Abstract
The present article is grounded in the following inquiry: are the rules concerning contractual interpretation provided by codified regulations or developed by jurisprudence for private law contracts also applicable to smart legal contracts? This question will be addressed through the utilization of a comparative research methodology, taking into account the trends embraced by scholars as well as by courts in both common law and civil law systems. In conclusion, and based on these methodological premises, various solutions present themselves to the interpreter, including the non-complete exclusion of the non-complete exclusion of the interpretative model based on the so-called contextualist theory. A similar theoretical approach would allow for an efficient synthesis between the more ambiguous legal expressions and the use of technological language.
Funding source: University of Trento
Award Identifier / Grant number: 4065002
-
Research funding: This study was funded by University of Trento (Grant No. 4065002).
References
Barnhizer, D. D. 2010. “Context as a Power: Defining the Field of Battle for Advantage in Contractual Interactions.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 607–40.Search in Google Scholar
Bix, B. 2012. Contract Law. Rules, Theory and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139024877Search in Google Scholar
Bridge, M. 2010. “Avoidance for Fundamental Breach of Contract Under the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59 (4): 911–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589310000473.Search in Google Scholar
Bridgeman, C. 2008. “Why Contracts Scholars Should Read Legal Philosophy: Positivism, Formalism and the Specification of Rules in Contract Law.” Cardozo Law Review 29 (4): 1443–86.Search in Google Scholar
Cannarsa, M. 2019. “Interpretation of Smart Contracts and Smart Contracts: Smart Interpretation or Interpretation of Smart Contracts?” European Review of Private Law 26 (6): 773–85. https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2018054.Search in Google Scholar
Cannarsa, M. 2020. “Contract Interpretation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms, edited by L. Di Matteo, M. Cannarsa, and C. Poncibò, 102–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108592239.006Search in Google Scholar
Carron, B., and V. Botteron. 2019. “How Smart Can a Contract Be?” In Blockchains, Smart Contracts, Decentralised Autonomous Organisations and the Law, edited by D. Kraus, T. Obrist, and O. Hari, 101–42. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781788115131.00011Search in Google Scholar
Catchlove, P. 2017. “Smart Contracts: A New Era of Contract Use.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=3090226 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3090226 (accessed September 1, 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Cieplak, J., and S. Leefatt. 2017. “Smart Contracts: A Smart Way to Automate Performance.” Georgetown Law Technology Review 1 (2): 273–508.Search in Google Scholar
Collins, H. 1994. “Good Faith in European Contract Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 14 (2): 229–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/14.2.229.Search in Google Scholar
Corbin, L. 1944. “The Parol Evidence Rule.” Yale Law Review 53 (4): 603–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/792866.Search in Google Scholar
Corbin, L. 1952. Corbin on Contracts. One Volume Edition. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar
Crowe, J. 2019. Natural Law and the Nature of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108653237Search in Google Scholar
De Caria, R. 2020. “Definitions of Smart Contracts.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms, edited by L. Di Matteo, M. Cannarsa, and C. Poncibò, 19–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108592239.002Search in Google Scholar
De Filippo, P., and A. Wright. 2018. Blockchain and the Law: The Rule of Code. Harvard: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674985933Search in Google Scholar
Di Matteo, L. 1998. Contract Theory: The Evolution of Contract Intent. East Lensing: Michigan State University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Di Matteo, L. 2004. “Reason and Context: A Dual Track Theory of Interpretation.” Penn State Law Review 109 (2): 397–486.Search in Google Scholar
Di Matteo, L., M. Infantino, J. Wang, and P. Monaco. 2021. “Once More Onto the Breach: A Comparative Analysis of the Meaning of Breach in Contractual Law.” Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems 31 (1): 35–91.Search in Google Scholar
