Home The Interpretation Matter in Smart (Legal) Contracts: Possible Answers from a Comparative Perspective
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Interpretation Matter in Smart (Legal) Contracts: Possible Answers from a Comparative Perspective

  • Francesco Petrosino EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 22, 2023

Abstract

The present article is grounded in the following inquiry: are the rules concerning contractual interpretation provided by codified regulations or developed by jurisprudence for private law contracts also applicable to smart legal contracts? This question will be addressed through the utilization of a comparative research methodology, taking into account the trends embraced by scholars as well as by courts in both common law and civil law systems. In conclusion, and based on these methodological premises, various solutions present themselves to the interpreter, including the non-complete exclusion of the non-complete exclusion of the interpretative model based on the so-called contextualist theory. A similar theoretical approach would allow for an efficient synthesis between the more ambiguous legal expressions and the use of technological language.


Corresponding author: Francesco Petrosino, Law Department, Università di Trento, Via G. Verdi 53, 38122 Trento, Italy, E-mail:

Funding source: University of Trento

Award Identifier / Grant number: 4065002

  1. Research funding: This study was funded by University of Trento (Grant No. 4065002).

References

Barnhizer, D. D. 2010. “Context as a Power: Defining the Field of Battle for Advantage in Contractual Interactions.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 607–40.Search in Google Scholar

Bix, B. 2012. Contract Law. Rules, Theory and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139024877Search in Google Scholar

Bridge, M. 2010. “Avoidance for Fundamental Breach of Contract Under the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59 (4): 911–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589310000473.Search in Google Scholar

Bridgeman, C. 2008. “Why Contracts Scholars Should Read Legal Philosophy: Positivism, Formalism and the Specification of Rules in Contract Law.” Cardozo Law Review 29 (4): 1443–86.Search in Google Scholar

Cannarsa, M. 2019. “Interpretation of Smart Contracts and Smart Contracts: Smart Interpretation or Interpretation of Smart Contracts?” European Review of Private Law 26 (6): 773–85. https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2018054.Search in Google Scholar

Cannarsa, M. 2020. “Contract Interpretation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms, edited by L. Di Matteo, M. Cannarsa, and C. Poncibò, 102–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108592239.006Search in Google Scholar

Carron, B., and V. Botteron. 2019. “How Smart Can a Contract Be?” In Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Law, edited by D. Kraus, T. Obrist, and O. Hari, 101–42. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781788115131.00011Search in Google Scholar

Catchlove, P. 2017. “Smart Contracts: A New Era of Contract Use.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=3090226 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3090226 (accessed September 1, 2023).Search in Google Scholar

Cieplak, J., and S. Leefatt. 2017. “Smart Contracts: A Smart Way to Automate Performance.” Georgetown Law Technology Review 1 (2): 273–508.Search in Google Scholar

Collins, H. 1994. “Good Faith in European Contract Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 14 (2): 229–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/14.2.229.Search in Google Scholar

Corbin, L. 1944. “The Parol Evidence Rule.” Yale Law Review 53 (4): 603–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/792866.Search in Google Scholar

Corbin, L. 1952. Corbin on Contracts. One Volume Edition. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Crowe, J. 2019. Natural Law and the Nature of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108653237Search in Google Scholar

De Caria, R. 2020. “Definitions of Smart Contracts.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms, edited by L. Di Matteo, M. Cannarsa, and C. Poncibò, 19–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108592239.002Search in Google Scholar

De Filippo, P., and A. Wright. 2018. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674985933Search in Google Scholar

Di Matteo, L. 1998. Contract Theory: The Evolution of Contract Intent. East Lensing: Michigan State University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Di Matteo, L. 2004. “Reason and Context: A Dual Track Theory of Interpretation.” Penn State Law Review 109 (2): 397–486.Search in Google Scholar

Di Matteo, L., M. Infantino, J. Wang, and P. Monaco. 2021. “Once More Onto the Breach: A Comparative Analysis of the Meaning of Breach in Contractual Law.” Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1): 35–91.Search in Google Scholar

