordination. Yet, such insubordinate subordination is characterized by sentential autonomy in terms of illocutive force (i.e., it is not only presupposed as subordinates usually are). It will be shown that a reliable diagnostic is provided by the selection of modal particles in the narrow sense, which German and Dutch excel in. It will be illustrated that even the property of matrix V2 as opposed to subordinate Vfinal, otherwise a reliable diagnostic in German and Dutch, are not sufficient conditions for subordination vs. matrix status, sentential presupposition vs. assertive status, and independent (autonomous) illocutive force vs. dependent (inherited) illocutive force. Modal particles play a major diagnostic role in this categorial dichotomy. It will be argued that since formal subordination is an insufficient condition for the separation of formal and notional independence of sentential autonomy the theory of sentence types will have fundamentally to be modified with the main asset of a thorough notional rather than formal definition of sentential autonomy.

References

Abraham, Werner 1974. Über “Sprecher” und “Hörer” als Kategorien in einem didaktisch orientierten Grammatikprogramm. In: W. Bauer and M. Hartig (eds.) Studien zur generativen Grammatik, 11–32. Frankfurt/M: Athenaion.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner 2003a. ‘Epistemic creationism’: myths vs. profunda facie explanatory irrefutables on modal verbs in German and in general. In: L.-O. Delsing, C. Falk, G. Jossefsson and H.A. Sigurdsson (eds.) Grammatik i focus. Festskrift till Christer Platzack 18 november 2003, Vol. 2, 1–8. Lund: Wallin & Dalholm.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner 2003b. Canonic and non-canonic deliberations about epistemic modality: its emergence out of where? On an extended notion of grammatic(al)ization. Published in Germania et alia. Digital volume dedicated to Hans den Besten. University of Amsterdam December 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner 2012 Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In: Werner Abraham and Elisabeth Leiss (eds.) Modality and theory of mind elements across languages, 67–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110271072.67Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner 2013. Zur grammatischen Grundlegung von Modalität – semantisch-syntaktische Affinitäten zu nominaler Referenz, Aspekt und Quantifikation. In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss (eds.) Funktionen von Modalität, 25–76. [Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen/LIT 55]. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110333091.25Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner 2014. Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials? Studia Linguistica 69(3): 1–41.10.1111/stul.12031Search in Google Scholar

Altmann, Hans 1987. Zur Problematik der Konstitution von Satzmodi als Formtypen. In: Jörg Meibauer (ed.) Satzmodus zwischen Grammatik und Pragmatik, 22–56. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111560588-003Search in Google Scholar

Altmann, Hans 1993. Satzmodus. In: J. Jacobs, A.V. Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.) Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, 1006–1029. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Altmann, Hans 2005. Modalpartikeln und Satzmodus im Nordmittelbairischen. In: U. Kanz and A. Wildfeuer (eds.) Kreuther Kräuterbuschen, 171–191. Regensburg: Edition Vulpes.Search in Google Scholar

Altmann, Hans, Anton Batliner and Wilhelm Oppenrieder (eds.) 1989. Zur Intonation von Modus und Fokus im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. (=Linguistische Arbeiten 234).10.1515/9783111658384Search in Google Scholar

Bayer, J. 2014. Syntactic and phonological properties of wh-operators and wh-movement in Bavarian. In: G. Grewendorf and H. Weiß (eds.) Bavarian Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.220.02baySearch in Google Scholar

Baumann, Stefan 2006: The intonation of givenness – evidence from German. Tübingen: Niemeyer. (=Linguistische Arbeiten 508).10.1515/9783110921205Search in Google Scholar

Beckman, M., M. Díaz-Campos, J. T. McGory and T. A. Morgan 2002. Intonation across Spanish, in the tones and break indices framework. Probus 14: 9–36. doi:10.1515/prbs.2002.008Search in Google Scholar

Bennis, Hans 1998. Exclamatives! In: R. Van and R. Kager (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/avt.15.05benSearch in Google Scholar

Chen, Aoju 2007. Language-specificity in the perception of continuation intonation. In Tones and tunes II: Phonetic and behavioural studies in word and sentence prosody, 107–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Retrieved from http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/faces/viewItemOverviewPage.jsp?itemId=escidoc:5980810.1515/9783110207576.1.107Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2): 239–297.Search in Google Scholar

Delfitto, Denis and Fiorin Gaetano 2014. Exclamatives: Issues of syntax, logical form, and interpretation. LINGUA 52: 1–20.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Delfitto, Dennis 2014. Exclamatives: issues of syntax, logical form and interpretation. LINGUA 152: 1–20.10.1016/j.lingua.2014.09.003Search in Google Scholar

Elvira-García, Wendy 2015. Prosody as a phonological cue for differentiating between elliptical and insubordinated constructions in Spanish. Abstract SLE 2015 Leiden.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In: Irina Nikolaeva (ed.) Finiteness: theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780199213733.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas and Honoré Watanabe 2016. The dynamics of insubordination: An overview. In: N. Evans and H. Watanabe (eds.) Insubordination, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.115Search in Google Scholar

Groenendijk, J. and M. Stockhoff 1984: On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics ! of answers. In: F. Landmann and F. Veltmann (eds.) Varieties of formal semantics, 143–170. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof 1982. Semantic analysis of WH-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 175–233.10.1007/BF00351052Search in Google Scholar

Gunlogson, Christine 2001. True to form: rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz. Printed version 2003: New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203502013Search in Google Scholar

