Abstract
This paper deals with V-N-conversion in the Romance languages from a cognitive and constructional perspective. In contrast to English, the Romance languages distinguish different types of V-N-conversion on the basis of morphological and semantic properties: a stem conversion type and two types of nominalized infinitives. The critical discussion of earlier cognitive approaches to conversion leads to a comprehensive synchronic and diachronic description of all Romance V-N-conversion types, taking into account both the differences with respect to boundedness and the occurrence of metonymic meanings. On these grounds the syntactic type of the nominalized infinitive is modeled within the framework of Construction Grammar and its lexicalization as an instance of constructional change.
© 2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Editorial
- Frames and constructions enhance text coherence: The case of DNI resolutions in spoken discourse
- Information status and English relative constructions: A corpus-based study of Japanese learners in spoken language
- Key is a llave is a Schlüssel: A failure to replicate an experiment from Boroditsky et al. 2003
- Illness-conceptions in the persuasive sections of Hungarian medical recipes from the 16th and 17th centuries
- Figurative processes in meaning interpretation: A case study of novel English compounds
- Romance verb-noun-conversions from a cognitive perspective
- Geographic variation of quite + ADJ in twenty national varieties of English: A pilot study
- A usage-based study of the just me construction
- German es – a Construction Grammar approach
- wollen: On the verge between quotative and reportive evidential
- Variation between singular and plural subject-verb agreement in German: A usage-based approach
- More on the as-predicative: Granularity issues in the description of construction networks
- Constructing a schema: Word-class changing morphology in a usage-based perspective
- Idiosyncrasies and generalizations: Argument structure, semantic roles and the valency realization principle
Articles in the same Issue
- Masthead
- Editorial
- Frames and constructions enhance text coherence: The case of DNI resolutions in spoken discourse
- Information status and English relative constructions: A corpus-based study of Japanese learners in spoken language
- Key is a llave is a Schlüssel: A failure to replicate an experiment from Boroditsky et al. 2003
- Illness-conceptions in the persuasive sections of Hungarian medical recipes from the 16th and 17th centuries
- Figurative processes in meaning interpretation: A case study of novel English compounds
- Romance verb-noun-conversions from a cognitive perspective
- Geographic variation of quite + ADJ in twenty national varieties of English: A pilot study
- A usage-based study of the just me construction
- German es – a Construction Grammar approach
- wollen: On the verge between quotative and reportive evidential
- Variation between singular and plural subject-verb agreement in German: A usage-based approach
- More on the as-predicative: Granularity issues in the description of construction networks
- Constructing a schema: Word-class changing morphology in a usage-based perspective
- Idiosyncrasies and generalizations: Argument structure, semantic roles and the valency realization principle