Di Matteo, L., and B. D. Morant. 2010. “Contract in Context and Contract as Context.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 549–78.Search in Google Scholar

Djurovič, M. 2019. “The Enforceability of Smart Contracts.” Italian Law Journal 5 (2): 493–511.Search in Google Scholar

Eberle, E. J. 2009. “The Method and Role of Comparative Law.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 8 (3): 451–86.Search in Google Scholar

Farnsworth, E. A. 1984. “On Trying to Keep One’s Promises: The Duty of Best Efforts in Contract Law.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 46 (7): 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Farnsworth, E. A., ed. 2004. Farnsworth on Contracts. Aspen: Aspen Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J., C. F. Sabel, and R. Scott. 2014. “Text and Context: Contract Interpretation as Contract Design.” Cornell Law Review 100 (1): 23–98.10.2139/ssrn.2394311Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, V. 2000. “In Search of Best Efforts: Reinterpretating Bloor v. Falstaff.” St. Louis Law Journal 44 (4): 1465–86.Search in Google Scholar

Greenwalt, K. 2005. “A Pluralist Approach to Interpretation: Wills and Contracts.” San Diego Law Review 42 (2): 533–606.Search in Google Scholar

Grundmann, S. 2006. “The General Clause or Standard in EC Contract.” In General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law, edited by S. Grundmann, and D. Mazeaud, 141–61. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar

Grundmann, S., and P. Hacker. 2017. “Digital Technology as a Challenge to European Contract Law.” European Review of Contract Law 13 (3): 255–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2017-0012.Search in Google Scholar

Hesselink, M. W. 2011. “The Concept of Good Faith.” In Towards a European Civil Code, edited by A. Hartkamp, M. Hesselink, E. Hondius, C. Mak, and E. du Perron, 619–49. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar

Hillman, R. A. 2010. “Contract Law in Context: The Case of Software Contracts.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 669–88.Search in Google Scholar

Janssen, U., and F. P. Patti. 2020. “Demistificare Gli Smart Contracts.” Osservatorio del dritto civile e commerciale 1: 31–50.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, N. S. 2010. “Reasonable Expectations in Sociocultural Context.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 641–68.Search in Google Scholar

Kolvart, M., M. Poola, and A. Rull. 2016. “Smart Contracts.” In The Future of Law and eTechnologies, edited by T. Kerikmäe, and A. Rull, 133–47. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_7Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Q. 2019. “Termination of Contract for Fundamental Breach.” In Research Handbooks on Remedies in Private Law, edited by R. Halson, and D. Campbell, 166–81. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781786431271.00019Search in Google Scholar

Lurger, B. 2011. “The “Social” Side of Contract Law and the New Principle of Regard and Fairness.” In Towards a European Civil Code, edited by A. Hartkamp, M. Hesselink, E. Hondius, C. Mak, and E. du Perron, 353–84. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar

Mann, R. J. 2004. “Contracts – Only With Consent.” The University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (6): 1873–902. https://doi.org/10.2307/3313071.Search in Google Scholar

McKinney, S. A., R. Landy, and R. Wilka. 2018. “Smart Contracts, Blockchain and the Next Frontier of Transactional Law.” Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts 13 (3): 313.Search in Google Scholar

Mik, E. 2017. “Smart Contracts: Terminology, Technical Limitations and Real World Complexity.” Law, Innovation and Technology 9 (2): 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1378468.Search in Google Scholar

Mik, E. 2019. “Smart Contracts: A Requiem.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3499998 (accessed September 1, 2023).10.2139/ssrn.3499998Search in Google Scholar

Mik, E. 2020. “The Resilience of Contract Law in Light of Technological Change.” In The Future of the Law of Contract, edited by M. Furmston, 112–41. Abingdon-New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429056550-7Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Z. 2006. “Best Efforts?: Difference Judicial Interpretation of a Familiar Term.” Arizona Law Review 48 (3): 615–38.Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, C. 2019. Interpretation of Contracts. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315761701Search in Google Scholar

