Abstract
The contribution deals with the representation of African law in comparative legal literature. It aims at moving forward from an understanding of African legal systems as bounded entities, frequently dubbed “pluralistic” but too often described as derivative from western law, that is the law of the former colonial powers. The paper reacts to common representations of African law based on the “stratigraphic approach” and on the notion of legal pluralism. While remaining a valuable tool for the study of African legal systems in a structuralist fashion, the stratigraphic approach ultimately fails to capture the more dynamic dimension of legal relations and the agency of legal subjects better conveyed by the notion of legal pluralism. The notion of legal pluralism, in turn, points at the existence of plural normative orders in all legal systems, therefore it seems to have lost its specificity to post-colonial African societies. Moreover, research on legal pluralism has become progressively dominated by academic lawyers adopting a normative and theoretical approach with little regard for empirical observation of law in society.
Funding source: Università degli Studi di Trento
Award Identifier / Grant number: 4065002
Funding source: University of Trento
Award Identifier / Grant number: 4065002
-
Research funding: This study was funded by University of Trento (Grant No. 4065002).
References
Banda, Tinenenji 2015. “Sub-Saharan African Legal Traditions.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by James D. Wright, 654–9. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86140-1Search in Google Scholar
Chanock, Martin 1985. Law, Custom, and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. African Studies Series, Vol. 45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Günter 2019. Comparative Law as Critique. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Fuller, Chris 1994. “Legal Anthropology: Legal Pluralism and Legal Thought.” Anthropology Today 10 (3): 9–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/2783478.Search in Google Scholar
Graziadei, Michele 2022. “Rodolfo Sacco: An Intellectual Portrait in Memoriam of Rodolfo Sacco.” Italian Law Journal 8 (1): 11–20.Search in Google Scholar
Graziadei, Michele 2003. “The Functionalist Heritage.” In Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, edited by Pierre Legrand, and Roderick Munday, 100–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511522260.005Search in Google Scholar
Griffiths, J. 2001. “Legal Pluralism.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser, and Paul B. Baltes, 8650–4. Oxford: Pergamon.10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02785-6Search in Google Scholar
Griffiths, John 1986. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18 (24): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387.Search in Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. and T. O. Ranger, eds. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Past and Present Publications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kischel, Uwe. 2019. Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198791355.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 1988. “Legal Pluralism.” Law & Society Review 22 (5): 869–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053638.Search in Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk, ed. 2005. Law and Anthropology: A Reader. Malden: Blackwell Pub.Search in Google Scholar
Mundy, Martha, ed. 2002. Law and Anthropology. Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 2015. What the Rest Think of the West: Since 600 AD. Oakland: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar
Poggeschi, Giovanni 2018. “Il Rapporto Fra Lingua e Diritto Nel Prisma Della Comparazione Fra Linguistica e Teoria Del Diritto.” In Diritto: Storia e Comparazione. Nuovi Propositi per Un Binomio Antico, edited by Alessandro Somma, and Massimo Brutti, 419–55. Frankfurt: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History Open Access Publication. https://doi.org/10.12946/gplh11.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo 1989. “Di Alcune Singolari Convergenze Fra Il Diritto Sncestrale Dei Berberi e Quello Dei Somali.” Africa: Rivista Trimestrale Di Studi e Documentazione Dell’istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente 44 (3): 341–68.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo. 1995. Il diritto africano. Trattato di diritto comparato. Torino: UTET.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo. 1973. Introduzione al Diritto Privato Somalo: Un Paese Africano Inizia L’edificazione Del Socialismo. Torino: Giappichelli.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo 1985. Le grandi linee del sistema giuridico somalo. Milan: Giuffrè.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo 1991a. “Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment I of II).” American Journal of Comparative Law 39 (1): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/840669.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo 1991b. “Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment II of II).” American Journal of Comparative Law 39 (2): 343–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/840784.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo 1988. “The Romanist Substratum in the Civil Law of the Socialist Countries.” Review of Socialist Law 14 (1): 65–86; https://doi.org/10.1163/187529888x00059.Search in Google Scholar
Sacco, Rodolfo, and Gabriele Crespi Reghizzi 1979. “Le Invalidità Del Negozio Giuridico Nel Diritto Sovietico.” Rivista di Diritto Civile I: 179.Search in Google Scholar
Snyder, Francis. 1999. “Governing Economic Globalisation: Global Legal Pluralism and European Law.” European Law Journal 5 (4): 334–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00087.Search in Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther 1997. “Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World-Society’. In Global Law without a State, edited by Gunther Teubner, 3–28. Dartmouth: Brookfield.Search in Google Scholar
Woodman, Gordon R. 2015. “African Legal Systems.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., 272–75, edited by James D. Wright. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10111-4Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Comparative Law and Methodology Between Homogeneity and Complexity
- Research Articles
- Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm
- The Interpretation Matter in Smart (Legal) Contracts: Possible Answers from a Comparative Perspective
- Methodological Paradigms in Representing African Law: The Stratigraphic Approach and the Notion of Legal Pluralism
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Comparative Law and Methodology Between Homogeneity and Complexity
- Research Articles
- Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm
- The Interpretation Matter in Smart (Legal) Contracts: Possible Answers from a Comparative Perspective
- Methodological Paradigms in Representing African Law: The Stratigraphic Approach and the Notion of Legal Pluralism
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats
- Private Property and the Commons: The Case Study of Water Distribution in Persian Qanats