Di Matteo, L., and B. D. Morant. 2010. “Contract in Context and Contract as Context.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 549–78.Search in Google Scholar
Djurovič, M. 2019. “The Enforceability of Smart Contracts.” Italian Law Journal 5 (2): 493–511.Search in Google Scholar
Eberle, E. J. 2009. “The Method and Role of Comparative Law.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 8 (3): 451–86.Search in Google Scholar
Farnsworth, E. A. 1984. “On Trying to Keep One’s Promises: The Duty of Best Efforts in Contract Law.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 46 (7): 1–20.Search in Google Scholar
Farnsworth, E. A., ed. 2004. Farnsworth on Contracts. Aspen: Aspen Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J., C. F. Sabel, and R. Scott. 2014. “Text and Context: Contract Interpretation as Contract Design.” Cornell Law Review 100 (1): 23–98.10.2139/ssrn.2394311Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, V. 2000. “In Search of Best Efforts: Reinterpretating Bloor v. Falstaff.” St. Louis Law Journal 44 (4): 1465–86.Search in Google Scholar
Greenwalt, K. 2005. “A Pluralist Approach to Interpretation: Wills and Contracts.” San Diego Law Review 42 (2): 533–606.Search in Google Scholar
Grundmann, S. 2006. “The General Clause or Standard in EC Contract.” In General Clauses and Standards in European Contract Law, edited by S. Grundmann, and D. Mazeaud, 141–61. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar
Grundmann, S., and P. Hacker. 2017. “Digital Technology as a Challenge to European Contract Law.” European Review of Contract Law 13 (3): 255–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2017-0012.Search in Google Scholar
Hesselink, M. W. 2011. “The Concept of Good Faith.” In Towards a European Civil Code, edited by A. Hartkamp, M. Hesselink, E. Hondius, C. Mak, and E. du Perron, 619–49. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar
Hillman, R. A. 2010. “Contract Law in Context: The Case of Software Contracts.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 669–88.Search in Google Scholar
Janssen, U., and F. P. Patti. 2020. “Demistificare Gli Smart Contracts.” Osservatorio del dritto civile e commerciale 1: 31–50.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, N. S. 2010. “Reasonable Expectations in Sociocultural Context.” Wake Forest Law Review 45 (3): 641–68.Search in Google Scholar
Kolvart, M., M. Poola, and A. Rull. 2016. “Smart Contracts.” In The Future of Law and eTechnologies, edited by T. Kerikmäe, and A. Rull, 133–47. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_7Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Q. 2019. “Termination of Contract for Fundamental Breach.” In Research Handbooks on Remedies in Private Law, edited by R. Halson, and D. Campbell, 166–81. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781786431271.00019Search in Google Scholar
Lurger, B. 2011. “The “Social” Side of Contract Law and the New Principle of Regard and Fairness.” In Towards a European Civil Code, edited by A. Hartkamp, M. Hesselink, E. Hondius, C. Mak, and E. du Perron, 353–84. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar
Mann, R. J. 2004. “Contracts – Only With Consent.” The University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (6): 1873–902. https://doi.org/10.2307/3313071.Search in Google Scholar
McKinney, S. A., R. Landy, and R. Wilka. 2018. “Smart Contracts, Blockchain and the Next Frontier of Transactional Law.” Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts 13 (3): 313.Search in Google Scholar
Mik, E. 2017. “Smart Contracts: Terminology, Technical Limitations and Real World Complexity.” Law, Innovation and Technology 9 (2): 269–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1378468.Search in Google Scholar
Mik, E. 2019. “Smart Contracts: A Requiem.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3499998 (accessed September 1, 2023).10.2139/ssrn.3499998Search in Google Scholar
Mik, E. 2020. “The Resilience of Contract Law in Light of Technological Change.” In The Future of the Law of Contract, edited by M. Furmston, 112–41. Abingdon-New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429056550-7Search in Google Scholar
Miller, Z. 2006. “Best Efforts?: Difference Judicial Interpretation of a Familiar Term.” Arizona Law Review 48 (3): 615–38.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, C. 2019. Interpretation of Contracts. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315761701Search in Google Scholar
Molot, J. T. 2006. “The Rise and Fall of Textualism.” Columbia Law Review 106 (1): 1–69.Search in Google Scholar
Morant, B. D. 1998. “Law, Literature, and Contract: An Essay in Realism.” Michigan Journal of Race & Law 4 (1): 1–38.Search in Google Scholar