Molot, J. T. 2006. “The Rise and Fall of Textualism.” Columbia Law Review 106 (1): 1–69.Search in Google Scholar

Morant, B. D. 1998. “Law, Literature, and Contract: An Essay in Realism.” Michigan Journal of Race & Law 4 (1): 1–38.Search in Google Scholar

Morant, B. D. 2006. “The Salience of Power in the Regulation of Bargains: Procedural Unconoscionability and the Importance of Context.” Michigan State Law Review 2006 (4): 925–62.Search in Google Scholar

Paech, P. 2017. “The Governance of Blockchain Financial Networks.” Modern Law Review 80 (6): 1073–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12303.Search in Google Scholar

Park, R. 2006. “Putting the “Best” in Best Efforts.” University of Chicago Law Review 73 (1): 705–29.Search in Google Scholar

Patterson, E. W. 1964. “The Interpretation and Construction of Contracts.” Columbia Law Review 64 (5): 833–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1120825.Search in Google Scholar

Pavillon, C. 2014. “Private Standards of Fairness in European Contract Law.” European Review of Contract Law 1 (10): 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2014-0003.Search in Google Scholar

Perillo, J. M., and J. D. Calamari, eds. 2009. Calamari and Perillo on Contracts. Toronto: Thomson Reuters.Search in Google Scholar

Rakoff, T.D. 1995. “The Implied Terms of Contracts: Of “Default”. Rules and “Situation Sense”.” In Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law, edited by J. Beatson, and D. Friedmann, 191–228. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265788.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Rüfner, T. 2018. “Art. 8:103 Fundamental Non-Performance.” In Commentaries on European Contract Law, edited by N. Jansen, and R. Zimmermann, 1074–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, R. E. 2013. “Text Versus Context. The Failure of the Unitary Law of Contract Interpretation.” In The American Illness: Essays on the Rule of Law, edited by F. H. Buckley, 312–35. New Heaven-London: Yale University Press.10.12987/9780300195071-016Search in Google Scholar

Sklaroff, J. M. 2017. “Smart Contracts and the Cost of Inflexibility.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 166 (1): 263–303.Search in Google Scholar

Stempel, J. W. 2021. “What is the Meaning of “Plain Meaning”.” Tort & Trial Practice Law Journal 56 (3): 552–620.Search in Google Scholar

Summers, R. S., and M. Taruffo. 1991. “Interpretation and Comparative Analysis.” In Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study, edited by D. N. MacCornick, and R. S Summers, 461–510. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Szabo, N. 1994. “Smart Contracts.” http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl.Search in Google Scholar

Tai, E. T. T. 2019. “Force Majeure and Excuses in Smart Contracts.” European Review of Private Law 6 (26): 787–804.10.54648/ERPL2018055Search in Google Scholar

Tan, Z. X. 2016. “Beyond the Real and the Paper Deal: The Quest for Contextual Coherence in Contractual Intepretation.” Modern Law Review 79 (4): 623–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12203.Search in Google Scholar

Thayer, J. B. 1893. “The “Parole Evidence” Rule.” Harvard Law Review 6 (7): 325–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321619.Search in Google Scholar

Vogenauer, S. 2018. “Interpretation.” In Commentaries on European Contract Law, edited by N. Jansen, and R. Zimmermann, 740–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Werbach, K., and N. Cornell. 2017. “Contracts Ex Machina.” Duke Law Journal 67 (2): 313–82.Search in Google Scholar

Willet, C. 1996. Aspect of Fairness in Contract. London: Blackstone.Search in Google Scholar

Willet, C. 2007. Fairness in Consumer Contracts: The Case of Unfair Terms. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Witthaker, S., and R. Zimmermann. 2000. “Good Faith in European Contract Law: Surveying the Legal Landscape.” In Good Faith in European Contract Law, edited by S. Witthaker, and R. Zimmermann, 7–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zweigert, H., and K. Kötz. 1998. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-09-17
Accepted: 2023-11-05
Published Online: 2023-11-22

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gj-2023-0118/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button