Home Linguistics & Semiotics Constructicon in progress
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Constructicon in progress

A short introduction to the constructionist approach to syntactic analysis (CASA)
  • Thomas Hoffmann ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 19, 2024

Abstract

Over the last forty years, Construction Grammar has emerged as the leading syntactic theory in cognitive linguistics. Usage-based versions of Construction Grammar have successfully been used to explain language acquisition, change, and variation. How the theory can be applied in foreign language teaching, however, has only recently attracted scholarly attention (De Knop and Gilquin 2016; Boas 2022). As part of this enterprise, the Constructionist Approach to Syntactic Analysis (CASA; Herbst and Hoffmann 2018, 2024) offers a new model that enables language teachers and students to analyse the most complex naturally occurring sentences. In the present paper, I will provide a short introduction to the CASA model. In addition to this, I will illustrate how this approach not only allows for a descriptive analysis of sentences, but how it offers teachers and students important theoretic insights into the cognitive nature of language.

References

Adams, Douglas. 2003. The salmon of doubt: Hitchhiking the galaxy one last time. New York: Ballantine Books.Search in Google Scholar

Behrens, Heike. 2009a. Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics 47(2). 383–411.10.1515/LING.2009.014Search in Google Scholar

Behrens, Heike. 2009b. Konstruktionen im Spracherwerb. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 37(3). 427–444.10.1515/ZGL.2009.030Search in Google Scholar

Bencini, Giulia M. L. 2013. Psycholinguistics. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 379–396. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0021Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C. (ed.). 2022. Directions for pedagogical construction grammar: Data, methods and applications. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 49–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0004Search in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa & Elena Lieven. 2005. Towards a lexically specific grammar of children’s question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3). 437–474.10.1515/cogl.2005.16.3.437Search in Google Scholar

De Knop, Sabine & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds). 2016. Applied construction grammar. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110458268Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Nick C. 2003. Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In Catherine J. Doughty & Michael H. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, 63–103. Oxford & Malden: Blackwell Publishing Limited.10.1002/9780470756492.ch4Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctvc772nnSearch in Google Scholar

Hampe, Beate & Doris Schönefeld. 2003. Creative syntax: Iconic principles within the symbolic. In Wolfgang G. Müller & Olga Fischer (eds.), From sign to signing, 243–261. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/ill.3.18hamSearch in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas. 2018. Collo-creativity and blending: Recognizing creativity requires lexical storage in constructional slots. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 309–328.10.1515/zaa-2018-0027Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas & Thomas Hoffmann. 2018. Construction grammar for students: A constructionist approach to syntactic analysis (CASA). Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6(1). 197–218.10.1515/gcla-2018-0010Search in Google Scholar

Herbst, Thomas & Thomas Hoffmann. 2024. A Construction grammar of the English language: CASA – A constructionist approach to syntactic analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/clip.5Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2019. Construction grammar and its application to English, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9781474433624Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2019. Language and creativity: A construction grammar approach to linguistic creativity. Linguistics Vanguard 5(1). 1–8.10.1515/lingvan-2019-0019Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2020. Construction grammar and creativity: Evolution, psychology, and cognitive science. Cognitive Semiotics 13(1). 1–11.10.1515/cogsem-2020-2018Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2022a. Construction grammar: The structure of English (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas. 2022b. Constructionist approaches to creativity. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 10(1). 259–284.10.1515/gcla-2022-0012Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lieven, Elena. 2014. First-language learning from a usage-based approach. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Jörg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions collocations patterns, 9–32. Berlin & Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110356854.9Search in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, Friedemann, Bert Cappelle & Yury Shtyrov. 2013. Brain basis of meaning, words, constructions, and grammar. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 397–416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0022Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Mark. 2018. The role of creativity in multimodal construction grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 66(3). 357–370.10.1515/zaa-2018-0030Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-02-19
Published in Print: 2023-12-15

©2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 22.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gcla-2023-0002/html
Scroll to top button