Morant, B. D. 2006. “The Salience of Power in the Regulation of Bargains: Procedural Unconoscionability and the Importance of Context.” Michigan State Law Review 2006 (4): 925–62.Search in Google Scholar
Paech, P. 2017. “The Governance of Blockchain Financial Networks.” Modern Law Review 80 (6): 1073–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12303.Search in Google Scholar
Park, R. 2006. “Putting the “Best” in Best Efforts.” University of Chicago Law Review 73 (1): 705–29.Search in Google Scholar
Patterson, E. W. 1964. “The Interpretation and Construction of Contracts.” Columbia Law Review 64 (5): 833–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1120825.Search in Google Scholar
Pavillon, C. 2014. “Private Standards of Fairness in European Contract Law.” European Review of Contract Law 1 (10): 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2014-0003.Search in Google Scholar
Perillo, J. M., and J. D. Calamari, eds. 2009. Calamari and Perillo on Contracts. Toronto: Thomson Reuters.Search in Google Scholar
Rakoff, T.D. 1995. “The Implied Terms of Contracts: Of “Default”. Rules and “Situation Sense”.” In Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law, edited by J. Beatson, and D. Friedmann, 191–228. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198265788.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Rüfner, T. 2018. “Art. 8:103 Fundamental Non-Performance.” In Commentaries on European Contract Law, edited by N. Jansen, and R. Zimmermann, 1074–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Scott, R. E. 2013. “Text Versus Context. The Failure of the Unitary Law of Contract Interpretation.” In The American Illness: Essays on the Rule of Law, edited by F. H. Buckley, 312–35. New Heaven-London: Yale University Press.10.12987/9780300195071-016Search in Google Scholar
Sklaroff, J. M. 2017. “Smart Contracts and the Cost of Inflexibility.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 166 (1): 263–303.Search in Google Scholar
Stempel, J. W. 2021. “What is the Meaning of “Plain Meaning”.” Tort & Trial Practice Law Journal 56 (3): 552–620.Search in Google Scholar
Summers, R. S., and M. Taruffo. 1991. “Interpretation and Comparative Analysis.” In Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study, edited by D. N. MacCornick, and R. S Summers, 461–510. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Szabo, N. 1994. “Smart Contracts.” http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl.Search in Google Scholar
Tai, E. T. T. 2019. “Force Majeure and Excuses in Smart Contracts.” European Review of Private Law 6 (26): 787–804.10.54648/ERPL2018055Search in Google Scholar
Tan, Z. X. 2016. “Beyond the Real and the Paper Deal: The Quest for Contextual Coherence in Contractual Intepretation.” Modern Law Review 79 (4): 623–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12203.Search in Google Scholar
Thayer, J. B. 1893. “The “Parole Evidence” Rule.” Harvard Law Review 6 (7): 325–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1321619.Search in Google Scholar
Vogenauer, S. 2018. “Interpretation.” In Commentaries on European Contract Law, edited by N. Jansen, and R. Zimmermann, 740–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Werbach, K., and N. Cornell. 2017. “Contracts Ex Machina.” Duke Law Journal 67 (2): 313–82.Search in Google Scholar
Willet, C. 1996. Aspect of Fairness in Contract. London: Blackstone.Search in Google Scholar
Willet, C. 2007. Fairness in Consumer Contracts: The Case of Unfair Terms. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Witthaker, S., and R. Zimmermann. 2000. “Good Faith in European Contract Law: Surveying the Legal Landscape.” In Good Faith in European Contract Law, edited by S. Witthaker, and R. Zimmermann, 7–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Zweigert, H., and K. Kötz. 1998. An Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Comparative Law and Methodology Between Homogeneity and Complexity
- Research Articles
- Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm
- The Interpretation Matter in Smart (Legal) Contracts: Possible Answers from a Comparative Perspective
- Methodological Paradigms in Representing African Law: The Stratigraphic Approach and the Notion of Legal Pluralism
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Comparative Law and Methodology Between Homogeneity and Complexity
- Research Articles
- Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm
- The Interpretation Matter in Smart (Legal) Contracts: Possible Answers from a Comparative Perspective
- Methodological Paradigms in Representing African Law: The Stratigraphic Approach and the Notion of Legal Pluralism
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats