Choosing among the Shades of Nuance: The Discourse of Proportionality in International Law

References

Aleinikoff,T. Alexander.1986–1987. Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing. Yale Law Journal96:943–1005.10.2307/796529Suche in Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka. 2002. The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR. Antwerp, New York: Intersentia.Suche in Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, Gaetano. 1991. International Law Commission, Third Report on State Responsibility, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/440 and Add. 1.Suche in Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon.2008. Text of a Debate Held December 18th, 2007 under the Auspices of the Jim Shasha Center for Strategic Studies of the Federmann School for Public Policy and Government of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In Can Democracy Overcome Terror?: Democracy Fights Terror with One Hand Tied behind Its Back: Why, When and How – Must This Hand Be Untied.Suche in Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon.2012. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139035293Suche in Google Scholar

Best, Geoffrey.1994. War and Law Since 1945. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brownlie, Ian.1963. International Law and the Use of Force by States. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198251583.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo.2000. Il Principio della Proporzionalità nell’ordinamento Internazionale. Milano: A. Giuffrè.Suche in Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo.2014. Proportionality in the Law of Armed Conflict. In The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Armed Conflict, edited by Andrew Clapham and Paola Gaeta, assistant editors, Tom Haeck and Alice Priddy, 332–352. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/law/9780199559695.003.0013Suche in Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas.2009. Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.10.1163/ej.9789004170285.i-670Suche in Google Scholar

Crawford, Emily.2011. Proportionality. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1459.10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e1459Suche in Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald.1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Falk, Richard.1970. The Status of Law in International Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M.2008. On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law. American Journal of International Law102:715–767.10.2307/20456680Suche in Google Scholar

Gardam, Judith.2004. Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by States. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511494178Suche in Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Higgins, Rosalyn.1994. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jütersonke, Oliver. 2010. Morgenthau, Law and Realism. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511780011Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. [1928] 1945. Natural Law Doctrine and Legal Positivism. In General Theory of Law and State, translated by Anders Wedberg, Wolfgang Herbert Kraus, 390–446. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. [1934] 1992. Introduction to Problems of Legal Theory. A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, David.1987. International Legal Structures. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, David.2006. The “Rule of Law,” Political Choices, and Development Common Sense. In The New Law and Development: A Critical Appraisal, edited by David M.Trubek and AlvaroSantos, 95–173. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754425.004Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan.1994. A Semiotics of Legal Argument, reprinted with “European Introduction: Four Objections” and bibliographies. In Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Vol. III, Book 2, 309–365.Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan.1997. The Critique of Adjudication (Fin de Siècle). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan.2006. Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–2000. In The New Law and Development: A Critical Appraisal, edited by David M.Trubek and AlvaroSantos, 19–73. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754425.002Suche in Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan.2011. A Transnational Genealogy of Proportionality in Private Law. In The Foundations of European Private Law, edited by RogerBrownsword, Hans-W.Micklitz and LeoneNiglia, 185–220. Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, and StephanSchill.2009. Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality, and the Emerging Global Administrative Law. In 50 Years of the New York Convention, edited by Albert Jan vanden Berg, 5–68. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.10.2139/ssrn.1466980Suche in Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti.2002. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511494222Suche in Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti.2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511493713Suche in Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti.2007. The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics. Modern Law Review70:1–30.10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00624.xSuche in Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti.2008. Occupied Zone – “A Zone of Reasonableness?”. Israel Law Review41:13–40.10.1017/S0021223700000170Suche in Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti.2009. The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later. European Journal of International Law20:7–19.10.1093/ejil/chp006Suche in Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias.2009. Democracy Is Not Enough: Rights, Proportionality and the Point of Judicial Review. New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, Paper 118.Suche in Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch.1933. The Function of Law in the International Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch.1950. Sovereignty over Submarine Areas. British Yearbook of International Law27:376–433.Suche in Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch.1958. The Development of International Law by the International Court. London: Stevens.Suche in Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch. [1937] 1970. General Rules of the Law of Peace. In International Law, Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, Vol. 1, edited by ElihuLauterpacht, 179–444. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch. [1953] 1975. “On Realism, Especially in International Relations.” In International Law, Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, Vol. 2, edited by ElihuLauterpacht, 52–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Luteran, Martin.2011. Towards Proportionality as a Proportion between Means and Ends. In Law and Outsiders: Norms, Processes and ‘Othering’ in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Cian C.Murphy and PennyGreen, 3–22. Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Marks, Susan.1995. The European Convention on Human Rights and Its ‘Democratic Society’. British Yearbook of International Law66:209–238.10.1093/bybil/66.1.209Suche in Google Scholar

Matthews, Jud, and Alec StoneSweet. 2008. Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law47:72–164.Suche in Google Scholar

McDougal, Myres, and FlorentinoFeliciano. 1961. Law and Minimum World Public Order. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans.1940. Positivism, Functionalism, and International Law. American Journal of International Law34:260–284.10.2307/2192998Suche in Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans.1946. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans.1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Suche in Google Scholar

Morgenthau, Hans.1952. Another “Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review46:961–988.10.2307/1952108Suche in Google Scholar

Newton, Michael, and LarryMay.2014. Proportionality in International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg.2010. Thin or Thick? The Principle of Proportionality and International Humanitarian Law. Law & Ethics of Human Rights4:243–255.10.2202/1938-2545.1050Suche in Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg.2013. Multipurpose Self-Defence, Proportionality Disoriented: A Response to David Kretzmer. European Journal of International Law24:283–290.10.1093/ejil/cht015Suche in Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander.2005. The Impact of Peremptory Norms on the Interpretation and Application of United Nations Security Council Resolutions. European Journal of International Law16:59–88.10.1093/ejil/chi103Suche in Google Scholar

Pound, Roscoe.1908. Mechanical Jurisprudence. Columbia Law Review8:605–623.10.2307/1108954Suche in Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar.1962. Dag Hammarskjold and the Relation of Law to Politics. American Journal of International Law56:1–8.10.2307/2196547Suche in Google Scholar

Webber, Gregoire C.N.2009. The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511691867Suche in Google Scholar