Gussenhoven, Carlos and Aoju Chen 2000. Universal and language specific effects in the perception of question intonation. INTERSPEECH/ICSLP 2000(6): 91–94. Beijing.10.21437/ICSLP.2000-216Search in Google Scholar

Hardt, Daniel 2013. A uniform syntax and discourse structure: the copenhagen dependency treebanks. Dialogue and Discourse 4(2): 53–64 doi:10.5087/dad.2013.203Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd 2016. On discourse markers and the limits of grammaticalization. Talk at Symposium “Grammatikalisierung in interdisziplinärer Perspektive” Universität München, 6–8 Juli.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck and Tania Kuteva 2016. On insubordination and cooptation. In: N. Evans and H. Watanabe (eds.) Insubordination, 39–64. [Typological Studies in Language 115]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.115.02heiSearch in Google Scholar

Higginbotham, James 1996: The semantics of questions. In S. Lappin (ed.) The handbook ! of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Sebastian 2014. Interpretation selbständiger Sätze im Diskurs. Syntax und Intonation in Interaktion. Frankfurt, a.M.: Peter Lang Verlag.10.3726/978-3-653-04002-9Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Sebastian and S. Baumann 2013. Satzmodus und die Diskurspartikel: Intonation und Interpretation. Linguistische Berichte 236: 473–496.10.46771/2366077500236_5Search in Google Scholar

Kaiser, Sebastian and Volker Struckmeier 2015. When insubordination is an artefact (of sentence type theories). Talk and Handout SLE-Leiden 2015.Search in Google Scholar

Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 852–897.10.1075/sl.35.4.03kalSearch in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred 2010. How to interpret ‘expletive’ negation under bevor in German. In: T. Hanneforth and G. Fanselow (eds.) Language and logos: Studies in theoretical and computational linguistics, 214–236. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050062365.214Search in Google Scholar

Lohnstein, Horst 2000. Satzmodus – kompositionell. Zur Parametrisierung der Modusphrase ! im Deutschen. Berlin, NY: Akademie Verlag. (=studia grammatica 49).10.1515/9783050079196Search in Google Scholar

Lohnstein, Horst 2007. On clause types and sentential force. Linguistische Berichte 209: 63–86.10.46771/2366077500209_4Search in Google Scholar

Meibauer, Jörg, Markus Steinbach and Hans Altmann (eds.) 2013. Satztypen des Deutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110224832Search in Google Scholar

Peters, J. 2006. Intonation. In: Duden. Die Grammatik, Bd. 4, 7, 95–128 Völlig neu erarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Postma, Gertjan 1996. The nature of quantification of high-degree: ‘very’, ‘many’, and the exclamative. Linguistics in the Netherland 1996: 209–220.10.1075/avt.13.20posSearch in Google Scholar

Reis, Marga 2000: Anmerkungen zu Verb-erst-Satz-Typen im Deutschen. In: R. Thieroff (eds.) Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis, 215–227. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi:10.1007/s11049-004-0766-5Search in Google Scholar

Reis, Marga 2005. On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German: A reply to Büring & Hartmann 2001. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23: 459–483. doi:10.1007/s11049-004-0766-5Search in Google Scholar

Reis, Marga and Angelika Wöllstein 2010: Zur Grammatik (vor allem) konditionaler V1-Gefüge im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 111–179.10.1515/zfsw.2010.004Search in Google Scholar

Rett, Jessica and Sarah E. Murray 2013. A semantic account of mirative evidentials. Proceedings of SALT 23: 453–472.10.3765/salt.v23i0.2687Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi 2014. Syntactic cartography and the syntacticization of scope-discourse semantics. In: Anne Reboul (ed.) Mind, values, and metaphysics, 517–533. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-05146-8_30Search in Google Scholar

Struckmeier, Volker 2014. Ja doch wohl C. Modal particles in German as C-related elements. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 16–48.10.1111/stul.12019Search in Google Scholar

Thurmair, Maria 2013. Satztyp und Modalpartikeln. In: Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach and Hans Altmann (eds.) Satztypen des Deutschen, 627–651. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110224832.627Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert 2004a. Zur Strukturbedeutung von Interrogativsätzen. Linguistische Berichte 199: 313–350.10.46771/9783967696974_3Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert 2004b. Sentence type meanings. Ms., University of Tübingen.Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert 2013a. An analysis of prosodic F-effects in interrogatives: prosody, syntax and semantics. Lingua 124: 131–175.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Truckenbrodt, Hubert 2013b. Selbständige Verb-Letzt-Sätze. In Jörg Meibauer, Markus Steinbach and Hans Altmann (eds.) Satztypen des Deutschen, 232–246. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110224832.232Search in Google Scholar

Verstraete, Jean Christoph and Sarah D’Hertenfelt 2016. Running in the family: Patterns of complement insubordination in Germanic. In: N. Evans and H. Watanabe (eds.) Insubordination, 65–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.115.03verSearch in Google Scholar

Weiß, Helmut 1998. Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer (Linguistische Arbeiten. 391).10.1515/9783110912487Search in Google Scholar


Notes

I have profited from critical remarks extended by Nick Evans on a draft version of this. The lively discussions during the Workshop on ‘insubordinate subordination’ at the Annual Conference of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE) 2015 in Leiden have sharpened my own insights and lines of argumentation.


Published Online: 2017-9-13
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 17.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/glot-2017-0001/html
Scroll to top button